Bydon, Mohamad

Study Design. Post hoc analysis of prospectively-collected data. Objective. To identify factors predicting the most (and least) satisfaction following surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Summary of Background Data. Patient satisfaction affects long-term outcomes after surgery but the preoperative factors that influence postoperative satisfaction have not been well studied in patients with CSM. Methods. We conducted a post hoc analysis of prospectively-collected data from the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM registry cohort. Baseline and surgical characteristics were compared for patients with CSM reporting the most [North American Spine Society Satisfaction Score (NASS) 1] and least (NASS 4) satisfaction 24 months postoperatively. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed using backward stepwise elimination to determine significant predictors of most versus least satisfaction. Twenty-four-month patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared. Results. Overall, 1141 patients were prospectively enrolled with 948 (83.1%) reaching 24-month follow-up. Of these, 699 met prespecified inclusion criteria: 610 (87.3%) were most satisfied and 89 (12.7%) were least satisfied. Though there were mean improvements in all 24-month PROs for the most satisfied cohort ( P <0.001), there were no significant improvements in 24-month PROs for the least satisfied cohort ( P >0.05). Using multivariable logistic regression modeling, a preoperative symptom of upper extremity weakness (OR=2.5, P =0.003), subjective myelopathy (OR=2.0, P =0.04), absence of numbness complaints (OR=2.2, P =0.003), symptom duration under 12 months (OR=1.6, P =0.047), Caucasian race (OR=2.3, P =0.001), participation in activities outside of the home (OR=2.0, P =0.04), anterior approach (OR=2.3, P <0.001), and higher baseline quality of life (OR=4.0, P =0.01) were predictive of the most satisfaction. Conclusion. Compared with the least satisfied, those most satisfied following surgery for CSM more often had a preoperative symptom of arm weakness, subjective myelopathy, the absence of numbness complaints, symptom duration under 12 months, higher baseline quality of life, and participation in activities outside of the home. Compared with a posterior approach, an anterior approach was associated with the most satisfaction. Taken together, early surgical treatment--before myelopathic symptoms significantly impact one's quality of life--may be considered to optimize patient satisfaction following CSM surgery.

Background Although regional anesthesia (RA) is associated with improved pain control, reduced opioid use, and accelerated recovery after arthroplasty, racial and geographic differences have been identified in hip and knee arthroplasty, with limited data for shoulder and ankle arthroplasty. We examined differences in RA utilization for shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle arthroplasty, based on patient-level and hospital-level characteristics. Methods Using the National Inpatient Sample, we conducted a cross-sectional study of adults who underwent shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle arthroplasties from 2016 to 2020. RA was defined using procedure codes for neuraxial anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks. Weighted descriptive statistics summarized RA utilization and compared patient-level and hospital-level characteristics using standardized mean differences (SMDs), with ≥0.10 indicating meaningful differences. Results We identified 1132 011 unweighted admissions, representing approximately 5.7 million weighted arthroplasties. RA was used in 7.0% of cases. RA utilization varied by procedure type, with the highest rates in shoulder (11.4%) and ankle arthroplasty (11.4%), followed by knee (9.1%) and hip arthroplasty (2.4%). Variation in RA utilization was observed in ankle arthroplasty based on race (SMD=0.11) and primary payer (SMD=0.12). RA use also varied by hospital size for shoulder (SMD=0.13), hip (SMD=0.29), and knee arthroplasty (SMD=0.22), by hospital location and teaching status for shoulder (SMD=0.17), hip (SMD=0.18), knee (SMD=0.19), and ankle arthroplasty (SMD=0.12), and by geographic region for shoulder (SMD=0.26), hip (SMD=0.45), knee (SMD=0.24), and ankle arthroplasty (SMD=0.17). Conclusions There is notable variation in RA use for inpatient arthroplasty across hospitals and geographic regions, with limited variation based on patient characteristics. These findings highlight the presence of system-level variation in RA use and underscore the need for further research to better understand the drivers of these patterns.

