Flatten, Karen S.

Abstract The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a kinase that regulates proliferation and apoptosis, has been extensively evaluated as a therapeutic target in hematologic malignancies. Rapamycin analogues, which partially inhibit mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1), showed limited anti-tumor activity due to feedback mechanisms involving mTORC2 and incomplete inhibition of mTORC1. Thus, attention has turned to agents targeting both mTOR complexes by binding the mTOR kinase domain. The purpose of this study was to delineate the mechanisms of mTOR dual inhibitor induced apoptosis in human neoplastic lymphoid cells in vitro. MTS assays and propidium iodide staining followed by flow cytometry for subdiploid populations demonstrated that OSI-027 and MLN0128 inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in a wide range of lymphoid cell lines including Jurkat, Nalm-6, Molt-4, and SeAX. Raptor and Rictor knockdown in Jurkat and Nalm-6 increased cell death, suggesting both mTOR complexes play a role in apoptosis. 4EBP1 phosphorylation was inhibited by mTOR dual inhibitors, but not by rapamycin. Expression of 4EBP1 T37A/T46A and 4EBP1 T37A/T46A/S65A/T70A, which mimic dephosphorylated 4EBP1, increased Puma mRNA and protein levels as well as apoptosis. Moreover, 4EBP1 knockdown abrogated mTOR dual inhibitor induced Puma upregulation and cell death, further supporting the role of 4EBP1 dephosphorylation in mTORC1 dependent apoptosis. In accord with the known dependence of c-Myc translation on the eIF4E/eIF4G complex, we also observed c-Myc downregulation after treatment with OSI-027, MLN0128 and 4EGI-1, but not rapamycin. Puma induction mirrored c-Myc downregulation under a variety of conditions, including expression of nonphosphorylatable 4EBP1 in parental Jurkat cells or wt 4EBP1 in 4EBP1 deficient cells. Furthermore, c-Myc knockdown induced Puma mRNA and protein as well as increased apoptosis. Collectively, these results support a model in which mTORC1 inhibition, acting through 4EBP1, induces Puma upregulation and apoptosis through c-Myc downregulation. In order to assess the parallel mTORC2-dependent Bim-mediated apoptotic mechanism, we utilized reporter assays and RNAseq experiments. OSI-027-induced Bim promoter activity decreased markedly when the nucleotides -29 to -18 were removed, suggesting that this response element is critical for OSI-027-induced promoter activation. In silico analysis identified eight transcription factors, including SP1, Egr-1, and Myb, that potentially bind this 12-bp region. In RNAseq experiments, we detected a 9-fold increase in Egr-1. Egr-1 upregulation was confirmed by qRT-PCR and immunoblotting after dual inhibitors treatment or Rictor knockdown. Moreover, dominant negative Egr-1 or Egr-1 knockdown diminished dual inhibitor-induced Bim promoter activation and Bim upregulation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that OSI-027 enhances binding of Egr-1 to a region of the Bim promoter including bp -29 to -18, further confirming that Egr-1 functions as a direct transcriptional activator for Bim upon mTOR dual inhibitor treatment. NFκB is a known transcription factor for Egr-1 and we observed increased p65 in the nucleus and increased NFκB transcriptional activity after dual inhibitor treatment. Overexpression of S32A/S36A IκB impaired the ability of dual inhibitors to induce NFκB transcriptional activation, Egr-1 mRNA and protein, Bim promoter activation and Bim mRNA and protein upregulation. Collectively, these results suggest that mTORC2 inhibition induces Bim upregulation and apoptosis through NFκB and Egr-1 transactivation. When fresh clinical ALL isolates were exposed to OSI-027 or MLN0128 ex vivo, inhibition of 4EBP1 phosphorylation along with upregulation of Egr-1 and Bim and/or c-Myc downregulation accompanied by Puma induction occurred, indicating that the pathways identified in ALL cell lines can also potentially be engaged in clinical ALLs. These observations not only provide new insight into the survival roles of mTOR in lymphoid malignancies, but also identify alterations that potentially modulate the action of mTOR dual inhibitors. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Acquired PARP inhibitor (PARPi) resistance in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) as a result of restored homologous recombination has been observed following secondary mutations that restore full-length protein in BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, and RAD51D. Additionally, loss of BRCA1 methylation has also been shown to confer resistance. However, little is known about the role of RAD51C methylation in acquired PARPi resistance. In ARIEL2 Part 1, a phase 2 study of the PARPi rucaparib in ovarian carcinoma, four (2%) tumors demonstrated RAD51C methylation. The present study utilizes HGSOC patient derived xenografts (PDXs) and recurrent samples from ARIEL2 to assess the role of RAD51C methylation in the development of PARPi resistance. Methods: To drive PARPi resistance, PDX039, an extremely PARPi-sensitive model lacking demonstrable mutations in DNA repair genes, was treated cyclically with niraparib (100 mg/kg) for 21 days, after which the tumor was allowed to regrow and re-established in new mice for the next treatment round. To evaluate the frequency of methylation change, RAD51C methylation was analyzed in 12 rucaparib-treated mice (300 or 450 mg/kg) harboring PDX183, a PARPi-sensitive model without mutations in DNA repair genes. Global changes in gene expression following development of PARPi resistance were assessed by RNA sequencing. RAD51C promoter methylation was evaluated by bisulfite sequencing. Subsequent functional analysis included qRT-PCR, IHC, and western blot. DNA damage response pathways are being evaluated by immunofluorescence ex vivo following niraparib, rucaparib, or IR. Results: PDX039 grew through PARPi treatment by the third and fourth cycle of therapy. RAD51C was the only DNA repair gene to show significant change in RNAseq analysis (log2 fold-change=8.43; p=2e-192), corresponding with a loss of RAD51C methylation. Moreover, after just one round of PARPi treatment, RAD51C methylation was lost in 1 of 12 PARPi-treated PDX183 xenografts. RAD51C methylation loss ultimately resulted in restoration of expression, for which functional analysis is ongoing. Analysis of patient samples is currently underway. Conclusions: In HGSOC PDX models, RAD51C methylation affords PARPi sensitivity in the absence of DNA repair gene mutations. Treatment pressure with PARPi can reverse RAD51C methylation and restore RAD51C expression. Isolated changes in methylation of the RAD51C locus are sufficient to restore HR and convey PARPi resistance. Citation Format: Rachel M. Hurley, Ksenija Nesic, Cordelia McGehee, Olga Kondrashova, Maria I. Harrell, Paula A. Schneider, Xiaonan Hou, Cristina Correia, Karen S. Flatten, Giada V. Zapparoli, Alexander Dobrovic, Kevin K. Lin, Thomas C. Harding, Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Matthew Wakefield, S. John Weroha, Clare L. Scott, Scott H. Kaufmann. Loss of RAD51C promoter hypermethylation confers PARP inhibitor resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5885.

Abstract Purpose: To determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of veliparib in combination with weekly topotecan in patients with solid tumors. Correlative studies were included to assess the impact of topotecan and veliparib on poly(ADP-ribose) levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, serum pharmacokinetics of both agents, and potential association of germline repair gene mutations with outcome. Experimental Design: Eligible patients had metastatic nonhematologic malignancies with measurable disease. Using a 3 + 3 design, patients were treated with veliparib orally twice daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17 and topotecan intravenously on days 2, 9, and 16 every 28 days. Tumor responses were assessed by RECIST. Results: Of 58 patients enrolled, 51 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The MTD and RP2D was veliparib 300 mg twice daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17 along with topotecan 3 mg/m2 on days 2, 9, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. DLTs were grade 4 neutropenia lasting >5 days. The median number of cycles was 2 (1–26). The objective response rate was 10%, with 1 complete and 4 partial responses. Twenty-two patients (42%) had stable disease ranging from 4 to 26 cycles. Patients with germline BRCA1, BRCA2, or RAD51D mutations remained on study longer than those without homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations (median 4 vs. 2 cycles). Conclusions: Weekly topotecan in combination with veliparib has a manageable safety profile and appears to warrant further investigation.

A peptide-universal nucleotide conjugate that mimics the topoisomerase I-DNA covalent complex was synthesized and then utilized to raise monoclonal antibodies.

Abstract Purpose: DNA repair defects have been previously reported in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Inhibitors of PARP have shown activity in solid tumors with defects in homologous recombination (HR). This study was performed to assess MPN sensitivity to PARP inhibitors ex vivo. Experimental Design: HR pathway integrity in circulating myeloid cells was evaluated by assessing the formation of RAD51 foci after treatment with ionizing radiation or PARP inhibitors. Sensitivity of MPN erythroid and myeloid progenitors to PARP inhibitors was evaluated using colony formation assays. Results: Six of 14 MPN primary samples had reduced formation of RAD51 foci after exposure to ionizing radiation, suggesting impaired HR. This phenotype was not associated with a specific MPN subtype, JAK2 mutation status, or karyotype. MPN samples showed increased sensitivity to the PARP inhibitors veliparib and olaparib compared with normal myeloid progenitors. This hypersensitivity, which was most pronounced in samples deficient in DNA damage–induced RAD51 foci, was observed predominantly in samples from patients with diagnoses of chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, or unspecified myelodysplastic/MPN overlap syndromes. Conclusions: Like other neoplasms with HR defects, MPNs exhibit PARP inhibitor hypersensitivity compared with normal marrow. These results suggest that further preclinical and possibly clinical study of PARP inhibitors in MPNs is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 22(15); 3894–902. ©2016 AACR.

Key Points Agents that inhibit both complexes containing the mammalian target of rapamycin are particularly toxic to acute lymphocytic leukemia cells. This killing reflects engagement of a 4EBP1/c-MYC/PUMA axis downstream of mTORC1 and an NF-κB/EGR1/BIM axis downstream of mTORC2.

