Thomas, Staci

Context Early sport specialization, or the participation in 1 sport year-round to the exclusion of all others, is a growing concern in youth athletics because of its possible association with musculoskeletal injury. The underlying injury risk may be the result of coordination differences that sport-specialized athletes have been speculated to exhibit relative to multisport athletes; however, little evidence exists to support or refute this notion. Objective To examine relative hip- and knee-joint angular-motion variability among adolescent sport-specialized and multisport female adolescent athletes to determine how sport specialization may affect coordination. Design Cohort study. Setting Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants A total of 366 sport-specialized and 366 multisport adolescent female basketball, soccer, and volleyball players. Intervention(s) Drop–vertical-jump (DVJ) assessment. Main Outcome Measure(s) Average coupling-angle variability (CAV) for hip flexion and knee flexion, knee flexion and ankle flexion, hip flexion and knee abduction, knee flexion and knee abduction, knee flexion and knee internal rotation, and knee abduction and knee internal rotation. Results The sport-specialized group exhibited increased coupling variability in dominant-limb hip flexion and knee flexion (P = .015), knee flexion and knee abduction (P = .014), and knee flexion and knee internal rotation (P = .048) while landing during the DVJ, although they had small effect sizes (η2 = 0.010, 0.010, and 0.007, respectively). No differences were present between groups for any of the other CAV measures of the dominant limb, and no differences were found for any CAV measures of the nondominant limb (all P values > .05). Conclusions Sport specialization was associated with increased variability of critical hip- and knee-joint couplings responsible for effective landing during the DVJ. Altered coordination strategies that involve the hip and knee joints may underlie unstable landings, inefficient force-absorption strategies, or greater contact forces that can place the lower extremities at risk for injury (or a combination of these).

Objectives: The ability of current return to sport (RTS) criteria to identify young, active patients after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) independently, at high risk for future ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injury is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine if meeting current, standard RTS criteria collectively, or in part, would identify young athletes at risk for an ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injury after primary ACLR and RTS. The tested hypothesis was the likelihood of an ipsilateral or contralateral 2nd ACL injury in the first 2 years after RTS would be the same in groups that successfully met or failed to meet all RTS criteria prior to RTS. The second hypothesis was that quadriceps femoris strength at the time of RTS would identify which limb was at greatest risk for future ACL injury. Methods: One hundred eighty-one patients (116 female) with a mean age of 16.7±2.9 years old underwent ACLR and were released to return to pivoting/cutting sports. These patients were enrolled in a prospective, observational cohort study, completed a RTS assessment and were tracked for occurrence of an ipsilateral graft tear or contralateral ACL injury after ACLR for 24 months. The RTS assessment included 6 tests: isometric quadriceps strength, 4 functional hop tests and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) patient reported outcome survey. Limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated for strength and hop test assessments [(inv/uninv)*100]. Subjects were classified into groups that successfully passed all 6 RTS tests at a level of 90 compared to those that failed to meet all 6 criteria. Chi Square tests and Fisher Exact Tests were used to determine if successfully passing all 6 RTS measures resulted in a reduced risk of 2nd ACL injury in the first 24 months after RTS as well as to assess if ability to successfully pass individual RTS criteria resulted in reduced risk of 2nd ACL injury. Results: Thirty-nine (21.5%) patients suffered a 2nd ACL injury with 18 ipsilateral graft failures and 21 contralateral ACL tears in the first 24 months after RTS following ACLR. At the time of RTS, 57 patients (31.5%) achieved LSI values of 90% or greater on all testing as well as an IDKC value of 90 or greater. At this level, there was no difference in ipsilateral graft failures between patients who passed all RTS criteria (15.8%) and those who failed at least 1 criterion (7.3%; p=0.08). There was also no difference in contralateral ACL injuries between patients who passed all RTS criteria (7.0%) and those who failed at least 1 criterion (13.7%; p=0.22). When individual RTS criterion were evaluated, patients who failed to achieve 90% quadriceps strength LSI were 84% less likely to suffer an ipsilateral graft failure (OR=0.16; 95%CI: 0.04, 0.74;p=0.009), but 3 times more likely to suffer a contralateral ACL injury (OR=2.5; 95%CI:1.0, 6.5;p=0.05). Conclusion: Current criteria to evaluate readiness to return young athletes to pivoting and cutting sports, may not identify young, active patients independently at high risk for a future ipsilateral graft tear or contralateral ACL injury. Inability to achieve 90% LSI on an isometric quadriceps strength assessment resulted in a reduced risk of ipsilateral graft failure, but an increased risk in contralateral ACL injury after ACLR and RTS. Further investigation is needed on the relationship between quad strength and side of future ACL injury and whether other factors may help contribute to a predictive model of future ACL injury specific to limb.

