Villasboas, José C.

Background: Immunochemotherapy is the current standard-of-care frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Our group previously reported that addition of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus to R-CHOP resulted in excellent efficacy in the Alliance N1085 trial (Witzig TE et al, Blood Cancer J, 2017, 7(6):e576), with 23 of 24 patients achieving event-free survival at 24 months (EFS24), supporting further investigation of PI3K/mTOR targeting in DLBCL. New insights into molecular classification of DLBCL suggest that multiple genetic subtypes of DLBCL (eg, MCD, BN2, ST2, and EZB per LymphGen classification) may be susceptible to PI3K/mTOR targeting. Therefore, we conducted a phase 1/1b trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with a novel PI3K inhibitor parsaclisib and standard immunochemotherapy. Methods: Adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL were eligible if any of the following was present: 1) non-GCB subtype per the Hans algorithm; 2) protein expression of either MYC (≥40%) or BCL2 (≥50%) by immunohistochemistry; or 3) MYC rearrangement by FISH. Patients with high grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements were also eligible. Phase 1 followed a 3+3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of parsaclisib (plus R-CHOP) to be used in Phase 1b (dose expansion). The primary efficacy endpoint in phase 1/1b was complete response (CR) rate by PET. A polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) safety lead-in cohort was added later to explore the safety and efficacy of parsaclisib (at MTD) plus Pola-R-CHP. Results: From July 2020 to May 2023, 50 patients were enrolled; 1 patient withdrew consent before study treatment and was excluded from this analysis. Nine patients were treated in Phase 1, 33 in Phase 1b, and 7 in the Pola cohort. The median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range 20-86), and 20 (41%) were female. Two (4%) patients had ECOG PS ≥2, 26 (53%) had elevated LDH, 19 (39%) had >1 extranodal site, 37 (76%) had stage III/IV, and 25 (51%) had high-intermediate or high-risk International Prognostic Index (3-5). 23 (47%) had non-GCB subtype, 23 (46.9%) had MYC or BCL2 single expression, 21 (42.9%) had MYC/BCL2 double expression, and 6 (12%) had MYC rearrangement (2 with BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements). In Phase 1, 3 patients were treated at dose level 1 (parsaclisib 20 mg QD, d1-10) and 6 at dose level 2 (parsaclisib 20 mg QD, d1-14). No dose limiting toxicity was observed. Therefore, dose level 2 for parsaclisib was the MTD and was used in Phase 1b. In the Pola cohort (n=7), only 1 of 6 evaluable patients experienced significant toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea). Among all 49 patients, the most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) of any grade included neutropenia (83.7%), thrombocytopenia (79.6%), leukopenia (77.6%), lymphopenia (71.4%), anemia (71.4%), nausea (63.3%), fatigue (40.8%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (36.7%), constipation (24.5%), and diarrhea (22.4%), and the most common grade ≥3 TRAE included neutropenia (71.4%), leukopenia (69.4%), lymphopenia (49.0%), thrombocytopenia (20.4%), anemia (16.3%), febrile neutropenia (6.1%), and diarrhea (6.1%). In Phase 1/1b (n=42), the overall response rate (ORR) to parsaclisib plus R-CHOP was 97.6%, and the CR rate was 90.5%. After a median follow-up of 28.5 months (95% CI 27.7-32.7), the estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 84.6% (95% CI 73.9-96.8), and the estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 95.1% (95% CI 88.7-100.0). In the Pola cohort, the ORR to parsaclisib plus Pola-R-CHP was 100% and the CR rate was 100%. After a median follow-up of 15.6 months (95% CI 13.5-NE), 1 patient had disease relapse at 11.95 months, and all patients were alive. Conclusions: Addition of the PI3K inhibitor parsaclisib to R-CHOP or Pola-R-CHP immunochemotherapy is considered safe in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. Combination of parsaclisib and standard immunochemotherapy resulted in high ORR and CR rate and encouraging preliminary PFS and OS outcomes patients with high-risk DLBCL. These data support further investigation of PI3K/mTOR targeting in newly diagnosed DLBCL in future trials.

