Schmitt, Laura C.

Background: Biomechanical predictors of a second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and return to sport (RTS) have been identified; however, these measures may not be feasible in a standard clinical environment. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether standard clinical measures predicted the risk of second ACL injuries. The hypothesis tested was that a combination of strength, function, and patient-reported measures at the time of RTS would predict the risk of second ACL injuries with high sensitivity and specificity. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3 and Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 163 participants (mean age, 16.7 ± 3.0 years) who underwent primary ACLR and were able to RTS were evaluated. All participants completed an assessment of isokinetic strength, hop testing, balance, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Participants were tracked for a minimum of 24 months to identify occurrences of a second ACL injury. The initial 120 participants enrolled were used to develop a clinical prediction model that utilized classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, and the remaining 43 participants enrolled were used as a validation dataset. Additional analyses were performed in all 163 participants using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Approximately 20% (23/114) of the initial subset of the cohort suffered a second ACL injury. CART analysis identified age, sex, knee-related confidence, and performance on the triple hop for distance at the time of RTS as the primary predictors of a second ACL injury. Using these variables, a model was generated from which high-risk (n = 53) and low-risk groups (n = 61) were identified. A total of 22 participants in the high-risk group and 1 participant in the low-risk group suffered a second ACL injury. High-risk participants fit 1 of 2 profiles: (1) age <19 years, triple hop for distance between 1.34 and 1.90 times body height, and triple hop for distance limb symmetry index (LSI) <98.5% (n = 43) or (2) age <19 years, triple hop for distance >1.34 times body height, triple hop for distance LSI >98.5%, female sex, and high knee-related confidence (n = 10). The validation step identified the high-risk group as being 5 times (odds ratio, 5.14 [95% CI, 1.00-26.46]) more likely to suffer a second ACL injury, with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 72.0%. Conclusion: These findings recognize measures that accurately identify young patients at high risk of sustaining a second ACL injury within 24 months after RTS. The development of a clinical decision algorithm to identify high-risk patients, inclusive of clinically feasible variables such as age, sex, confidence, and performance on the triple hop for distance, can serve as a foundation to re-evaluate appropriate discharge criteria for RTS.

Objectives: The incidence of second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and return to sport (RTS) in a young, active population is likely between 25-33% with the greatest risk in the first 12 months after RTS. Although the use of allograft tissue in young athletes has been reported to result in increased risk of graft failure, differences in graft and contralateral ACL injury risk between patients who receive a hamstrings (HS) autograft and bone-patellar tendon- bone (BTB) autograft has yet to be reported in a young, athletic population. The tested hypothesis was that the relative risk (RR) of ipsilateral graft failure would be higher in young, active patients who receive an ACLR with a hamstrings graft, while the RR of contralateral ACL injury would be higher in patients who receive and ACLR with a BTB autograft. Methods: One hundred thirty-nine subjects (99 female/40 male) with a mean age of 16.9±2.0 years old (range: 13-25 y/o) underwent ACLR with either a HS autograft (n=79) or a BTB autograft (n=60) and were released to return to pivoting/cutting sport. These patients were enrolled in a prospective, observational cohort study and were tracked for incidence of 2 nd ACL after ACLR for a median of 73 months. Thirty-four (24.5%) suffered a 2 nd ACL injury. Fisher’s exact tests were used to determine whether graft choice (HS vs. BTB) was associated with risk of either ipsilateral graft failure or contralateral ACL injury. Sub-group analyses by sex were also conducted. Results: Patients who underwent ACLR with HS graft (n=79) sustained 14 ipsilateral tears and 6 contralateral ACL injuries. Patients who received an ACLR with BTB (n=62) sustained 2 ipsilateral tears and 12 contralateral ACL injuries (Table 1). Patients who received an ACLR with HS graft were 6 times more likely (RR=6.2; 95% CI: 1.4-28.7) to suffer a graft failure after RTS than the BTB group. In the first 12 months after RTS, the HS graft patients were nearly 10 times (RR=9.5; 95% CI: 1.2-76.1) more likely to suffer an ipsilateral graft failure. Patients