Abstract Background Spinal cord injury (SCI) induces complex secondary pathophysiological cascades, including microvascular disruption, glial activation, and chronic neuroinflammation. These vascular changes are dynamic and spatially heterogeneous across acute, subacute, and chronic phases. However, limitations in in vivo imaging resolution have impeded precise, longitudinal evaluation of spinal microcirculation. Objective To quantify post-SCI alterations in spinal cord vessel density, flow speed, and morphology over time using ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM), and to correlate these changes with chronic astrocytic reactivity assessed by GFAP expression. Methods Eleven Sprague-Dawley rats underwent T9–T11 laminectomy; nine received a standardized 200 kdyn contusion using the Infinite Horizons Impactor and were assigned to acute (24h), subacute (7d), and chronic (21d) groups (n = 3/group), while two served as uninjured controls. ULM was performed using a Vevo 3100 high-frequency ultrasound system with a 40 MHz transducer following intravenous Definity® microbubble injection. Vessel density (VD) and flow speed (FS) were quantified at the lesion epicenter and adjacent rostral/caudal regions. Arterial and venous compartments were distinguished by flow direction. Histological sections were stained for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and %Area was quantified across phases. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test evaluated between-group differences; Pearson correlation identified phase-specific relationships between vascular metrics and chronic GFAP expression. Results ULM provided super-resolved imaging of spinal microvasculature at 5–10 µm resolution. Venous VD significantly declined from 0.92 ± 0.18 (acute) to 0.42 ± 0.23 (subacute) and 0.11 ± 0.07 (chronic, p < 0.001), particularly in dorsal regions. Arterial VD remained stable across timepoints (p > 0.05), while FS demonstrated transient reductions in both arterial and venous systems during the subacute phase. Chronic venous FS partially recovered by Day 21. GFAP-positive area increased significantly in the chronic group (3.3 ± 0.87%) compared to acute (1.52 ± 0.42%) and subacute (1.40 ± 0.05%) (p < 0.05), indicating delayed astrocyte reactivity. Correlation analysis revealed significant inverse associations between chronic GFAP %Area and early ventral venous density (r = − 1.0, p < 0.05), as well as positive correlations with chronic ventral arterial FS (r = 1.0, p < 0.01), suggesting early microvascular deficits may predict long-term gliosis. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility and power of ULM to quantify dynamic microvascular remodeling in SCI with unprecedented resolution. Venous rarefaction precedes chronic astrocytosis, while arterial flow speed partially recovers over time. These findings highlight key spatiotemporal biomarkers of injury progression and support the use of ULM as a noninvasive platform for monitoring SCI pathophysiology and guiding therapeutic timing.

