Dyke, Daniel L. Van

Abstract Figure Figure In order to characterize the clinical course of patients (pts) with deletion 17p13.1 (17p-) CLL, we identified 100 consecutive treatment-naïve pts with 17p- from the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC, n=61) and Mayo Clinic (n=39) clinical databases. The diagnosis of 17p- was established by FISH with a median time from initial diagnosis to FISH documenting 17p- of 9 months. Median age was 64 yrs (60 for MDACC pts & 70 for Mayo pts) and Rai stage was 0, 1–2 and 3–4 in 34%, 49% and 17% pts respectively. 17p- was the sole FISH abnormality in 29%. Unmutated IgVH and ZAP-70 positivity were present in 30/62 and 54/84 patients respectively. <<<TIME TO FIRST THERAPY>>> 69 asymptomatic pts were followed until they developed progressive disease requiring therapy as defined by the NCIWG 96 criteria. The 2 year actuarial risk of progression to initiation of therapy was 43% (46% for MDACC pts & 36% for Mayo pts). Only 2 of 10 pts with stable disease >2 years progressed on prolonged follow-up of up to 54 months. Two pts with baseline 17p- in 10% and 13% of nuclei lost their 17p- clone after 23 and 41 months. Independent predictors of shorter time to treatment were Rai stage > 0 (hazard ratio 7.2) and unmutated IgVH (HR 5.3). Pts with 0, 1 or 2 of these factors had a 2 year progression rate of 0%, 48% and >75% respectively (p<0.01). Other prognostic parameters such as ZAP-70 and CD38 did not have independent prognostic utility. <<<RESPONSE TO THERAPY>>> 41 pts from MDACC were assessable for response to first therapy. Overall (OR) and complete response (CR) rates were: rituximab without chemotherapy (n=6), OR 67% CR 17%; purine analogue + rituximab combinations (n=20), OR 75% CR 30%; purine analogue, rituximab + alemtuzumab combinations (n=13), OR 85% CR 54%. The pt who achieved CR after rituximab was negative for minimal residual disease assessed by flow cytometry and consensus primer IgH PCR, and has remained in remission at 29 months. At 2 years, 75% of complete responders remained relapse free. <<<SURVIVAL FROM 17P- DIAGNOSIS>>> Two year survival was 78%. Independent predictors of inferior survival were age 60+ (HR 3.4), B-symptoms (HR 3.7) and 17p- in nuclei 70+% (HR 6.0). Considering age 60+ and 17p- in nuclei 70+% in a prognostic model, 2 year survival was 100%, 82% and 55% for pts with 0, 1 and 2 risk factors respectively. Other prognostic parameters such as ZAP-70, IgVH mutation status and CD38 did not have independent prognostic utility. <<<CONCLUSIONS>>> Pts with de novo 17p- CLL exhibit marked clinical heterogeneity, with some pts experiencing an indolent course with prolonged survival. Survival and time to treatment among patients with 17p- can be predicted using clinical and biological characteristics.

