Al‐Kateb, Hussam

Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab has been increasingly used off label for recurrent gliomas, yet biomarkers predicting response are poorly defined. Gliomas exhibit substantial molecular heterogeneity across Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM), Astrocytoma, IDH-Mutant (A-IDHm), and Oligodendroglioma, 1p/19q co-deleted (OLIGO), which may influence immunotherapy efficacy. This study aimed to identify molecular predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) in recurrent glioma patients treated with pembrolizumab. Methods: Adults ≥18 years with recurrent glioma receiving ≥2 cycles of pembrolizumab between 2014 - 2024 were retrospectively identified across Mayo Clinic. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) reports were reviewed and archival tumor tissue resected prior to pembrolizumab initiation was analyzed when available. Comprehensive molecular profiling was performed using the Mayo Clinic Solid Tumor Panel which employs the Illumina Tru-Sight Oncology 500 High-Throughput NGS assay. Progression was assessed using RANO 2.0 criteria. Genomic alterations (clinically relevant sequences and/or copy-number variants) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences in PFS compared using the log-rank test. Results: Thirty-three patients were included [median (range) age: 44.0 (21-76) years; 63.6% male]. The interval between tumor tissue sampling and pembrolizumab initiation was 9.9 (0.9-176.1) months, and median treatment duration was 2.8 (1.4-10.4) months. Median PFS for the overall cohort was 2.4 (0.8-15.2) months, and median overall survival from pembrolizumab initiation was 6.9 (0.9-48.2) months. Patients with OLIGO (n=8) had a longer PFS [4.6 (1.9-15.2) months] than either A-IDHm [n=11; PFS 2.1 (1.1-4.4) months] or GBM [n=14; PFS 2.3 (0.8-9.2) months]. Within OLIGO, CDKN2A/B heterozygous deletion (n=3) predicted a shorter PFS (3.9 vs 10.9 months; p=0.0462), while in A-IDHm, FANC mutation (n=2) was associated with a longer PFS (4.17 vs 1.61 months; p=0.0224). No significant associations with PFS were observed for other altered genes or pathways evaluated, including but not limited to Tumor Mutational Burden, EGFR, RB1, TP53, FUBP1, NF 1 or 2, PTEN, PDGFRA, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, CDK4, KRAS, MLH1, MLH2, MSH6 genomic alterations or CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (all p>0.05). Conclusions: Pembrolizumab shows limited overall efficacy in recurrent gliomas, however, exploratory analyses identified several subtype-specific genomic alterations that may correlate with PFS. These hypothesis-generating findings highlight the potential influence of underlying tumor biology on immunotherapy response and warrant further validation in larger, prospective cohorts. Citation Format: Shameel Shafqat, Muhammad Asad Maqbool, Hussam Al Kateb, Terry C. Burns, Jian L. Campian, Shannon P. Fortin Ensign, Evanthia Galanis, Julie E. Hammack, Cristaine M. Ida, Mitch L. Klebig, Timothy J. Kaufmann, Autumn C. Moon, Maciej M. Mrugala, Bryan J. Neth, Alyx B. aPorter, Michael W. Ruff, Ugur T. Sener, Wendy J. Sherman, Joon H. Uhm, Rachael A. Vaubel, Sani H. Kizilbash. Molecular correlates of progression-free survival in recurrent gliomas treated with pembrolizumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5253.