with a HS graft were 3 times less likely (RR=0.33; 95%CI: 0.12-0.935) to suffer a contralateral ACL injury and nearly 7 times less likely (RR=0.15, 95%CI: 0.031-0.709) to suffer a contralateral ACL injury in the first 12 months after RTS compared to the BTB group. When the cohort was divided by sex, females with HS grafts were significantly more likely to sustain a graft failure in the first 12 months after RTS (p=0.008) and by final follow-up (p=0.002) compared to females with BTB graft. Females with HS grafts were 3 times less likely (RR=0.30; 95%CI: 0.095-0.943) to suffer a contralateral ACL injury than females with BTB graft and 6 times less likely (RR=0.17; 95%CI: 0.034-0.846) to suffer contralateral ACL injury in the first year after RTS. Males demonstrated no significant difference in ipsilateral or contralateral injury risk based on graft type. Conclusion: Young, active females who return to pivoting and cutting sports after ACLR with HS autograft are at greater risk to suffer a graft failure and reduced risk to suffer a contralateral ACL injury compared to females who undergo ACLR with BTB graft tissue. No significant differences in 2 nd ACL injury risk based on graft type were observed in the male patients. [Table: see text]

Background: Previous work shows that young athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) demonstrate single-leg (SL) landing movement asymmetries at the time of return to sport (RTS); however, the effect of movement asymmetries on longitudinal knee-related function after ACLR has not been examined. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of SL drop-landing movement symmetry at the time of RTS on knee-related function 2 years later in young athletes after ACLR. The first hypothesis was that young athletes who demonstrated SL drop-landing asymmetries at RTS would demonstrate decreased knee function 2 years later compared with those who demonstrated symmetric SL drop-landing mechanics. The second hypothesis was that SL drop-landing movement symmetry at RTS would be associated with knee functional recovery 2 years later. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: This study included 48 young athletes who had undergone ACLR and were assessed at the time of RTS (77% female; mean [±SD] age at RTS, 17.6 ± 2.6 years) and followed for 2 years after RTS. Three sagittal-plane landing variables of interest were calculated using 3-dimensional motion analysis during an SL drop-landing task at the time of RTS: knee flexion excursion, peak internal knee extension moment, and peak trunk flexion. The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated for each landing variable using the following: LSI = (involved/uninvolved) × 100%. The LSI was used to divide the cohort into symmetric (SYM) and asymmetric (ASYM) groups for each landing variable: knee flexion excursion (SYM: LSI ≥ 90% [n = 23]; ASYM: LSI < 85% [n = 18]), peak internal knee extension moment (SYM: LSI ≥ 90% [n = 19]; ASYM: LSI < 85% [n = 22]), and peak trunk flexion (SYM: LSI ≤ 105% [n = 25]; ASYM: LSI > 115% [n = 19]). At 2 years after RTS, knee-related function was evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, and performance on SL hop tests. Functional recovery was defined based on literature cutoffs for knee-related functional measures. Differences in 2-year function were compared between the symmetry groups using Mann-Whitney U tests because of nonnormality. Logistic regression was used to determine if landing symmetry at the time of RTS would be associated with 2-year knee functional recovery after RTS. Results: The ASYM knee flexion excursion group demonstrated decreased function at 2 years after RTS compared with the SYM group on the KOOS-Pain (ASYM: 93.0 ± 8.2; SYM: 98.4 ± 3.0; P = .008) and the KOOS–Quality of Life (ASYM: 81.6 ± 16.1; SYM: 94.1 ± 9.7; P = .008). Knee flexion excursion was associated with knee functional recovery on the KOOS-Pain and the KOOS–Quality of Life ( P = .033 and P = .012, respectively) at 2 years after RTS, after controlling for the quadriceps strength LSI and graft type. Conclusion: Young athletes after ACLR with asymmetries in knee kinematics at the time of RTS reported decreased self-reported function 2 years later; however, the clinical importance of these differences needs to be further understood.