Back to Authors

Coté, Gregory M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0181-886X

Mayo Clinic

Massachusetts General Hospital

Citations 18

Efficacy, safety, and immune priming effect of tazemetostat in patients with epithelioid sarcoma.
Gounder, Mrinal M. , Schöffski, Patrick , Villalobos, Víctor M. , Jahan, Thierry, Ratan, Ravin , Dileo, Palma , Agulnik, Mark , Attia, Steven , Sierra, Laura, Lingaraj, Trupti , Yang, Jay , Agarwal, Shefali , Stacchiotti, Silvia , Coté, Gregory M. , Chen, Tom Wei‐Wu , Gupta, Abha A. , Italiano, Antoîne , Mir, Olivier , Pressey, Joseph G. , Jones, Robin L.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 11564-11564

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.11564 Get It

11564 Background: Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a rare, aggressive soft tissue sarcoma characterized by loss of inhibitor of integrase 1 (INI1), allowing enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) to repress cell differentiation and promote tumorigenesis. Tazemetostat (TAZ) is a selective inhibitor of EZH2 approved by the FDA for treatment of patients (pts) aged ≥16 years with metastatic or locally advanced ES ineligible for complete resection. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, multi-cohort phase 2 study (NCT02601950) evaluated safety and efficacy of TAZ in pts with INI1-negative tumors. ES pts were enrolled in Cohorts 5 and 6; pts in Cohort 6 underwent mandatory pre-dose (at screening) and post-dose biopsies (at Day 1 of cycle 2). Herein, we report the interim efficacy and safety data from Cohort 6. Results: As of July 31 2019, 44 pts were enrolled into Cohort 6 and treated with TAZ 800 mg BID. The objective response rate (ORR) was 11.4%; 4 pts (9.1%) had a partial response and 1 pt (2.3%) had a complete response (Table). Another 17 pts (38.6%) had stable disease (SD). 18 pts had progressive disease; 13 of these pts remained on study beyond progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 56 weeks were 19.4% and 59.4%, respectively. In a pooled posthoc analysis of 106 ES pts from Cohorts 5 (n = 62), and 6, ORR was 13.2%. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 16 pts (36.4%), most commonly anemia (6.8%; n = 3) and tumor pain (6.8%; n = 3). 3 pts (6.8%) experienced grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs. One pt discontinued study drug and there were no treatment-emergent dose reductions or treatment-related deaths. These safety data from Cohort 6 are consistent with previously reported data from Cohort 5. 19 paired biopsies were included for translational endpoint analyses. Preliminary RNA seq and pathway analyses are currently ongoing and updated data, including additional biomarker data will be presented. Conclusions: Consistent with previously reported data from the completed Cohort 5, TAZ demonstrated clinically meaningful, durable, single agent activity in ES pts. Efficacy data from Cohort 6 continue to mature with 8 patients still on treatment. TAZ was well tolerated with a low incidence of treatment related AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT02601950 . [Table: see text]
CBT-1 in combination with doxorubicin in patients with metastatic, unresectable sarcomas who previously progressed on doxorubicin.
Chawla, Sant P. , Thornton, Katherine A., Oldham, Robert K., Okuno, Scott H. , Matlow, Susan, Barnett, Daryl, Attia, Steven , Coté, Gregory M. , Burgess, Melissa , Ballman, Karla V.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 12, 2020 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS11077-TPS11077

