McAllister‐Lucas, Linda M.

Abstract BACKGROUND H3K27-altered diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is a devastating pediatric brainstem tumor that affects 200-300 individuals in the US per year. Median survival is 9-11 months, and there are virtually no long-term survivors. Despite decades of clinical trials, radiation therapy remains standard of care, extending survival by 2-3 months. Elucidating the mechanisms that drive H3K27-altered DMG pathogenesis in order to uncover therapeutic vulnerabilities is of critical importance. Recent studies implicate MALT1 as a potential therapeutic target in gliomas. MALT1 is the effector molecule of the CARMA-BCL10-MALT1 (CBM) signalosome, a cytoplasmic protein complex that drives downstream pro-survival transcriptional activity. MALT1, which possesses scaffolding and protease functions, promotes cell viability, proliferation, and migration/invasion in multiple cancer types. We aim to evaluate the hypotheses that MALT1 promotes DMG cancer cell proliferation and migration and that MALT1 inhibition will abrogate tumor progression. METHODS/RESULTS We screened a panel of cells including astrocytes, neural stem cells, and DMG cell lines by Western blot and found that CBM complex members BCL10 and MALT1 are present in all cells tested. We next demonstrated that MALT1 is proteolytically active in DMG cell lines SF8628 and HSJD-DIPG-007. Specifically, we showed cleavage of the MALT1 protease substrate HOIL, which was abrogated by treatment with the MALT1 protease inhibitor MLT-748. We next generated multiple dox-inducible MALT1 shRNA DMG cell lines to assess the impact of MALT1 deficiency on DMG biology. Thus far, we find that shRNA knockdown of MALT1 does not impact SF8628 cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS MALT1 is expressed and proteolytically active in DMG cells. Initial studies show that MALT1 knockdown does not affect proliferation of SF8628 cells. We will next evaluate the effect of MALT1 knockdown on proliferation of additional DMG cell lines, as well as the impact on other malignant features of DMG cells including migration/invasion.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) represents approximately 40% of all childhood and adolescent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Miles/Cairo, BJH 2012). Children with relapsed or progressive BL develop chemoimmunotherapy-resistant disease and can rarely be cured with salvage therapy (Cairo et al, JCO 2012). Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a regulator of normal B-cell development and is activated upon B-cell receptor (BCR) stimulation. Chronic active BCR signaling through BTK activation can be inhibited by the selective and covalent BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib (Young/Staudt et al, Nat Rev Drug Dicov 2013). Preclinical studies of ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) suggest that its inhibitory effect on cell proliferation is in the range of 1.0uM to 25.0uM (Herman et al, Blood 2011; Cinar et al, Leuk Res 2013), which is higher than the typical plasma concentration range in patients at the recommended dose of 560mg (<0.6uM) (Advani et al, JCO 2013). Despite these relatively high IC50 values in vitro, ibrutinib has been highly effective in the treatment of patients with refractory CLL and MCL (Byrd et al, NEJM 2013 and Wang et al, NEJM 2013). Ibrutinib was initially approved by the FDA (IMBRUVICA, USPI) for patients with MCL in November 2013 and CLL in February 2014, who have received at least one prior therapy. BL, however, is associated with tonic vs chronic active BCR signaling; while, both CLL and MCL have chronic active BCR signaling. These findings suggest that the antitumor activity of ibrutinib in BL, which is associated with tonic BCR signaling, may be less pronounced than in Activated B cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (ABC-DLBCL), CLL or MCL. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesize that ibrutinib may be a potential adjuvant agent in the treatment of BL. Therefore, we investigated the in vivo anti-tumor activity of ibrutinib in BL xenografted NSG mice. METHODS: Raji Burkitt lymphoma (BL) cells (ATCC) were exposed to ibrutinib (0-10uM, generously provided by Janssen R&D LLC) alone and in combination with dexamethasone (1uM) for 5 days and then MTS cell proliferation assay (Promega) was performed. The IC50 values were determined with CompuSynTM software (Chou and Martin, ComboSyn, 2005) based on data derived from MTS assay. Raji BL cells were stably transfected with a firefly luciferase expression plasmid (ffluc-zeo), kindly provided by Laurence Cooper MD, PhD. NSG mice (NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ, 6-8 weeks old) from Jackson laboratory were irradiated (2.5 Gy) and then mice were subcutaneously injected with one million ffluc-zeo