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon autograft often results in hamstring muscle strength asymmetry. However, the effect of hamstring muscle strength asymmetry on knee mechanics has not been reported. Hypothesis: Participants with hamstring strength asymmetry would demonstrate altered involved limb knee mechanics during walking and jogging compared with those with more symmetric hamstring strength at least 2 years after ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: There were a total of 45 participants at least 2 years after ACLR (22 male, 23 female; mean time after ACLR, 34.6 months). A limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated for isometric hamstring strength to subdivide the sample into symmetric hamstring (SH) (LSI ≥90%; n = 18) and asymmetric hamstring (AH) (LSI <85%; n = 18) groups. Involved knee kinematic and kinetic data were collected using 3-dimensional motion analysis during gait and jogging. Peak sagittal-, frontal-, and transverse-plane knee angles and sagittal-plane knee moments and knee powers were calculated. Independent-samples t tests and analyses of covariance were used to compare involved knee kinematic and kinetic variables between the groups. Results: There were no differences in sagittal- and frontal-plane knee angles between the groups ( P > .05 for all). The AH group demonstrated decreased tibial internal rotation during weight acceptance during gait ( P = .01) and increased tibial external rotation during jogging at initial contact ( P = .03) and during weight acceptance ( P = .02) compared with the SH group. In addition, the AH group demonstrated decreased peak negative knee power during midstance ( P = .01) during gait compared with the SH group, after controlling for gait speed, which differed between groups. Conclusion: Participants with hamstring strength asymmetry showed altered involved knee mechanics in the sagittal plane during gait and in the transverse plane during gait and jogging compared with those with more symmetric hamstring strength. Clinical Relevance: Hamstring strength asymmetry is common at 3 years after ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft and affects involved knee mechanics during gait and jogging. Additional research is warranted to further investigate the longitudinal effect of these alterations on knee function and joint health after ACLR.

Background: The incidence of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is high. Often, return-to-sport (RTS) tests of strength and functional hopping rely on limb symmetry indices (LSIs) to identify deficits, although the utility of these measures in athletes with bilateral ACL injuries is unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to investigate if LSIs used as RTS criteria in female patients after unilateral ACLR were appropriate for female patients with bilateral ACL involvement. The hypothesis tested was that asymmetries with traditional LSI measures would be present in a population after unilateral ACLR but would not be present in a population with bilateral ACLR due to the lack of a healthy internal control limb. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 45 female subjects were classified into 3 groups: after second (contralateral) ACLR (ACLR-B; n = 15); after primary unilateral ACLR (ACLR-U; n = 15); and uninjured controls (CTRL; n = 15). After being cleared for RTS, each subject completed a single-legged hop for distance (SLHD), triple hop for distance (THD), and triple-crossover hop for distance (CHD) test, in addition to an isometric quadriceps strength test on both limbs. Means and LSI ([ involved limb/ uninvolved limb] × 100) were calculated for each test. Limb symmetry deficits were defined by LSI <90%. Results: Analysis of functional hop testing revealed a side × group interaction for SLHD ( P = .001), THD ( P = .019), and CHD ( P = .04). Side-to-side differences were found in the ACLR-U group for all hop tests ( P = .001-.003) and in the ACLR-B group for SLHD ( P = .002) and THD tests ( P = .024). No side-to side differences were seen in the CTRL group ( P > .05). A side × group interaction was found for isometric quadriceps strength ( P = .006), with lower LSI seen in the ACLR-U group (81% ± 17.6%) compared with the CTRL group (102.2% ± 10.8%) and the ACLR-B group (95.6% ± 24.9%). Although no interaction was seen, side-to-side differences were noted in the THD in the ACLR-U group ( P = .013) and ACLR-B group ( P = .024) and in the CHD in the ACLR-U group ( P = .001). Despite absence of an LSI deficit, bilateral peak quadriceps strength in the ACLR-B group was comparable to the involved limb of the ACLR-U group and less than in the CTRL group ( P = .012). Conclusion: Both the ACLR-U and the ACLR-B groups demonstrated side-to-side deficits during functional hop tests; however, these deficits were not identified according to the clinically accepted LSI values of ≥90%, calling into question the efficacy of current RTS criteria. At the time of RTS, only individuals in the ACLR-U group demonstrated an altered LSI in quadriceps strength. Significantly lower quadriceps strength of both limbs in the ACLR-B group was seen compared with the CTRL group, despite no LSI deficits in quadriceps strength. Current use of LSIs during strength and performance tests may not be an appropriate means of identifying residual deficits in female patients after bilateral ACLR at time of RTS. Furthermore, a better indicator of strength performance in this population may need to include a comparison of strength performance values to the normative values of healthy controls.