Back to Authors

Weisdorf, Daniel J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8078-8579

Mayo Clinic

University of Minnesota

Citations 44

Risk factors for acute GVHD and survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation
Jagasia, Madan , Arora, Mukta , Urbano-Ispizúa, Álvaro , Pavletic, Steven Z. , Haagenson, Michael , Zhang, Mei-Jie , Antin, Joseph H. , Bolwell, Brian J., Bredeson, Christopher , Cahn, Jean‐Yves, Cairo, Mitchell S. , Gupta, Vikas , Lee, Stephanie J. , Litzow, Mark R. , Weisdorf, Daniel J. , Horowitz, Mary M. , Hahn, Theresa , Flowers, Mary E.D. , Chao, Nelson J. , McCarthy, Philip L. , Cutler, Corey S. , Gale, Robert Peter , Weisdorf, Dan , Gupta, Vikas , Lee, Stephanie J

Blood | October 19, 2011 | Volume: 119 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 296-307

10.1182/blood-2011-06-364265 Get It

Abstract Risk factors for acute GVHD (AGVHD), overall survival, and transplant-related mortality were evaluated in adults receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants (1999-2005) from HLA-identical sibling donors (SDs; n = 3191) or unrelated donors (URDs; n = 2370) and reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, MN. To understand the impact of transplant regimen on AGVHD risk, 6 treatment categories were evaluated: (1) myeloablative conditioning (MA) with total body irradiation (TBI) + PBSCs, (2) MA + TBI + BM, (3) MA + nonTBI + PBSCs, (4) MA + nonTBI + BM, (5) reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) + PBSCs, and (6) RIC + BM. The cumulative incidences of grades B-D AGVHD were 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37%-41%) in the SD cohort and 59% (95% CI, 57%-61%) in the URD cohort. Patients receiving SD transplants with MA + nonTBI + BM and RIC + PBSCs had significantly lower risks of grades B-D AGVHD than patients in other treatment categories. Those receiving URD transplants with MA + TBI + BM, MA + nonTBI + BM, RIC + BM, or RIC + PBSCs had lower risks of grades B-D AGVHD than those in other treatment categories. The 5-year probabilities of survival were 46% (95% CI, 44%-49%) with SD transplants and 33% (95% CI, 31%-35%) with URD transplants. Conditioning intensity, TBI and graft source have a combined effect on risk of AGVHD that must be considered in deciding on a treatment strategy for individual patients.
Allogeneic transplantation for therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia
Litzow, Mark R. , Tarima, Sergey , Pérez, Waleska S., Bolwell, Brian J., Cairo, Mitchell S. , Camitta, Bruce M., Luger, Selina M. , Marks, David I. , Pasquini, Marcelo C. , Phillips, Gordon L., Rizzo, J. Douglas , Sierra, Jorge , Tallman, Martin S. , Weisdorf, Daniel J. , Cutler, Corey S. , Lima, Marcos de , DiPersio, John F. , Gale, Robert Peter , Keating, Armand , Lazarus, Hillard M. , Maziarz, Richard Thomas , McCarthy, Philip L. , Weisdorf, Dan

Blood | December 24, 2009 | Volume: 115 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1850-1857

10.1182/blood-2009-10-249128 Get It

Abstract Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDSs) and acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) have a poor prognosis with conventional therapy. Encouraging results are reported after allogeneic transplantation. We analyzed outcomes in 868 persons with t-AML (n = 545) or t-MDS (n = 323) receiving allogeneic transplants from 1990 to 2004. A myeloablative regimen was used for conditioning in 77%. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) and relapse were 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38-44) and 27% (24-30) at 1 year and 48% (44-51) and 31% (28-34) at 5 years, respectively. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 32% (95% CI, 29-36) and 37% (34-41) at 1 year and 21% (18-24) and 22% (19-26) at 5 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, 4 risk factors had adverse impacts on DFS and OS: (1) age older than 35 years; (2) poor-risk cytogenetics; (3) t-AML not in remission or advanced t-MDS; and (4) donor other than an HLA-identical sibling or a partially or well-matched unrelated donor. Five-year survival for subjects with none, 1, 2, 3, or 4 of these risk factors was 50% (95% CI, 38-61), 26% (20-31), 21% (16-26), 10% (5-15), and 4% (0-16), respectively (P < .001). These data permit a more precise prediction of outcome and identify subjects most likely to benefit from allogeneic transplantation.
Impact of cytogenetics on outcome of matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission
Tallman, Martin S. , Dewald, Gordon W., Gandham, Sharavi, Logan, Brent R. , Litzow, Mark R. , Mehta, Jayesh, Pedersen, Tanya L., Pérez, Waleska S., Rowe, Jacob M. , Wetzler, Meir , Weisdorf, Daniel J. , Keating, Armand , Lazarus, Hillard M. , Weisdorf, Dan

Blood | March 21, 2007 | Volume: 110 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 409-417

10.1182/blood-2006-10-043299 Get It

We compared the treatment-related mortality, relapse rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) by cytogenetic risk group of 261 patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission (CR1) and 299 patients in CR2 in undergoing matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). For patients in first CR, the DFS and OS at 5 years were similar for the favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable risk groups at 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-56%) and 30% (22%-38%); 27% (19%-39%) and 29% (8%-56%); and 30% (95% CI, 22%-38%) and 30% (95% CI, 20%-41%), respectively. For patients in second CR, the DFS and OS at 5 years were 42% (95% CI, 33%-52%) and 35% (95% CI, 28%-43%); 38% (95% CI, 23%-54%) and 45% (95% CI, 35%-55%); and 37% (95% CI, 30%-45%) and 36% (95% CI, 21%-53%), respectively. Cytogenetics had little influence on the overall outcome for patients in first CR. In second CR, outcome was modestly, but not significantly, better for patients with favorable cytogenetics. The graft-versus-leukemia effect appeared effective, even in patients with unfavorable cytogenetics. However, treatment-related mortality was high. Matched unrelated donor HSCT should be considered for all patients with unfavorable cytogenetics who lack a suitable HLA-matched sibling donor.
Unrelated Donor Marrow Transplantation for B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia After Using Myeloablative Conditioning: Results From the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
Pavletic, Steven Z. , Khouri, Issa F. , Haagenson, Michael , King, Roberta, Bierman, Philip J., Bishop, Michael R. , Carston, Michael J., Molina, Arturo , Copelan, Edward A. , Ringdén, Olle , Ballen, Karen K. , Weisdorf, Daniel J. , Montserrat, Emili , Anasetti, Claudio , Bishop, Michael Russell , Giralt, Sergio , Roy, Vivek , Adkins, Douglas R. , McCarthy, Philip L. , Ringden, Olov , Weisdorf, Dan

Journal of Clinical Oncology | July 26, 2005 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 5788-5794

10.1200/jco.2005.03.962 Get It

Purpose To determine the role of myeloablative conditioning and unrelated donor (URD) bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of patients with advanced B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients and Methods A total of 38 CLL patients received a matched URD transplant using bone marrow procured by the National Marrow Donor Program. The median age was 45 years (range, 26 to 57 years), the median time from diagnosis was 51 months, and the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was three. Fifty-five percent of patients were chemotherapy refractory and 89% had received fludarabine. Conditioning included total-body irradiation in 92% of patients. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of methotrexate with cyclosporine or tacrolimus for 82% of patients. Results Twenty-one patients (58%) achieved complete response and six (17%) achieved partial response. Incidences of grades 2 to 4 acute GVHD were 45% at 100 days and incidences of chronic GVHD were 85% at 5 years. Eleven patients are alive and disease free at a median of 6 years (range, 3.0 to 9.0 years). Five-year overall survival, failure-free survival, disease progression rates, and treatment-related mortality (TRM) were 33%, 30%, 32%, and 38% respectively. Conclusion These data demonstrate that lasting remissions can be achieved after URD transplantation in patients with advanced CLL. High TRM suggest that myeloablative conditioning and HLA-mismatched donors should be avoided in future protocols, and it is mandatory to investigate transplant strategies with a lower morbidity and mortality, including the use of nonmyeloablative regimens.