Abstract Introduction: Clinical staging of multifocal non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is facilitated by comparative genomic analysis of separate tumor nodules, but the role of genome-wide copy number profiling for this purpose is uncertain. Methods: We analyzed single nucleotide variants (SNVs), gene fusions, small copy number variants (gene amplifications and homozygous deletions) (sCNVs), and large-scale copy number variants (lCNVs) in a retrospective cohort of 34 patients with >1 lung cancer nodule tested on a previously validated tumor-only 515-gene next generation sequencing (NGS) panel (MayoComplete Solid Tumor Panel). For patients with <2 shared SNVs, a Bayesian approach was formulated to calculate the probability of shared versus independent events occurring in different tumor nodules in the same patient. The prevalence of specific lCNVs in NSCLC was derived from an independent dataset of 100 NSCLC peers tested by the same panel, and the prevalence of SNVs, fusions, and sCNVs in NSCLC was derived from publicly available data. Alterations unique to different tumor nodules and suspected germline alterations were excluded from the Bayesian analysis. Results: There were 54 total comparisons for 34 patients. Eleven of the patients (32.4%) had >=2 shared SNVs along with one or more shared lCNVs also identified in each patient. Eight patients (23.5%) had no shared SNVs, gene fusions, sCNVs, or lCNVs. Using the Bayesian approach for the remaining fifteen (44.1%) patients with at least one shared alteration (SNVs, sCNVs, and lCNVs), the probability of clonal relatedness ranged from 73% for a shared whole arm or whole chromosome lCNV to >99% for tumors with two or more shared alterations including multiple or complex lCNVs and SNVs. Whole chromosome or whole arm lCNVs were sometimes shared between tumor nodules with different driver SNVs. Conclusions: Incorporating lCNVs into comparative genomic analysis provides additional evidence of clonal relatedness in a subset of multifocal NSCLCs. However, differences in bioinformatics pipelines for calling lCNVs, concerns over the imprecision of genome-wide copy number profiling, and uncertainty regarding the temporal relationship between lCNVs and carcinogenesis (including somatic events possibly related to “field cancerization”) create challenges for integrating lCNVs into comparative genomic analysis with standard clinical workflows for tumor-only NGS on paraffin embedded tissue sections. Our simplified approach mitigates some of the uncertainty introduced by incorporating lCNVs into clonality determination. Citation Format: Claire Teigen, Ying-Chun Lo, Sounak Gupta, Stephanie Smoley, Beth Pitel, Hussam Al Kateb, Gopi Sivasankaran, Benjamin Kipp, Ande Rumilla, Gang Zheng, Kevin Halling, Katherine Geiersbach, . A Bayesian framework for evaluating somatic copy number variants into comparative genomic analysis of multifocal non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5423.

Abstract BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab is FDA approved for solid tumors with high tumor mutation burden (TMB) and may thus have efficacy in hypermutant glioma. This study aimed to identify factors influencing efficacy of pembrolizumab in recurrent glioma. METHODS This retrospective study at Mayo Clinic included patients with adult-type diffuse gliomas who received pembrolizumab (≥2 cycles) for recurrent disease (01/01/2014–05/01/2025). The Mayo Clinic Solid Tumor Panel (MCSTP), which uses the Illumina TruSight Oncology 500 High-Throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay, was also used to assess the molecular characteristics of the recurrent tumors. Responders to pembrolizumab were defined as patients who did not meet RANO 2.0 criteria for progressive disease on first radiographic response assessment. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-Regression analyses. RESULTS Sixty-two patients were identified (median age: 46 years; 65% male; 94% white). All patients received pembrolizumab and had prior alkylating chemotherapy. The median PFS from pembrolizumab initiation was 2.3 months. Twenty-five (40%) patients were responders. Patients with IDH-mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted gliomas (OLIGO, n=13) had a longer PFS (4.3 months) than IDH wildtype gliomas (IDH-WT, n=33, 2.2 months, p=0.012) and IDH-mutant, 1p/19q non-co-deleted (IDH-MUT, n=16, 1.7 months, p=0.0006). The proportion of responders was significantly greater in OLIGO patients (IDH-WT, 33%; IDH-MUT, 19%; OLIGO, 85%, p=0.0008). Overall PFS was not impacted by patient age, sex, or extent of initial resection. Twenty-nine percent of patient tumors tested thus far (6/21) had a high TMB (≥10 mut/Mb). Two-thirds (4/6) of high TMB patients were responders, while only one-third (5/15) of low TMB patients were responders. CONCLUSIONS Patients with recurrent OLIGO may have a longer PFS with pembrolizumab therapy than IDH-WT and IDH-MUT. Furthermore, high TMB may be associated with longer PFS with pembrolizumab therapy in glioma. Additional patients are being assessed using MCSTP (total expected n=43); complete data will be presented.