Background: The impact of maturation on lower extremity strength and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may help guide future studies of age-specific rehabilitation. Hypothesis Pediatric ACLR patients would demonstrate higher thigh strength symmetry and knee-related function at return to sport (RTS) compared with adolescent and young adult participants who underwent traditional ACLR. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Level of Evidence: Level 2. Methods: A total of 144 young athletes at the time of RTS clearance post-ACLR were classified into 3 maturational groups (pediatric, n = 16 with physeal-sparing ACLR [mean age = 12.3 years; range = 9.2-14.6 years]; adolescent, n = 113 [mean age = 16.5 years; range = 14.1-19.8 years]; young adult, n = 15 [mean age = 22.0 years; range = 20.5-24.9 years]). Quadriceps and hamstring strength were measured using an electromechanical dynamometer. Knee-related function was measured using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form and single-leg hop tests. The Limb symmetry Index (LSI) was used in calculations for hop and strength tests. Group differences were compared with Kruskal-Wallis tests and Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests. Proportions of participants meeting literature-recommended RTS criterion cutoffs were compared among the groups using chi-square tests. Results: The pediatric group demonstrated higher quadriceps LSI ( P = 0.01), IKDC scores ( P < 0.01), single-hop LSI ( P < 0.01), and crossover-hop LSI ( P = 0.02) compared with the young adult group. In addition, the pediatric group demonstrated higher IKDC scores ( P < 0.01) and single-hop LSI ( P = 0.02) compared with the adolescent group. The adolescent group demonstrated higher IKDC scores ( P < 0.01), single-hop LSI ( P = 0.02), and crossover-hop LSI ( P = 0.03) compared with the young adult group. The proportions of participants meeting all RTS criterion cutoffs were highest in the pediatric group and lowest in the young adult group ( P = 0.03). Conclusion: Young athletes at RTS clearance after pediatric ACLR demonstrated higher quadriceps strength symmetry and knee-related function than adolescents and young adults after traditional ACLR. Clinical Relevance: These findings demonstrate the need for further study regarding the impact of these group differences on longitudinal outcomes after ACLR, including successful RTS and risk of second ACL injury.

