Walkoff, Lara

Females have unique physiological considerations that must be considered during image acquisition and interpretation. Familiarity with imaging of pregnant and lactating patients requires modifications from standard protocols to mitigate radiation-induced risk to both the mother and the fetus. Manifestations in the chest related to conception, pregnancy, and gynecologic pathologies are female-specific. Furthermore, there are a number of conditions that exclusively or disproportionately affect females, including diffuse lung diseases. Here, we review the expected normal findings and variant appearances of diseases in female patients on chest imaging to help the radiologist arrive at the correct diagnosis and avoid diagnostic pitfalls. In addition, the general principles of thoracic imaging in women of reproductive age are discussed.

Objective The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of diffuse pulmonary ossification (DPO) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD), and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Methods High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) from 71 IPF, 67 SSc-ILD, and 75 HP cases were independently evaluated by 2 thoracic radiologists blinded to patient data. Studies were assessed for the presence of DPO, HRCT scanning pattern, stigmata of granulomatous infection, and honeycombing. Results The prevalence of DPO was significantly higher in cases of IPF and SSc compared with HP, although there was no significant difference in prevalence between the IPF and SSc groups, even when accounting for the presence of prior granulomatous infection. Interobserver agreement for the presence of DPO was substantial. Conclusions Although prevalence DPO on HRCT varies between some forms of ILD, the use of DPO to influence characterization of ILD should be considered with caution.

Purpose: Differentiating between systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is important because of the differences in workup, prognosis, and treatment. However, there is much overlap in the appearance of these 2 entities on high-resolution computed tomography. We propose that inflammation and/or fibrosis focally or disproportionately involving the bilateral anterolateral upper lobes and posterosuperior lower lobes [“Four Corners” Sign (FCS)] is specific for SSc-ILD. Materials and Methods: Randomized high-resolution computed tomography studies from 74 IPF and 73 SSc-ILD cases were evaluated by 2 thoracic radiologists blinded to all patient data. For each case the reviewers noted whether the FCS was present and assigned a confidence level on the basis of a 7-point Likert scale. The same process was then performed on a randomized external validation group of 42 SSc-ILD and 42 IPF cases. Results: For Likert scores of 6 or 7 (“mostly agree” or “entirely agree” that the FCS is present, respectively) the sensitivity in SSc was 16.4% (95% confidence interval, 9.7%, 26.6%), specificity 100.0% (95% confidence interval, 95.1%, 100.0%). There was a significant association between a confidently present FCS and SSc compared with a confidently present FCS and IPF (P=0.0003). Analysis on an external validation group of 42 SSc and 42 IPF cases conferred similarly high specificity for SSc in cases characterized as FCS with high confidence. Conclusion: The FCS, a pattern of focal or disproportionate inflammation and/or fibrosis involving the bilateral anterolateral upper lobes and posterosuperior lower lobes, is specific for SSc-ILD when readers are confident of its presence.

Background Mycotic and oncotic aneurysms may result in devastating neurologic sequelae if undetected. The objectives of this study were to examine interobserver variability and accuracy of cross-sectional imaging for the detection of distal territory mycotic and oncotic aneurysms. Methods We searched our institutional database for all radiology reports from 2005 to 2015 with an indication or diagnosis of mycotic or oncotic aneurysm. Patients who underwent DSA and either CTA or MRA within 12 weeks of each other were identified. The cross-sectional images from each study were blinded and reviewed by two radiologists. If positive for aneurysm, location and number of aneurysms were reported. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and interobserver variability were determined for MRA and MRA/CTA. Results Twenty-five patients were included in this study. Ten (40%) harbored distal aneurysms. Cross-sectional imaging had a sensitivity of 45.5%, specificity of 90.0%, and kappa value of 0.29 (0.00–0.69) for the detection of cerebral mycotic and oncotic aneurysms. Conclusions Because of the low sensitivity and high interobserver variability of cross-sectional imaging, DSA should remain the gold standard for evaluation of suspected oncotic and mycotic aneurysms. In cases in which cross sectional imaging is negative and there is a high clinical suspicion for mycotic aneurysm, DSA should be strongly considered.