Abstract Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes and analysis methods for B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) vary extensively among cytogenetic laboratories. This is not unexpected, as neither national nor international standards have been established for most FISH studies. Lack of standardization is problematic when data collected at multiple institutions are used for clinical correlative studies. To circumvent such problems, the five participating laboratories in the CLL Research Consortium (CRC) designed and executed a joint CLL FISH validation study. Methods: Initially a survey was sent to assess equipment, methods and experience with FISH for CLL. In a pilot study to compare laboratory performance in scoring patient samples, slides from ten patients were prepared and sent to each participating lab to be hybridized with five probe sets (= 50 hybridizations) and analyzed according to their local protocol. In a second pilot study, slides from two patient samples and identical probe sets were sent to the participating labs where hybridization and analysis were carried out according to their local protocol. Next, technologists and directors from all participating labs attended a workshop where technologists working in pairs scored nuclei together, techniques and scoring criteria were established, and consensus reached on other concerns. In a proficiency test nine months after the workshop, slides from two patient samples (10 hybridizations) were hybridized and scored according to each lab’s protocol and results shared using a common reporting form. Results: Survey results indicated that four labs used the same commercially available CLL FISH panel, and one used a combination of probes from the same vendor plus several home-brew probes. Each lab scored between 100 and 200 nuclei per hybridization site, and each independently set normal cutoff values. The FISH panel included probes to detect 11q, 13q, and 17p deletions, trisomy 12, and IGH gene rearrangement. One lab included probes to detect 6q deletion. In the first pilot study each lab used their hybridization methods, probe sets, and scoring criteria. Differences among labs were observed due to variations in probe strategy, reporting of anomalies, and perhaps most important, scoring criteria. Probe strategy differences resulted in variable reporting of 11q- vs monosomy 11 and 12q duplication vs trisomy 12. Some participants reported 13q-x1 and 13q-x2 as subclones and some reported only 13q-. One lab reported an IGH rearrangement whereas the others scored IGH as normal. In the second pilot study each lab used the same methods and probe sets to facilitate comparison of scoring by the technologists. All labs correctly identified the abnormalities, and there were no false positive results. Minor scoring differences were attributed to variation in scoring criteria or inexperience with an unfamiliar FISH probe strategy. The proficiency test that followed the workshop demonstrated 100% concordance in identification of abnormalities. Inter-lab scoring was much improved compared to the first pilot study. The only exceptions were a 13q- range of 72–90% in one case, and a 17p- range of 38–67% in another case. Conclusion: The pilot studies identified a need to develop common scoring criteria. The subsequent workshop and proficiency test demonstrated that the collaborative effort resulted in more standardized scoring among the CRC laboratories. Our collaborative study emphasizes the need to establish rigorous standards and guidelines for FISH procedures and scoring criteria. Standardization of FISH methods among participating laboratories will enhance the confidence in FISH studies for both clinical applications and cooperative intergroup clinical research.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Karyotype analysis of metaphase cells for discovering genome-wide cytogenetic abnormalities has played an important role in prognosis and counseling of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Due to the low proliferative rate of CLL B cells, karyotype analysis has been of limited clinical utility in this disease. Thus, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on interphase cells has replaced karyotype analysis for the assessment of recurrent genetic changes in CLL. Recently, immunostimulatory CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG) have been shown to induce primary CLL B cell proliferation via engagement of toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), thereby rendering karyotype analysis feasible and providing for a useful and reliable method to discover new cytogenetic abnormalities in CLL B cells. However, we and others have shown that CpG stimulation of CLL and normal B cells also induces robust expression of activation induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a mutagenic enzyme that is linked to the development of cytogenetic abnormalities. It is therefore plausible that cytogenetic abnormalities observed following CpG stimulation of CLL B cells may not reflect de novo abnormalities but rather reflect CpG induced-AID mediated cytogenetic alterations. We began to address this possibility by assessing the effects of CpG stimulation on the karyotypes of normal blood B cells. HYPOTHESIS: Since CpG stimulation induces AID expression in CLL and normal B cells, we hypothesize that: robust B cell activation by CpG could result in cytogenetic abnormalities thereby contributing to lymphomagenesis; and if CpG induces cytogenetic abnormalities that are linked to disease initiation and/or progression, such information would be of great value