Background: In the ZUMA2 study, a higher peak chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell expansion correlated with better outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) receiving brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel). However, in clinical practice, peak CAR T cell expansion is not routinely assessed for. Since patients receive lymphodepleting agents prior to CAR T cell infusion, it is hypothesized that peak absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), which can be easily measured, in the first two weeks after CAR T cell infusion represents peak CAR T cell expansion. Our group previously showed that peak ALC was associated with response durability and outcomes in patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel. In this retrospective study, we assessed the association of peak ALC with clinical outcomes after brexu-cel infusion in patients with R/R MCL. Methods: Patients with R/R MCL who received brexu-cel between March 2020-March 2024 at Mayo Clinic were included in this analysis. Peak ALC was defined as maximum ALC value in the first 14 days after CAR T cell infusion. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from CAR T cell infusion to lymphoma relapse, progression, or death, and overall survival (OS) was defined as time from to CAR T cell infusion to death. The optimal cutoff point for peak ALC that correlated with PFS was determined by the log-rank method using the Cutoff Finder application, a computational method which fits Cox proportional hazard models to the dichotomized variable and survival. The optimal cutoff was the point with the most significant PFS split by log-rank test. Results: A total of 43 patients were identified. The median age at time of CAR T cell infusion was 68 years (IQR 58, 73). 34 (79%) were male, 28 (74%) had Ki-67 >30%, 14 (33%) had blastoid or pleomorphic histology, and 19 (44%) had TP53 mutation or deletion. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (IQR 2, 4) and 13 (30%) received prior autologous stem cell transplant. 32 (74%) received bridging therapy prior to CAR T cell infusion. All patients received fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide for lymphodepletion. The best overall response rate was 88%, with a complete response rate of 84%. After a median follow-up of 25.6 months (95% CI 14.4-31.4), the median PFS and OS were 16.6 (95% CI 8.6-NE) and 35.1 (95% CI 24.5-NE) months, respectively. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 95% (4.7% grade ≥3). The median time to initial CRS and maximum grade CRS onset was 4.5 days (IQR 1, 6.25) and 5.5 days (IQR 2.75, 7), respectively. The incidence of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was 65% (18% grade ≥ 3). The median time to initial and maximum grade ICANS onset was 9 days (IQR 6, 11) and 10.5 days (IQR 7, 12), respectively. The median ALC at time of CAR T cell infusion was 0.03 x109/L (IQR 0.02, 0.05). Among 37 patients with identifiable ALC peaks, the median ALC peak was 0.84 (IQR 0.41, 2.45) and the median time to peak ALC was 12 days (IQR 9, 12). 6 patients had no identifiable peak ALC due to no frequent CBC differentials post CAR T cell infusion. A peak ALC of ≥0.45 × 109/L correlated significantly with PFS, with median PFS not reached for the group with peak ALC of ≥0.45 × 109/L (n=27) compared to 9.3 months for the group with peak ALC of <0.45 × 109/L (n=10) and a 1-year PFS rate of 68% vs 33% (p=0.02). OS was also significantly higher in patients with a peak ALC of ≥0.45 × 109/L (median OS not reached vs 11 months, 1-year OS rate of 84% vs 44%, p=0.01). The incidence of ICANS was significantly higher (74% vs 30%, p=0.02) in patients with a peak ALC of ≥0.45 × 109/L. Numerically, the group with peak ALC of ≥0.45 × 109/L had a later onset of initial and maximum grade ICANS, but the difference was not statistically significant. Peak ALC was not associated with ICANS severity. There was a trend towards higher incidence of CRS (100% vs 80%, p=0.07) and earlier CRS onset (3 vs 5 days, p=0.07) in the high peak ALC group. There was no difference in CRS severity. Conclusion: Peak ALC after CAR T cell infusion was significantly associated with better PFS and OS and higher incidence of ICANS in patients with R/R MCL receiving brexu-cel. Peak ALC may serve as a surrogate measure for peak CAR T cell expansion in routine practice, but confirmatory studies are needed. Larger studies are warranted to confirm the association of peak ALC with PFS, OS and toxicities in patients with R/R MCL receiving brexu-cel.

