Farmer, Adam D.

The accurate diagnosis of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), such as functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome, is crucial for improving patient symptoms, outcomes and ultimately, quality of life. However, busy clinicians often face challenges in diagnosing and managing these conditions, particularly when patients present with non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms together with psychosocial distress and/or social issues. DGBI are among the most common reasons for gastroenterology referral, with a global prevalence of approximately 40% in adults based on large-scale epidemiologic studies. While diagnostic algorithms aid in positively identifying DGBI, they often overlook key factors influencing treatment decisions. The Rome V Multidimensional Clinical Profile (MDCP) offers a comprehensive, patient-centered framework that extends beyond diagnosis alone. It integrates five core domains: (1) the primary diagnosis, (2) clinical modifiers, (3) impact on daily activities and quality of life, (4) psychosocial modifiers, and (5) physiological features and biomarkers. By considering comorbidities, illness severity, psychosocial contributors, and potential biomarkers, the MDCP enables clinicians to develop a holistic understanding of the patient's condition. This multidimensional approach facilitates tailored, evidence-based treatment plans that address the biopsychosocial aspects of DGBI, ultimately enhancing symptom management and patient well-being. Furthermore, it highlights gaps in knowledge and stimulates targeted research into these highly prevalent disorders. This case-oriented educational review will evaluate three DGBIs – functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic abdominal pain – using the MDCP approach.

ABSTRACT Background Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) comprises inherited connective tissue disorders characterised by joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility and tissue fragility. It links to systemic comorbidities, including gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, but hitherto large‐scale data remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of GI, systemic and psychological comorbidities in EDS patients versus propensity score‐matched controls, using a comprehensive research network database. Design This was a retrospective, propensity‐matched analysis (2005–2023) utilising the TriNetX network. We identified EDS patients (excluding Marfan's syndrome). Propensity score matching (1:1) generated balanced cohorts for age, sex and baseline characteristics. Comorbidities were analysed via prevalence rates and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Matched cohorts included 59,128 pairs. Among GI disorders, gastroesophageal reflux disease was most common in EDS (18.4%, OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4–1.5, p < 0.001), followed by constipation (12.4%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7–1.9, p < 0.001), irritable bowel syndrome (7.3%, OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.5–2.8, p < 0.001) and gastroparesis (4.7%, OR 8.2, 95% CI 7.3–9.2, p < 0.001). Psychiatric conditions showed heightened prevalence of anxiety (26.1%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7–1.8, p < 0.001) and depression (18.7%, OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2–1.3, p < 0.001). Systemic comorbidities included postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (13.2%, OR 899.7, 95% CI 483.8–1673.0, p < 0.001), chronic pain (7.9%, OR 7.0, 95% CI 6.4–7.6, p < 0.001), migraines (19.7%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 2.4–2.6, p < 0.001) and fibromyalgia (9.5%, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6–1.8, p < 0.001). Conclusion EDS patients exhibit heightened risk for GI, systemic and psychological comorbidities, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approaches for effective management.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders seen by clinicians in both primary and secondary care. Since publication of the last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline in 2007, substantial advances have been made in understanding its complex pathophysiology, resulting in its re-classification as a disorder of gut-brain interaction, rather than a functional gastrointestinal disorder. Moreover, there has been a considerable amount of new evidence published concerning the diagnosis, investigation and management of IBS. The primary aim of this guideline, commissioned by the BSG, is to review and summarise the current evidence to inform and guide clinical practice, by providing a practical framework for evidence-based management of patients. One of the strengths of this guideline is that the recommendations for treatment are based on evidence derived from a comprehensive search of the medical literature, which was used to inform an update of a series of trial-based and network meta-analyses assessing the efficacy of dietary, pharmacological and psychological therapies in treating IBS. Specific recommendations have been made according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, summarising both the strength of the recommendations and the overall quality of evidence. Finally, this guideline identifies novel treatments that are in development, as well as highlighting areas of unmet need for future research.

SummaryBackgroundThe wireless motility capsule (WMC) offers the ability to investigate luminal gastrointestinal (GI) physiology in a minimally invasive manner.AimTo investigate the effect of testing protocol, gender, age and study country on regional GI transit times and associated pH values using the WMC.MethodsRegional GI transit times and pH values were determined in 215 healthy volunteers from USA and Sweden studied using the WMC over a 6.5‐year period. The effects of test protocol, gender, age and study country were examined.ResultsFor GI transit times, testing protocol was associated with differences in gastric emptying time (GET; shorter with protocol 2 (motility capsule ingested immediately after meal) vs. protocol 1 (motility capsule immediately before): median difference: 52 min, P = 0.0063) and colonic transit time (CTT; longer with protocol 2: median 140 min, P = 0.0189), but had no overall effect on whole gut transit time. Females had longer GET (by median 17 min, P = 0.0307), and also longer CTT by (104 min, P = 0.0285) and whole gut transit time by (263 min, P = 0.0077). Increasing age was associated with shorter small bowel transit time (P = 0.002), and study country also influenced small bowel and CTTs. Whole gut and CTTs showed clustering of data at values separated by 24 h, suggesting that describing these measures as continuous variables is invalid. Testing protocol, gender and study country also significantly influenced pH values.ConclusionsRegional GI transit times and pH values, delineated using the wireless motility capsule (WMC), vary based on testing protocol, gender, age and country. Standardisation of testing is crucial for cross‐referencing in clinical practice and future research.