Behm, Kevin T.

ABSTRACT Background Minimal‐invasive surgery (MIS) was proven beneficial in Crohn's Disease (CD). Intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) represents a further improvement as it is associated with decreased complications and shorter hospitalization. Extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) is preferred to ICA as it allows haptic feedback of the bowel and mesentery, which is historically required for bowel resection in CD to minimize recurrences. We compared ICA and ECA in terms of recurrences and complications. Methods All patients between 2016 and 2022 with Crohn's disease who underwent a MIS ileocecectomy were identified and divided into ICA and ECA groups. Exclusion criteria were open surgery, end ileostomies, follow‐up < 1 month, and ileocecectomy not due to CD. Results 107 patients were included in the ICA group (44.9% male, mean age of 40.2 [±16.6] years), while 270 patients were in the ECA group (46.7% male, mean age of 41.9 [±17.3] years). The rate of endoscopic recurrences with a Rutgeerts score > 2, clinical recurrence, and surgical recurrence were not statistically different between the two cohorts. On the multivariable analysis for endoscopic and clinical recurrences, the ICA/ECA approach was not significant. The ECA group revealed a higher overall complication rate (30.4% versus 15.9%, p = 0.004). The median length of stay was significantly reduced in the ICA group ( p < 0.001). Conclusion ICA seems to be safe in ileocecectomies for CD. The complication rate and length of stay were reduced while not affecting the endoscopic, clinical, and surgical recurrence rates. MIS technology provides enhanced visualization and haptic feedback, which could be used as surrogates for the tactile evaluation intra‐operatively.

BACKGROUND: Stoma-free survival represents a key quality-of-life outcome after surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. Despite advances in neoadjuvant and surgical management, up to 30% of patients ultimately require a permanent fecal diversion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stoma-free survival and identify factors associated with permanent stoma formation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing coloanal anastomosis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Single tertiary referral center (2017–2021). PATIENTS: A total of 126 patients with clinical stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent curative-intent resection with coloanal anastomosis were included. INTERVENTION: Curative-intent resection with coloanal anastomosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was stoma-free survival. Secondary analyses examined factors associated with permanent fecal diversion. RESULTS: The medical records of 126 patients were analyzed, comprising 62.5% men, with a mean age of 54 ± 10 years and a median BMI of 27.7 (interquartile range 24.5–31.4). At a median follow-up of 53.0 months, the 5-year stoma-free survival rate was 88.9%. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that BMI ≥35 (HR 3.80; 95% CI, 1.04–13.91, p = 0.044) and handsewn coloanal anastomosis with mucosectomy compared to stapled coloanal anastomosis without mucosectomy (HR 5.58; 95% CI, 1.71–18.14, p = 0.004), as well as local recurrence (HR 6.51; 95% CI, 1.44–29.46), were associated with worse stoma-free survival. The 30-day major morbidity rate was 7.9% after the index surgery. Sixteen patients required permanent fecal diversion due to bowel dysfunction (n = 11), disease recurrence (n = 4), or bowel obstruction (n = 1). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, single-institution design with limited generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Coloanal anastomosis in the era of total neoadjuvant therapy resulted in favorable 5-year stoma-free survival. BMI ≥35, handsewn coloanal anastomosis with mucosectomy, and local recurrence were associated with worse stoma-free survival. See Video Abstract . SUPERVIVENCIA SIN ESTOMA TRAS UNA RESECCIÓN ANTERIOR BAJA CON ANASTOMOSIS COLOANAL PARA EL CÁNCER RECTAL EN ESTADIO II-III ANTECEDENTES: La supervivencia sin estoma representa un resultado clave para la calidad de vida tras la cirugía de cáncer rectal localmente avanzado. A pesar de los avances en el tratamiento neoadyuvante y quirúrgico, hasta un 30 % de los pacientes requieren finalmente una derivación fecal permanente. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la supervivencia sin estoma e identificar los factores asociados con la formación de un estoma permanente en pacientes con cáncer rectal localmente avanzado sometidos a anastomosis coloanal. DISEÑO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. ENTORNO: Centro terciario de referencia único, 2017-2021. PACIENTES: Se incluyó a un total de 126 pacientes con adenocarcinoma rectal en estadio clínico II-III que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante y se sometieron a una resección con intención curativa con anastomosis coloanal. INTERVENCIÓN: Resección con intención curativa con anastomosis coloanal. