Said, Adnan

Background Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have sleep disruption. The aim of this study is to understand how underlying factors such as diet, degree of liver disease and morningness–eveningness tendencies contribute to this sleep disruption. Methods Patients with NAFLD were recruited from liver clinics at a University and Veterans Affairs practice. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis were excluded. Patients completed self-reported surveys to evaluate sleep disturbance using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and chronotype (circadian preference) using the morningness–eveningness questionnaire (MEQ). Information on occupation, physical activity and dietary intake were collected at clinic intake. Dietary intake was evaluated via food-frequency questionnaire and analyzed as individual categories or grouped on the basis of dietary composition. Results A 54 patients completed the survey; 37% were female. Median ESS was 8 ± 4.2 and 37% of NAFLD patients were found to have sleep disturbance as defined by ESS >10. Sleep disturbance was common in NAFLD regardless of the liver disease stage. Dietary factors, including higher added sugar (P = 0.01), candy intake (P = 0.01), elevated Ferritin level (P = 0.04) and elevated platelet count (P = 0.05), were significantly associated with sleep disturbance. Chronotype, time to sleep, and duration of sleep were not associated with sleep disruption. Conclusions Sleep disruption is present in NAFLD regardless of underlying cirrhosis. Interventions aimed at improving dietary and lifestyle practices such as reduced sugar intake may help mitigate the risk for sleep disruption in NAFLD. Further longitudinal studies are needed to further delineate these links.

BACKGROUNDThe incidence of metachronous colorectal cancer (MCRC) among colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors varies significantly, and the optimal colonoscopy surveillance practice for mitigating MCRC incidence is unknown.METHODSA cost‐effectiveness analysis was used to compare the performances of the US Multi‐Society Task Force guideline and all clinically reasonable colonoscopy surveillance strategies for 50‐ to 79‐year‐old posttreatment CRC patients with a computer simulation model.RESULTSThe US guideline [(1,3,5)] recommends the first colonoscopy 1 year after treatment, whereas the second and third colonoscopies are to be repeated at 3‐ and 5‐year intervals. Some promising alternative cost‐effective strategies were identified. In comparison with the US guideline, under various scenarios for a 20‐year period, 1) reducing the surveillance interval of the guideline after the first colonoscopy by 1 year [(1,2,5)] would save up to 78 discounted life‐years (LYs) and prevent 23 MCRCs per 1000 patients (incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio [ICER] ≤ $23,270/LY), 2) reducing the intervals after the first and second negative colonoscopies by 1 year [(1,2,4)] would save/prevent up to 109 discounted LYs and 36 MCRCs (ICER ≤ $52,155/LY), and 3) reducing the surveillance intervals after the first and second negative colonoscopy by 1 and 2 years [(1,2,3)] would save/prevent up to 141 discounted LYs and 50 MCRCs (ICER ≤ $63,822/LY). These strategies would require up to 1100 additional colonoscopies per 1000 patients. Although the US guideline might not be cost‐effective in comparison with a less intensive oncology guideline [(3,3,5); the ICER could be as high as $140,000/LY], the promising strategies would be cost‐effective in comparison with such less intensive guidelines unless the cumulative MCRC incidence were very low.CONCLUSIONSThe US guideline might be improved by a slight increase in the surveillance intensity at the expense of moderately increased cost. More research is warranted to explore the benefits/harms of such practices. Cancer 2016;122:2560–70. © 2016 American Cancer Society.