Abstract Purpose: DROSHA, DGCR8, and DICER1 regulate miRNA biogenesis and are commonly mutated in cancer. Although DGCR8 and DICER1 germline pathogenic variants (GPV) cause autosomal dominant tumor predisposition, no association between DROSHA GPVs and clinical phenotypes has been reported. Experimental Design: After obtaining informed consent, sequencing was performed on germline and tumor samples from all patients. The occurrence of germline DROSHA GPVs was investigated in large pediatric and adult cancer datasets. The population prevalence of DROSHA GPVs was investigated in the UK Biobank and Geisinger DiscovEHR cohorts. Results: We describe nine children from eight families with heterozygous DROSHA GPVs and a diagnosis of pineoblastoma (n = 8) or Wilms tumor (n = 1). A somatic second hit in DROSHA was detected in all eight tumors analyzed. All pineoblastoma tumors analyzed were classified as miRNA processing–altered 1 subtype. We estimate the population prevalence of germline DROSHA loss-of-function variants to be 1:3,875 to 1:4,843 but find no evidence for increased adult cancer risk. Conclusions: This is the first report of DROSHA-related tumor predisposition. As pineoblastoma and Wilms tumor are also associated with DICER1 GPVs, our results suggest that the tissues of origin for these tumors are uniquely tolerant of general miRNA loss. The miRNA processing–altered 1 pineoblastoma subtype is associated with older age of diagnosis and better outcomes than other subtypes, suggesting DROSHA GPV status may have important clinical and prognostic significance. We suggest that genetic testing for DROSHA GPVs be considered for patients with pineoblastoma, Wilms tumor, or other DICER1-/DGCR8-related conditions and propose surveillance recommendations through research studies for individuals with DROSHA GPVs.

Molecular investigations have led to increased therapeutic options for prostatic adenocarcinoma. A single case report of a PRPSAP1 :: NTRK3 gene fusion occurring in prostate cancer was previously reported. A review of the literature revealed that NTRK gene rearrangements are exceedingly rare molecular events in prostate cancer. NTRK gene fusions can be oncogenic drivers or develop as resistance mechanisms. The tumor-agnostic approvals of TRK inhibitors by the FDA provide additional rationale for molecular investigations of aggressive prostatic adenocarcinomas. This may prove to be an additional therapeutic option for patients with aggressive prostatic carcinomas refractory to initial therapy. We report a case of an aggressive castrate-resistant prostatic adenocarcinoma with a BMP6 :: NTRK3 gene fusion.

Abstract Calmodulin‐binding transcriptional activator 1 (CAMTA1) is highly expressed in the brain and plays a role in cell cycle regulation, cell differentiation, regulation of long‐term memory, and initial development, maturation, and survival of cerebellar neurons. The existence of human neurological phenotypes, including cerebellar dysfunction with variable cognitive and behavioral abnormalities (CECBA), associated with CAMTA1 variants, has further supported its role in brain functions. In this study, we phenotypically and molecularly characterize the largest cohort of individuals ( n = 26) with 23 novel CAMTA1 variants (frameshift‐7, nonsense‐6, splicing‐1, initiation codon‐1, missense‐5, and intragenic deletions‐3) and compare the findings with all previously reported cases (total = 53). We show that the most notable phenotypic findings are developmental delay/intellectual disability, unsteady or uncoordinated gait, hypotonia, behavioral problems, and eye abnormalities. In addition, there is a high incidence of dysarthria, dysgraphia, microcephaly, gastrointestinal abnormalities, sleep difficulties, and nonspecific brain MRI findings; a few of which have been under‐reported. More than one third of the variants in this cohort were inherited from an asymptomatic or mildly affected parent suggesting reduced penetrance and variable expressivity. Our cohort provides a comprehensive characterization of the spectrum of phenotypes and genotypes among individuals with CECBA and the large data will facilitate counseling and formulating management plans and surveillance recommendations for these individuals.

