Summerfield, Douglas T.

AbstractAimWe investigated whether a commercial bi‐level positive airway pressure (BPAP) device, would improve peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) during recreational aviation up to 12,500 feet without supplemental oxygen. Ten adults with recreational flight experience (age:47 ± 14; female = 5) completed a standardized flight profile in an unpressurised aircraft, involving randomized crossover design at 8,000 feet and 12,500 feet with BPAP or control. SpO2, middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and relative tidal volume (TV) index were measured continuously. Psychomotor vigilance test (3‐min) assessed reaction time halfway through taxi and altitude stages. Altitude significantly (p < 0.05) decreased mean SpO2, MCAv, and RR, and increased TV index and HR. There was no effect of altitude (p > 0.05) on reaction time. BPAP increased mean SpO2 at 8,000 feet [Control: 92 ± 1%; BPAP: 94 ± 2%; mean difference (MD) = 2 ± 2%; p = 0.002] and 12,500 feet [Control: 86 ± 4%; BPAP: 89 ± 4%; MD = 2 ± 3%; p = 0.013]. BPAP lowered MCAv at 8,000 feet [Control: 53 ± 10 cm/s; BPAP: 50 ± 9 cm/s; MD = ‐3 ± 2 cm/s; p = 0.001] and 12,500 feet [Control: 52 ± 10 cm/s; BPAP: 50 ± 8 cm/s; MD = ‐2 ± 3 cm/s; p = 0.041]. BPAP increased TV index at 8,000 feet (Control: 6.6 ± 1.3; BPAP:8.1 ± 1.8; MD = 1.9 ± 0.8; p < 0.001) but not 12,500 feet, without effect on RR or reaction time. This study provides preliminary results that BPAP may improve mean SpO2 for recreational aviators up to 12,500 feet without supplemental oxygen.

BACKGROUND High altitude (HA) exposure influences appetite, protein synthesis and breakdown, and aerobic capacity. Thus, HA exposure typically causes weight (wt) loss, while the impact on aerobic capacity upon return to sea level is more variable. OBJECTIVE To examine the influence of hypobaric hypoxia on body composition and exercise capacity in elite HA climbers (n=4, 2 female) acclimating at ≥5,150 m over 2 mo. relative to trekkers (n=8, 0 female) acclimating at 5,150 m over 2 wks (Mt. Everest, Nepal). Each elite climber successfully summited Mt. Everest. METHODS Body composition (DEXA, skin folds, wt) and exercise capacity (treadmill) were assessed before and within 2 wks post HA. RESULTS HA exposure increased Hct and Hb, with peak values of 52±5% and 18±2 g/dl, and 50±3% and 17±1 g/dl for the climbers and trekkers, respectively. HA decreased lean and fat tissue in both the climbers (lean −4.4±2.3%, fat −8.2±4.0%) and trekkers (lean −1.8±1.6%, fat −5.8±6.1%) (all P ≤0.06). No change was observed in skin folds for either group. Wt decreased in the climbers (−5±2%, P <0.03) and trekkers (−3±1%, P <0.01). There was no change in VO 2max pre‐to post‐HA in either group (climbers 3.26 ± 0.37 vs. 3.27 ± 0.61 L/min; trekkers 3.60 ± 0.54 vs. 3.66 ± 0.43 L/min). CONCLUSION HA results in both lean and fat tissue loss in well acclimatized climbers and trekkers with little subsequent impact on aerobic capacity. Mayo Clinic & TNF.

Objective It is well documented that cognitive performance may be altered with ascent to altitude, but the association of various cognitive performance tests with symptoms of acute mountain sickness (AMS) is not well understood. Our objective was to assess and compare cognitive performance during a high-altitude expedition using several tests and to report the association of each test with AMS, headache, and quality of sleep. Methods During an expedition to Mount Everest, 3 cognitive tests (Stroop, Trail Making, and the real-time cognitive assessment tool, an in-house developed motor accuracy test) were used along with a questionnaire to assess health and AMS. Eight team members were assessed pre-expedition, postexpedition, and at several time points during the expedition. Results There were no significant differences ( P >.05) found among scores taken at 3 time points at base camp and the postexpedition scores for all 3 tests. Changes in the Stroop test scores were significantly associated with the odds of AMS ( P <.05). The logistic regression results show that the percent change from baseline for Stroop score (β = −5.637; P = .032) and Stroop attempts (β = −5.269; P = .049) are significantly associated with the odds of meeting the criteria for AMS. Conclusions No significant changes were found in overall cognitive performance at altitude, but a significant relationship was found between symptoms of AMS and performance in certain cognitive tests. This research shows the need for more investigation of objective physiologic assessments to associate with self-perceived metrics of AMS to gauge effect on cognitive performance.

Objective: To establish evidence-based guidelines for the use of bedside cardiac ultrasound, echocardiography, in the ICU and equivalent care sites. Methods: Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to rank the “levels” of quality of evidence into high (A), moderate (B), or low (C) and to determine the “strength” of recommendations as either strong (strength class 1) or conditional/weak (strength class 2), thus generating six “grades” of recommendations (1A–1B–1C–2A–2B–2C). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used for all questions with clinically relevant outcomes. RAND Appropriateness Method, incorporating the modified Delphi technique, was used in formulating recommendations related to terminology or definitions or in those based purely on expert consensus. The process was conducted by teleconference and electronic-based discussion, following clear rules for establishing consensus and agreement/disagreement. Individual panel members provided full disclosure and were judged to be free of any commercial bias. Results: Forty-five statements were considered. Among these statements, six did not achieve agreement based on RAND appropriateness method rules (majority of at least 70%). Fifteen statements were approved as conditional recommendations (strength class 2). The rest (24 statements) were approved as strong recommendations (strength class 1). Each recommendation was also linked to its level of quality of evidence and the required level of echo expertise of the intensivist. Key recommendations, listed by category, included the use of cardiac ultrasonography to assess preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated (1B) patients, left ventricular (LV) systolic (1C) and diastolic (2C) function, acute cor pulmonale (ACP) (1C), pulmonary hypertension (1B), symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) (1C), right ventricular (RV) infarct (1C), the efficacy of fluid resuscitation (1C) and inotropic therapy (2C), presence of RV dysfunction (2C) in septic shock, the reason for cardiac arrest to assist in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1B–2C depending on rhythm), status in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) (1C), the presence of pericardial effusion (1C), cardiac tamponade (1B), valvular dysfunction (1C), endocarditis in native (2C) or mechanical valves (1B), great vessel disease and injury (2C), penetrating chest trauma (1C) and for use of contrast (1B–2C depending on indication). Finally, several recommendations were made regarding the use of bedside cardiac ultrasound in pediatric patients ranging from 1B for preload responsiveness to no recommendation for RV dysfunction. Conclusions: There was strong agreement among a large cohort of international experts regarding several class 1 recommendations for the use of bedside cardiac ultrasound, echocardiography, in the ICU. Evidence-based recommendations regarding the appropriate use of this technology are a step toward improving patient outcomes in relevant patients and guiding appropriate integration of ultrasound into critical care practice.