Liepelt‐Scarfone, Inga

ABSTRACT Background With pathway‐specific trials in PD associated with variants in the glucocerebrosidase gene (PD GBA ) under way, we need markers that confirm the impact of genetic variants in patient‐derived biofluids in order to allow patient stratification merely based on genetics and that might serve as biochemical read‐out for target engagement. Objective To explore GBA‐pathway‐specific biomarker profiles cross‐sectionally (TUEPAC‐MIGAP, PPMI) and longitudinally (PPMI). Methods We measured enzyme activity of the lysosomal glucocerebrosidase, CSF levels of glucosylceramides (upstream substrate of glucocerebrosidase), CSF levels of ceramides (downstream product of glucocerebrosidase), lactosylceramides, sphingosines, sphingomyelin (by‐products) and CSF levels of total α‐synuclein in PD GBA patients compared to PD GBA_wildtype patients. Results Cross‐sectionally in both cohorts and longitudinally in PPMI: (1) glucocerebrosidase activity was significantly lower in PD GBA compared to PD GBA_wildtype . (2) CSF levels of upstream substrates (glucosylceramides species) were higher in PD GBA compared to PD GBA_wildtype . (3) CSF levels of total α‐synuclein were lower in PD GBA compared to PD GBA_wildtype . All of these findings were most pronounced in PD GBA with severe mutations (PD GBA_severe ). Cross‐sectionally in TUEPAC‐MIGAP and longitudinally in PPMI, CSF levels of downstream‐products (ceramides) were higher in PD GBA_severe . Cross‐sectionally in TUEPAC‐MIGAP by‐products sphinganine and sphingosine‐1‐phosphate and longitudinally in PPMI species of by‐products lactosylceramides and sphingomyelin were higher in PD GBA_severe . Interpretation These findings confirm that GBA mutations have a relevant functional impact on biomarker profiles in patients. Bridging the gap between genetics and biochemical profiles now allows patient stratification for clinical trials merely based on mutation status. Importantly, all findings were most prominent in PD GBA with severe variants. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

ABSTRACTBackground: In 2015, the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society published clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease (PD). Although recent validation studies suggest high accuracy, one unmet need is for highly specific criteria for clinical trials in early/de novo PD.Objectives: The objective of this study was to generate and test a PD diagnostic criteria termed “clinically established early PD.”Methods: We modified the Movement Disorder Society criteria to increase specificity for early PD by removing all disease duration components and changing red flags to absolute exclusions. We then estimated the sensitivity/specificity of clinically established early PD criteria in patients with disease duration <5 years, selected from a 626‐patient validation study.Results: After documentation of parkinsonism, 18 individual exclusion criteria are assessed that preclude the diagnosis of “clinically established early PD.” Among 212 PD and 152 non‐PD patients, the estimated specificity was 95.4%, with 69.8% sensitivity.Conclusions: We describe high‐specificity criteria for de novo PD, which are freely available for use in clinical trials. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

ABSTRACT This article describes research criteria and probability methodology for the diagnosis of prodromal PD. Prodromal disease refers to the stage wherein early symptoms or signs of PD neurodegeneration are present, but classic clinical diagnosis based on fully evolved motor parkinsonism is not yet possible. Given the lack of clear neuroprotective/disease‐modifying therapy for prodromal PD, these criteria were developed for research purposes only. The criteria are based upon the likelihood of prodromal disease being present with probable prodromal PD defined as ≥80% certainty. Certainty estimates rely upon calculation of an individual's risk of having prodromal PD, using a Bayesian naïve classifier. In this methodology, a previous probability of prodromal disease is delineated based upon age. Then, the probability of prodromal PD is calculated by adding diagnostic information, expressed as likelihood ratios. This diagnostic information combines estimates of background risk (from environmental risk factors and genetic findings) and results of diagnostic marker testing. In order to be included, diagnostic markers had to have prospective evidence documenting ability to predict clinical PD. They include motor and nonmotor clinical symptoms, clinical signs, and ancillary diagnostic tests. These criteria represent a first step in the formal delineation of early stages of PD and will require constant updating as more information becomes available. © 2015 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society