Back to Authors

Besser, Lilah M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-0877

Mayo Clinic

University of Washington

Citations 3

Version 3 of the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center’s Uniform Data Set
Besser, Lilah M. , Kukull, Walter A. , Chui, Helena C., Galasko, Douglas, Weıntraub, Sandra , Jicha, Gregory A. , Carlsson, Cynthia M., Burns, Jeffrey M. , Rascovsky, Katya, Teylan, Merilee, Beekly, Duane, Bollenbeck, Mark, Monsell, Sarah E. , Zhou, Xiao‐Hua , Thomas, Nicole M. , Robichaud, Elizabeth, Dean, Margaret, Hubbard, Janene L., Jacka, Mary, Schwabe‐Fry, Kristen, Wu, Joylee, Phelps, Creighton H., Morris, John C. , Carlsson, Cynthia M. , Morris, John C , Knopman, David S. , Chui, Helena C. , Quinn, Joseph F. , Sweet, Robert A. , Thomas, George E. C. , Mock, Charles , Jicha, Gregory A

Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders | October 30, 2018 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 351-358

10.1097/wad.0000000000000279 Get It

Introduction: In 2015, the US Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADC) implemented Version 3 of the Uniform Data Set (UDS). This paper describes the history of Version 3 development and the UDS data that are freely available to researchers. Methods: UDS Version 3 was developed after years of coordination between the National Institute on Aging-appointed Clinical Task Force (CTF), clinicians from ∼30 ADCs, and the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC). The CTF recognized the need for updates to align with the state of the science in dementia research, while being flexible to the diverse needs and diseases studied at the ADCs. Version 3 also developed a nonproprietary neuropsychological battery. Results: This paper focuses on the substantial Version 3 changes to the UDS forms related to clinical diagnosis and characterization of clinical symptoms to match updated consensus-based diagnostic criteria. Between March 2015 and March 2018, 4820 participants were enrolled using UDS Version 3. Longitudinal data were available for 25,337 of the 37,568 total participants using all UDS versions. Discussion: The results from utilization of the UDS highlight the possibility for numerous research institutions to successfully collaborate, produce, and use standardized data collection instruments for over a decade.
P1‐337: African American Brain Autopsies from The National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center
Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Besser, Lilah M. , Crook, Julia E. , Kukull, Walter A. , Dickson, Dennis W.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | October 17, 2016 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 7S_Part_11 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1088 Get It

Neuropathologic differences by race from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center
Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Besser, Lilah M. , Kukull, Walter A. , Crook, Julia E. , Dickson, Dennis W.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | April 18, 2016 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 669-677

10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.004 Get It

AbstractIntroductionCompared to Caucasians, African Americans (AAs) have higher dementia prevalence, different genetic markers, and higher vascular risk factors. However, pathologic underpinnings are unknown.MethodsWe used neuropathologic and clinical data on 110 AA and 2500 Caucasians who were demented before death. The groups were compared regarding demographics, cognition, apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype, comorbidities, and clinical and neuropathologic characteristics.ResultsAA and Caucasians differed in their demographics, cognition at the last visit before death, APOE genotype, presence of hypertension, primary clinical diagnoses, and AD, cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and other neuropathologies such as Lewy body disease (LBD).DiscussionAD, LBD, and CVD pathology were more common and TDP and frontotemporal lobar degeneration–tau less common in AA than in Caucasians. APOE accounted for most of the AD neuropathologic differences. If replicated, the observed differences in underlying neuropathology by race will be important for public health policy and recruitment for and interpreting of clinical trials.