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: El resultado principal fue la supervivencia sin estoma. Los análisis secundarios examinaron los factores asociados con la derivación fecal permanente. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 126 pacientes, de los cuales el 62,5 % eran hombres, con una edad media de 54 ± 10 años y un índice de masa corporal medio de 27,7 kg/m 2 (rango intercuartílico: 24,5-31,4 kg/m 2 ). Con una mediana de seguimiento de 53,0 meses, la tasa de supervivencia sin estoma a 5 años fue del 88,9 %. El análisis de regresión de Cox univariante mostró que el índice de masa corporal ≥ 35 kg/m 2 (razón de riesgo = 3,80, intervalo de confianza del 95 %: 1,04-13,91, p = 0,044) y la anastomosis coloanal cosida a mano con mucosectomía, en comparación con la anastomosis coloanal grapada sin mucosectomía (razón de riesgo = 5,58, intervalo de confianza del 95 %: 1,71-18,14, p = 0,004), así como la recurrencia local (razón de riesgo = 6,51, intervalo de confianza del 95 %: 1,44-29,46) se asociaron con una peor supervivencia sin estoma. La tasa de morbilidad grave a los 30 días fue del 7,9 % tras la cirugía índice. Dieciséis pacientes requirieron una derivación fecal permanente debido a disfunción intestinal (n = 11), recurrencia de la enfermedad (n = 4) u obstrucción intestinal (n = 1). LIMITACIONES: Diseño retrospectivo, de una sola institución, con una generalización limitada. CONCLUSIONES: La anastomosis coloanal en la era de la terapia neoadyuvante total dio lugar a una supervivencia sin estoma favorable a los 5 años. El índice de masa corporal ≥ 35 kg/m2, la anastomosis coloanal cosida a mano con mucosectomía y la recurrencia local se asociaron con una peor supervivencia sin estoma. (AI-generated translation )

BACKGROUND: End colostomy reversal with colorectal anastomosis (Hartmann’s reversal) is a technically challenging procedure associated with significant morbidity due to adhesions and distorted anatomy after the index surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for Hartmann’s reversal. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data. SETTINGS: High-volume tertiary referral center with specialized colorectal surgery expertise. PATIENTS: A total of 218 patients who underwent Hartmann’s reversal between May 2018 and April 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay and rate of conversion. Secondary outcomes included overall complication rates and time to return of bowel function. RESULTS: Of 218 patients, 139 (63.8%) underwent open surgery, 48 (22.0%) underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 31 (14.2%) underwent robotic surgery. Robotic surgery had the lowest estimated blood loss (median 77.5 vs 100 mL laparoscopic and 150 mL open, p < 0.0001). Conversion to open surgery occurred in 16.1% of robotic cases compared with 35.4% of laparoscopic cases ( p = 0.0618). Minimally invasive approaches were associated with shorter hospital length of stay (median 3.0 vs 4.0 days, p < 0.0001) and faster return of bowel function (median 2.0 vs 3.0 days, p = 0.0095) compared to open surgery. Overall 30-day morbidity was 23.4%, with no significant difference among approaches ( p = 0.30). The temporal trend showed increasing adoption of robotic techniques, from 0% in 2018 to 53.8% in 2023, and a decrease in the proportion of cases approached by open surgery, from 76.9% in 2018 to 23.1% in 2023. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and single-institution experience with limited follow-up duration. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive approaches to Hartmann’s reversal are associated with improved short-term outcomes compared to open surgery. The robotic approach shows promise in reducing conversion rates, potentially extending the benefits of minimally invasive surgery to more patients undergoing this challenging procedure. See Video Abstract . COMPARACIÓN DE LOS ENFOQUES ABIERTO, LAPAROSCÓPICO Y ROBÓTICO PARA LA REVERSIÓN DE HARTMANN: LA EXPERIENCIA DE LA CLÍNICA MAYO ANTECEDENTES: La reversión de la colostomía terminal con anastomosis colorrectal (reversión de Hartmann) es un procedimiento técnicamente complejo asociado a una morbilidad significativa debido a las adherencias y la distorsión anatómica tras la cirugía inicial. OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados perioperatorios de los abordajes abiertos, laparoscópicos y robóticos para la reversión de Hartmann. DISEÑO: Análisis retrospectivo de datos mantenidos prospectivamente. ENTORNO: Centro terciario de referencia de gran volumen con experiencia especializada en cirugía colorrectal. PACIENTES: Un total de 218 se sometieron a la reversión de Hartmann entre mayo de 2018 y abril de 2023. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS: Los resultados primarios incluyeron la duración de la estancia hospitalaria y la tasa de conversión. