Ordentlich, Peter

Abstract Background: Entinostat, a class I HDAC inhibitor (HDACi), has shown promising activity in ENCORE 301, a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of entinostat + exemestane (EE) vs. exemestane + placebo (EP) in advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer progressed on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. ENCORE 301 met the primary progression free survival endpoint and showed a median 8.3-month improvement in the overall survival (OS) exploratory endpoint for the EE arm. Emerging preclinical work suggests that entinostat has immunomodulatory effects and can eradicate modestly immunogenic mouse tumors in combination with immune checkpoint blockade agents via reduction of circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Based on these data, we conducted an analysis of immune subsets in blood samples from ENCORE 301 breast cancer patients. Method: Blood was collected from a subset of 49 patients (27 EE and 22 EP) representative of the 130 patients enrolled in ENCORE 301 on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1; pre-treatment), C1D2, C1D8, and C1D15 for biomarker analysis. Of these, 34 patient samples (20 EE and 14 EP) were analyzed for circulating immune subsets. The percent change in subsets at C1D15 vs. baseline was assessed based on the following surface markers: Lin-MDSC (lin; CD3, CD19, CD56)-HLA-DR-CD11b+CD33+), granulocytic MDSC (CD14-CD11b+CD33+), monocytic MDSC (Lin-HLA-DR-CD11b+CD33+CD14+), immature MDSC (Lin-HLA-DR-CD11b+CD33+CD14-), CD8+ T-cells (CD4-CD8+), Foxp3-CD4+ T-cells (CD8-CD4+Foxp3-), and Tregs (CD4+CD8-CD25hiFoxp3+). Monocytes were analyzed for three populations: CD14+, CD14+HLA-DRhi, and CD14+HLA-DRlow/negative. In addition, PD-1, CTLA-4, and TIM-3 were measured on T-cell subsets, and CD40 was measured on MDSCs. Results: In line with preclinical data, we observed a significant reduction in granulocytic MDSC (-14.67% vs. +20.56%, p 0.029) and monocytic MDSC (-62.3% vs. +1.97%, p 0.002) in EE. Entinostat did not alter immature MDSC levels (-20.9% vs. -15.0%, p 0.93) suggesting a downstream effect of entinostat on MDSC subsets. Interestingly, CD40, a costimulatory receptor required for MDSC-mediated immune suppression was significantly down-regulated in all MDSC subsets except granulocytic MDSC where a downward trend was observed. Entinostat did not significantly impact the ratio of CD8+ T-cells per CD4+ T-cells or per Tregs or alter expression of CTLA4, PD-1, or TIM3 on T-cell subsets. Reduced expression of HLA-DR on monocytes has been associated with poor prognosis in cancer. Consistent with entinostat-mediated immunomodulatory effects, a significant increase in the number of HLA-DR+ monocytes (34.1% vs. -11.38%, p 0.0004) and level of HLA-DR expression on monocytes (16.3% vs. -4.7%; p 0.015) was observed. Conclusion: Data with entinostat combined with exemestane in ENCORE 301 provide the first evidence of HDACi-mediated reduction of immunosuppressive MDSCs and increased immunocompetent CD14+HLA-DRhi monocytes in patients. These findings may explain the improved OS seen with EE in ENCORE 301 and provide strong rationale for planned combination studies of entinostat with immune checkpoint blockade agents. Citation Format: Chumsri S, Lee M-J, Tomita Y, Lee S, Tomita S, Cruickshank S, Ordentlich P, Trepel JB. Epigenetic immune modulation by entinostat in breast cancer: Correlative analysis of ENCORE 301 trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-10.

Abstract Background: Targeting immune checkpoint programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 pathway has shown promising clinical activity with some preliminary association of clinical benefit with PD-L1 expression on tumors. Recent preclinical and clinical studies highlight the beneficial immunomodulatory potential of epigenetic therapy. Entinostat is a class I specific histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi). A promising preclinical study showed that entinostat in combination with immune checkpoint blockade agent can eradicate modestly immunogenic breast tumors in mice via reduction in immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells. In this study, we investigated the effects of entinostat on expression of immune-related genes in breast cancer cells to further explore the potential mechanism of its combined activity. Method: Gene expression was assessed on Nanostring platform using the nCounter GX Human ImmunologyV2 panel comprised of 594 immune-related and 15 reference genes. Gene expression was normalized to the internal positive controls and reference genes using nSolver2.0 software. Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (MCF-7 and T47D) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T) were used for the analysis. Gene expression analysis was performed on control and after 24-hour treatment of entinostat at clinically relevant 125 and 500 nM concentrations. Results: Overall, a greater number of immune-related genes were induced > 2 fold with entinostat at 125 and 500 nM in TNBC compared to HR+: 77 and 118 genes in MDA-MB-231, 80 and 147 genes in Hs578T, 20 and 64 genes in MCF-7, and 73 and 72 genes in T47D, respectively. In particular, MHC class I (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C) and II (HLA-DMA, HLA-DMB, HLA-DOA, HLA-DOB, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQA2, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DQB2, HLA-DRA, and HLA-DRB1) genes were induced by entinostat in a dose dependent manner (range 1.5-22.44 fold). These inductions were observed in both HR+ and TNBC cell lines. Interestingly, we found higher baseline expression and a several fold increase in PD-L1 expression in TNBC. PD-L1 mRNA expression increased by 1.74 and 2.14 fold in MDA-MB-231 and 3 and 9.6 fold in Hs578T with 125 and 500 nM treatment, respectively. Corresponding increase in PD-L1 protein expression after entinostat treatment was also observed. In contrast, there appeared to be no significant changes in PD-L1 expression after entinostat treatment in MCF-7 and T47D. Furthermore, we also identified 21 genes that were differentially induced by entinostat in TNBC but not in HR+. These genes include PTPN22, ARG2, CISH, IL17A, ICAM2, KIR3DL1, CXCR3, TLR2, CFD, CCR5, IL13, LILRA3, IL8, TNFRSF9, DPP4, MR1, SELPLG, PTGS2, IL1B, CD3D, and MBL2. No significant change in PDL2 expression was observed in any of the cell lines. Conclusion: Our data suggest that entinostat induces immune-related genes involved in antigen presentation in both ER+ and TNBC cells, potentially increasing the immunogenicity of these tumors. Given the significant induction of PD-L1 expression with entinostat in TNBC, our preclinical data provides support for further investigation of entinostat in combination with anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 in this subtype of breast cancer. Citation Format: Chumsri S, Necela BM, Ordentlich P, Advani P, Moreno-Aspitia A, McLaughlin SA, Geiger X, McDonough M, Vallow LA, Perez EA, Thompson EA. Immunomodulatory effects of entinostat on PD-L1 and MHC class I and II in different subtypes of breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-04-02.