Objectives: The incidence of 2nd anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and return to sport (RTS) ranges from 25%-33% in young, active populations; with the greatest risk in the first 12 months after RTS. Recent data indicate that failure to successfully meet traditional RTS criteria, inclusive of strength, functional hop testing and patient reported outcome scores, may identify athletes at increased risk of future injury after ACLR. However, these studies have focused on adult populations and it is unknown if similar RTS criteria apply to young, adolescent, pivoting/cutting athletes. The purpose of this study was to determine if meeting all current, standard RTS criteria would identify young athletes at risk for future ACL injury after primary ACLR and RTS. The tested hypothesis was the likelihood of 2 nd ACL injury in the first 2 years after RTS would be lower in patients who met all RTS criteria prior to initiation of pivoting and cutting activity compared to patients who failed to meet all RTS criteria prior to RTS. Methods: One hundred fifty-nine subjects (112 female, 47 male) with a mean age of 17.2±2.6 years old (range: 13-25 y.o.) underwent ACLR and were released to return to pivoting/cutting sport. These patients were enrolled in a prospective, observational cohort study, completed a RTS assessment and were then tracked for occurrence of 2 nd ACL after ACLR for 24 months. The RTS assessment included 6 tests: isometric quadriceps strength, 4 functional hop tests and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) patient reported outcome survey. Limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated for strength and hop test assessments [(involved/uninvolved)*100]. The IKDC was reported on a 0-100 scale with 100 representing a perfect score. Subjects were classified into groups that successfully passed all 6 RTS tests at a level of 90 and again at 95 compared to those that failed to meet all 6 criteria. Chi Square tests were used to determine if successfully passing all 6 RTS measures at various levels of symmetry resulted in a reduced risk of 2 nd ACL injury in the first 24 months after RTS. Results: Thirty-five (22.0%) patients suffered a 2 nd ACL injury, with 26 occurring in the first 12 months after RTS. At the time of RTS, 42 patients (26%) achieved LSI values of 90 or greater on all testing as well as an IKDC value of 90 or greater. The remaining 117 subjects (74%) scored below 90 on at least 1 of the 6 assessments. At this level, there was no difference in 2 nd ACL injury prevalence between patients who passed all RTS criteria (12/42; 28.6%) and those who failed at least 1 criteria (23/117; 19.7%) (p=0.23). When the passing criteria was elevated to 95 on all RTS testing, only 15 subjects (9%) successfully passed all 6 tests. There was no significant difference in 2 nd ACL injury prevalence between patients who passed all RTS criteria (5/15; 33%) and those who failed at least 1 test (30/144; 20.8%) (p=0.32). Sub-group analysis which evaluated the group by graft type, also indicated no significant differences between groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Current criteria to evaluate readiness to return young athletes to pivoting and cutting sports, using quadriceps strength symmetry, functional hop performance symmetry and patient reported outcomes, may not identify young, active patients at high risk for 2 nd ACL injury. Future work must identify more appropriate criteria to assess readiness to RTS in the young, athletic population and incorporate these findings into practice.

Context: An estimated 40 million school-aged children (age range = 5−18 years) participate annually in sports in the United States, generating approximately 4 million sport-related injuries and requiring 2.6 million emergency department visits at a cost of nearly $2 billion. Objective: To determine the effects of a school-based neuromuscular training (NMT) program on sport-related injury incidence across 3 sports at the high school and middle school levels, focusing particularly on knee and ankle injuries. Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Setting: A total of 5 middle schools and 4 high schools in a single-county public school district. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 474 girls (222 middle school, 252 high school; age = 14.0 ± 1.7 years, height = 161.0 ± 8.1 cm, mass = 55.4 ± 12.2 kg) were cluster randomized to an NMT (CORE; n = 259 athletes) or sham (SHAM; n = 215 athletes) intervention group by team within each sport (basketball, soccer, and volleyball). Intervention(s): The CORE intervention consisted of exercises focused on the trunk and lower extremity, whereas the SHAM protocol consisted of resisted running using elastic bands. Each intervention was implemented at the start of the season and continued until the last competition. An athletic trainer evaluated athletes weekly for sport-related injuries. The coach recorded each athlete-exposure (AE), which was defined as 1 athlete participating in 1 coach-directed session (game or practice). Main Outcome Measure(s): Injury rates were calculated overall, by sport, and by competition level. We also calculated rates of specific knee and ankle injuries. A mixed-model approach was used to account for multiple injuries per athlete. Results: Overall, the CORE group reported 107 injuries (rate = 5.34 injuries/1000 AEs), and the SHAM group reported 134 injuries (rate = 8.54 injuries/1000 AEs; F1,578 = 18.65, P &lt; .001). Basketball (rate = 4.99 injuries/1000 AEs) and volleyball (rate = 5.74 injuries/1000 AEs) athletes in the CORE group demonstrated lower injury incidences than basketball (rate = 7.72 injuries/1000 AEs) and volleyball (rate = 11.63 injuries/1000 AEs; F1,275 = 9.46, P = .002 and F1,149 = 11.36, P = .001, respectively) athletes in the SHAM group. The CORE intervention appeared to have a greater protective effect on knee injuries at the middle school level (knee-injury incidence rate = 4.16 injuries/1000 AEs) than the SHAM intervention (knee-injury incidence rate = 7.04 injuries/1000 AEs; F1,261 = 5.36, P = .02). We did not observe differences between groups for ankle injuries (F1,578 = 1.02, P = .31). Conclusions: Participation in an NMT intervention program resulted in a reduced injury incidence relative to participation in a SHAM intervention. This protective benefit of NMT was demonstrated at both the high school and middle school levels.

