Stokken, Janalee K.

Background Giant frontal mucoceles, characterized by significant intracranial and/or intraorbital extension, can present with significant neurologic symptoms. Although typical mucoceles are managed endoscopically, giant mucoceles are often treated with an open or combined approach due to various concerns, including frontal lobe displacement, size, and rapid decompression of the intracranial component. The impact of significant intracranial extension on outcomes is not well described. Objective This review studied key neurologic considerations in the management of giant frontal sinus mucoceles and analyzed outcomes of different management strategies. Methods Systematic literature review by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Results Thirty-two articles, which represented 85 cases, met inclusion criteria. Neurologic symptoms on presentation ranged from headache (24.7%) and vision loss (12.9%) to extremity weakness (1.2%), frontal lobe syndrome (2.4%), and seizures (4.7%). Twenty-eight patients were treated endoscopically (34.1%), and 54 (65.9%) were treated with an external approach. Twenty-five of the open procedures included a craniotomy. Indications for the open approach included subdural empyema, enucleation, or large anterior table defects. Perioperative antibiotics were not consistently used. No perioperative seizures were reported with any approach. There were six cerebrospinal fluid leaks, all in the patients who underwent open procedures. The overall recurrence rate was 3.5%, with no recurrences reported in patients treated with an open approach. Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 8 years. Conclusions Giant frontal mucoceles often present with various neurologic symptoms. Both open and endoscopic techniques offer excellent results. Endoscopic management is effective and preferred, except in special circumstances. An interdisciplinary team approach should be used to optimize surgical planning.

Background The interaction between the host and microorganisms in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is poorly understood and is a growing area of interest. More recently, methodologies have been developed to assess the microbiome without the use of culture by analyzing the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene. We reviewed the microbiome literature to better understand the role of microbes in CRS. Methods Systematic review of studies that used the 16S ribosomal RNA gene deep sequencing. Results Nine publications met the search criteria. Eight studies evaluated the microbiome in controls (total, 83 subjects; range, 3-28 per study), whereas six of the studies included patients with CRS (total, 121 patients; range, 7-43 per study). Various sequencing techniques, primers, sample sites, and extraction methods were used. Of the articles that specified the number of taxa in controls, an average of 1587 taxa were identified (range, 911-2330). Significant heterogeneity was noted among the studies; however, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroides phyla were identified in every sample of control patients and patients with CRS. Three of the studies showed enrichment to some degree of Staphylococcus aureus in patients with CRS. The total bacterial burden in CRS was similar to the controls. One study demonstrated a decrease in diversity, whereas other studies did not show any changes in CRS when compared with controls. Conclusion Although there are common phyla present in both control patients and patients with CRS, no consistent enrichment of any particular taxon was identified. Our findings indicated that there was no clear single causative microbe in CRS. More studies are needed to better understand the significance of the host interaction with the microbiome and the role it plays in CRS.

Objectives/HypothesisTo review our experience with endoscopic orbital apex surgery.Study DesignRetrospective review.MethodsAll cases with Current Procedural Terminology codes for endoscopic orbital decompression between 2002 and 2011 at two institutions were reviewed. Patients with a diagnosis of Graves orbitopathy or an orbital complication of sinusitis were excluded. Presenting symptoms, lesion location, pathology, surgical outcomes, and complications were examined.ResultsA total of 27 patients were identified. Seventeen (63%) of the patients were men, and the average age was 56 (range = 14–82) years. Eighteen patients had primary orbital apex lesions, and nine patients had sinonasal lesions that predominantly involved the medial orbital apex. The lesions were found to be on the right in 59% of cases. The etiologies include benign (40.7%), malignant (44%), infectious (7.4%), and metastatic (7.4%) lesions. Obtaining a pathologic diagnosis was successful endoscopically in all but two (7.4%) patients, both with lateral lesions. The two‐surgeon, four‐handed technique and intraoperative image guidance employing fused computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging were used in the majority of intraconal cases. Complications occurred in three patients (11%) and included myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis, and vision loss. There were no cerebrospinal fluid leaks or postoperative hemorrhages. Notably, vision remained stable or improved in all but one patient (3.7% risk of vision decline). Average follow‐up was 4 years (range = 1 month–8 years).ConclusionsThe endoscopic approach to the orbit apex offers significant advantages over traditional external approaches, and should be the preferred approach for all medial and inferior lesions. A two‐surgeon multihanded technique can help facilitate difficult cases.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 126:20–24, 2016