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps11077 Get It

TPS11077 Background: The response rates of advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) to single-agent, first-line anthracycline are typically less than 25%. P-glycoprotein 1 (P-gp), a cell membrane drug efflux pump, is believed to be a resistance mechanism in STS. CBT-1 is a small molecule, orally administered, P-gp antagonist currently under clinical development. This is a multi-institutional open label phase I study of CBT-1 in combination with doxorubicin in patients with anthracycline-refractory sarcoma. The study is designed to determine a maximum tolerable dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and the safety/tolerability of the combination of CBT-1 and doxorubicin. The study will evaluate anti-cancer activity as a secondary objective as measured by Disease Control Rate (DCR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD]) at 12 weeks. Objective Response Rate (ORR; CR+PR) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) will be monitored. Correlative studies include assessment of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamicendpoints. Methods: Patients 18 years or older with locally advanced metastatic, unresectable STS, prior progression on ≤ 150 mg/m2 of doxorubicin (or another anthracycline equivalent), ECOG PS ≤ 1 and normal organ function, are eligible for this study. Dosing includes fixed doxorubicin (37.5 mg/m2 IV day 5 and day 6) and escalation of oral CBT-1 on days 1-7 of a 21 day cycle. This study follows a standard 3+3 phase I design where dose escalation will occur if < 0/3 or 1/6 patients experience a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Tumor assessments are conducted at Week 6 and Week 12. For patients with response or stable disease, treatment is allowed to continue for 4-5 cycles to a maximum of 450 mg/m2 lifetime doxorubicin exposure. Once RP2D is defined, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled into the dose expansion phase. To date, Cohorts 1 (50 mg CBT-1) and 2 (100 mg CBT-1) have been completed with one DLT of grade 4 neutropenia lasting longer than 7 days in Cohort 1. Enrollment to Cohort 3 began December 2018. (References: Oldham, R. K., Reid, W. K., Preisler, H. D., and Barnett, D. (1998) Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 13, 71-80; Kelly, R. J., Robey, R. W., Chen, C. C., Draper, D., Luchenko, V., Barnett, D., Oldham, R. K., Caluag, Z., Frye, R. A., Steinberg, S. M., Fojo, T., Bates, S. E. (2012) The Oncologist 17 (4) 512-e523; Robey, R. W., Shukla, S., Finely, E. M., Oldham, R. K., Barnett, D., Ambudkar, S. V., Fojo, T., Bates, S. E., (2008) Biochemical Pharmacology 75, 6, 1302-1312). Clinical trial information: NCT03002805.
Safety and efficacy of tazemetostat, a first-in-class EZH2 inhibitor, in patients (pts) with epithelioid sarcoma (ES) (NCT02601950).
Schöffski, Patrick , Agulnik, Mark , Villalobos, Víctor M. , Jahan, Thierry, Attia, Steven , Sierra, Laura, Yang, Jay , Rajarethinam, Anand, Gounder, Mrinal M. , Stacchiotti, Silvia , Jones, Robin L. , Chen, Tom Wei‐Wu , Italiano, Antoîne , Demetri, George D. , Coté, Gregory M. , Chugh, Rashmi , Gupta, Abha A. , Loggers, Elizabeth T , Tine, Brian A. Van

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 25, 2020 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 11003-11003

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.11003 Get It

11003 Background: ES is a rare soft tissue sarcoma that metastasizes in approximately 30% to 50% of cases. More than 90% of ES tumors lack expression of INI1, an important component of epigenetic regulation. Loss of INI1 function allows another epigenetic modifier, EZH2, to become an oncogenic driver in tumor cells. Tazemetostat, a first-in-class, selective, oral inhibitor of EZH2, has demonstrated tumor regression and favorable safety in phase 1/2 trials. Methods: Data from a phase 2 open-label, multicenter trial of pts with locally advanced or metastatic ES are reported. Efficacy was assessed with primary and secondary endpoints including objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, disease control rate (DCR; objective confirmed response of any duration or stable disease [SD] lasting ≥32 weeks), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS); safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results: As of September 17, 2018, 62 INI1-negative ES pts were enrolled and treated with tazemetostat 800 mg BID. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 1 (range: 0-9). There were 9/62 (15%) confirmed partial responses (PRs) with an ORR of 15% and DCR of 26%. The DOR ranged from 7.1+ weeks to 103.0+ weeks (median: not reached) with a median OS of 82.4 weeks (95% CI: 47.4, not estimable) for all 62 pts. Tazemetostat was generally well tolerated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally mild to moderate with the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs; ≥10% incidence) regardless of attribution being fatigue (24/62; 39%), nausea (22/62; 35%), and cancer pain (20/62; 32%). Any treatment-related TEAEs of grade ≥3 were reported in 10/62 (16%) pts. TEAEs grade ≥3 reported in ≥2 pts included anemia (6%) and decreased weight (3%). There were no drug-related deaths and a low discontinuation rate (1.7%). Conclusions: In the largest prospective clinical trial of ES to date, tazemetostat achieved disease control in 26% of pts with advanced ES who entered this study. Durable clinical response of the drug was documented. Tazemetostat demonstrated favorable safety with few pts with treatment-related AEs grade ≥3. Clinical trial information: NCT02601950.
Targeting Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Related Refractory Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors (MPNST) in a Phase II Study of Everolimus in Combination with Bevacizumab (SARC016)
Widemann, Brigitte C. , Lu, Yao , Okuno, Scott H. , Meyer, Christian F. , Chugh, Rashmi , Milhem, Mohammed , Hirbe, Angela C. , Kim, AeRang , Turpin, Brian , Pressey, Joseph G. , Jayaprakash, Nalini, Helman, Lee J. , Onwudiwe, Ndidi, Cichowski, Karen , Perentesis, John P. , Okuno, Scott , Chugh, Rashmi , Milhem, Mohammed M , Hirbe, Angela C , Kim, AeRang , Pressey, Joseph G , Reinke, Denise K. , Coté, Gregory M. , Dombi, Eva , Cichowski, Karen M.