Background: Biomechanical predictors of a second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and return to sport (RTS) have been identified; however, these measures may not be feasible in a standard clinical environment. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether standard clinical measures predicted the risk of second ACL injuries. The hypothesis tested was that a combination of strength, function, and patient-reported measures at the time of RTS would predict the risk of second ACL injuries with high sensitivity and specificity. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3 and Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 163 participants (mean age, 16.7 ± 3.0 years) who underwent primary ACLR and were able to RTS were evaluated. All participants completed an assessment of isokinetic strength, hop testing, balance, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Participants were tracked for a minimum of 24 months to identify occurrences of a second ACL injury. The initial 120 participants enrolled were used to develop a clinical prediction model that utilized classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, and the remaining 43 participants enrolled were used as a validation dataset. Additional analyses were performed in all 163 participants using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Approximately 20% (23/114) of the initial subset of the cohort suffered a second ACL injury. CART analysis identified age, sex, knee-related confidence, and performance on the triple hop for distance at the time of RTS as the primary predictors of a second ACL injury. Using these variables, a model was generated from which high-risk (n = 53) and low-risk groups (n = 61) were identified. A total of 22 participants in the high-risk group and 1 participant in the low-risk group suffered a second ACL injury. High-risk participants fit 1 of 2 profiles: (1) age <19 years, triple hop for distance between 1.34 and 1.90 times body height, and triple hop for distance limb symmetry index (LSI) <98.5% (n = 43) or (2) age <19 years, triple hop for distance >1.34 times body height, triple hop for distance LSI >98.5%, female sex, and high knee-related confidence (n = 10). The validation step identified the high-risk group as being 5 times (odds ratio, 5.14 [95% CI, 1.00-26.46]) more likely to suffer a second ACL injury, with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 72.0%. Conclusion: These findings recognize measures that accurately identify young patients at high risk of sustaining a second ACL injury within 24 months after RTS. The development of a clinical decision algorithm to identify high-risk patients, inclusive of clinically feasible variables such as age, sex, confidence, and performance on the triple hop for distance, can serve as a foundation to re-evaluate appropriate discharge criteria for RTS.

Objectives: The incidence of second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and return to sport (RTS) in a young, active population is likely between 25-33% with the greatest risk in the first 12 months after RTS. Although the use of allograft tissue in young athletes has been reported to result in increased risk of graft failure, differences in graft and contralateral ACL injury risk between patients who receive a hamstrings (HS) autograft and bone-patellar tendon- bone (BTB) autograft has yet to be reported in a young, athletic population. The tested hypothesis was that the relative risk (RR) of ipsilateral graft failure would be higher in young, active patients who receive an ACLR with a hamstrings graft, while the RR of contralateral ACL injury would be higher in patients who receive and ACLR with a BTB autograft. Methods: One hundred thirty-nine subjects (99 female/40 male) with a mean age of 16.9±2.0 years old (range: 13-25 y/o) underwent ACLR with either a HS autograft (n=79) or a BTB autograft (n=60) and were released to return to pivoting/cutting sport. These patients were enrolled in a prospective, observational cohort study and were tracked for incidence of 2 nd ACL after ACLR for a median of 73 months. Thirty-four (24.5%) suffered a 2 nd ACL injury. Fisher’s exact tests were used to determine whether graft choice (HS vs. BTB) was associated with risk of either ipsilateral graft failure or contralateral ACL injury. Sub-group analyses by sex were also conducted. Results: Patients who underwent ACLR with HS graft (n=79) sustained 14 ipsilateral tears and 6 contralateral