Study Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective. To assess how operative order affects clinical outcomes and complications in patients with concomitant lumbar spinal and hip pathologies. Summary of Background Data. Concomitant lumbar spinal and hip pathologies are becoming increasingly prevalent in the growing population. Determining the optimal operative order for surgical treatment remains challenging, particularly when comparing spine arthrodesis followed by hip arthroplasty (SAHA) with hip arthroplasty followed by spine arthrodesis (HASA). Prior studies report conflicting results regarding outcomes and complications. Methods. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies reporting on postoperative outcomes and complications in patients with concomitant lumbar spinal and hip pathologies. Random-effects model meta-analysis of pooled outcomes was performed comparing operative order groups (SAHA and HASA), with postoperative complications and revisions being our primary endpoints. Results. A total of 22 studies, yielding 161,326 patients who received surgical treatment for concomitant lumbar spinal and hip pathologies, were included. The majority of patients underwent SAHA (pooled estimate: 88.4%, 95% CI: 76.9–96.3%, P =0.01). Females comprised 56.1% (95% CI: 49.2–62.8%) of the study population. The mean age was 70.6±6.4 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 2.6±2.1 years. The mean number of treated levels was 2.1±1.4. No significant differences were noted between the SAHA and HASA groups with respect to complications, including hip dislocation ( P =0.7), mechanical loosening ( P =0.8), periprosthetic fractures ( P =0.7), deep venous thrombosis (DVT) ( P =0.8), and infection ( P =0.9). Revisions were required in 3.6% of patients in the SAHA group (95% CI: 2.5–4.9%) and 2.6% of patients in the HASA group (95% CI: 0.5–6.2%, P =0.5). Conclusion. Among patients surgically treated for concomitant lumbar spinal and hip pathologies, SAHA was significantly more commonly performed than HASA. Our analysis shows that postoperative complications and revisions did not significantly differ depending on operative order.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: This study aims to assess the effects of CT-based subsidence on lumbar sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and to determine if subsidence and cage properties are independent predictors of postoperative changes in regional lordosis. Summary of Background Data: Subsidence is a well-known complication following interbody fusion and has previously been associated with recurrence of preoperative symptoms and higher reoperation rates. There is incomplete evidence to characterize the effects of subsidence on lumbar alignment and PROMs following TLIF. Methods: All adult patients who underwent 1- or 2-level TLIF at a multi-institutional academic center between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Interbody subsidence at the superior and inferior endplate of each TLIF level was directly measured on both coronal and sagittal CT scans obtained between 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on the maximum subsidence at each operative level: mild-moderate (<4 mm) or severe (≥4 mm). Preoperative, immediate (<3 mo), and intermediate (>6 mo) postoperative radiographic outcomes (local and global lumbar alignment) and PROMs (VAS Back, Oswestry Disability Index, PROMIS Physical Function and Mood) were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared patient demographics, surgical factors, and changes in radiographic measures and PROMs across subsidence groups. Multiple linear regression analyzed independent effects of subsidence and cage characteristics on alignment. Results: Sixty-seven patients with 85 unique fusion levels were included (55 with mild-moderate subsidence, 30 with severe subsidence). Levels with severe subsidence demonstrated significantly less regional lordosis at final follow-up than nonseverely subsided levels (6.4 vs. 9.1 degrees, P =0.032). No PROM significantly differed between severe and nonsevere subsidence subgroups. Linear regression analysis revealed that severe subsidence was a strong independent predictor of regional lordosis ( P =0.029) at final follow-up. Conclusions: Severe subsidence negates perioperative improvements in regional lordosis following TLIF, while changes in regional alignment are maintained in the absence of severe subsidence. Level of Evidence: Level III.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgeon-team familiarity is a critical factor that affects surgical outcomes. The relationships between familiarity and surgical outcomes are varied, and an operational definition of this measure remains underdeveloped. This study creates an effective time-based measure of surgeon-team familiarity and assesses its association with clinical and operational outcomes for neurosurgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 9049 neurosurgery cases performed at 2 campuses of a tertiary academic medical center over a 3-year timeframe was conducted. This study measures normalized case duration as a proxy for operational performance and 30-day postoperative complications for clinical outcomes. Multivariate linear regression and logistic regression were used to analyze relationships between surgeon-team familiarity and surgical outcomes, with risk factors as control variables for case mix. RESULTS: For normalized case duration, the coefficient of surgeon-team familiarity is negative (β = −0.015, P = .03), but the squared term exhibits a positive relationship (β = 0.049, P = .003). The overall regression is statistically significant ( R 2 = 0.046, adjusted R 2 = 0.045, P < .001). The logistic regression shows that surgeon-team familiarity scores are negatively correlated (odds ratio = 0.356, 95% CI [0.126, 0.987]) with the risks of postoperative complications. It is statistically significant and explains between 2.4% (Cox & Snell R Square) and 6.0% (Nagelkerke R Square) of the variance for postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study found that surgeon-team familiarity is positively associated with neurosurgery outcomes. Teams familiar with the surgeons will likely improve operational performance and reduce the risk of postoperative complications, whereas too much familiarity may lengthen the case duration. Surgical practice leaders can use electronic health record data to define appropriate familiarity scores and incorporate key metrics when developing surgical team assignments for optimal operating room performance.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) lack consensus on the most appropriate calculation method. This retrospective study aimed to identify the optimal MCIDs for commonly used PROMs in CSM. METHODS: The CSM database from the Quality Outcomes Database SpineCORe Study Group was analyzed. Baseline, 3-month, and 24-month PROM values for Neck Disability Index (NDI), 5-dimension Euro-quality of life (EQ-5D) in quality-adjusted life years, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, and neck/arm pain numeric rating scale (NRS) were collected. MCIDs were calculated for each PROM using previously validated techniques. MCID values were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) with the North American Spine Society satisfaction scale as an anchor. RESULTS: A total of 1141 patients with CSM undergoing surgery were included in this analysis. Improvement of ≥30% from baseline was the optimal MCID for NDI and neck/arm NRS. At 24 months, the optimal percentage cutoff MCID for these instruments resulted in AUCs of 0.76, 0.72, and 0.67, similar to the 30% improvement method, with AUCs of 0.73, 0.71, and 0.67, respectively. Numeric cutoffs (0.065 at 3 months; 0.149 at 24 months) were the superior MCIDs for EQ-5D. For mJOA score, a severity-adjusted MCID outperformed other methods, yielding an AUC of 0.67 at 24 months. MCIDs were achieved in 63% of patients for NDI, 59% for neck pain NRS, 61% for arm pain NRS, 52% for EQ-5D, and 59% for mJOA score at 24 months. CONCLUSION: Using the Quality Outcomes Database SpineCORe data set, we defined optimal MCIDs for key PROMs in CSM. A ≥30% improvement from baseline was optimal in NDI and arm/neck NRS. An absolute numeric cutoff was superior for EQ-5D (0.149 at the 24-month follow-up). A severity-adjusted MCID performed best for mJOA score. These redefined benchmarks better capture the treatment impact and guide care decisions for patients with CSM.

