Dhawan, Sangeeta

Accumulation of DNA damage drives β-cell dysfunction, senescence, and death in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Although α-cell dysfunction also contributes to disease pathology, α-cells remain remarkably resistant to senescence and increased cell death under diabetogenic stress. The mechanisms underlying these differential responses to diabetogenic stress, particularly differences in their DNA damage vulnerability, remain unclear. We demonstrate that replication introduces a window of genomic vulnerability in both α- and β-cells during neonatal growth, with α-cells exhibiting higher replication rates and DNA damage. We show that neonatal β-cells resolve DNA damage more efficiently during mitosis and favor error-free repair, whereas α-cells compensate for their greater DNA-damage vulnerability through increased cellular turnover. Using mouse models of overnutrition and diabetes, we show that β-cells exhibit greater vulnerability to terminal DNA damage and impaired repair capacity under diabetogenic stress, with compensatory replication amplifying this vulnerability. We demonstrate that developmental and postnatal epigenetic programs shape the differential DNA damage vulnerability of postnatal β- and α-cells. Loss of de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in pancreatic progenitors selectively increases the DNA damage vulnerability of β-cells from neonatal growth through adulthood. Complementing this developmental process, enhancer analyses reveal lineage-specific DNA damage response regulatory landscapes that are remodeled in β-cells under metabolic stress. Collectively, our findings uncover novel developmental mechanisms that shape the distinct DNA damage responses of postnatal β- and α-cells during growth and diabetes. Article Highlights Mechanisms underlying the differential susceptibility of pancreatic β- and α-cells to diabetogenic stress remain unclear. We investigated whether replication, repair fidelity, and developmental epigenetic programs determine the vulnerability of postnatal β- and α-cells to DNA damage, a key driver of β-cell failure in diabetes. Replication introduces DNA damage vulnerability in both neonatal β- and α-cells, yet β-cells resolve damage more efficiently. Loss of DNA methyltransferase 3a in pancreatic progenitors selectively heightens β-cell DNA damage vulnerability that persists into adulthood. Moreover, diabetogenic stress preferentially compromises β-cell repair fidelity. These findings reveal how developmental programs shape β-cell resilience and may influence lifelong diabetes risk.

In response to the lockdowns and travel bans during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, Peter C. Butler at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), started a virtual islet biology seminar series. After the authors of this article joined him as co-organizers, this initiative became the Islet Research Seminar Series (IRSS). Like islets of Langerhans adapt to their changing environment, the islet biology community quickly embraced this new format. The IRSS evolved into a lasting scientific forum that convenes weekly and is attended by islet biologists from the U.S., Canada, Europe, and Israel. The series covers a range of topics in islet biology, with presentations from scientists representing all career stages. It has proven particularly valuable for trainees and early-stage investigators in exposing them to a variety of topics in islet biology without travel required and facilitating more spontaneous interactions with senior scientists than at in-person meetings. While the online format is not meant to replace live scientific conferences, we believe that the IRSS plays a unique role in keeping the islet biology community connected and abreast of the most recent scientific discoveries in our field. The success of this platform stands as a testament to the scientific community to adapt and thrive through challenges. This article is dedicated to Peter C. Butler, UCLA, who initiated the IRSS.

AbstractIntroductionWe sought to determine whether chromogranin A‐positive hormone‐negative (CPHN) endocrine cells are increased in the pancreas of pregnant women, offering potential evidence in support of neogenesis.MethodsAutopsy pancreata from pregnant women (n = 14) and age‐matched non‐pregnant control women (n = 9) were obtained. Staining of pancreatic sections for chromogranin A, insulin and a cocktail of glucagon, somatostatin, pancreatic polypeptide and ghrelin was undertaken, with subsequent evaluation for CPHN cell frequency.ResultsThe frequency of clustered β‐cells was increased in pregnant compared to non‐pregnant subjects (46.6 ± 5.0 vs. 31.8 ± 5.0% clustered β‐cells of total clustered endocrine cells, pregnant vs. non‐pregnant, p < .05). Frequency of endocrine cocktail cells was lower in pregnant women than non‐pregnant women (36.2 ± 4.0 vs. 57.0 ± 6.8% clustered endocrine cocktail cells of total clustered endocrine cells, pregnant vs. non‐pregnant, p < .01). No difference in frequency of CPHN cells was found in islets, nor in clustered or single cells scattered throughout the exocrine pancreas, between pregnant and non‐pregnant women. The frequency of CPHN cells in pregnancy was independent of the number of pregnancies (gravidity).ConclusionsOur findings of no increase in CPHN cell frequency in pancreas of pregnant women suggest that this potential β‐cell regenerative mechanism is not that by which the increased β‐cell mass of pregnancy is achieved. However, an increase in the percentage of clustered β‐cells was found in pregnancy, with decreased frequency of other endocrine cells in clusters, suggesting a compensatory shift from other pancreatic endocrine cell types to β‐cells as a mechanism to meet the increased insulin demands of pregnancy.