in the interpretation of cytogenetic data obtained from CpG-stimulated CLL B cells. METHODS: We performed interphase FISH analysis on freshly isolated blood B cells, and metaphase karyotype analysis on CpG stimulated B cells from 17 healthy blood donors. Pure (>98%) B cells obtained by negative selection, were hybridized at isolation with a probe set to identify deletion 6q, 11q, 13q, and 17p, trisomy 12, and IGH gene rearrangements, and cells were also stimulated for 5 days with 10 μg/ml CpG (CpG 2006, synthesized in-house) plus IL-2 and IL-15 for metaphase analysis. At least 20 post-CpG metaphase spreads were analyzed for each sample and abnormalities were considered clonal using the accepted convention (gains or translocations are present in two or more cells and loss present in at least 3 cells). The expression of AID in the B cells pre- and post-CpG stimulation was assessed by RT-PCR. RESULTS: FISH analysis of freshly isolated B cells showed that all 17 subjects were normal. After CpG stimulation, all samples examined exhibited strong AID expression as revealed by RT-PCR. By karyotype analysis, none of the 17 CpG stimulated samples showed evidence of clonal abnormalities. However, one or more nonclonal chromosomal abnormalities were observed in 7 out of 17 (41.2%) samples. Among those 7 samples, 4 samples had 1 abnormal metaphase out of a minimum of 20 examined while the other 3 samples exhibited two or more cells, each with distinct abnormalities. Some of those nonclonal abnormalities have also been observed in CLL (i.e., trisomy 3, trisomy 12 and 14q32 rearrangements). This is a much higher incidence of nonclonal abnormalities than has been seen with peripheral blood cells cultured by other methods. CONCLUSION: Our data have significance for the biology of CLL and for clinical practice. First, our data suggest that signaling through TLR9, and perhaps other receptors that likewise induce robust B cell AID expression, may represent a natural mechanism by which B lineage cells acquire chromosomal abnormalities during normal immune responses that may predispose toward neoplastic transformation. Second, given that none of the CpG-induced metaphases in normal B cells resulted in clonal abnormalities in the 5 day timeframe, our data also validate the clinical utility of CpG as a valuable tool for the cytogenetic analysis of CLL B cells since only clonal abnormalities are currently scored. However, it remains possible that non-clonal abnormalities seen in CpG-stimulated CLL B cells may be relevant to the disease process if future work shows that CpG stimulation uncovers recurring non-clonal defects of chromosomes/genes associated with tumorigenic events.

Abstract Figure Figure Background: An isolated 13q deletion in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the single most common cytogenetic abnormality and is a favorable prognostic parameter (Dohner et al., NEJM3432:1910, 2000). Although 13q- can occur as either a heterozygous (13q-x1) or homozygous (13q-x2) deletion, it is unknown whether these two genetic types differ in their impact on clinical outcome. We previously postulated that 13q-x2 may be a more aggressive anomaly than 13q-x1 (Dewald et al., BJH121:287, 2003) and have undertaken a long-term clinical follow-up of patients with an isolated FISH detectable 13q- to test this hypothesis. Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with CLL between October 1992 to May 2008 and who had 13q deletion as their sole FISH abnormality. FISH was performed within 2 years of diagnosis and prior to treatment in all patients. Patients were sorted into three groups: 13q-x1 only, 13q-x2 only, or mosaic with both 13q-x1 and 13q-x2 cells. We assessed differences in percentage of abnormal cells, demographic characteristics, and clinical outcome among the three groups. Results: We identified 259 patients with isolated 13q deletion. Age ranged from 38 to 90 years (median=61) and included 99 women and 160 men. With respect to Rai stage, 142 patients (60%) had low risk [Rai 0], 81 (34%) intermediate risk [Rai I-II], and 13 (6%) high risk [Rai III-IV] disease. After a median follow-up of 1.9 years, 40 patients (15%) have been treated and 17 (7%) have died. Median TFS and OS for all patients were 6.9 and 9.3 years, respectively. The mean percentage of abnormal nuclei in the three groups was 44%, 53%, and 47% for 13q-x1 only, mosaic 13q-x1/13q-x2, or 13q-x2 only, respectively (p=0.22). No significant difference in age or gender was observed based on whether 13q- occurred as a heterozygous or homozygous deletion, or was mosaic. Likewise, no significant difference in survival (p=0.313, see Table) or time to treatment (p=0.53) was found among the three groups. Five year OS rates for the 13q- x1 only, 13q- x2 only, and mosaic 13q- x1/13q- x2 are 85%, 95%, and 83%, respectively Median time to treatment for 13q-x1 was not reached, and for the mosaic13q-x1/13q-x2 and 13q-x2 groups median time to treatment was 6.9 and 4.9 years, respectively. Conclusions: The presence of deletion in one versus two 13q- chromosomes in CLL patients appears to have no significant impact on treatment free or overall survival. This observation supports the grouping of CLL patients with isolated 13q- of one or both alleles into a single risk category as originally proposed in the risk categorization by Dohner et al. Taking the present findings together with those of Dohner et al and Dewald et al, we propose a hierarchical risk model of FISH abnormalities in CLL as 17p- à 11q- à 6q- à +12 à normal à 13q-, from most to least aggressive. The 13q- group would now include 13q-x1, 13q-x2, and the mosaic subgroups.