ACL injuries. Patients who received an ACLR with BTB (n=62) sustained 2 ipsilateral tears and 12 contralateral ACL injuries (Table 1). Patients who received an ACLR with HS graft were 6 times more likely (RR=6.2; 95% CI: 1.4-28.7) to suffer a graft failure after RTS than the BTB group. In the first 12 months after RTS, the HS graft patients were nearly 10 times (RR=9.5; 95% CI: 1.2-76.1) more likely to suffer an ipsilateral graft failure. Patients with a HS graft were 3 times less likely (RR=0.33; 95%CI: 0.12-0.935) to suffer a contralateral ACL injury and nearly 7 times less likely (RR=0.15, 95%CI: 0.031-0.709) to suffer a contralateral ACL injury in the first 12 months after RTS compared to the BTB group. When the cohort was divided by sex, females with HS grafts were significantly more likely to sustain a graft failure in the first 12 months after RTS (p=0.008) and by final follow-up (p=0.002) compared to females with BTB graft. Females with HS grafts were 3 times less likely (RR=0.30; 95%CI: 0.095-0.943) to suffer a contralateral ACL injury than females with BTB graft and 6 times less likely (RR=0.17; 95%CI: 0.034-0.846) to suffer contralateral ACL injury in the first year after RTS. Males demonstrated no significant difference in ipsilateral or contralateral injury risk based on graft type. Conclusion: Young, active females who return to pivoting and cutting sports after ACLR with HS autograft are at greater risk to suffer a graft failure and reduced risk to suffer a contralateral ACL injury compared to females who undergo ACLR with BTB graft tissue. No significant differences in 2 nd ACL injury risk based on graft type were observed in the male patients. [Table: see text]

Context: Fewer athletic injuries and lower anterior cruciate ligament injury incidence rates were noted in studies of neuromuscular-training (NMT) interventions that had high compliance rates. However, several groups have demonstrated that preventive NMT interventions were limited by low compliance rates. Objective: To descriptively analyze coach and athlete compliance with preventive NMT and compare the compliance between study arms as well as among school levels and sports. Design: Randomized, controlled clinical trial. Setting: Middle and high school athletic programs. Participants or Other Participants: A total of 52 teams, comprising 547 female athletes, were randomly assigned to the experimental or control group and followed for 1 athletic season. Intervention(s): The experimental group (n = 30 teams [301 athletes]: 12 basketball teams [125 athletes], 6 soccer teams [74 athletes], and 12 volleyball teams [102 athletes]) participated in an NMT program aimed at reducing traumatic knee injuries through a trunk-stabilization and hip-strengthening program. The control group (n = 22 teams [246 athletes]: 11 basketball teams [116 athletes], 5 soccer teams [68 athletes], and 6 volleyball teams [62 athletes]) performed a resistive rubber-band running program. Main Outcome Measure(s): Compliance with the assigned intervention protocols (3 times per week during the preseason [mean = 3.4 weeks] and 2 times per week in-season [mean = 11.9 weeks] of coaches [coach compliance] and athletes [athlete compliance]) was measured descriptively. Using an independent t test, we compared coach and athlete compliance between the study arms. A 2-way analysis of variance was calculated to compare differences between coach and athlete compliance by school level (middle and high schools) and sport (basketball, soccer, and volleyball). Results: The protocols were completed at a mean rate of 1.3 ± 1.1 times per week during the preseason and 1.2 ± 0.5 times per week in-season. A total of 88.4% of athletes completed 2/3 of the intervention sessions. Coach compliance was greater in the experimental group than in the control group (P = .014). Coach compliance did not differ by sport but was greater at the high school than the middle school (P = .001) level. Athlete compliance did not differ by study arm, sport, or school level. Conclusions: Athletes received instruction in about 50% of each protocol. Nearly 90% of athletes performed more than 2/3 of the assigned NMT interventions. The assigned intervention was performed more often in the experimental arm compared with the control arm. Coaches at the high school level complied with the given protocol more than middle school coaches did. Athletes complied well with the protocol, but coaches did not, especially at the middle school level.