AbstractContextChronic pancreatitis (CP) is characterized by inflammation, fibrosis, and a loss of pancreatic acinar cells, which can result in exocrine and eventually endocrine deficiency. Pancreatitis has been reported to induce formation of new endocrine cells (neogenesis) in mice. Our recent data have implicated chromogranin A–positive hormone-negative (CPHN) cells as potential evidence of neogenesis in humans.ObjectiveWe sought to establish if CPHN cells were more abundant in CP in humans.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsWe investigated the frequency and distribution of CPHN cells and the expression of the chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 10 (CXCL10) and its receptor chemokine C-X-C motif receptor 3 in pancreas of nondiabetic subjects with CP.ResultsCPHN cell frequency in islets was increased sevenfold in CP [2.1% ± 0.67% vs 0.35% ± 0.09% CPHN cells in islets, CP vs nonpancreatitis (NP), P &lt; 0.01], as were the CPHN cells found as scattered cells in the exocrine areas (17.4 ± 2.9 vs 4.2 ± 0.6, CP vs NP, P &lt; 0.001). Polyhormonal endocrine cells were also increased in CP (2.7 ± 1.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.04, CP vs NP, % of polyhormonal cells of total endocrine cells, P &lt; 0.01), as was expression of CXCL10 in α and β cells.ConclusionThere is increased islet endogenous expression of the inflammation marker CXCL10 in islets in the setting of nondiabetic CP and an increase in polyhormonal (insulin-glucagon expressing) cells. The increase in CPHN cells in CP, often in a lobular distribution, may indicate foci of attempted endocrine cell regeneration.

Development of cell replacement therapies in diabetes requires understanding of the molecular underpinnings of β-cell maturation. The circadian clock regulates diverse cellular functions important for regulation of β-cell function and turnover. However, postnatal ontogenesis of the islet circadian clock and its potential role in β-cell maturation remain unknown. To address this, we studied wild-type Sprague-Dawley as well as Period1 luciferase transgenic (Per1:LUC) rats to determine circadian clock function, clock protein expression, and diurnal insulin secretion during islet development and maturation process. We additionally studied β-cell–specific Bmal1-deficient mice to elucidate a potential role of this key circadian transcription factor in β-cell functional and transcriptional maturation. We report that emergence of the islet circadian clock 1) occurs during the early postnatal period, 2) depends on the establishment of global behavioral circadian rhythms, and 3) leads to the induction of diurnal insulin secretion and gene expression. Islet cell maturation was also characterized by induction in the expression of circadian transcription factor BMAL1, deletion of which altered postnatal development of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and the associated transcriptional network. Postnatal development of the islet circadian clock contributes to early-life β-cell maturation and should be considered for optimal design of future β-cell replacement strategies in diabetes.

Abstract Context: Type 2 diabetes is characterized by a β-cell deficit and a progressive defect in β-cell function. It has been proposed that the deficit in β-cells may be due to β-cell degranulation and transdifferentiation to other endocrine cell types. Objective: The objective of the study was to establish the potential impact of β-cell dedifferentiation and transdifferentiation on β-cell deficit in type 2 diabetes and to consider the alternative that cells with an incomplete identity may be newly forming rather than dedifferentiated. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pancreata obtained at autopsy were evaluated from 14 nondiabetic and 13 type 2 diabetic individuals, from four fetal cases, and from 10 neonatal cases. Results: Whereas there was a slight increase in islet endocrine cells expressing no hormone in type 2 diabetes (0.11 ± 0.03 cells/islet vs 0.03 ± 0.01 cells/islet, P &lt; .01), the impact on the β-cell deficit would be minimal. Furthermore, we established that the deficit in β-cells per islet cannot be accounted for by an increase in other endocrine cell types. The distribution of hormone negative endocrine cells in type 2 diabetes (most abundant in cells scattered in the exocrine pancreas) mirrors that in developing (embryo and neonatal) pancreas, implying that these may represent newly forming cells. Conclusions: Therefore, although we concur that in type 2 diabetes there are endocrine cells with altered cell identity, this process does not account for the deficit in β-cells in type 2 diabetes but may reflect, in part, attempted β-cell regeneration.