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron las tasas generales de complicaciones y el tiempo de recuperación de la función intestinal. RESULTADOS: De los 218 pacientes, 139 (63,8 %) se sometieron a cirugía abierta, 48 (22,0 %) a cirugía laparoscópica y 31 (14,2 %) a cirugía robótica. La cirugía robótica tuvo la menor pérdida de sangre estimada (mediana, 77,5 ml frente a 100 ml en laparoscopia y 150 ml en cirugía abierta, p < 0,0001). La conversión a cirugía abierta se produjo en el 16,1 % de los casos robóticos frente al 35,4 % de los casos laparoscópicos ( p = 0,0618). Los abordajes mínimamente invasivos se asociaron con una estancia hospitalaria más corta (mediana de 3,0 días frente a 4,0 días, p < 0,0001) y un retorno más rápido de la función intestinal (mediana de 2,0 días frente a 3,0 días, p = 0,0095) en comparación con la cirugía abierta. La morbilidad global a los 30 días fue del 23,4 %, sin diferencias significativas entre los distintos enfoques ( p = 0,30). La tendencia temporal mostró un aumento en la adopción de técnicas robóticas, del 0 % en 2018 al 53,8 % en 2023, y una disminución en la proporción de casos abordados mediante cirugía abierta, del 76,9 % en 2018 al 23,1 % en 2023. LIMITACIONES: Diseño retrospectivo y experiencia de una sola institución con una duración de seguimiento limitada. CONCLUSIONES: Los enfoques mínimamente invasivos para la reversión de Hartmann se asocian con mejores resultados a corto plazo en comparación con la cirugía abierta. El enfoque robótico es prometedor para reducir las tasas de conversión, lo que podría ampliar los beneficios de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva a más pacientes que se someten a este procedimiento tan complejo. ( AI-generated translation ).

Objective: This study establishes objective benchmarks for robotic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) proficiency, evaluating individual surgeon learning curves using risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis. Summary Background Data: IPAA is a standard surgical treatment for conditions like refractory ulcerative colitis; robotic assistance offers potential advantages. However, the robotic IPAA learning curve is not clearly defined. Conventional analyses often overlook significant inter-surgeon variability and patient-specific factors, hindering surgical training optimization. Methods: A multi-site retrospective analysis of 123 consecutive robotic IPAA procedures performed by 11 surgeons between June 2015 and December 2023 was conducted. Patient-related variables were used for risk adjustment, and RA-CUSUM charts were generated to assess 30-day complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay at both aggregate and individual surgeon levels. Results: Aggregate RA-CUSUM data indicated general improvement trends for operative time and length of stay, alongside higher-than-expected complication rates in the early phase. Disaggregated analyses at the individual surgeon level revealed significant heterogeneity in performance trajectories and learning patterns across all three outcomes, directly challenging the concept of a standardized, uniform learning curve. Although postoperative complication and length of stay outcomes did not significantly differ between surgeons, operative time varied significantly. Conclusions: The acquisition of skill in robotic IPAA is a highly individualized process, suggesting the traditional uniform learning curve model is insufficient for contemporary surgical education. These findings strongly advocate for a shift towards personalized training paradigms that incorporate deliberate practice, targeted feedback, and simulation to optimize learning and patient outcomes.

Abstract Introduction Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a common surgical procedure for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. This study compared the outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open IPAA techniques, with a focus on surgical complications and pouch failure rates. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of patients who underwent IPAA at three Mayo Clinic locations between 2015 and 2020. Data on patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared across the three surgical approaches. Pouch failure was defined as the need for pouch excision or a diverting loop ileostomy. Results In all, 401 patients underwent IPAA with either an open (149, 37.2%), robotic (145, 36.2%), or laparoscopic (107, 26.7%) technique. The overall rate of pouch failure was 6.5% and did not differ significantly between the three surgical approaches. Compared with laparoscopy, robotic IPAA was associated with a lower conversion rate to open surgery (1.4 versus 17.8%; P &lt; 0.0001) and fewer 30-day readmissions (15.9% versus 28.0%; P = 0.02). However, robotic and laparoscopic IPAA approaches had higher rates of venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism and readmission than the open approach. Pouchitis was the most common cause of pouch failure across all surgical techniques. Conclusion Robotic IPAA had lower conversion and reduced 30-day admission rates compared with a laparoscopic approach. However, open surgery had lower rates of 30-day readmission and rates thromboembolism than robotic IPAA. The surgical approach itself does not appear to significantly impact long-term pouch failure rates.

