Bennett, Courtney

An ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is a life-threatening condition within the spectrum of acute coronary syndrome, with well-recognized implications for short-term and long-term health outcomes. Retrospective review of our institutional electronic health records identified patterns of inaccurate acute coronary syndrome diagnostic assignment, including the presence of erroneous ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnoses in discharge records. Such erroneous diagnoses in the durable health record may increase risk to patients through inadequate risk assessment and inappropriate follow-up care. Misapplication of a shortcut in our electronic health record system for rapidly ordering emergent cases was identified as a potential cause of the quality gap. To address this issue, a nurse-led quality improvement project was developed by using the define, measure, analyze, improve, and control framework. The project intervention decreased the percentage of patients with erroneous diagnoses from 24% to 7% and marginally improved nursing staff satisfaction. Our project successfully addressed an institutional quality concern. Our goal of reducing erroneous discharge diagnoses with minimal disruption to our existing practice was achieved, positively affecting our patients. Including both nurse leaders and frontline health care workers ensured the success of our project.

Abstract Aims The Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC) recently proposed pragmatic consensus definitions to standardize classification of cardiogenic shock (CS) in registries and clinical trials. We aimed to describe contemporary CS epidemiology using the SHARC definitions in a cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) population. Methods and results The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) is a multinational research network of advanced CICUs coordinated by the TIMI Study Group (Boston, MA). Cardiogenic shock was defined as a cardiac disorder resulting in SBP < 90 mmHg for ≥30 min [or the need for vasopressors, inotropes, or mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to maintain SBP ≥ 90 mmHg] with evidence of hypoperfusion. Primary aetiologic categories included acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS), heart failure-related CS (HF-CS), and non-myocardial (secondary) CS. Post-cardiotomy CS was not included. Heart failure-related CS was further subcategorized as de novo vs. acute-on-chronic HF-CS. Patients with both cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic components of shock were classified separately as mixed CS. Of 8974 patients meeting shock criteria (2017–23), 65% had isolated CS and 17% had mixed shock. Among patients with CS (n = 5869), 27% had AMI-CS (65% STEMI), 59% HF-CS (72% acute-on-chronic, 28% de novo), and 14% secondary CS. Patients with AMI-CS and de novo HF-CS were most likely to have had concomitant cardiac arrest (P < 0.001). Patients with AMI-CS and mixed CS were most likely to present in more severe shock stages (SCAI D or E; P < 0.001). Temporary MCS use was highest in AMI-CS (59%). In-hospital mortality was highest in mixed CS (48%), followed by AMI-CS (41%), similar in de novo HF-CS (31%) and secondary CS (31%), and lowest in acute-on-chronic HF-CS (25%; P < 0.001). Conclusion SHARC consensus definitions for CS classification can be pragmatically applied in contemporary registries and reveal discrete subpopulations of CS with distinct phenotypes and outcomes that may be relevant to clinical practice and future research.

Introduction: Ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), are associated with high mortality and morbidity. Sedation through agents like benzodiazepines, propofol, and opiates are mainstays of treatment but are limited by side effects. Dexmedetomidine is a α2-presynaptic receptor agonist with a safe and efficacious sedative profile. Furthermore, it has been recently proposed as a sedative agent in VT due its additional antiarrhythmic properties. Methods: A systemic literature review was conducted of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus. Randomized controlled trials comparing the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias of dexmedetomidine with placebo or an alternative sedative agent were included. Two researchers independently extracted the data and performed quality assessments. Results: We identified 6 studies that met the selection criteria. Our meta-analysis demonstrated significant reduction of the overall risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients receiving dexmedetomidine (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16, 0.76). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in risk of mortality (RR 0.59 95% CI 0.12, 3.02). Dexmedetomidine also significantly increased the risk of bradycardia (RR 2.78 95% CI 2.00, 3.87). There was no significant difference in risk of tachycardia (RR 0.59 95% CI 0.12, 3.02) or hypotension (RR 1.07 95% CI 0.64, 1.81). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the dexmedetomidine reduces the risk of VA by 65% compared to control. Further prospective research is necessary to clarify the antiarrhythmic and sedative properties of dexmedetomidine and its potential effect on patient outcomes.