Abstract Background: Peripheral blood (PB) is sometimes used in place of bone marrow (BM) for cytogenetic studies in either primary (PMF) or post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia (post-PV/ET MF) myelofibrosis. In a retrospective study, we examined overall yield from PB cytogenetic studies in MF and where possible compared the results with those obtained by BM cytogenetic analysis. Methods: Standard laboratory techniques were used to perform cytogenetic studies in both the PB and BM. A successful study constituted the acquisition of at least two analyzable metaphases and an abnormal clone required the presence of a specific cytogenetic abnormality in at least two metaphases. Clinical and laboratory correlations were made using variables collected at the time of cytogenetic studies. Results I: A total of 242 PB cytogenetic studies were reviewed to identify 59 MF cases; 39 were PMF and 20 post-PV/ET MF. Median age was 60 years (range 36–77) and 37 were male patients. The median duration of the disease at the time of PB cytogenetic studies was 3.5 years (range 0.2–35). At least two analyzable metaphases (median 20, range 2–31) were obtained in 49 (81%) of the 59 study patients; in univariate analysis, this was predicted by presence and degree of circulating myeloid progenitor cells (p < 0.0001), higher PB CD34 count (p < 0.0001), higher leukocyte count (p = 0.0008), and absence of myeloid growth factor therapy (p = 0.005). In multivariable analysis, only the presence of circulating myeloid progenitor cells sustained its significance. Results II: Twenty two cases had concomitant PB and BM cytogenetic studies performed. Of these, 9 patients had abnormal BM cytogenetic findings; the concomitant PB cytogenetic studies were also abnormal in 5 (56%) patients but normal in the other 4. Conversely, PB cytogenetic studies were abnormal in 12 patients; the concomitant BM cytogenetic studies were abnormal in 5 (41%) and normal in the remaining 7. PB cytogenetic studies were not successful in 4 of the 22 total cases; BM studies were successful in 3 of these 4 cases and the results were normal in all. Conclusion: In the presence of circulating myeloid progenitor cells, PB can be considered as an alternative to BM for cytogenetic studies in MF patients, especially in view of the difficulty getting BM aspirates in this disease. However, considering the prognostic value of specific cytogenetic abnormalities in MF, the non-trivial discordance between the BM and PB cytogenetic findings, observed in the current study, warrants a prospective evaluation for further clarification.

7055 Introduction: Cytogenetic abnormalities have been shown to be the most important determinant of prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In AML, trisomy 13 has been placed in the intermediate prognostic category although recent reports associate it with a more dismal outcome. The number of cases reported in the literature are relatively few, we reviewed our experience with trisomy 13 in hematologic malignancies to determine its significance and prognosis. Methods: We conducted a clinicopathological review of cases seen in our institution from January of 1990 to October of 2006. Our cytogenetic records were searched for patients, who had a hematological disorder whose non-stimulated bone marrow karyotype was found to have trisomy 13 as a sole abnormality. In men the absence of the Y chromosome was not regarded as a separate abnormality. Results: A total of 27 patients were identified. The median age was 76 years (range 25–87), 22/27 were male. The number of cases and diseases identified were 15 with AML, 5 with a myelodysplastic syndrome, 4 with an uncategorized myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disorder, 2 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 1 with a chronic myeloproliferative disorder. Of the AML group 7 were M0 according to the FAB classification, 2 patients were identified to have M4 and another two M2. A single case each of M1 and M6 was also identified. In these 15 patients, 9 underwent induction chemotherapy, which consisted of intermediate dose Ara-C in 3 cases, anthracycline plus Ara-C in 5 patients, and daunorubicin, vincristine and prednisone in 1. Another 3 patients were given palliative treatment. For the rest of the subjects the type of treatment was unknown. A CR was obtained in 6 patients, 1 patient underwent a myeloablative stem cell transplant. Death has occurred in 24 patients, the median survival of the entire group was 5.4 months. In the patients with AML the median survival was 4.7 months, of the patients who achieved a CR the median survival was 9.5 months. Conclusions: We describe one of the largest series reported to date of trisomy 13 in hematologic malignancies and found that trisomy 13 is associated with male gender and an older age at presentation, as well as a poor prognosis. In AML its presence is associated with an FAB-M0 phenotype and its occurrence should be regarded as a high-risk feature. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

