Handlogten, Kathryn S.

Background: Immersive technologies (ImTs), including virtual, augmented, or mixed reality, are increasingly used to support periprocedural pediatric patients, but clinical adoption varies widely across children’s hospitals and specialties. Multiple determinants for the adoption of ImT in health care have been identified; however, these have not been well characterized in pediatric perioperative settings. Aims: Among Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Improvement Network (SPAIN) member institutions, we describe the current state of pediatric perioperative ImT use, identify barriers and facilitators to ImT adoption, and report perceived implementation-related factors. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional cross-sectional survey of pediatric perioperative practices via key contacts from SPAIN. Survey responses underwent mixed-methods analyses informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results: Among 27 eligible institutions, 24 (89%) provided responses, 13 of which reported ImT use. Of these, 8 (62%) reported existing institutional infrastructure or governance to support ImT. Use patterns were highly heterogeneous, but use was commonly paired with the presence of champions, technology expertise, and available resource support. Use cases included anxiety reduction, distraction, and procedural support. Barriers, facilitators, and potential strategies for successful implementation were highlighted. Conclusions: ImT is used variably across pediatric anesthesia practices affiliated with SPAIN. These findings provide a descriptive snapshot of current practice and highlight factors commonly associated with adoption. Further work is needed to more rigorously characterize the implementation processes and evaluate strategies that may support integration of ImT into routine care in diverse clinical settings.

Pediatric regional anesthesia offers significant benefits, yet its adoption faces barriers, including perceived overcomplexity. This study aimed to identify and establish a set of core, high-value, low-complexity nerve blocks to improve perioperative pain management in pediatric patients. A four-round modified Delphi consensus study was conducted with an international panel of pediatric and regional anesthesia experts. An initial long list of regional techniques was compiled by the Steering Committee and refined through iterative input. Panelists rated each technique on a 10-point Likert scale for importance. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of panelists assigning a mean importance score of ≥8. Techniques receiving 50%–74% agreement were categorized as having strong agreement and considered for inclusion. The final selection was confirmed through a virtual roundtable discussion. Thirty-three experts representing 12 pediatric and regional societies participated. Consensus was reached on six regional techniques, with strong agreement (*) on two additional techniques, identifying eight core pediatric regional anesthesia blocks: supraclavicular brachial plexus block, rectus sheath block, transverse abdominis plane block*, suprainguinal fascia iliaca block*, femoral nerve block, adductor canal block, popliteal sciatic nerve block, and landmark-based caudal block. This consensus-driven framework defines a core set of pediatric regional anesthesia techniques that balance clinical effectiveness, feasibility, and accessibility. These findings provide a practical entry point for practitioners looking to incorporate pediatric regional anesthesia into their practice, regardless of prior experience. Future efforts should focus on standardized training, implementation research, and policy initiatives to support widespread adoption and improve perioperative pain management in children globally.

AbstractBackgroundThe use of spinal anesthesia in infants is seeing resurgence as an alternative to general anesthesia.AimsOur primary aims are to describe our institution's experience introducing a spinal anesthesia and sedation protocol for infants undergoing urologic surgery, to describe methods of improving prolonged anesthesia, and to describe the failure rate of spinal anesthesia in these patients. Sedation was provided for some infants with intranasal dexmedetomidine ± fentanyl.MethodsThis is a retrospective case series examining infants aged 1‐<14 months who received spinal anesthesia for circumcision, orchiopexy, orchiectomy, hypospadias repair, or epispadias repair. The electronic medical record was reviewed and compared with unmatched historical controls who received general anesthesia.ResultsA total of 230 patients underwent a urologic procedure; 102 patients received spinal anesthesia and 128 received general anesthesia. Length of surgical time with spinal anesthesia ranged from 4 to 189 minutes. The hospital length of stay was shorter in the spinal anesthesia group (median [IQR] of 5.3 hours [4.3, 7.2]) compared to the general anesthesia group (17.1 hours [15.6, 17.5]).The median bupivacaine dose was 0.75 mg/kg [0.67, 0.85]. There was one case in which cerebral spinal fluid was unable to be obtained, and one case that required conversion to general anesthesia after surgery had started. There were no cases of apnea, bleeding, infection, or neurologic compromise.ConclusionsWe describe the successful implementation of an infant spinal anesthesia and sedation protocol and a technique that uniquely provides prolonged surgical anesthesia with a low failure rate. We also report shorter anesthesia time, surgical time, and recovery room length of stay in patients who received spinal anesthesia compared to general anesthesia.

AbstractAbstract In a series of 57,787 patients receiving arterial cannulation, 21 patients were identified as having experienced vascular complications or nerve injuries, resulting in a very low complication rate of 3.4/10,000. The rate of complications differed significantly (P < 0.001) across the three most common catheter sizes (2.7/10,000 for 20 gauge, 17.2/10,000 for 18 gauge, and 9.4/10,000 for 5 French). Given the low frequency of complications observed, the current study does not have sufficient statistical power to make definitive conclusions regarding the risk factors (listed in the appendix). Background Prior research has provided inconsistent data regarding the risk factors associated with complications from arterial cannulation. The goal of this study was to clearly define the incidence and risks factors associated with arterial cannulation complications. Methods After obtaining institutional review board approval, all patients requiring arterial line placement with documentation were included in this retrospective study between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2012. Leveraging two robust data warehouses, the Perioperative DataMart and the Mayo Clinic Life Silences System, the authors cross-matched arterial line cannulation with a documented vascular consult, neurologic consult, infection, or return to surgery within 30 days in order to identify the initial patient population. Results A total of 62,626 arterial lines were placed in 57,787 patients, and 90.1% of the catheters placed were 20-gauge catheters. The radial artery was cannulated in 94.5% of patients. A total of 21 patients were identified as having experienced vascular complications or nerve injuries, resulting in a complication rate of 3.4 per 10,000 (95% CI, 2.1 to 5.1). Cardiac surgery had the largest number of catheters placed (n = 15,419) with 12 complications (complication rate = 7.8 per 10,000; 95% CI, 4.0 to 13.6). The rate of complications differed significantly (P < 0.001) across the three most common catheter sizes (2.7 per 10,000 [95% CI, 1.5 to 4.4] for 20 gauge, 17.2 per 10,000 [95% CI, 4.7 to 43.9] for 18 gauge, and 9.4 per 10,000 [95% CI, 1.1 to 34.1] for 5 French). Conclusion In a large retrospective study, the authors document a very low rate of complications with arterial line placement.