Abstract Aim Reversal of diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) traditionally occurs at ≥12 weeks after formation. Early closure has been performed in attempts to reduce DLI‐associated morbidity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether time to stoma reversal impacts postoperative morbidity. Method A retrospective review was conducted using institutional‐level American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data for adult patients who underwent DLI closure between January 2012 and December 2021 across a multistate health system. Time to DLI closure was stratified into three groups: ≤12, 12–24 or 24–36 weeks. Additional data were obtained from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was major morbidity after DLI closure. Results A total of 482 patients underwent DLI closure. Eighty four patients underwent closure at ≤12 weeks (17.4%), 300 at 12–24 weeks (62.2%) and 98 at 24–36 weeks (20.3%). The most common diagnosis at DLI formation was cancer ( n = 211, 43.8%). Patients in the ≤12 weeks closure group more commonly had ulcerative colitis or diverticular disease and a lower American Society of Anesthesiologists class than patients with closure at 24–36 weeks ( p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in complication severity, overall major morbidity or its individual components amongst the time to DLI closure groups. There were no differences in anastomotic leaks or need for laparotomy. On multivariable analysis, immunosuppressive therapy and preoperative haematocrit <30% were significant risk factors for major morbidity after DLI closure. Conclusion Major morbidity did not differ by time to DLI closure group, indicating that closure at ≤12 weeks is safe in selected patients.

AbstractAimMinimally invasive transanal platforms are now the standard of care for select low‐risk rectal tumours. However, existing platforms come with persistent technical challenges. The da Vinci SP Surgical System™ offers a new alternative designed to work effectively in narrow spaces. This technology has the potential to enhance the feasibility and proximal extent of complex transanal resections. This study aimed to describe the morbidity and technical success in patients undergoing single‐port robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (SPR‐TAMIS). Secondary outcomes include rates of local recurrence.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent SPR‐TAMIS at our institution between February 2019 and December 2023.ResultsThe study included 31 patients (19 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 61 ± 13.3 years. The average tumour distance from the anal verge was 10 cm. Thirty patients completed SPR‐TAMIS, with one patient requiring conversion to robotic sigmoidectomy due to location in the mid‐sigmoid colon. The mean operating time was 106 ± 42 min. Twenty‐eight out of 30 patients underwent full‐thickness excision and all but two were successfully closed. All specimens were resected intact, and margins were negative in 93.5% of cases. The average tumour size was 13 ± 34 cm2, with 13 lesions classified as adenomas and 16 as adenocarcinomas. All patients who did not undergo associated procedures were discharged on the day of surgery. Two patients experienced 30‐day morbidity. At a mean follow‐up of 18 months (± 13), no local or systemic recurrences were identified.ConclusionSPR‐TAMIS for excision of low‐risk rectal tumours is associated with high rates of technical success and low 30‐day morbidity. Further research is needed to compare SPR‐TAMIS with other techniques to determine potential advantages over current transanal platforms.

Objective: To compare robotic-assisted proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (R-IPAA) outcomes and laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA within a specialized robotic surgery center, using matching techniques to minimize potential confounding factors. Background: Minimally invasive approaches, particularly laparoscopy, have improved outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease and familial adenomatous polyposis undergoing IPAA. Robotic-assisted surgery offers potential technical advantages, but its definitive superiority over laparoscopy in this context remains under debate. Methods: This retrospective, “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology”–compliant study analyzed 234 consecutive patients undergoing IPAA (117 robotic and 117 laparoscopic). Data encompassed patient demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. We employed various matching techniques to address potential bias. Primary endpoints focused on 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations, with secondary endpoints including hospital stay, blood loss, and stoma closure rates. Results: R-IPAA demonstrated a lower conversion rate to open surgery ( P = 0.02), a shorter hospital stay ( P = 0.04), and reduced blood loss ( P = 0.0003) compared with laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA. While overall 30-day morbidity rates were similar ( P = 0.4), matched analyses suggested a trend towards fewer reoperations and 3-month IPAA-associated complications after diverting loop ileostomy closure in the robotic group. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In a high-volume robotic surgery center, R-IPAA reduced the risk of conversion to open surgery while reducing intraoperative blood loss and providing shorter lengths of stay with equivalent perioperative outcomes. Promising trends to reduce 30-day reoperations and surgical complications after diverting loop ileostomy closure were observed after a matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: IPAA has become the criterion standard for treating ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, and selected cases of Crohn’s colitis. Robotic surgery promises improved postoperative outcomes and decreased length of stay. However, few studies have evaluated the benefits of robotic IPAA compared to laparoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term 30-day postoperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA and diverting loop ileostomy. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study from a single, high-volume center. SETTINGS: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (tertiary referral center for IBD). PATIENTS: All adult patients undergoing minimally invasive proctectomy with IPAA and diverting loop ileostomy between January 2015 and April 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day complications, hospital length of stay, estimated blood loss, conversion rate, 30-day readmission, and 30-day reoperation. RESULTS: Two hundred seventeen patients were included in the study; 107 underwent robotic proctectomy with IPAA and diverting loop ileostomy, whereas 110 had laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA and diverting loop ileostomy. Operating time was significantly longer in the robotic group (263 ± 38 vs 228 ± 75 minutes, p < 0.0001). The robotic group also had lower estimated blood loss (81.5 ± 77.7 vs 126.8 ± 111.0 mL, p = 0.0006) as well as fewer conversions (0% vs 8.2%, p = 0.003). Patients in the robotic group received more intraoperative fluids (3099 ± 1140 vs 2472 ± 996 mL, p = 0.0001). However, there was no difference in length of stay, 30-day morbidity, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, rate of diverting loop ileostomy closure at 3 months, and surgical IPAA complication rate after ileostomy closure. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, single-center study, potential bias because of the novelty of the robotic approach, and lack of long-term and quality-of-life outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic proctectomy with IPAA and diverting loop ileostomy may offer advantages in terms of estimated blood loss and conversion rate while maintaining the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes. See Video Abstract. NAVEGANDO EL PROGRESO: EXPERIENCIA DE OCHO AÑOS EN UN SOLO CENTRO CON PROCTECTOMÍA MÍNIMAMENTE INVASIVA Y ANASTOMOSIS ANAL-BOLSA ILEAL ANTECEDENTES: La anastomosis anal-bolsa ileal (IPAA) se ha convertido en el estándar de oro para el tratamiento de la colitis ulcerosa, la poliposis adenomatosa familiar y casos seleccionados de colitis de Crohn. La cirugía robótica promete mejores resultados posoperatorios y una menor duración de la estancia hospitalaria. Sin embargo, pocos estudios han evaluado los beneficios de la IPAA robótica en comparación con la laparoscopia. OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados postoperatorios a corto plazo a 30 días de la proctectomía robótica versus laparoscópica con IPAA e ileostomía en asa de derivación. DISEÑO: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de un único centro de gran volumen. AJUSTES: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (centro terciario de referencia para EII). PACIENTES: Todos los pacientes adultos sometidos a proctectomía mínimamente invasiva con IPAA y DLI entre Enero de 2015 y Abril de 2023. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS: Complicaciones a los 30 días, duración de la estancia hospitalaria, pérdida de sangre estimada, tasa de conversión, reingreso a los 30 días y reoperación a los 30 días. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron en el estudio 217 pacientes; 107 se sometieron a proctectomía robótica con IPAA y DLI, mientras que 110 se sometieron a proctectomía laparoscópica con IPAA y DLI. El tiempo operatorio fue significativamente mayor en el grupo robótico (263 ± 38 minutos versus 228 ± 75 minutos, p < 0,0001); la pérdida de sangre estimada (EBL) fue menor en el grupo robótico (81,5 ± 77,7 ml versus 126,8 ± 111,0 ml, p = 0,0006), así como el número de conversiones (0% versus 8,2%, p = 0,003). Los pacientes del grupo robótico recibieron más líquidos intraoperatorios (3099 ± 1140 ml versus 2472 ± 996 ml, p = 0,0001). Sin embargo, no hubo diferencias en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria, la morbilidad a los 30 días, el reingreso a los 30 días, la reoperación a los 30 días, la tasa de cierre del DLI a los tres meses y la tasa de complicaciones quirúrgicas de la IPAA después del cierre de la ileostomía. LIMITACIONES: Diseño retrospectivo, estudio unicéntrico, posible sesgo debido a la novedad del enfoque robótico, falta de resultados a largo plazo y de calidad de vida. CONCLUSIONES: La proctectomía robótica con IPAA y DLI puede ofrecer ventajas en términos de EBL y tasa de conversión, manteniendo al mismo tiempo los beneficios de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva. Se necesita más investigación para evaluar los resultados a largo plazo. (Traducción—Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil)