Gallup, Dianne

Introduction: Despite the use of different definitions for worsening heart failure (WHF) in prior clinical trials and registries, an in-hospital WHF event has consistently been associated with worse patient outcomes. WHF is being considered as a potential endpoint to support drug approval. We combined patients from two acute HF trials conducted by the HF Network (ROSE-AHF and DOSE-AHF) to understand how different WHF definitions are associated with event rates. Methods: WHF was defined as persistent or worsening HF requiring rescue therapy including IV vasoactive agents, ultrafiltration, or mechanical support over 72 hours after randomization in ROSE and also included additional open label loop or thiazide diuretic in DOSE. We assessed the relationship between WHF and the composite endpoint (CE) of re-hospitalization, emergency room visits for HF and mortality through 60 days. We also assessed for a differential relationship of WHF from 0-24 hours, 24-48 hours and 48-72 hours post-randomization. Results: The overall incidence of WHF was 14.6% (24.1% in DOSE and 6.3% in ROSE). Patients who developed WHF had lower baseline systolic blood pressure, less peripheral edema and higher BUN. In the combined dataset, WHF was associated with an increase in the CE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.42; p-value 0.01). However, the association between WHF and 60-day outcomes was significant in ROSE but not in DOSE (Table). The development of WHF between 48-72 hours compared with 0-24 hours or 24-48 hours was associated with improved outcomes ([HR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.27 - 0.88, p-value 0.02 and [HR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.26 - 0.78, p-value 0.004, respectively). Conclusions: A WHF definition that incorporated intensification of diuretics increased the event rate but was not associated with worse 60-day outcomes. The timing of a WHF event also had a differential association with outcomes. These data support the use of a standardized WHF definition in clinical trials.

Background— In-hospital worsening heart failure (WHF) is an important event that has inconsistent definitions used across trials. We used data from 2 acute heart failure (HF) trials from the National Institutes of Health HF Network, DOSE (Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation) and ROSE (Renal Optimization Strategies), to understand event rates associated with different WHF definitions. Methods and Results— We pooled data from 668 patients in DOSE and ROSE and assessed the relationship between WHF and the composite end point of rehospitalization, emergency room visits for HF, and mortality through 60 days. We also assessed for a differential relationship between the timing of WHF development and outcomes. The overall incidence of WHF was 14.6% (24.1% in DOSE, 6.3% in ROSE, and 5.0% in DOSE using the ROSE definition). WHF was associated with an increase in the composite end point (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–2.42; P =0.01). However, the association between WHF and outcomes was significantly stronger in ROSE than in DOSE (HR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.45–4.91; P <0.01 and HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.79–2.08; P =0.31, respectively). Development of WHF between baseline to 24 hours compared with 24 to 48 hours or 48 to 72 hours demonstrated a trend toward improved outcomes (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21–1.17; P =0.11 and HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20–1.04; P =0.06, respectively). Conclusions— A WHF definition that excluded the intensification of diuretics resulted in a lower event rate but a stronger association with outcomes. These data support the need for continued efforts to standardize WHF definitions in clinical trials. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT00577135 (DOSE) and NCT01132846 (ROSE).

Background— Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction (RVD) is a poor prognostic factor in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The physiological perturbations associated with RVD or RV function indexed to load (RV–pulmonary arterial [PA] coupling) in HFpEF have not been defined. HFpEF patients with marked impairment in RV–PA coupling may be uniquely sensitive to sildenafil. Methods and Results— In a subset of HFpEF patients enrolled in the Phosphodiesteas-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status And Exercise Capacity in Diastolic Heart Failure (RELAX) trial, physiological variables and therapeutic effect of sildenafil were examined relative to the severity of RVD (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE]) and according to impairment in RV–PA coupling (TAPSE/pulmonary artery systolic pressure) ratio. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation and diuretic use, n-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide levels, renal dysfunction, neurohumoral activation, myocardial necrosis and fibrosis biomarkers, and the severity of diastolic dysfunction all increased with severity of RVD. Peak oxygen consumption decreased and ventilatory inefficiency (VE/VCO 2 slope) increased with increasing severity of RVD. Many but not all physiological derangements were more closely associated with the TAPSE/pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratio. Compared with placebo, at 24 weeks, TAPSE decreased, and peak oxygen consumption and VE/CO 2 slope were unchanged with sildenafil. There was no interaction between RV–PA coupling and treatment effect, and sildenafil did not improve TAPSE, peak oxygen consumption, or VE/VCO 2 in patients with pulmonary hypertension and RVD. Conclusions— HFpEF patients with RVD and impaired RV–PA coupling have more advanced heart failure. In RELAX patients with RVD and impaired RV–PA coupling, sildenafil did not improve RV function, exercise capacity, or ventilatory efficiency. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00763867.