Back to Authors

Haller, Elizabeth

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Designing an interprofessional learning curriculum for medical and physical therapy students in gross anatomy curriculum (18.5)
Euerle, Terin, Haller, Elizabeth, Lachman, Nirusha , Pawlina, Wojciech, Youdas, James W., Hellyer, Nathan J. , Krause, David A.

The FASEB Journal | June 15, 2021 | Volume: 28 | Issue: S1 | Pages: No page available

10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.18.5 Get It

Interprofessional collaboration in healthcare is crucial for quality patient care. While it continues to be an expected competency, most educational programs lack interprofessional learning (IPL) experiences. We administered the five‐point Likert Readiness of Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) to first year medical (MD) and physical therapy (PT) students to evaluate attitudes toward IPL. Students agreed that “For small group learning to work, students need to trust and respect each other” (average of 4.6 out of five points). They also disagreed that learning with other healthcare students is a waste of time or unnecessary (averages of 1.91 and 1.98 respectively). Clearly students desire IPL experiences, and with this in mind, we established an IPL curriculum for their gross anatomy courses. Students were first grouped into interprofessional teams at a social event. In dissection lab, PT students taught upper limb and MD students taught thorax anatomy. We also conducted IPL anatomy based problem solving sessions in a classroom setting. Anatomy courses provide an ideal platform for IPL opportunities. Lab and classroom activities enable students to work together through a shared experience of understanding anatomical concepts from different perspectives. By establishing an IPL curriculum, we hoped to increase interprofessional collaboration early in students’ medical education. Our results indicate positive student attitude toward the learning experience.
Long‐term effect of a short interprofessional education interaction between medical and physical therapy students
Sytsma, Terin T. , Haller, Elizabeth, Youdas, James W., Hellyer, Nathan J. , Pawlina, Wojciech, Lachman, Nirusha , Haller, Elizabeth P, Krause, David A.

Anatomical Sciences Education | June 4, 2015 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 317-323

10.1002/ase.1546 Get It

Medicine is increasingly focused on team‐based practice as interprofessional cooperation leads to better patient care. Thus, it is necessary to teach teamwork and collaboration with other health care professionals in undergraduate medical education to ensure that trainees entering the workforce are prepared to work in teams. Gross anatomy provides an opportunity to expose students to interprofessional education (IPE) early in their training. The purpose of this study is to describe an IPE experience and report if the experience has lasting influence on the participating students. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) questionnaire was administered to first year medical (MD) and physical therapy (PT) students at Mayo Medical School and Mayo School of Health Sciences. Results demonstrated an openness on the part of the students to IPE. Interprofessional education experiences were incorporated into gross anatomy courses in both medical and PT curricula. The IPE experiences included a social event, peer‐teaching, and collaborative clinical problem‐solving sessions. These sessions enhanced gross anatomy education by reinforcing previous material and providing the opportunity to work on clinical cases from the perspective of two healthcare disciplines. After course completion, students again completed the RIPLS. Finally, one year after course completion, students were asked to provide feedback on their experience. The post‐curricular RIPLS, similar to the pre‐curricular RIPLS, illustrated openness to IPE from both MD and PT students. There were however, significant differences in MD and PT perceptions of roles and responsibilities. One‐year follow‐up indicated long‐term retention of lessons learned during IPE. Anat Sci Educ 8: 317–323. © 2015 American Association of Anatomists.