Back to Authors

Freytes, Cesar

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center

Citations 1

Allogeneic transplantation provides durable remission in a subset of DLBCL patients relapsing after autologous transplantation
Fenske, Timothy S. , Ahn, Kwang Woo , Graff, Tara M., Digilio, Alessandro, Kamble, Rammurti T., Ayala, Ernesto , Brammer, Jonathan E. , Cairo, Mitchell S. , Chen, Andy , Chen, Yi‐Bin, D’Souza, Anita , Farooq, Umar , Freytes, Cesar, Ganguly, Siddhartha , Inwards, David J. , Kharfan‐Dabaja, Mohamed A. , Nathan, Sunita , Pawarode, Attaphol , Reddy, Nishitha , Seo, Sachiko , Sureda, Anna , Smith, Sonali M. , Inwards, David, Bashir, Qaiser , Bacher, Ulrike , Chen, Yi‐Bin , Chhabra, Saurabh , Farooq, Umar , Hertzberg, Mark , Jaglowski, Samantha , Lazarus, Hillard M. , Perales, Miguel‐Angel , Hamadani, Mehdi , Chen, Andy I. , D'Souza, Anita

British Journal of Haematology | March 18, 2016 | Volume: 174 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 235-248

10.1111/bjh.14046 Get It

Summary For diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma ( DLBCL ) patients progressing after autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (auto HCT ), allogeneic HCT (allo HCT ) is often considered, although limited information is available to guide patient selection. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research ( CIBMTR ) database, we identified 503 patients who underwent allo HCT after disease progression/relapse following a prior auto HCT . The 3‐year probabilities of non‐relapse mortality, progression/relapse, progression‐free survival ( PFS ) and overall survival ( OS ) were 30, 38, 31 and 37% respectively. Factors associated with inferior PFS on multivariate analysis included Karnofsky performance status ( KPS ) <80, chemoresistance, auto HCT to allo HCT interval <1‐year and myeloablative conditioning. Factors associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis included KPS <80, chemoresistance and myeloablative conditioning. Three adverse prognostic factors were used to construct a prognostic model for PFS , including KPS <80 (4 points), auto HCT to allo HCT interval <1‐year (2 points) and chemoresistant disease at allo HCT (5 points). This CIBMTR prognostic model classified patients into four groups: low‐risk (0 points), intermediate‐risk (2‐5 points), high‐risk (6‐9 points) or very high‐risk (11 points), predicting 3‐year PFS of 40, 32, 11 and 6%, respectively, with 3‐year OS probabilities of 43, 39, 19 and 11% respectively. In conclusion, the CIBMTR prognostic model identifies a subgroup of DLBCL patients experiencing long‐term survival with allo HCT after a failed prior auto HCT .