Background: The incidence of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is high. Often, return-to-sport (RTS) tests of strength and functional hopping rely on limb symmetry indices (LSIs) to identify deficits, although the utility of these measures in athletes with bilateral ACL injuries is unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to investigate if LSIs used as RTS criteria in female patients after unilateral ACLR were appropriate for female patients with bilateral ACL involvement. The hypothesis tested was that asymmetries with traditional LSI measures would be present in a population after unilateral ACLR but would not be present in a population with bilateral ACLR due to the lack of a healthy internal control limb. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 45 female subjects were classified into 3 groups: after second (contralateral) ACLR (ACLR-B; n = 15); after primary unilateral ACLR (ACLR-U; n = 15); and uninjured controls (CTRL; n = 15). After being cleared for RTS, each subject completed a single-legged hop for distance (SLHD), triple hop for distance (THD), and triple-crossover hop for distance (CHD) test, in addition to an isometric quadriceps strength test on both limbs. Means and LSI ([ involved limb/ uninvolved limb] × 100) were calculated for each test. Limb symmetry deficits were defined by LSI <90%. Results: Analysis of functional hop testing revealed a side × group interaction for SLHD ( P = .001), THD ( P = .019), and CHD ( P = .04). Side-to-side differences were found in the ACLR-U group for all hop tests ( P = .001-.003) and in the ACLR-B group for SLHD ( P = .002) and THD tests ( P = .024). No side-to side differences were seen in the CTRL group ( P > .05). A side × group interaction was found for isometric quadriceps strength ( P = .006), with lower LSI seen in the ACLR-U group (81% ± 17.6%) compared with the CTRL group (102.2% ± 10.8%) and the ACLR-B group (95.6% ± 24.9%). Although no interaction was seen, side-to-side differences were noted in the THD in the ACLR-U group ( P = .013) and ACLR-B group ( P = .024) and in the CHD in the ACLR-U group ( P = .001). Despite absence of an LSI deficit, bilateral peak quadriceps strength in the ACLR-B group was comparable to the involved limb of the ACLR-U group and less than in the CTRL group ( P = .012). Conclusion: Both the ACLR-U and the ACLR-B groups demonstrated side-to-side deficits during functional hop tests; however, these deficits were not identified according to the clinically accepted LSI values of ≥90%, calling into question the efficacy of current RTS criteria. At the time of RTS, only individuals in the ACLR-U group demonstrated an altered LSI in quadriceps strength. Significantly lower quadriceps strength of both limbs in the ACLR-B group was seen compared with the CTRL group, despite no LSI deficits in quadriceps strength. Current use of LSIs during strength and performance tests may not be an appropriate means of identifying residual deficits in female patients after bilateral ACLR at time of RTS. Furthermore, a better indicator of strength performance in this population may need to include a comparison of strength performance values to the normative values of healthy controls.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are physically and financially devastating but affect a relatively small percentage of the population. Prospective identification of risk factors for ACL injury necessitates a large sample size; therefore, study of this injury would benefit from a multicenter approach. Purpose: To determine the reliability of kinematic and kinetic measures of a single-leg cross drop task across 3 institutions. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-five female high school volleyball players participated in this study. Three-dimensional motion data of each participant performing the single-leg cross drop were collected at 3 institutions over a period of 4 weeks. Coefficients of multiple correlation were calculated to assess the reliability of kinematic and kinetic measures during the landing phase of the movement. Results: Between-centers reliability for kinematic waveforms in the frontal and sagittal planes was good, but moderate in the transverse plane. Between-centers reliability for kinetic waveforms was good in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes. Conclusion: Based on these findings, the single-leg cross drop task has moderate to good reliability of kinematic and kinetic measures across institutions after implementation of a standardized testing protocol. Clinical Relevance: Multicenter collaborations can increase study numbers and generalize results, which is beneficial for studies of relatively rare phenomena, such as ACL injury. An important step is to determine the reliability of risk assessments across institutions before a multicenter collaboration can be initiated.