Ζεκερίδου, Αναστασία

This cohort study examines the oncological, neurological, and serological profiles of adult male patients with testicular germ cell tumors and paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.

Abstract Objectives γ‐Aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABA B R)‐IgG (immunoglobulin G) is an intermediate‐risk paraneoplastic autoantibody often associated with seizures. We aimed to assess the clinical and oncological features of GABA B R‐IgG autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and evaluate the performance of antibody testing. Methods Patients testing positive for GABA B R‐IgG in serum/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory were identified. Archived sera were retested by cell‐based assay (CBA) at 1:100 and 1:200 dilutions. A live‐cell flow cytometry–based assay (LCFBA) was developed and validated using archived sera and CSF. True positivity included patients with classic presentations of GABA B R‐IgG AE or oncological explanations for antibody presence. Results Eighty‐six patients (median age 63 years; 43 female) presented with classic presentations of GABA B R‐IgG AE: encephalopathy with prominent seizures ( n = 55), status epilepticus ( n = 23), and rapidly progressive dementia ( n = 8). In addition, 44 patients (33%) had a false‐positive result for GABA B R‐IgG characterized by non‐specific symptoms/alternate diagnoses. Malignancy was identified in 78% of true‐positive patients, predominantly small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Testing serum at 1:100 dilution on CBA and using tissue immunofluorescence assay (IFA) in serum and CSF improved the identification of true‐positive patients ( p < 0.001). CBA at 1:100 dilution performed better than conventional CBA (at 1:10 dilution, p < 0.001) and tissue IFA ( p = 0.031). An in‐house LCFBA showed 100% sensitivity and specificity in CSF, performing similarly to conventional CBA ( p = 0.125) in CSF, but better than tissue IFA ( p = 0.031). Furthermore, serum LCFBA performed better than conventional CBA ( p = 0.022) and tissue IFA ( p = 0.006). LCFBA had the highest diagnostic accuracy and was closely followed by CBA at 1:100 dilution. Significance GABA B R‐IgG AE often presents as encephalopathy with seizures or status epilepticus in the context of an underlying SCLC. Multimodal evaluation using tissue IFA and fixed CBA at higher dilutions improves detection of true cases. LCFBA performs very well as a diagnostic test with very high sensitivity and specificity.

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate the value of cytokine, chemokine, and neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations in predicting relapse risk, chronic epilepsy, and functional impairment in LGI1 autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Methods Cytokines/chemokines (IL‐1‐beta, IL‐2, IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐6, IL‐8/CXCL8, IL‐10, IL‐12p70, IL‐13, IL‐17A, GM‐CSF, TNF‐alpha, IFN‐gamma, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL13, BAFF) and NfL concentrations were measured in CSF and paired serum from LGI1‐AE patients evaluated at Mayo Clinic (01/2015–02/2024), using a multiplex immunoassay system (ELLA, Bio‐Techne) and correlated with clinical outcomes. A laboratory‐based cohort of LGI1‐IgG‐positive patients and control cohorts, including patients with mixed non‐inflammatory disorders (MNID), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) were analyzed. Results Forty‐four patients with LGI1‐AE were included; 29 (66%) were male, with a median age of 68.5 years (range, 8–85). Median time from symptom onset to CSF sampling was eight months (IQR, 3–17); 19/42 (45%) experienced a clinical relapse and 27% developed chronic epilepsy. Serum IL‐6, serum and CSF IL‐8/CXCL8, and IL‐17A were higher in LGI1‐IgG positive patients than MNID ( p < 0.05). TLE cytokine/chemokine profiles were similar to LGI1 AE; AD patients had lower serum IL‐6 and CSF IL‐8/CXCL8 ( p = 0.04; p = 0.01), and higher serum IL‐17A and GM‐CSF ( p = 0.004; p = 0.01) than LGI1‐AE. Higher CSF IL‐6 and IL‐8/CXCL8 in LGI1‐AE associated with clinical relapse ( p < 0.05) and higher CSF NfL associated with chronic epilepsy ( p = 0.01). Conclusion Elevations in IL‐6, IL‐8/CXCL8, and IL‐17A were identified in this LGI1‐AE cohort. CSF IL‐6, IL‐8/CXCL8, and NfL levels are potential prognostic biomarkers for risk of relapse and chronic epilepsy in LGI1‐AE.

Abstract Anti-IgLON5 disease is an autoimmune encephalitis that presents with a heterogenous clinical phenotype, including sleep disorders, movement abnormalities and bulbar involvement. It is characterized by autoantibodies against IgLON5, 85% association with HLA-DQB1*05:∼ and a brainstem-dominant tauopathy. Cellular and murine models report pathogenic effects of the autoantibodies, and neurodegenerative factors suggest progressive atrophy as a common sequela. However, evidence from in vivo patient data and long-term follow-up is limited, and the degree of progression remains elusive. In this multicentre study, clinical and brain MRI data were collected from 127 patients across 12 countries to investigate the relationships between clinical presentations and the development of distinct brain atrophy patterns. Our data show that most patients develop a complex multisystem phenotype as the disease progresses; however, neuromuscular manifestations rarely emerge at later disease stages. By comparison to healthy controls, this disease presents with severe substructure-specific atrophy, especially affecting the hypothalamus, brainstem, accumbens and basal ganglia, which, in age-independent analyses, show significant ventricular enlargement and also suggest progression of brainstem atrophy over the disease course. Moreover, the focality of atrophy was functionally linked to specific symptoms, with more severe involvement of the basal ganglia in patients with movement disorders, and greater atrophy in the hippocampus and thalamus in patients with cognitive impairment. Taken together, our results provide evidence of distinct atrophy patterns in anti-IgLON5 disease, which closely mirror sites of pathophysiologic processes, including autoantibody binding and tau deposition. Our data emphasize the brainstem as the pathophysiological hub of the disease and provide normative data for the incorporation of atrophy measurements into routine clinical assessments and future treatment studies to monitor disease trajectory and evaluate future treatment strategies.