Abstract Replication stress and DNA damage activate the ATR-Chk1 checkpoint signaling pathway that licenses repair and cell survival processes. In this study, we examined the respective roles of the ATR and Chk1 kinases in ovarian cancer cells using genetic and pharmacologic inhibitors in combination with cisplatin, topotecan, gemcitabine, and the PARP inhibitor veliparib (ABT-888), four agents with clinical activity in ovarian cancer. RNA interference (RNAi)–mediated depletion or inhibition of ATR sensitized ovarian cancer cells to all four agents. In contrast, while cisplatin, topotecan, and gemcitabine each activated Chk1, RNAi-mediated depletion or inhibition of this kinase in cells sensitized them only to gemcitabine. Unexpectedly, we found that neither the ATR kinase inhibitor VE-821 nor the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776 blocked ATR-mediated Chk1 phosphorylation or autophosphorylation, two commonly used readouts for inhibition of the ATR-Chk1 pathway. Instead, their ability to sensitize cells correlated with enhanced CDC25A levels. In addition, we also found that VE-821 could further sensitize BRCA1-depleted cells to cisplatin, topotecan, and veliparib beyond the potent sensitization already caused by their deficiency in homologous recombination. Taken together, our results established that ATR and Chk1 inhibitors differentially sensitize ovarian cancer cells to commonly used chemotherapy agents and that Chk1 phosphorylation status may not offer a reliable marker for inhibition of the ATR-Chk1 pathway. A key implication of our work is the clinical rationale it provides to evaluate ATR inhibitors in combination with PARP inhibitors in BRCA1/2-deficient cells. Cancer Res; 73(12); 3683–91. ©2013 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Incorporation of cytarabine into DNA activates checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), which stabilizes stalled replication forks, induces S-phase slowing, and diminishes cytarabine cytotoxicity. The selective Chk1 inhibitor SCH 900776 abrogates cytarabine-induced S-phase arrest and enhances cytarabine cytotoxicity in acute leukemia cell lines and leukemic blasts in vitro. To extend these findings to the clinical setting, we have conducted a phase I study of cytarabine and SCH 900776. Experimental Design: Twenty-four adults with relapsed and refractory acute leukemias received timed sequential, continuous infusion cytarabine 2 g/m2 over 72 hours (667 mg/m2/24 hours) beginning on day 1 and again on day 10. SCH 900776 was administered as a 15- to 30-minute infusion on days 2, 3, 11, and 12. The starting dose of SCH 900776 was 10 mg/m2/dose. Results: Dose-limiting toxicities consisting of corrected QT interval prolongation and grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia occurred at 140 mg flat dosing (dose level 5, equivalent to 80 mg/m2). Complete remissions occurred in 8 of 24 (33%) patients, with 7 of 8 at 40 mg/m2 or higher. SCH 900776 did not accumulate at any dose level. Marrow blasts obtained pretreatment and during therapy showed increased phosphorylation of H2Ax after SCH 900776 beginning at 40 mg/m2, consistent with unrepaired DNA damage. Conclusions: These data support a randomized phase II trial of cytarabine +/− SCH 900776 at a recommended flat dose of 100 mg (equivalent to 56 mg/m2) for adults with poor-risk leukemias. The trial (SP P05247) was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00907517. Clin Cancer Res; 18(24); 6723–31. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Previous studies have shown that the replication checkpoint, which involves the kinases ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3 related (ATR) and Chk1, contributes to cytarabine resistance in cell lines. In the present study, we examined whether this checkpoint is activated in clinical acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) during cytarabine infusion in vivo and then assessed the impact of combining cytarabine with the recently described Chk1 inhibitor SCH 900776 in vitro. Experimental design: AML marrow aspirates harvested before and during cytarabine infusion were examined by immunoblotting. Human AML lines treated with cytarabine in the absence or presence of SCH 900776 were assayed for checkpoint activation by immunoblotting, nucleotide incorporation into DNA, and flow cytometry. Long-term effects in AML lines, clinical AML isolates, and normal myeloid progenitors were assayed using clonogenic assays. Results: Immunoblotting revealed increased Chk1 phosphorylation, a marker of checkpoint activation, in more than half of Chk1-containing AMLs after 48 hours of cytarabine infusion. In human AML lines, SCH 900776 not only disrupted cytarabine-induced Chk1 activation and S-phase arrest but also markedly increased cytarabine-induced apoptosis. Clonogenic assays demonstrated that SCH 900776 enhanced the antiproliferative effects of cytarabine in AML cell lines and clinical AML samples at concentrations that had negligible impact on normal myeloid progenitors. Conclusions: These results not only provide evidence for cytarabine-induced S-phase checkpoint activation in AML in the clinical setting, but also show that a selective Chk1 inhibitor can overcome the S-phase checkpoint and enhance the cytotoxicity of cytarabine. Accordingly, further investigation of the cytarabine/SCH 900776 combination in AML appears warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 18(19); 5364–73. ©2012 AACR.