Sarcoma | July 24, 2019 | Volume: 2019 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-8

10.1155/2019/7656747 Get It

Purpose. There are no known effective medical treatments for refractory MPNST. Inactivation of the NF1 tumor suppressor in MPNST results in upregulation of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling and angiogenesis, which contributes to disease progression. We conducted a phase II study for patients (pts) with refractory MPNST combining everolimus (10 mg PO once daily) with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR) (complete response, partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥ 4 months). Patients and Methods. Patients ≥18 years old with chemotherapy refractory sporadic or NF1 MPNST were eligible. Tumor response was assessed after every 2 cycles (the WHO criteria). A two-stage design targeting a 25% CBR was used: if ≥ 1/15 pts in stage 1 responded, enrollment would be expanded by 10 pts, and if ≥ 4/25 patients had clinical benefit, the combination would be considered active. Results. Twenty-five pts, 17 with NF1 and 8 with sporadic MPNST, enrolled. One of 15 pts in stage 1 had clinical benefit. Of 10 additional pts enrolled, 2 had clinical benefit. The median number of completed cycles was 3 (range 1–16). Adverse events were similar to those known for this combination. Conclusion. With a CBR of 12% (3/25), the combination of everolimus and bevacizumab did not reach the study’s target response rate and is not considered active in refractory MPNST.
Phase 2 multicenter study of the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat in adults with INI1 negative epithelioid sarcoma (NCT02601950).
Gounder, Mrinal M. , Schöffski, Patrick , Attia, Steven , Jones, Robin L. , Blakemore, Stephen J. , Clawson, Alicia, Daigle, Scott R., Ribich, Scott , Roche, Maria , Rodstrom, Jill, Ho, Peter, Jones, Robin L , Stacchiotti, Silvia , Italiano, Antoîne , Demetri, George D. , Coté, Gregory M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 11058-11058