INTRODUCTION Mutations in BTK and PLCG2 have been reported to occur in ~80% of CLL patients (pts) who have progression of disease on ibrutinib therapy (Woyach, JCO 2017; Ahn, Blood 2017). These mutations are described as appearing months before actual relapse and thus considered as a potential predictive biomarker for future relapse (Quinquenel, Blood 2019). However, the outcomes of these pts after disease progression are not well described. In this study, we seek to investigate time to next therapy and overall survival (OS) following progression among CLL pts on ibrutinib therapy with and without these resistance mutations. METHODS Between 10/2012 and 6/2019, we identified 34 pts in the Mayo Clinic clinical CLL resource who progressed while receiving ibrutinib therapy and also had testing for BTK and PLCG2 mutation performed as part of routine clinical practice at either NeoGenomics Laboratories or The Ohio State University. OS was calculated from time of ibrutinib progression to last known alive or death date; OS was plotted using Kaplan Meier methods and was compared using the log-rank test between various groups (e.g., mutation positive vs negative; CLL progression vs Richter's). Cumulative incidence of time to next treatment in those who had a treatment after progression was adjusted for the competing risk of death. RESULTS Of 34 pts who progressed while receiving ibrutinib, 26 pts experienced CLL progression and 8 pts had Richter's transformation; baseline characteristics in Table 1A. The presence of a BTK or PLCG2 mutation was found in 20/34 (59%) pts (specific mutations in Table 1B). BTK mutation alone was present in 9 pts, 7 pts had PLCG2 mutation alone, and 4 pts had both mutations. Median time between a positive test and start of next therapy was 4 months (range 1-19 months) and did not vary between BTK vs PLCG2 mutations. Among the 26 pts with CLL progression, 18 (69%) pts had a mutation present: BTK alone (n=8), PLCG2 alone (n=6), both (n=4). Therapy following progression on ibrutinib in these pts was as follows: venetoclax (n=16; 11 pts who continued ibrutinib in combination), idelalisib (n=4), investigational treatments (n=2), continued ibrutinib alone (n=2), dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab; n=1), and unknown (n=1). Twelve of the 26 pts with CLL progression on ibrutinib, including 8 pts with a prior resistance mutation detected, had subsequent progression of disease on the aforementioned next line therapy. Treatment of these patients consisted of the following: restarted ibrutinib in addition to current treatment of venetoclax (n=5), venetoclax (n=2), pembrolizumab (n=2; 1 pt with continued ibrutinib), obinutuzumab with continued ibrutinib (n=1), gemcitabine and vinorelbine with continued ibrutinib (n=1), and no further treatment (n=1). Among the 8 pts with Richter's transformation as the initial progression event on ibrutinib after mutation testing, 1 pt had a BTK mutation and 1 pt had a PLCG2 mutation. Treatments following progression on ibrutinib included multi-agent chemoimmunotherapy (n=3; 2 pts received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone [R-CHOP] with continued ibrutinib and 1 pt received doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine [ABVD] alone), pembrolizumab (n=3; 1 pt in combination with continued ibrutinib), venetoclax in combination with continued ibrutinib (n=1), and venetoclax and obinutuzumab (n=1). The median time to next treatment (second line of treatment beyond ibrutinib) for the 31 pts who started another therapy following progression on ibrutinib was 16.7 months (95% CI 9.6-NE; Figure 1A) and was not significantly different for pts with or without a resistance mutation (p=0.57). Median OS for all 26 pts with CLL progression was 28.7 month and there was no difference according to presence or absence of a resistance mutation (median 28.7 months vs 18.2 months, p=0.53; Figure 1B). The 8 pts with Richter's transformation had a median OS of 7.1 months (95% CI 2.0-NE). CONCLUSION Approximately 60% of pts tested in this progression cohort had a BTK or PLCG2 mutation at time of or preceding progression on ibrutinib therapy. OS and time to next therapy did not differ statistically between pts with mutated vs non-mutated clones; however, caution should be applied with the conclusions given the limited sample size. Disclosures Ding: DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding. Kay:MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Other: DSMB. Parikh:Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding.