tumor cells. Tumor progression and tumor burden were monitored by Bioluminescent Imaging system using the Xenogen IVIS-200 (Caliper Life Sciences). Mice were orally gavaged with either vehicle or ibrutinib (12.5mg/kg) for 10 days (once a day) at post-tumor cells injection. Analysis of survival rates were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences evaluated by log-rank test using the Prism Version 6.0 software. RESULTS: Ibrutinib compared to control induced a significant dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation in Raji BL cells (5uM, 0.561 ± 0.170, p<0.03, IC50=5.20uM) following 120 hours (5 days) of ibrutinib treatment. Interestingly, we observed a significant decrease in cell proliferation in Raji BL cells (5uM, 0.213 ± 0.078, p<0.002, IC=0.50 ± 0.374uM) following ibrutinib and 1uM dexamethasone combination treatment following 120 hours (5 days) of treatment. We observed a significant decrease of tumor progression by tumor luminescence signal intensity following ibrutinib treated Raji BL xenografted NSG mice at day 20 (12.5mg/kg, p<0.001 and 25mg/kg, p<0.05) and day 25 (12.5mg/kg, p<0.05 and 25mg/kg, p<0.05) compared to control (Figure 1A).Ibrutinib (12.5 mg/kg) treated mice (n=39) significantly prolonged survival compared to vehicle controls (n=28) (p<0.0001) (Figure 1B). CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib (12.5mg/kg) significantly decreased tumor progression and significantly increased survival in Raji BL xenografted NSG mice, suggesting that ibrutinib may be a potential adjuvant agent for therapy in the treatment of BL. Future studies will investigate the efficacy of combination therapy with ibrutinib on survival in BL xenografted NOD/SCID mice. Disclosures Galardy: Mission Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma (PMBL) is a rare form of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Lones/Cairo et al, JCO 2000). We have previously reported a significant decrease in EFS among pediatric and adolescent patients with PMBL compared with other stage III non-PMBL diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients following FAB/LMB 96 therapy, suggesting that new therapeutic targeted agents are needed (Gerrard/Cairo et al, Blood 2013). Activation of the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway has now emerged as a central oncogenic pathway that promotes growth and survival in both normal and malignant B-cells. The cascade of signaling pathways downstream of the BCR includes BTK, MAPK, NF-κB and AKT. PMBL has a constitutively activated NF-kB pathway (Rosenwald et al, JEM 2003). Ibrutinib is a selective and covalent BTK inhibitor that inhibits chronic active BCR signaling and downstream signaling including the NF-kB pathway (Herman et al, Blood 2014) and is an active agent in ABC-DLBCL, which also has an activated NF-kB pathway (Griner et al, PNAS 2014). Preclinical studies of ibrutinib in CLL and MCL suggested that the inhibitory effects on cell proliferation were seen in the range of 1.0uM to 25.0uM (Herman et al, Blood 2011; Cinar et al, Leuk. Res 2013). Despite these relatively high IC50 values in vitro, ibrutinib has been highly effective in the treatment of patients with refractory CLL and MCL (Byrd et al, NEJM 2013 and Wang et al, NEJM 2013). Ibrutinib was approved by the FDA (IMBRUVICA, USPI) for patients with MCL in November 2013 or CLL in February 2014, who have received at least one prior therapy. However, the antitumor activity against PMBL of ibrutinib alone and in combination with other agents is currently unknown. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesize that ibrutinib in combination with other agents may be a future targeted agent in the treatment of PMBL. Therefore, we investigated the effect of ibrutinib alone and in combination with dexamethasone, rituximab and carfilzomib on cell proliferation and apoptosis in a PMBL cell line. METHODS: The Karpas-1106P PMBL cell line (DSMZ, Germany) was treated with ibrutinib alone (0-10uM, generously provided by Janssen R&D LLC) and in combination with dexamethasone (1uM), rituximab (20ug/ml) and carfilzomib (5nM) for 5 days treatment. The MTS cell proliferation assay (Promega) and western blot analysis were performed. Significant differences were determined by Student's t -test.The IC50 values were determined with CompuSyn software (Chou and Martin, ComboSyn, 2005). RESULTS: We observed a significant down-regulation of phosphorylated BTK after 5 days with ibrutinib treatment in Karpas-1106P cell line with 1uM ibrutinib (0.178 ± 1.63, p<0.0001) and the expression of total BTK protein was also significantly decreased with 1uM ibrutinib following 5 days of treatment (0.803±0.190, p<0.005) compared to control (1.000±0.00). We also observed a significant dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation (0-10uM, p<0.0001) in ibrutinib-treated