Back to Authors

Fogh, Shannon

0009-0004-4776-5083

Mayo Clinic

University of California, San Francisco

Citations 3

Neuro-Oncology Practice Clinical Debate: Early treatment or observation for patients with newly diagnosed oligodendroglioma and small-volume residual disease
Fogh, Shannon , Boreta, Lauren , Nakamura, Jean L. , Johnson, Derek R. , Chi, Andrew S, Kurz, Sylvia C. , Johnson, Derek R , Chi, Andrew S

Neuro-Oncology Practice | June 27, 2020 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 11-17

10.1093/nop/npaa037 Get It

Abstract Advances in treatment of oligodendroglioma represent arguably the most significant recent development in the treatment of brain tumors, with multiple clinical trials demonstrating that median survival is approximately doubled in patients with World Health Organization grade II and III 1p/19q codeleted gliomas (ie, oligodendrogliomas) treated with procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine chemotherapy and radiation vs radiation alone. However, chemoradiotherapy itself is not without morbidity, including both short-term toxicities primarily related to chemotherapy and longer-term cognitive issues likely due to radiation. Patients and physicians both desire maximally effective therapy with minimal toxicity, and it remains unclear whether some patients with macroscopic residual disease after surgery can safely delay therapy, to avoid or delay toxicity, while simultaneously preserving the full benefits of treatment. In this article, experts in the field discuss the rationale for the approaches of up-front treatment with chemoradiotherapy and initial observation, respectively.
Peer support: A needs assessment for social support from trained peers in response to stress among medical physicists
Johnson, Jennifer , Ford, Eric , Yu, James B. , Buckey, Courtney, Fogh, Shannon , Evans, Suzanne B. , Evans, Suzanne , Yu, James B

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | July 29, 2019 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 157-162

10.1002/acm2.12675 Get It

AbstractPurposePrevious studies suggest that within radiation oncology, medical physicists (MP) experience high workloads. Little is known about how MPs use social support (SS) in times of stress.MethodsIn collaboration with the Workgroup on Prevention of Medical Error, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine administered this Human Investigation Committee (HIC) approved email survey to 8566 members. Respondents were considered likely to seek SS if they answered (probably/definitely would) and unlikely to seek support if they answered (probably/definitely would not). Logistic regression was applied to determine associations between demographic factors and willingness to seek support as well as perception of barriers.ResultsOne thousand two hundred and ninety‐seven members (15.1%) accessed and gave consent for the survey. One thousand and one (11.7%) respondents answered all relevant questions. Respondents were predominantly male (69.1%), MP in radiation oncology (81.8%), private practice (51.6%), with practice duration> 10 yr (60.2%). MPs were likely to seek SS for personal physical illness (78.63%), involvement in a medical error (73.94%) or adverse patient outcome (75.17%). MPs sought SS in the setting of personal fatigue (33.2%) or burnout (44.3%). Barriers to seeking SS were lack of time (80.3%), and uncertainty about whom to access (70.7%). MPs responded that they would be most likely to seek support from an equally experienced medical physicist colleague (81.0%). Most MPs (67.0%) identified as having experienced stressors, with serious family illness (35.2%), or burnout (32.8%) being most common. Factors associated with MPs unwillingness to seek SS for medical error included> 20 yr in practice (vs still in training — OR 0.30, P = 0.015), and male gender (OR 0.60, P = 0.003). Male gender was associated with the lowest willingness to seek support (OR 2.10, P = 0.0001), but also with fewer perceived barriers (OR 1.60, P = 0.0075).ConclusionWillingness to seek SS is demonstrated, and MPs want colleagues to provide support. Given these results, peer support could be considered among MPs.
Case-Based Review: meningioma
Fogh, Shannon , Barker, Fred G., Brastianos, Priscilla K. , Clarke, Jennifer , Oberndorfer, Stephan, Preusser, Matthias , Raghunathan, Aditya , Santagata, Sandro , Theodosopoulos, Philip V. , Fogh, Shannon E, Clarke, Jennifer L, Johnson, Derek R. , Kaufmann, Timothy J. , Santagata, Sandro , Raghunathan, Aditya , Preusser, Matthias

Neuro-Oncology Practice | January 15, 2016 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 120-134

10.1093/nop/npv063 Get It

AbstractMeningioma is by far the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults. Treatment of meningioma is complex due to a tremendous amount of variability in tumor behavior. Many patients are incidentally found to have tumors that will remain asymptomatic throughout their lives. It is important to identify these patients so that they can be spared from potentially morbid interventions. On the other end of the spectrum, high-grade meningiomas can behave very aggressively. When treatment is necessary, surgical resection is the cornerstone of meningioma therapy. Studies spanning decades have demonstrated that extent of resection correlates with prognosis. Radiation therapy, either in the form of external beam radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery, represents another important therapeutic tool that can be used in place of or as a supplement to surgery. There are no chemotherapeutic agents of proven efficacy against meningioma, and chemotherapy treatment is generally reserved for patients who have exhausted surgical and radiotherapy options. Ongoing and future studies will help to answer unresolved questions such as the optimum use of radiation in resected WHO grade II meningiomas and the efficacy of additional chemotherapy agents.