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.11058 Get It

11058 Background: Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma (STS) typically seen in young adults accounting for < 1% of all STS. While local disease may be indolent, ES can rapidly spread and patients (pts) with distant metastasis are often resistant to systemic treatment with 1 year survival of < 50%. The defining molecular feature of ES is the absence of tumor expression of INI1, a SWI/SNF subunit member involved in chromatin remodeling. Tazemetostat, a potent and selective EZH2 inhibitor, has demonstrated tumor regressions in INI1 negative preclinical malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT) models and phase 1 clinical activity in MRT and ES pts. The proposed mechanism of tazemetostat sensitivity is INI1 loss inducing compromised SWI/SNF activity and tumor dependence on PRC2 activity (of which EZH2 is the catalytic subunit). Preliminary phase 2 safety and efficacy of tazemetostat in ES pts is reported here. Methods: This is a phase 2 multicenter open-label single arm study of tazemetostat (800 mg po BID) in adult pts with ES whose tumors harbor evidence of INI1 loss. Pts enroll into 1 of 5 cohorts of different tumor types with INI1 loss/reduction, up to 30 pts each, using a 2-stage Green-Dahlberg design. For the ES cohort, primary endpoint is disease control rate (DCR) defined as objective response of any duration or stable disease (SD) lasting ≥32 wks. Success at stage 2 required DCR in ≥5/30 treated pts. Key secondary endpoints include safety/tolerability, ORR, PFS, OS, PK and response biomarkers e.g. H3K27me3. Results: In 31 ES pts with a median of 1 prior systemic therapy, stage 2 DCR criteria was surpassed with a RECIST confirmed PR (4 pts) and SD ≥32 wks (2 pts) observed to date. 13 pts are still on treatment therefore DCR and ORR will be updated. Tazemetostat was well tolerated with grade 1/2 fatigue (39%), nausea (26%) and vomiting (19%) as the most frequently reported AEs regardless of attribution. Conclusions: In the largest prospective clinical trial of ES to date, tazemetostat monotherapy shows promising antitumor activity, including confirmed responses and long-term SD, with favorable safety/tolerability in ES. Enrollment has been expanded to 60 ES pts given the clinical activity described here. Clinical trial information: NCT02601950.
SARC016: Phase II study of everolimus in combination with bevacizumab in sporadic and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) related refractory malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST).
Widemann, Brigitte C. , Meyer, Christian F. , Tine, Brian Andrew Van, Turpin, Brian , Jayaprakash, Nalini, Okuno, Scott H. , Helman, Lee J. , Onwudiwe, Ndidi, Steinberg, Seth M. , Coté, Gregory M. , Chugh, Rashmi , Milhem, Mohammed , Kim, AeRang , Dombi, Eva , Reinke, Denise K. , Cichowski, Karen , Perentesis, John P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 11053-11053

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.11053 Get It

A First-in-Human Phase I Study of OPB-111077, a Small-Molecule STAT3 and Oxidative Phosphorylation Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Cancers
Shapiro, Geoffrey I. , Bullock, Andrea J. , Rock, Edwin P. , Elekes, Agnes, Lin, Chester, Kostic, Dušan , Ohi, Naoto, Rasco, Drew , Papadopoulos, Kyriakos P. , Patnaik, Amita , Smith, Lon, Tolcher, Anthony W. , Flaherty, Keith T. , Berlin, Jordan D. , Witzig, Thomas E. , Habermann, Thomas M. , Ohi, Naoto, Coté, Gregory M. , Shapiro, Geoffrey I

The Oncologist | March 6, 2018 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 658-e72

10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0325 Get It

Abstract Lessons Learned OPB-111077 is a novel inhibitor of STAT3 and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation that exhibited promising anticancer activity in preclinical models. In this first-in-human phase I study of OPB-111077 in unselected advanced cancers, treatment-emergent adverse events, most frequently nausea, fatigue, and vomiting, were generally mild to moderate in intensity and could be medically managed. Overall, only modest clinical activity was observed after OPB-111077 given as monotherapy. Notable antitumor activity was seen in a subject with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Background OPB-111077 is a novel inhibitor of STAT3 and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation with promising anticancer activity in preclinical models. Methods Open-label, phase I trial of OPB-111077 in advanced cancers with no available therapy of documented benefit. Initial dose escalation in unselected subjects was followed by dose expansion. Patients received oral OPB-111077 daily in 28-day cycles until loss of clinical benefit. Results Eighteen subjects enrolled in dose escalation, and 127 in dose expansion. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed at 300 mg and 400 mg QD; maximum tolerated dose was defined as 250 mg QD. Frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included nausea, fatigue, and vomiting. TEAEs were generally mild to moderate and could be medically managed. OPB-111077 reached micromolar drug concentrations, had an elimination half-life of approximately 1 day, and reached steady-state by day 8. A durable partial response was observed in one subject with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Seven subjects with diverse tumor types had stable disease or minor responses for at least eight treatment cycles (224 days). Conclusion OPB-111077 is generally well tolerated, and its pharmacokinetic profile is sufficient for further clinical development. Notable clinical activity was observed in a subject with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Overall, modest efficacy was observed against unselected tumors.
Abstract B118: A phase 1, open-label multiple dose escalation trial to determine safety and tolerability of once daily OPB-111077 in subjects with advanced cancer
Papadopoulos, Kyriakos P. , Patnaik, Amita , Rascoe, Drew, Smith, Lon, Bullock, Andrea J. , Monga, Manish, Lin, Chester, Tsai, Lin-Feng, Elekes, Agnes, Ohi, Naoto, Tatsumi, Kunihiko, Coté, Gregory M. , Flaherty, Keith T. , Shapiro, Geoffrey I. , Berlin, Jordan D. , Habermann, Thomas M. , Witzig, Thomas E. , Ohi, Naoto, Tolcher, Anthony W.

