Back to Authors

Sarkar, Bidyut K.

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7270-6715

Mayo Clinic

Public Health Foundation of India

Citations 1

Cardiac rehabilitation delivery model for low-resource settings
Grace, Sherry L. , Turk-Adawi, Karam , Contractor, Aashish , Atrey, Alison , Ghisi, Gabriela L. Melo, Oldridge, Neil , Sarkar, Bidyut K. , Yeo, Tee Joo , Mendis, Shanthi , Oh, Paul , Hu, Dayi , Sarrafzadegan, Nizal , Ghisi, Gabriela Lima de Melo , Turk-Adawi, Karam , Campbell, Norm R.C. , Derman, Wayne Elton , López-Jiménez, Francisco , Lima de Melo Ghisi, Gabriela , Grace, Sherry L

Heart | May 15, 2016 | Volume: 102 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 1449-1455

10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309209 Get It

Objective Cardiovascular disease is a global epidemic, which is largely preventable. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is demonstrated to be cost-effective and efficacious in high-income countries. CR could represent an important approach to mitigate the epidemic of cardiovascular disease in lower-resource settings. The purpose of this consensus statement was to review low-cost approaches to delivering the core components of CR, to propose a testable model of CR which could feasibly be delivered in middle-income countries. Methods A literature review regarding delivery of each core CR component, namely: (1) lifestyle risk factor management (ie, physical activity, diet, tobacco and mental health), (2) medical risk factor management (eg, lipid control, blood pressure control), (3) education for self-management and (4) return to work, in low-resource settings was undertaken. Recommendations were developed based on identified articles, using a modified GRADE approach where evidence in a low-resource setting was available, or consensus where evidence was not. Results Available data on cost of CR delivery in low-resource settings suggests it is not feasible to deliver CR in low-resource settings as is delivered in high-resource ones. Strategies which can be implemented to deliver all of the core CR components in low-resource settings were summarised in practice recommendations, and approaches to patient assessment proffered. It is suggested that CR be adapted by delivery by non-physician healthcare workers, in non-clinical settings. Conclusions Advocacy to achieve political commitment for broad delivery of adapted CR services in low-resource settings is needed.