Abstract Purpose: Hyperactivation of AKT is common and associated with endocrine resistance in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. The allosteric pan-AKT inhibitor MK-2206 induced apoptosis in PIK3CA-mutant ER+ breast cancer under estrogen-deprived condition in preclinical studies. This neoadjuvant phase II trial was therefore conducted to test the hypothesis that adding MK-2206 to anastrozole induces pathologic complete response (pCR) in PIK3CA mutant ER+ breast cancer. Experimental Design: Potential eligible patients with clinical stage II/III ER+/HER2− breast cancer were preregistered and received anastrozole (goserelin if premenopausal) for 28 days in cycle 0 pending tumor PIK3CA sequencing. Patients positive for PIK3CA mutation in the tumor were eligible to start MK-2206 (150 mg orally weekly, with prophylactic prednisone) on cycle 1 day 2 (C1D2) and to receive a maximum of four 28-day cycles of combination therapy before surgery. Serial biopsies were collected at preregistration, C1D1 and C1D17. Results: Fifty-one patients preregistered and 16 of 22 with PIK3CA-mutant tumors received study drug. Three patients went off study due to C1D17 Ki67 >10% (n = 2) and toxicity (n = 1). Thirteen patients completed neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. No pCRs were observed. Rash was common. MK-2206 did not further suppress cell proliferation and did not induce apoptosis on C1D17 biopsies. Although AKT phosphorylation was reduced, PRAS40 phosphorylation at C1D17 after MK-2206 persisted. One patient acquired an ESR1 mutation at surgery. Conclusions: MK-2206 is unlikely to add to the efficacy of anastrozole alone in PIK3CA-mutant ER+ breast cancer and should not be studied further in the target patient population. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 6823–32. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Introduction: MutHER is a phase II trial that demonstrated the anti-tumor activity of the pan-HER inhibitor neratinib in HER2mut, non-amplified MBC. The major challenges to accrue to this trial were the large number of pts to screen for the 2-3% HER2mut population and the high rate (24%) of poor quality tumor DNA for sequencing. The goals of this ctDNA study were: 1) the concordance of HER2mut detected by ctDNA versus tumor testing; 2) the incidence of ctDNA HER2mut in HER2 non-amplified MBC; 3) changes in HER2mut variant allele frequency (VAF) on neratinib therapy. Methods: A sample size of 30 negative (neg) controls was needed to ensure 90% confidence if ctDNA testing has >90% specificity in detecting HER2mut. Thus, plasma from MBC pts obtained at screening for MutHER trial (Neg control: 40 pts without HER2mut on tumor testing; Positive (pos) control: 14 pts with known HER2mut who received neratinib) were subjected to Guardant360 ctDNA 70-gene panel sequencing (all exons of HER2 included). ctDNA from the 14 neratinib treated pts were also analyzed at week (wk) 4 and upon progression. ctDNA data from MBC pts clinically tested at Guardant Health were interrogated for HER2mut incidence. Results: Among the 14 pts with tumor pos for HER2mut, ctDNA sequencing identified the same HER2mut in 11, discrepant HER2mut in 1, and neg in 2. The 2 pts with ctDNA neg for HER2mut had progressive disease (PD) and stable disease (SD > 6 months) on neratinib, respectively. Among the 40 neg controls, 8 were not evaluable (no detectable ctDNA or assay unsuccessful) and all 32 successfully sequenced cases were neg for HER2mut. The sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA for HER2mut detection was 11/14 (79%, 90% CI: 53-94%) and 32/32 (100%, 90% CI: 91-100%), respectively. Among the 11 paired baseline and wk 4 samples, 9 (82%) had lower HER2mut VAFs at wk 4 than at baseline, with 1 complete response (CR), 1 partial response (PR), 5 SD, and 4 PD at wk 8 as best tumor response. Two pts had higher wk 4 ctDNA HER2mut VAFs and both had radiographic PD at wk 8. The absolute HER2mut VAF levels at wk 4 were significantly associated with TTP (Spearman rho=-0.69, p=0.02) and tumor size change (rho=0.67, p=0.05). The HER2mut VAFs were significantly higher at progression than wk 4 in all pts (p<0.01). One pt acquired a new HER2mut T798I, which is analogous to the gate-keeper mutation EGFR T790M. The incidence of HER2mut without amplification in unselected consecutive MBC clinically tested by Guardant360 was 3% (48/1,584), with mutation pattern similar to published tumor testing data. Conclusions: ctDNA sequencing is sensitive and highly specific in detecting HER2mut, offering a non-invasive method to identify pts for trials of HER2mut-targeted therapy. Decreased HER2mut VAFs at wk 4 was observed in 82% of cases, consistent with the on-target effect of neratinib. Increased HER2mut VAFs at wk 4 is a potential early marker of progression. Citation Format: Cynthia Ma, Ron Bose, Feng Gao, Rachel Freedman, Melinda Telli, Gretchen Kimmick, Eric Winer, Michael Naughton, Matthew Goetz, Christy Russell, Debu Tripathy, Melody Cobleigh, Andres Forero, Timothy Pluard, Carey Anders, Shana Thomas, Jill Anderson, Caroline Bumb, Kimberly Banks, Richard Lanman, Richard Bryce, Alshad Lalani, John Pfeifer, Daniel Hays, Mark Pegram, Kimberly Blackwell, Philippe Bedard, Hussam Al-Kateb, Matthew Ellis. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing for HER2 mutation (HER2mut) screening and response monitoring to neratinib in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT011. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT011