Miller, Alan B.

Introduction: In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), increasing body mass index (BMI) is not associated with worsening prognosis, termed the obesity paradox. Although this phenomenon has been studied extensively, data on the African-American population are limited. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between BMI and all-cause mortality in African Americans with HFrEF. Methods and Results: The African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT) database was utilized to conduct a retrospective analysis. In A-HeFT, 1050 self-identified black patients with BMI range of 15.7 to 69.4 kg/m 2 (median 30.3 kg/m 2 ) were followed for a median of 15 months, with 86 deaths. BMI was modeled as a curvilinear continuous variable using restricted cubic splines. Unadjusted Cox regression analysis of the relationship between BMI and all-cause mortality revealed a significant (p = 0.001) inverse relationship, with an increase in mortality risk below the median BMI of approximately 30 kg/m 2 (HR> 1.0) without an upward trend in mortality risk above a BMI > 30 kg/m 2 (Figure1). Adjustment for other variables including age, sex, comorbidities, and clinical assessments did not reveal an increase in HR above the median BMI. Conclusion: Consistent with the obesity paradox, the mortality risk increased with decreasing BMI and did not increase when the BMI exceeded the definition of obesity. Until the mechanisms of the obesity paradox are better understood, these results question whether weight reduction would be beneficial in the African American population with HFrEF.

Abstract Aims Hypothesis 1 of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial enrolled 1212 patients with an LVEF of ≤35% and CAD amenable to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients were randomized to CABG and optimal medical therapy (MED) or MED alone. The objective was to assess whether or not patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) enrolled in the STICH trial would have greater benefit from CABG than patients without DM. Methods and results The characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with and without DM randomized to CABG and MED or MED alone were compared. DM was present in 40%. At baseline, patients with DM had more triple vessel CAD, higher LVEF, and smaller left ventricular volumes. In patients with DM, the primary outcome of all-cause mortality occurred in 39% of patients in the MED group and 39% in the CABG group [hazard ratio (HR) with CABG 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73–1.26]. In patients without DM, the primary outcome occurred in 41% of patients in the MED group and 32% in the CABG group (HR with CABG 0.80, 95% CI 0.63–1.02). While numerically it would appear that the treatment effect of CABG is blunted in patients with DM, there was no significant interaction between DM and treatment group on formal statistical testing. Conclusions Patients with DM enrolled in the STICH trial had more triple vessel disease, smaller hearts, and higher LVEF than those without DM. CABG did not exert greater benefit in patients with DM.