Phitayakorn, Roy

Objective: This study aims to define an effective senior resident and understand the process of leadership and nontechnical skill development in the transition from junior to senior surgery resident. Summary Background: General surgery residents are responsible for patient care, technically demanding operations, and diverse care team management. However, leadership skill development for the transition from junior to senior resident roles is often overlooked. Methods: We conducted 15 semi-structured focus groups with surgery residents from an urban, academic institution. Focus group transcripts were inductively coded. Using content analysis and constant comparative methodology, primary codes were refined into categories and organized into higher-level themes. Results: Thirty-three general surgery residents completed fifteen focus groups. Six themes were identified. Three themes describe the process of becoming an effective senior resident: how to define a senior resident's scope of practice, the transition process, and the importance of personal investment. Three themes were identified regarding effective seniors: ideal traits, teachable skills, and the team and patient impact. Conclusions: Surgery residents define an effective senior resident as the team member with the highest level of experience who manages the big picture of patient care. The transition is improved by personal engagement and acknowledgement of the transition. Ideal traits of effective seniors, including emotional intelligence and inherent personality traits, allow a resident to more naturally assume this role; however, teachable skills, such as communication, expectation setting and competence, can be taught to improve one's effectiveness. The actions of a senior resident impact the team and patient care, underscoring the importance of understanding this role.

The “surgeon‐anatomist” was originally a single individual who self‐pursued knowledge and understanding of anatomy as the foundation for successful surgical outcomes. However, recent advances in medical education have ironically led to the separation of anatomy and surgery. This physical and emotional “divorce” of anatomists and surgeons into separate individuals has created several critical educational issues for medical and surgical educators including a general lack of anatomical knowledge in medical students and misalignment of graduate medical education procedural specialty training with the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education Core Competencies and now the Next Accreditation System. There are numerous opportunities for anatomists and surgeons to work together to improve educational instruction of established difficult anatomical regions, procedural training, or even develop new techniques and procedures. Similarly, anatomists with specialized training in medical education would be invaluable partners to ensure that procedural assessments align with instructional technologies for truly longitudinal curricula that starts at the medical student level, but stops at the patient outcomes of attending surgeons. This mutually beneficial relationship would be similar to multidisciplinary care teams and current surgeon and PhD/EdD partnerships. The restoration of the relationship between anatomists and surgeons would be invaluable to surgical education and remains an exciting research opportunity. Clin. Anat. 28:931–934, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.