Background Shock and preshock are defined on the basis of the presence of hypotension, hypoperfusion, or both. We sought to determine the hemodynamic underpinnings of shock and preshock noninvasively using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Methods and Results We included Mayo Clinic cardiac intensive care unit patients from 2007 to 2015 with TTE within 1 day of admission. Hypotension and hypoperfusion at the time of cardiac intensive care unit admission were used to define 4 groups. TTE findings were evaluated across these groups, and in‐hospital mortality was evaluated according to TTE findings in each group. We included 5375 patients with a median age of 69.2 years (36.8% women). The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 50%. Groups based on hypotension and hypoperfusion were assigned as follows: no hypotension or hypoperfusion, 59.7%; isolated hypotension, 15.3%; isolated hypoperfusion, 16.4%; and both hypotension and hypoperfusion, 8.7%. Most TTE variables of interest varied across these groups, with worse biventricular function, lower forward flow, and higher filling pressures as the degree of hemodynamic compromise increased. In‐hospital mortality occurred in 8.2%, and inpatient deaths had more TTE parameter abnormalities. In‐hospital mortality increased with the degree of hemodynamic compromise, and a marked gradient in in‐hospital mortality was observed when the clinical classification of shock and preshock was combined with TTE findings reflecting worse biventricular function, lower forward flow, or higher filling pressures. Conclusions Substantial differences in cardiac function are observed between cardiac intensive care unit patients with preshock and shock using TTE, and the combination of the clinical and TTE hemodynamic assessment provides robust mortality risk stratification.

Introduction: Ventricular storms are managed with a combination of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and ablation therapy. This study examines outcomes in patients who required cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) admission for ventricular storms. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 200 random adult patients who admitted to the CICU at Mayo Clinic Rochester in 2016-2017 for ventricular storm. Continuous variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. Results: Of the 200 patients, 33 (16.5%) patients underwent ablation and AAD therapy for ventricular arrhythmias; 167 underwent AAD therapy alone. The patients in the ablation group were significantly younger (median of 60.3 vs. 72.7, U=1570, p<.001), had a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.56 vs. 5.21, U=1916, p=.005), and a higher BMI (31.6 vs. 28.2, U=2028, p=.032). There was no difference in sex and race (white vs. non-white) between the two groups. The patients in the ablation groups had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality (0% vs. 20%, p=.001) and higher 1-year survival (91% vs. 63%, p=.001). There was no difference in length of stay in the CICU, length of stay in the hospital, or rate of hospital readmission within one year of discharge. Conclusions: Our study indicates that critically ill patients who undergo ablation and AAD for ventricular arrhythmias have decreased mortality compared to patients who underwent AAD therapy alone. More research is needed to elucidate whether this survival benefit is secondary to differences in treatment or baseline comorbidities in the two groups. Table 1: Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing ventricular storm treatment. Data is reported either as median or number of occurrences (%). Antiarrhythmic drug (AAD), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Body Mass Index (BMI), Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU), Length of Stay in days (LOS). * Significance with p values < .05

Purpose. To assess the antiarrhythmic properties of dexmedetomidine in patients in the intensive care unit. Methods. A literature review was conducted with Ovid MEDLINE (R), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, and Scopus. Study Selection. Randomized controlled trials were included, examining the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation with dexmedetomidine compared to placebo or an alternative sedative agent. For each publication that met the selection criteria, the patient demographics, incidence of arrhythmias, mortality, and adverse events were collected. Data extraction was carried out by two authors independently. Results. We identified 6 out of 126 studies that met the selection criteria for our meta-analysis, all of which focused on the perioperative cardiac surgery period. Patients receiving dexmedetomidine demonstrated a significant reduction of the overall incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16, 0.76). In particular, dexmedetomidine significantly decreased the risk of ventricular tachycardia compared with control (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08, 0.80, I2 0%). Regarding adverse events, dexmedetomidine significantly increased the frequency of bradycardia (RR 2.78 95% CI 2.00, 3.87). However, there was no significant difference in mortality (RR 0.59 95% CI 0.12, 3.02). Conclusion. From this meta-analysis, we report a decreased incidence of ventricular tachycardia with dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients. This result favors the use of dexmedetomidine for its antiarrhythmic properties.

Abstract Aims We sought to determine whether the Diamond–Forrester classification using non-invasive haemodynamic measurements by 2-D and Doppler echocardiography would predict hospital mortality in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. Methods and results We retrospectively analysed unique patients admitted to the CICU at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2007 to 2018. Doppler-derived cardiac index (CI) and ratio of mitral valve E velocity to medial mitral annulus e′ velocity (E/e′ ratio) were used to classify patients into four profiles: Profile I (warm/dry), Profile II (warm/wet), Profile III (cold/dry), and Profile IV (cold/wet). Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of hospital mortality, and Cox proportional-hazards analysis was used to determine predictors of mortality during one year of follow-up. We included 4563 patients with a mean age of 68.3 ± 14.3 years, including 36.2% female patients. The distribution of each profile was as follows: I, 47.4%; II, 36.2%; III, 7.9%; IV, 8.5%. A total of 5.8% patients died during hospitalization, and 18.1% died by 1 year. Patients with either low CI or elevated E/e′ ratio had higher in-hospital and 1 year mortality. Patients with elevated E/e′ ratio (i.e. Profiles II and IV) had an increased risk of death during hospitalization and at 1 year after multivariate adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio 1.72 and 2.17 for 1 year mortality, respectively, compared with Profile I, P < 0.01). Conclusions Simple Doppler echocardiographic assessment can be used to identify haemodynamic profiles defined by the Diamond–Forester classification in patients admitted in CICU. These profiles predict outcomes and may be used to guide therapy in critically ill patients.

Abstract Background Despite safety communications from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera infections (MCIs) from contaminated heater-cooler devices, new cases continue to be identified. Methods We retrospectively reviewed confirmed cases of MCI that were managed at Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) from 09/2015 to 01/2021. Clinical histories including prior cardiovascular surgery were recorded. Diagnostic workup including ophthalmologic examination, imaging, and laboratory testing was reviewed. Treatment and survival outcomes on follow-up were obtained. Results Twelve patients with MCI were included. All patients had aortic valve or graft replacement. Five patients had their surgical procedures following the 10/15/2015 FDA safety communication. The mean time from surgery to symptom onset (range) was 32 (13–73) months. Ten of 11 patients who underwent ophthalmologic examination had chorioretinal abnormalities. Three patients who underwent microbial cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid sequencing tested positive for M. chimaera, which was subsequently confirmed with blood culture growth. Echocardiography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) revealed evidence of prosthetic valve/graft infection in 7/12 (58.3%) and 6/10 (60.0%) of cases, respectively. Seven patients (58.3%) underwent redo cardiovascular surgery. Of these, 1 patient died 2 days postdischarge, 1 experienced spinal osteomyelitis relapse, and another had interval prosthetic valve fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on PET/CT suspicious for recurrent infection. Among 4 patients on medical therapy only, 3 expired or transitioned to hospice during follow-up. Conclusions MCI continues to occur despite the FDA communications. Incorporation of ophthalmologic examination and use of advanced tools may improve MCI diagnosis. The mortality in these patients is high even with aggressive surgical/medical management.

Introduction: The Mayo Clinic Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Admission Risk Score (M-CARS) has been shown to predict hospital mortality in the CICU population better than conventional critical care scoring models. We tested the hypothesis that M-CARS could similarly be used to predict one-year mortality. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult CICU patients admitted from 2007 to 2018. M-CARS was calculated using admission data. Groups were compared using Wilcoxon test for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables. Results: This study included 12428 unique patients with a mean age of 67 ± 15 years (37% females), of whom 11279 (90.8%) survived hospitalization and 2839 patients (22.8%) died within 1 year of admission. The 1-year survival decreased incrementally as a function of increasing M-CARS ( Figure 1A , p<0.0001), and all components of M-CARS were significant predictors of 1-year mortality (p<0.001). 1690 hospital survivors (15.0%) died within 1 year. The 1-year survival decreased incrementally as a function of increasing M-CARS for scores <3 (all p<0.001); however, there was no further adverse 1-year survival for patients with M-CARS ≥3 ( Figure 1B, p=0.99). M-CARS components associated with 1-year mortality among hospital survivors included blood urea nitrogen, red blood cell distribution width, Braden score, and respiratory failure (all p<0.001), while cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, and anion gap were not. Conclusions: M-CARS accurately predicts 1-year mortality among CICU admissions, with a plateau effects at high M-CARS scores ≥3. Significant predictors of 1-year mortality among CICU survivors include frailty markers rather than admission severity.