Background and Significance When patients (pts) with follicular lymphoma (FL) present with a high tumor burden, they require systemic treatment with rituximab (R) in combination with chemotherapy (chemo). Given the known cumulative toxicities of chemotherapy and the older age of pts at the time of diagnosis, novel chemo-free treatment approaches are desired by pts as well as physicians. R-lenalidomide (R-Len), a chemo-free alternative to R-based chemoimmunotherapy, has recently been listed as a chemo-free option in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN) guidelines. Golcadomide (GOLCA) is a potential first-in-class oral cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD™) agent purposefully designed for the treatment of lymphoma. GOLCA co-opts cereblon to induce targeted degradation of the transcription factors Ikaros/Aiolos, inducing deep, rapid, and extensive tumor killing, independent of cell of origin, and enhanced immunostimulatory activity. Compared with immunomodulatory (IMiD) agents like lenalidomide, GOLCA more efficiently drives the cereblon complex to the closed active state resulting in more potent degradation (Watson ER et al, Science 2022), which is expected to translate into improved clinical benefit. In addition, the phase 1/2 study CC-99282-NHL-001 showed that GOLCA alone or in combination with R (GOLCA-R) was well tolerated and showed promising activity in pts with heavily pre-treated relapsed/refractory (R/R) FL, including in those with prior Len-based therapies and/or T cell-redirecting therapies (Chavez et al, EHA 2024). Based on this, GOLSEEK-2 (NCT06425302) is a randomized phase 2 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of GOLCA-R as a chemo-free option in pts with newly diagnosed advanced-stage FL. Study Design and Methods After a screening period of ≤ 5 weeks, approximately 90 pts with newly diagnosed advanced-stage FL will be randomized 1:1:1 between GOLCA plus rituximab at a dose of 0.2 mg or 0.4 mg once daily from day 1 to 14 every 28 days for 12 cycles or investigator's choice R-chemo (R-CHOP or R-bendamustine). R maintenance could be considered (as per pt and physician decision) for pts who achieve a partial response or better after completion of initial therapy for up to one year in GOLCA-R arms and up to one and a half years in the R-chemo arm. Pts with histologically confirmed diagnosis of grade 1, 2, 3a FL, or classic FL according to WHO classification would be eligible for the study. Other key inclusion criteria include no prior systemic treatment for FL, stage II-IV disease, the requirement for treatment as per investigator's judgment, and measurable disease as defined by Lugano 2014 criteria. Key exclusion criteria include other lymphoma subtypes, clinical evidence of transformed lymphoma, and documented or suspected central nervous system involvement. The primary endpoint is complete metabolic response (CMR) during the GOLCA plus rituximab combination treatment period, assessed by the investigator and based on Lugano 2014 Response Criteria. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate, duration of response, complete response rate at 30 months, CMR rate at 6 months and 12 months, and safety outcomes.

Introduction: The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, commonly referred to as chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), has long been a cornerstone in the treatment of lymphoma. Although this approach has resulted in successful treatments for many patients (pts), a significant number continue to experience unfavorable results, underscoring the urgency for improved treatments. There is still a significant gap in knowledge about the immune profile of lymphoma pts, specifically in terms of (1) how their immune phenotype compare to those of healthy individuals and (2) how treatment affects their immune system. This study aimed to compare the immune profiles of lymphoma pts (at baseline) to that of matched healthy controls, and track the changes in the immune system during and after lymphoma treatment. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed, untreated lymphoma, without prior history of cancer or autoimmunity were enrolled in the Dyna-RISC study. Whole blood samples were collected at baseline (BL), on day 1 of cycle 2 (C2D1), on day 1 of last cycle (CLD1), and 6 months after completion of therapy (6mo). Age- and gender-matched healthy individuals provided blood for baseline comparison. Samples were stained fresh with a pre-mixed lyophilized cocktail containing 30 metal-tagged monoclonal antibodies (Maxpar Direct Immune Profile Assay), fixed and cryopreserved. Samples were barcoded and acquired in batches on the Helios CyTOF (cytometry by time-of-flight) system. Cytometry data was analyzed using OMIQ. Differential abundance analysis was performed using relative frequencies of cell subsets (% of parent) using a false-discovery rate of 0.05 to account for multiple comparisons. Results: Between 11/2020 and 06/2021, 15 lymphoma pts were enrolled. Median age was 62 years (range 43-86), 5 pts (33%) were female. Five pts had follicular lymphoma (FL), 3 had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL),1 had primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PBML), 1 had classic Hodgking lymphoma (cHL), 1 had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 1 had plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL), 1 had splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SpMZL), 1 had ALK- anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), 1 had subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL). Four pts received bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) and 7 pts received R-CHOP. In total, more than 30 million cellular events were acquired, resulting in over 18 million analyzable live single-cell events after expert manual gating. A total of 27 cell subsets were identified within 9 major immune cell compartments. At baseline, lymphoma pts showed significant reduction (p<0.05) of CD4+ naïve T cells (median 1.37%, range 0.33%-9.01%) compared to controls (median 9.28%, range 3.44-21.3%). Concurrently, lymphoma patients at baseline had significant elevation (p<0.05) of intermediate monocytes (median 2.1%, range 0.64%-5.73%) compared to controls (median 0.8%, range 0.2%-2.73%). Naïve cytotoxic T cells were significantly increased (p<0.05) in lymphoma pts at the 6mo timepoint (median 2.08%, range 0.7%-7.46%) compared to baseline (median 0.23%, range 0.03%-4.79%). A sub-group analysis restricted to patients who received either BR or R-CHOP with 6mo timepoint samples available (n=10), showed a significant reduction (p<0.05) in the frequency of CD4+ central memory T cells in the BR group (median 0.76%, range 0.06%-1.02%) compared to the R-CHOP group (median 3.3%, range 2.19%-5.0%). Additional results describing the details of the immune profile dynamics at intermediate timepoints (C2D1, CLD1) will be presented at the conference. Conclusion: Our results suggest that lymphoma patients have an unfavorable immune profile (high intermediate monocytes combined with low naïve CD4+ T cells) at the time of diagnosis, compared to matched healthy individuals. Their immune profile is reshaped after treatment with increase in naïve cytotoxic T cells 6 months after therapy. Bendamustine-based treatment seems to particularly affect T cell recovery post-therapy, leading to a reduction in CD4+ central memory T cells, compared to patients treated with R-CHOP. These findings highlight the importance of studying baseline and treatment-mediated immune changes in lymphoma pts. This characterization is of special interest in the context of therapies that rely on the fitness of immune cells to mediate an effect, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs).