Abstract Background: Entinostat, a class I HDAC inhibitor (HDACi), has shown promising activity in ENCORE 301, a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of entinostat + exemestane (EE) vs. exemestane + placebo (EP) in advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer progressed on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. ENCORE 301 met the primary progression free survival endpoint and showed a median 8.3-month improvement in the overall survival (OS) exploratory endpoint for the EE arm. Emerging preclinical work suggests that entinostat has immunomodulatory effects and can eradicate modestly immunogenic mouse tumors in combination with immune checkpoint blockade agents via reduction of circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Based on these data, we conducted an analysis of immune subsets in blood samples from ENCORE 301 breast cancer patients. Method: Blood was collected from a subset of 49 patients (27 EE and 22 EP) representative of the 130 patients enrolled in ENCORE 301 on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1; pre-treatment), C1D2, C1D8, and C1D15 for biomarker analysis. Of these, 34 patient samples (20 EE and 14 EP) were analyzed for circulating immune subsets. The percent change in subsets at C1D15 vs. baseline was assessed based on the following surface markers: Lin-MDSC (lin; CD3, CD19, CD56)-HLA-DR-CD11b+CD33+), granulocytic MDSC (CD14-CD11b+CD33+), monocytic MDSC (Lin-HLA-DR-CD11b+CD33+CD14+), immature MDSC (Lin-HLA-DR-CD11b+CD33+CD14-), CD8+ T-cells (CD4-CD8+), Foxp3-CD4+ T-cells (CD8-CD4+Foxp3-), and Tregs (CD4+CD8-CD25hiFoxp3+). Monocytes were analyzed for three populations: CD14+, CD14+HLA-DRhi, and CD14+HLA-DRlow/negative. In addition, PD-1, CTLA-4, and TIM-3 were measured on T-cell subsets, and CD40 was measured on MDSCs. Results: In line with preclinical data, we observed a significant reduction in granulocytic MDSC (-14.67% vs. +20.56%, p 0.029) and monocytic MDSC (-62.3% vs. +1.97%, p 0.002) in EE. Entinostat did not alter immature MDSC levels (-20.9% vs. -15.0%, p 0.93) suggesting a downstream effect of entinostat on MDSC subsets. Interestingly, CD40, a costimulatory receptor required for MDSC-mediated immune suppression was significantly down-regulated in all MDSC subsets except granulocytic MDSC where a downward trend was observed. Entinostat did not significantly impact the ratio of CD8+ T-cells per CD4+ T-cells or per Tregs or alter expression of CTLA4, PD-1, or TIM3 on T-cell subsets. Reduced expression of HLA-DR on monocytes has been associated with poor prognosis in cancer. Consistent with entinostat-mediated immunomodulatory effects, a significant increase in the number of HLA-DR+ monocytes (34.1% vs. -11.38%, p 0.0004) and level of HLA-DR expression on monocytes (16.3% vs. -4.7%; p 0.015) was observed. Conclusion: Data with entinostat combined with exemestane in ENCORE 301 provide the first evidence of HDACi-mediated reduction of immunosuppressive MDSCs and increased immunocompetent CD14+HLA-DRhi monocytes in patients. These findings may explain the improved OS seen with EE in ENCORE 301 and provide strong rationale for planned combination studies of entinostat with immune checkpoint blockade agents. Citation Format: Peter Ordentlich, Min-Jung Lee, Yusuke Tomita, Sunmin Lee, Saori Tomita, Scott Cruickshank, Saranya Chumsri, Jane B. Trepel. Epigenetic immune modulation by entinostat in breast cancer: Correlative analysis of ENCORE 301 trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR Inaugural International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; September 16-19, 2015; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A030.