Roarke, M.

Abstract Introduction Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with an increased incidence of aortic stenosis. Bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration and native aortic stenosis share similar pathological mechanisms. Evidence regarding the role of serum Lp(a) concentrations in bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration is lacking. Purpose To evaluate the association between serum Lp(a) concentrations and bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration. Methods In this retrospective multicenter study, consecutive patients who underwent a bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement between Jan-2010 and Dec-2020 and had a preoperatory serum Lp(a) measurement were included. A baseline transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed following the aortic valve replacement and a follow-up TTE was performed at least 24 months after the baseline study to determine the presence of bioprosthetic valve degeneration. Significant degeneration was defined as: (a) an increase >10 mmHg in mean bioprosthetic aortic valve gradient from baseline status + a decrease in effective orifice area + a decrease in Doppler velocity index + exclusion of clinically thrombotic leaflet thickening, OR (b) new moderate or severe prosthetic aortic regurgitation (if the main component was periprosthetic, then it was not considered). Lp(a) concentrations were compared between patients with and without degeneration and regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association between bioprosthetic valve degeneration and Lp(a) levels. Results In total, 211 cases were included (mean age 74.1 ±9.4 years, 72.0% males, 29.9% transcatheter aortic valve replacements) (Figure 1). Median time between baseline and follow-up TTE was 5.0 (IQR 3.7) years. Bioprostheses degeneration was observed in 33 (15.6%) patients at follow-up. Median serum levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in the patients affected by degeneration versus non-affected cases (50.0 vs 15.7 mg/dl, p=0.003). In the regression analysis, high Lp(a) levels (≥30 mg/dl) were associated with degeneration both in a univariate analysis (OR 4.8, 95%CI 2.2-10.9, p<0.001) and multivariate analysis adjusted by other risk factors for bioprostheses degeneration (age, sex, hypertension, smoking, patient prosthesis mismatch, creatinine levels, and body surface area) (OR 5.2, 95%CI 2.1-12.8, p<0.001). Conclusion Serum Lp(a) concentrations seem to be a risk factor for bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration (Figure 2). There is an increasing need to accurately predict bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration and to develop novel methods and treatments to increase their durability. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to investigate whether lowering Lp(a) could slow bioprostheses degradation.Population characteristicsLp(a) and bioprostheses degeneration

AbstractBackgroundSymptoms suggestive of gastroparesis are non‐specific and conflicting reports exist regarding the ability of symptoms to predict the presence of gastroparesis. Our aim, therefore, was to evaluate the relationships between gastroparetic symptoms and their impact on quality of life and determine their relationship with clinical factors and gastric emptying.MethodsGastric emptying scintigraphy, sociodemographic features, health care resource utilization, gastroparetic symptoms, and quality of life using validated questionnaires were obtained from consecutive patients referred for gastric emptying testing (GET). Descriptive analyses were conducted and logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations with abnormal gastric emptying after controlling for other covariates.Key ResultsTwo hundred and sixty‐six patients participated (195 females; mean age, 49.1 ± 17.6 years); 75% met Rome III criteria for functional dyspepsia. Gastric emptying was delayed in 28.2% at 4 h; the delay was mild in 48%, moderate in 20% and severe in 32%. Nausea/emesis and postprandial fullness, but not bloating, were significantly greater in those with delayed emptying. Postprandial fullness was most severe. Weak correlations were identified between symptom severity and the severity of gastric emptying delay. Quality of life was also lower in the delayed emptying group. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated associations between delayed gastric emptying and lower quality of life and increased symptom severity.Conclusions & InferencesIn patients referred for GET, gastroparetic symptoms were more severe in those with delayed emptying. A decrease in quality of life in those with delayed gastric emptying was also present; this was not related to the severity of the delay in gastric emptying.