OBJECTIVE Isthmic spondylolisthesis impacts up to 11.5% of the general population. For patients who have failed conservative therapy, decompression and fusion or decompression alone are options for surgical management. However, there remains debate as to whether reduction of mobile spondylolisthesis is integral to good patient outcomes. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address this by comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between patients treated with fusion in situ and those undergoing fusion with reduction of isthmic spondylolisthesis. METHODS The Scopus, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases were systematically queried on the basis of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies comparing treatment outcomes in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis after in situ fusion or fusion with spondylolisthesis reduction. Endpoints of interest included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, hospitalization duration, operative morbidity, and rates of surgical revision. Data from individual studies were aggregated using random-effects models to assess combined effects. RESULTS Of 277 identified studies, 7 studies were included with an aggregate 308 patients (143 underwent fusion in situ and 165 underwent reduction). Patients who underwent reduction for isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis had significantly lower rates of pseudarthrosis at last follow-up (OR 0.22, p = 0.03). Estimated blood loss, operative time, hospitalization duration, change in ODI score, change in back pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), and reoperation rate did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS For patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis, the present data suggest that fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis may lower rates of pseudarthrosis as compared to in situ fusion. However, operative morbidity and improvement in patient-reported outcomes were similar between strategies.

OBJECTIVE Hundreds of thousands of Americans undergo decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis annually. The mild (minimally invasive lumbar decompression) procedure was developed as a potentially less invasive alternative to open decompression; however, much of the evidence has been gathered from industry-sponsored studies. The present study sought to compare real-world clinical outcomes between the mild procedure and open decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS All patients who underwent the mild procedure at a single-institution, multisite, tertiary care center from 2005 to October 2024 were included. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to identify patients who underwent open decompression at the same institution, with age, sex, smoking, and comorbidities as covariates. Primary outcomes were change in pain on the numeric rating scale (NRS), surgical reoperation, and perioperative complications. For pain, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as a 30% improvement in NRS score. RESULTS A total of 175 patients who underwent the mild procedure (mean age 76.3 ± 8.7 years; 44.6% female) were matched to 175 patients treated with open decompression (mean age 75.4 ± 8.7 years; 44.0% female). Among patients with at least 60 days of follow-up, those treated with open decompression were more likely to achieve the MCID for pain (43.1% vs 22.2%, p < 0.001). Patients treated with mild were more likely to require reoperation (46.2% vs 29.3%, p = 0.008). Those who underwent the mild procedure experienced lower rates of durotomies (0% vs 2.9%, p = 0.024) but had higher rates of neurological deficits (6.3% vs 0.6%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS For patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis, those who underwent open decompression were more likely to achieve pain improvement and less likely to require reoperation compared with those who underwent the mild procedure.

OBJECTIVE Surgical site infection (SSI) is a leading cause of morbidity following posterior spine surgery. The optimal choice of skin closure technique depending on patient- and procedure-specific characteristics remains to be elucidated. METHODS The Neurosurgery Enterprise Registry (NER) at Mayo Clinic was queried for patients who underwent posterior spine surgery from 2017 to 2023. Propensity matching was performed to match patients on the basis of the development of SSI and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, race, and comorbidities. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed using data from the NER and medical records. RESULTS A total of 18,842 cases of posterior spine surgery were identified in the NER, and SSI was observed in 154 cases (0.8%). Of these patients, 308 patients were included in the 1:1 propensity score–matched cohort analysis, with 154 patients included in each group. Sutures were used in 224 patients (72.7%) and staples in 84 patients (27.3%) (p < 0.01). Female patients comprised 45.1% of the sutures group and 46.4% of the staples group (p = 0.8). The mean ± SD age was 59.8 ± 15.4 years in the sutures group and 60.8 ± 11.9 years in the staples group (p = 0.6). Fusion was performed in 27.2% of patients in the sutures group and 44% in the staples group (p < 0.01). Multilevel fusion comprised 68.9% of fusion cases in the sutures group and 67.6% in the staples group (p = 0.8). Comorbidities, such as diabetes (p = 0.6), hypertension (p = 0.1), and the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (p = 0.5) and immunosuppressants (p = 0.2), did not differ between groups. Univariate analysis performed in the propensity score–matched cohort showed that SSI was observed in 53.6% of patients in the sutures group and 40.5% in the staples group (p = 0.04). No significant differences were noted regarding 30-day (p = 0.3), 90-day (p = 0.2), and 1-year (p = 0.3) readmissions and 30-day (p = 0.7), 90-day (p = 0.8), and 1-year (p = 0.8) reoperations. On multivariable logistic regression, SSI was not significantly associated with the choice of skin closure technique (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS After adjustment for spinal fusion, number of fused levels, the use of immunosuppressants, and other risk factors, SSI development was not significantly associated with the use of sutures versus staples following posterior spine surgery in our institution. Additionally, no significant differences were observed regarding baseline characteristics and other perioperative outcomes. The authors’ analysis shows that skin closure technique did not significantly affect SSI rates and other outcomes in these patients.