Shah, Amit

Many older adults, particularly older women, use over-the-counter supplements for antiaging benefits, including for hair and skin. The supplement industry is unregulated by the Food and Drug Administration, and the interactions between supplements and medications are often overlooked by both patients and physicians. This article discusses the proposed mechanism of action, common misconceptions, possible benefits, and potential side effects of the most commonly used antiaging skin supplements by women, including biotin, nicotinamide, hyaluronic acid, collagen, zinc, vitamin C, vitamin A, vitamin E, and other antioxidants. Supplements may also interfere with common blood tests, such as biotin with the thyroid and troponin cardiac enzyme tests, which patients and their clinicians must be aware of and account for when interpreting lab results. Other supplements, such as zinc, are commonly taken in excess and may result in deficiencies in the absorption of other minerals, such as copper. Over-supplementation of fat-soluble vitamins, such as vitamin A and vitamin E, can result in toxic levels since excess is not excreted in the urine. The clinician caring for older patients’ skin and nails must ask older patients about supplement use and be aware of the potential harms of these supplements in some patients.

Abstract Purpose Medical student education in geriatrics is a critical need for every doctor-in-training as the population ages, with fewer than 7,000 geriatricians, and older patients, who now approach 20% of the U.S. population, having unique health care needs. This study presents the updated competencies in geriatrics for graduating medical students, framed by the Geriatrics 5Ms (Mind, Mobility, Medications, Multicomplexity, and What Matters Most). Method From 2019–2022, a working group of the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) drafted the updated medical student geriatrics education competencies, using a modified Delphi approach. The working group reviewed the literature, conducted an initial survey of working group members, and drafted and refined proposed updates to the competencies. The 27 resulting competencies were disseminated as a national survey to geriatrics experts and medical school education deans. Following the national survey, the competencies were updated and presented at the 2021 AGS Annual Scientific Meeting and open to public comment before they were finalized. Results The 27 updated geriatrics competencies for medical students included several new competencies, such as a focus on health equity, frailty, deprescribing, and patient priorities. A total of 211 respondents completed the national survey, including geriatrics experts (187/398, response rate: 47.0%) and education deans (24/191, response rate: 12.6%). All 27 proposed competencies met the predetermined threshold of 70% cumulative agreement, with a range of 93.0% (174/187) to 100% (187/187) among geriatrics experts and 87.5% (21/24) to 100% (24/24) among education deans. Conclusions The updated Geriatrics Competencies for Graduating Medical Students met with broad agreement among the geriatrics experts and medical school education deans who responded to the national survey. By focusing on the Geriatrics 5Ms, the competencies highlight key knowledge and skills graduating medical students need for the first day of internship to be prepared to deliver age-friendly care to older adults under their care.

Background: Understanding the accuracy of a woman's perceived breast cancer risk can enhance shared decision-making about breast cancer screening through provider and patient discussion. We aim to report and compare women's perceived lifetime breast cancer risk to calculated lifetime breast cancer risk. Methods: Women presenting to Mayo Clinic in Arizona and Minnesota in July 2016 completed a survey assessing their perceived breast cancer risk. Lifetime Gail risk scores were calculated from questions pertaining to health history and were then compared with perceived breast cancer risk. Results: A total of 550 predominantly white, married, and well-educated (≥college) women completed surveys. Using lifetime Gail risk scores, 5.6% were classified as high risk (>20% lifetime risk), 7.7% were classified as intermediate risk (15%–20%), and 86.6% were classified as average risk (<15%). Of the 27 women who were classified as high risk, 18 (66.7%) underestimated their risk and of the 37 women who were intermediate risk, 12 (32.4%) underestimated risk. Women more likely to underestimate their risk had a reported history of an abnormal mammogram and at least one or more relative with a history of breast cancer. Surveyed women tended to overestimate risk 4.3 (130/30) times as often as they underestimated risk. Conclusion: In a group of predominantly white, educated, and married cohort of women, there was a large portion of women in the elevated risk groups who underestimated risk. Specific aspects of medical history were associated with underestimation including a history of abnormal mammogram and family history of breast cancer. Overall, in our sample, more women overestimated than underestimated risk.

Although recent studies have explored the potential of multidomain brain health programs, there is a dearth of literature on operationalizing this research to create a clinical treatment program specifically for subjective cognitive decline (SCD). Patients seen by geriatricians in primary care and by behavioral neurology services at our institution presenting with SCD were recruited via a patient-appropriate flyer. After all participants had a 1-h brain health consultation with a neuropsychologist and were provided with program materials, they were randomized to attend a 10-week intervention designed to support program implementation (N = 10) or the control group of implementing the program on their own (N = 11). The program included (1) a calendar-based executive and memory support system for compensatory training and (2) training in healthy lifestyle. There were no significant differences between groups for any outcomes. Participants across both groups showed significant improvements with moderate effect sizes in compensatory strategy use, anxiety symptoms, and daily functioning, which were sustained through 6-month follow-up. They also increased physical activity by the end of the intervention period but did not sustain this through 6-month follow-up. Our pilot study demonstrates preliminary feasibility of a cognitive compensatory and lifestyle-based brain health program. Additional research is recommended to further develop two potentially scalable implementation strategies—coaching and self-implementation after brief consultation.

Anal cancer is rare in the general population but is steadily increasing in incidence over the past decade especially in women . Identification and screening of women with high risk facilitates detection of anal precancer and early-stage cancer, improves survival, and potentially uses less invasive therapies compared with the conventional chemoradiation treatments used for advanced cancers. No recently published guidelines currently describe details about screening women for anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC). The available evidence supports the existence of groups of women with higher prevalence of ASCC (e.g., women with human immunodeficiency virus, immune suppression, or previous lower-genital high-grade lesion or cancer) who would likely benefit from screening with some combination of anal cytology and human papillomavirus testing. Additional research is needed to establish the cost-effectiveness and the influence of screening on ASCC mortality rates.

Aquifer Geriatrics, formerly web‐based Geriatrics Education Modules, was initially developed through Donald W. Reynolds Foundation funding, and is now the national curriculum of the American Geriatrics Society and the Association of Directors of Geriatric Academic Programs. Aquifer Geriatrics consists of 26 evidence‐based, peer‐reviewed, online case‐based modules based on the Association of American Medical Colleges/John A. Hartford Foundation Minimum Geriatrics Competencies for Medical Students and is available by subscription at www.aquifer.org/courses . This curriculum aims to help address the national shortage of geriatrics educators, complement current teaching, bridge content gaps in geriatrics education, and standardize geriatrics‐focused educational content. This report will describe the development of Aquifer Geriatrics, highlight best practices to incorporate cases in a variety of teaching settings, describe teaching methods that utilize the curriculum to create a robust experience for learners, and address the cost of obtaining the curriculum. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:811–817, 2019.