Background: The 2008 International Working Group for CLL (IWCLL) criteria define MBL as a clonal B-cell disorder with a peripheral blood B-cell count of <5 x 109/L, in the absence of cytopenias(s), lymphadenopathy and/or organomegaly on physical examination, and no other concomitant lymphoproliferative disorder. In the presence of palpable lymphadenopathy and/or organomegaly, and a B-cell count of < 5 x 109/L, a diagnosis of small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) is established. A study by Gentile et al (Am J Hematol. 2013) reported that 29 out of 62 individuals with clinically identified MBL (42%) had lymphadenopathy identified on CT imaging. Notably, however, after a median follow-up of 35 months, the rate of progression among cases of MBL with lymphadenopathy identified on CT imaging was only 6.9% (2/29 patients), which was no different than in cases of MBL without lymphadenopathy on CT imaging (rate of progression, 9%; 3/33 patients). Our study sought to 1) determine if lymphadenopathy and/or organomegaly detected by imaging studies performed for unrelated reasons in individuals with MBL can identify a subset with shorter time to first CLL therapy (TFT) and overall survival (OS); and 2) compare outcomes of individuals with MBL who have incidentally detected lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly and SLL patients. Methods: We used the Mayo Clinic CLL Database to identify individuals with high-count MBL (absolute B-cell count: 0.5 - 4.9 x 109/L) and divided them into the following three cohorts: a) Cohort A: no imaging studies available at MBL diagnosis; b) Cohort B: imaging studies done within one year of MBL with no evidence of lymphadenopathy and/or organomegaly; and c) Cohort C: imaging studies done within one year of MBL with lymphadenopathy and/or organomegaly, attributable to MBL. All individuals with MBL were first seen at Mayo Clinic after 1/1/2002; those with a concomitant lymphoproliferative disorder within 3 months of diagnosis were excluded. Patients with SLL seen during the same time interval were identified as a comparison cohort. We compared the baseline characteristics (Kruskal Wallis for continuous and Chi-square for categorical variables) and TFT and OS across the three MBL cohorts, and patients with SLL. Cumulative incidence of TFT was adjusted for the competing risk of death. Age- and sex-adjusted OS was analyzed using inverse weights methods. Results: 657 individuals with high-count MBL with a median follow-up of 6.7 years were identified: 415 (63%) individuals were in Cohort A, 142 (22%) in Cohort B, and 100 in (15%) Cohort C. Compared to Cohort B, individuals in Cohort C were more likely to have unmutated IGHV, high expression of CD38, and higher beta-2 microglobulin level (Table 1). SLL patients were younger, had higher rate of unmutated IGHV, and had high expression of CD49d compared to MBL individuals in Cohort C (Table 1). There was suggestive evidence of a difference in TFT between Cohorts B and C (estimated 10-year treatment rate 28.3% vs. 41.6%; p=0.16; HR 1.62 95% CI 0.84-3.15). TFT was significantly shorter in SLL patients compared to those with Cohort C (estimated 10-year treatment rate 71% vs. 41.6%, respectively, P<0.001; Figure 1A). There was a trend toward shorter OS in Cohort C compared to Cohort B (estimated 10-year OS rate 53.7% vs. 64.2%, respectively, P=0.09; Figure 1B). In contrast, there was no difference in OS among MBL individuals in Cohort C compared to those with SLL (estimated 10-year OS rate 56.9% vs. 62.6%, P=0.72). Summary/Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that individuals with MBL who have incidentally identified lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly at diagnosis are more likely to have an unfavorable risk profile, shorter TFT and OS compared to patients who did not have lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly at MBL diagnosis. Additionally, these individuals have a longer TFT but similar OS compared to SLL patients seen during the same time interval. If externally validated, these findings have significant implications for individuals with newly diagnosed MBL. Disclosures Ding: Merck: Research Funding; DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding. Kay:MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Other: DSMB. Parikh:AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding.