Back to Authors

Gupta, Vishal

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5630-6672

Mayo Clinic

Borgess Medical Center

Citations 1

Intravascular Ultrasound in Lower Extremity Peripheral Vascular Interventions
Panaich, Sidakpal , Arora, Shilpkumar , Patel, Nilay , Patel, Nileshkumar , Savani, Chirag, Patel, Achint , Thakkar, Badal, Singh, Vikas , Patel, Nish , Agnihotri, Kanishk, Bhatt, Parth , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Gupta, Vishal , Attaran, Ramak R., Mena, Carlos, Cleman, Michael , Forrest, John K. , Badheka, Apurva O., Patel, Samir , Grines, Cindy L. , Panaich, Sidakpal S

Journal of Endovascular Therapy | December 26, 2015 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 65-75

10.1177/1526602815620780 Get It

Purpose: To examine the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) utilization during lower limb endovascular interventions as regards postprocedural complications and amputation. Methods: The study cohort was derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database between the years 2006 and 2011. Peripheral endovascular interventions were identified using appropriate ICD-9 procedure codes. Two-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The co-primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and amputation; the secondary outcome was postprocedural complications. Model results are given as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Hospitalization costs were also assessed. Results: Overall, among the 92,714 patients extracted from the database during the observation period, IVUS was used in 1299 (1.4%) patients. IVUS utilization during lower extremity peripheral vascular procedures was independently predictive of a lower rate of postprocedural complications (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.99, p=0.037) as well as lower amputation rates (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.77, p<0.001) without any significant impact on in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis also revealed IVUS utilization to be predictive of a nonsignificant increase in hospitalization costs ($1333, 95% CI −$167 to +$2833, p=0.082). Conclusion: IVUS use during lower limb endovascular interventions is predictive of lower postprocedural complication and amputation rates with a nonsignificant increase in hospitalization costs.