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | May 20, 2016 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 12_Supplement_2 | Pages: B118-B118

10.1158/1535-7163.targ-15-b118 Get It

Abstract Background: OPB-111077 is a new chemical entity with anticancer activity in vitro and in human tumor xenograft models. The compound modulates STAT3 phosphorylation but has no marked effect on activity of any of 69 tested human tyrosine or serine/threonine kinases. This P1 study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of OPB-111077 in subjects with advanced cancers. Methods: Primary objectives determined safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of OPB-111077 given orally once daily to subjects with advanced cancer. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity. In the first 2 cycles of dose escalation, Day 1 dose was followed by 2 days off study therapy for PK. The starting dose was 100 mg once daily. Single subject cohorts with dose level doublings were studied until the first ≥ Grade 2 AE that was possibly drug-related. Then a 3+3 design was used. After MTD determination, expansion cohorts were opened for subjects with malignancies possibly susceptible to inhibition by OPB-111077, including breast, cervical, colorectal, gastric, kidney, myeloma, non-small cell lung, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, ovarian, and prostate cancers, as well as “rare tumors” for which STAT3 inhibition might generate clinical activity. Results: Overall 145 subjects received OPB-111077. Mean age was 61 years (range 21-88), and 51% of subjects were female. Dose escalation occurred in 18 subjects. Four DLTs were observed: 2 at 400 mg QD (G3 nausea/vomiting), and 2 at 300 mg QD (G3 vertigo and G3 nausea/vomiting). The MTD was 250 mg QD. All subjects recovered from DLTs after drug discontinuation. Adverse events (AEs) that may be attributable to OPB-111077 include nausea (71%), vomiting (46%), fatigue (44%), dizziness/vertigo (26%), and hypothyroidism (19%). Most AEs were CTCAE Grades 1 or 2 and manageable with supportive treatment. OPB-111077 exposures increase dose proportionally and linearly with increasing single and multiple doses up to 250 mg. Median time to peak plasma concentration (tmax) is about 4 hours. Mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) is 16 μmol/L and mean trough concentration is 6 μmol/L after multiple doses of 250 mg QD. Terminal half-life is about 23 hours and steady state was reached by about 1 week. The major metabolites in plasma are pharmacologically inactive and unlikely to contribute to efficacy. Administration with a high fat meal did not significantly alter OPB-111077 bioavailability. Expansion cohorts enrolled 127 subjects, including NSCLC (13), breast (13), ovarian (11), kidney (11), colorectal (10), prostate (8), lymphoma (8), gastric (7), cervical (3) cancers, and myeloma (1). Rare tumors with STAT rationale included sarcomas (13), neuroendocrine tumors (7), squamous cell carcinomas (5), other carcinomas (12), and other malignant tumors (5). One RECIST Partial Response occurred in a subject with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma. In addition, 7 subjects with had stable disease for at least 8 treatment cycles, including gastric (2), cholangiocarcinoma, kidney, prostate, K-Ras mutant colon cancer, and esthesioneuroblastoma. Conclusions: OPB-111077 can be given safely and achieves clinically active drug levels in humans. Single agent clinical activity was observed. Translational work is ongoing to determine factors driving clinical activity Citation Format: Gregory Cote, Kyriakos Papadopoulos, Amita Patnaik, Drew Rascoe, Lon Smith, Andrea Bullock, Keith Flaherty, Geoffrey Shapiro, Jordan Berlin, Manish Monga, Thomas Habermann, Thomas Witzig, Chester Lin, Lin-Feng Tsai, Agnes Elekes, Naoto Ohi, Kunihiko Tatsumi, Anthony Tolcher. A phase 1, open-label multiple dose escalation trial to determine safety and tolerability of once daily OPB-111077 in subjects with advanced cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr B118.