Heisterbach, Patricia E.

Background: The paratenon is important for Achilles tendon healing. There is much interest in the use of exogenous growth factors (GFs) as potential agents for accelerating the healing of damaged Achilles tendons. Purpose/Hypothesis: The present study used a rat model to study the responses of the injured Achilles tendon to GFs in the presence or absence of the paratenon. The hypothesis was that responses of the injured tendon to GFs would be lower in the absence of a paratenon. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A 4-mm defect was created in the right Achilles tendon of 60 skeletally mature rats, which were treated with a validated combination of GFs (bFGF, BMP-12, and TGF-β1). Animals were randomly assigned to the intact paratenon (IP) group or resected paratenon (RP) group. Healing was studied anatomically, mechanically, and histologically after 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Results: IP tendons showed improved healing compared with RP tendons. IP tendons were significantly stronger (32.2 N and 48.9 N, respectively) than RP tendons (20.1 N and 31.1 N, respectively) after 1 and 2 weeks. IP tendons did not elongate as much as RP tendons and had greater cross-sectional areas (18.0 mm 2 , 14.4 mm 2 , and 16.4 mm 2 , respectively) after 1, 2, and 4 weeks compared with RP tendons (10.5 mm 2 , 8.4 mm 2 , and 11.9 mm 2 , respectively). On histology, earlier collagen deposition and parallel orientation of fibrils were found for IP tendons. Conclusion: The paratenon is essential for efficient Achilles tendon healing. Healing with GFs in this Achilles tendon defect model was superior in the presence of the paratenon. Clinical Relevance: Biological approaches to tendon engineering using GFs are in vogue and have been shown to improve healing of the rat Achilles tendon, most likely by inducing progenitor cells located within the paratenon. Clinically, resection or incision of the paratenon has been proposed for wound closure. Our data demonstrate the fundamental importance of the paratenon, which therefore should be preserved during Achilles tendon repair, especially if augmented with products such as platelet-rich plasma or autologous conditioned serum that are rich in GFs.

Background: The role of the paratenon in tendon healing is unknown. The present study compares healing in the presence or absence of the paratenon in an Achilles tendon defect model in rats. Hypothesis: Resection of the paratenon impairs tendon healing. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Sixty skeletally mature Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to either a resected paratenon (RP) group or an intact paratenon (IP) group. In all animals, a 4-mm portion of the Achilles tendon was resected in the midsubstance. In the RP group, the paratenon was resected completely. In the IP group, the paratenon was opened longitudinally and closed again after the tendon defect had been created. One, 2, and 4 weeks after surgery, 7 animals per group were tested biomechanically and 3 animals per group examined histologically. Results: The recovery of mechanical strength was much more rapid in IP tendons. Tear resistance was significantly increased for IP tendons (41.3 ± 8.8 N and 47.3 ± 14.1 N, respectively) compared with RP tendons (19.3 ± 9.1 N and 33.2 ± 6.4 N, respectively) after 1 and 2 weeks. The cross-sectional area was larger in the IP group after 1 and 2 weeks (8.2 ± 2.3 mm 2 and 11.3 ± 3.1 mm 2 vs 5.0 ± 2.4 mm 2 and 5.9 ± 2.0 mm 2 , respectively) compared with the RP group. Tendon stiffness was greater in the IP group after 1 week (10.4 ± 1.9 N/mm vs 4.5 ± 1.6 N/mm, respectively) compared with the RP group. In comparison, normal contralateral tendons had a maximal tear resistance of 56.6 ± 7.2 N, a cross-sectional area of 3.6 ± 0.7 mm 2 , and stiffness of 17.3 ± 3.8 N/mm. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed slightly delayed healing of RP tendons. Early collagen formation was seen in the IP group already after 1 week, whereas in the RP group, this only occurred after 2 weeks. After 4 weeks, the IP tendons showed more collagen crimp formation than the RP tendons. Conclusion: An intact paratenon promotes healing of the Achilles tendon. Clinical Relevance: Although incision or resection of the paratenon has been advocated when repairing injured or degenerative tendons, our data suggest that the integrity of the paratenon should be preserved.

Background: Several sophisticated approaches to tendon engineering have been investigated as ways to improve tendon healing with the early formation of repair tissue with possibly a high amount of type I collagen. Besides the new formation of collagen type I, there is evidence for the natural integration of surrounding collagen type I from healthy tendon parts into the healing defect. However, the simple application of a type I collagen sponge to the healing site to increase the amount of local collagen type I has not been investigated. Hypothesis: Healing of the rat Achilles tendon can be accelerated by an additional supply of collagen type I, resulting in increased tear resistance. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The right Achilles tendons of 42 rats were transected. In half of the animals, a type I collagen sponge was placed into the gap. Animals were allowed to move freely in their cages to simulate early functional therapy. After 1, 2, and 4 weeks, tendon length, width, maximal load to failure, and stiffness were measured and the healing site studied histologically according to the Bonar score. Inflammation was evaluated by the appearance of macrophages and neutrophilic and eosinophilic granulocytes. Results: Defects receiving collagen sponges showed improved healing, with significantly stronger (29.5 vs 5.0 N, respectively, at 1 week; P = .00003), shorter (11.6 vs 14.5 mm, respectively, at 4 weeks; P = .005), thicker (10.0 vs 1.8 mm 2 , respectively, at 1 week; P = .00002), and less stiff (19.5 vs 30.5 N/mm, respectively, at 4 weeks; P = .02) tendons than control tendons. Overall, the biomechanical properties of the collagen-treated tendons appeared to be significantly closer to those of native, uninjured tendons compared with tendons in the control group. Histologically, no inflammatory reaction due to the collagen sponge was found. Conclusion: Tendon healing was accelerated by the type I collagen sponge. Moreover, the mechanical properties of collagen-treated tendons appeared to be significantly closer to those of normal, uninjured tendons compared with control tendons without collagen treatment. Clinical Relevance: As a simple type I collagen sponge seems to increase the amount of local collagen type I, the careful use of such sponges might be an option for tendon augmentation during Achilles tendon surgery.