Karpas-1106P PMBL cell line. In combination with dexamethasone, the ibrutinib IC50 values for inhibition of cell proliferation were significantly decreased from 0.71uM ± 0.172 (ibrutinib alone) to 0.04uM ± 0.007 (p<0.005) with 1.0uM dexamethasone combination following 5 days of treatment. Second, in combination with rituximab experiment, the ibrutinib IC50 values was significantly decreased from 0.845uM ± 0.289 (ibrutinib alone) to 0.37uM ± 0.056 (p<0.05) with 20ug/ml rituximab following 5 days of treatment. Lastly, the ibrutinib IC50 values were significantly decreased from 0.72uM ± 0.185 (ibrutinib alone) to 0.002uM ± 0.001 (p<0.005) with 5nM carfilzomib combination following 5 days of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib alone and in combination with dexamethasone, rituximab and carfilzomib significantly inhibited cell proliferation in the Karpas-1106P PMBL cell line. Ibrutinib's potential as an adjuvant agent in combination treatment in patients with PMBL is supported by these experiments. Future studies will focus on the in vivo effects of ibrutinib alone and in combination with dexamethasone and carfilzomib in a NOD/SCID PMBL xenograft mouse model. Disclosures Galardy: Mission Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Burkitt lymphoma (BL) represents approximately 40% of all childhood and adolescent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Miles/Cairo, BJH, 2012). Children with relapsed or progressive BL develop chemotherapy-resistant disease and can rarely be cured with salvage therapy (Cairo et al, JCO, 2012). Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a regulator of normal B-cell development and is activated upon B-cell receptor (BCR) stimulation. Chronic active BCR signaling through BTK activation can be inhibited by the selective and covalent BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib (Young et al, Nat Rev, 2013). Ibrutinib has been highly effective in the treatment of refractory patients with CLL and MCL and has been approved by the FDA for patients with CLL or MCL who have received at least one prior therapy (USPI) (Byrd et al, NEJM, 2013 and Wang et al, NEJM, 2013). BL, however, is associated with tonic or possibly chronic active BCR signaling; while, both CLL and MCL have chronic active BCR signaling. We have previously demonstrated ibrutinib significantly decrease BL proliferation and viability in vitro (Lee/Cairo et al, ASH, 2014) OBJECTIVE: We hypothesize that ibrutinib may be a potential adjuvant agent in the treatment of BL. Therefore, we investigated the in vivo anti-tumor activity of ibrutinib in BL xenografted NOD/SCID (NSG) mice. METHODS: The luciferase expression plasmid (ffluc-Zeo), kindly provided by L. Cooper, MD) was transfected into Raji cells. Cells were subcutaneously injected into NSG mice (6-8wks old, NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ, Jackson lab). Tumor cells engraftment and progression were examined by Bioluminescent Imaging using the Xenogen IVIS-200 (Caliper Life Sciences). Mice were orally gavaged with vehicle control or Ibrutinib (1.25, 12.5 and 25mg/kg/day, generously provided by Janssen R&D, LLC) for 10 days. Statistical probability of survival and curve were determined by Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS: We observed a significant decrease in tumor luminescence intensity following ibrutinib treated BL xenografted NSG mice at day 20 (12.5mg/kg, p&lt;0.001 and 25mg/kg, p&lt;0.05) and at day 25 (12.5mg/kg, p&lt;0.05 and 25mg/kg, p&lt;0.05) compared to vehicle control. Furthermore, ibrutinib (12.5 mg/kg) treated mice significantly prolonged survival compared to vehicle control mice (p&lt;0.05). The median survival of mice following ibrutinib treatment (1.25, 12.5 and 25 mg/kg) were 31.5, 37.5 and 22.5 days, respectively, compared to control (24 days). CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib significantly decreased tumor progression and significantly increased the survival in BL xenografted NSG mice following 12.5mg/kg ibrutinib treatment. These results indicate that ibrutinib may be a potential adjuvant agent therapy in the treatment of BL. Future directions will be investigated the efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with dexamethasone in BL xenografted NSG mice. Citation Format: Sanghoon Lee, Changhong Yin, Timmy O'Connell, Matthew Barth, Janet Ayello, Lauren Harrison, Carmella van de Ven, Rodney Miles, Paul Galardy, Stanton C. Goldman, Megan Lim, Michelle Hermiston, Linda McAllister-Lucas, Lisa G. Roth, Sherrie L. Perkins, Mitchell S. Cairo. Ibrutinib significantly improves survival in a human Burkitt lymphoma (BL) xenograft NSG mouse model: Ibrutinib may be a potential adjuvant agent in the treatment of BL. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2608. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2608