Background and Methods: IEC-HS is a hyperinflammatory state with high morbidity and mortality. Effective interventions to reverse the process early in the clinical course may be critical to improve outcomes. We previously examined cytokine differences between IEC-HS and other secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and found significant differences in the patterns and outcomes.(1) This study examines cytokine profiles (CP) of patients treated with CAR-T from 9/2019 to 3/2024 who developed CRS, MAS-L and IEC-HS. Demographics and lab results were compared among the three groups and correlated with outcomes. Results: CP was tested in 113 of 366 CAR-T patients: 74 with CRS, 19 with MAS-L, and 20 with IEC-HS. The racial distribution was 93% White/Caucasian, 2% Black or African American, 1% Asian, 1% Native American and 3% other or unavailable. No differences were seen in demographics between groups except a higher percentage of patients with ECOG performance status ≥2 in IEC-HS (p=0.037). Incidence of IEC-HS by disease: 3.6% (7/193) in lymphoma, 5% (8/159) myeloma and 28.5% (4/14) B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (p=0.0002). Incidence of IEC-HS by CAR-T product: 3% (4/150) in Axi-cel, 23% (6/26) in Brexu-cel, 8% (1/13) in Tisa-cel, 5% each (3/60) in Cilta-cel and Ide-cel, and 0/17 in Liso-cel (p=0.001). Prior to lymphodepletion, labs were already different among the CRS, MAS-L, and IEC-HS groups: hemoglobin (g/dL: 11.1, 9.6, 8.45); platelets (x109/L: 168, 116, 52.5); ferritin (µg/L: 115, 946, 1944). CP was started when patients needed a second dose of tocilizumab or concern for developing MAS-L/IEC-HS, and continued daily until clinical improvement or resolution of inflammatory state. Tocilizumab and dexamethasone use were similar across groups. Other therapies used were vasopressors (3%, 10.5%, 45%; p<0.0001), Methylprednisolone (20%, 31.6%, 50%; p=0.027), Anakinra (12%, 63%, 85%; p<0.0001), Siltuximab (9.5%, 16%, 30%; p=0.06), Basiliximab (30% of IEC-HS), and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (30% of IEC-HS). Among the first CP, the CRS group had lower levels of cytokines (in pg/mL) compared to MAS-L and IEC-HS groups: TNF (31, 62.9, 47.7), IL-10 (29.3, 97.7, 169), IL-18 (794, 1353, 2011), IFN-gamma (74, 281, 250), MCP-1 (689, 2722, 2485.5), MIP-1 alpha (220, 234, 247.5), IL-6 (>315: 45%, 79%, 70%), soluble IL-2R alpha (>4000: 45%, 84%, 70%). The percentage of patients who received anakinra before CP1 were 4% (CRS), 21% (MAS-L) and 25% (IEC-HS) (p=0.007). IL-1 beta was below threshold among all patients who received anakinra in CRS and MAS-L and 75% in IEC-HS, suggesting rapid and effective IL-1 suppression by anakinra except in IEC-HS. Cytokines trends 24 hours and 48 hours after the first CP differed between MAS-L and IEC-HS. MAS-L had decreased TNF (62.9, 40.4, 18.5) and MCP-1 (2722, 355, 104) while these cytokines remained elevated or increased in IEC-HS (TNF: 47.7, 105.5, 62.6; MCP-1: 2486, 2276, 1585). IL-18 was minimally elevated in MAS-L (1353, 1955, 3068) and significantly increased in IEC-HS (2011, 2420, 4048). Notably, CP2 and CP3 levels of these cytokines in IEC-HS were statistically significantly higher than corresponding CPs among CRS and MAS-L. In addition, patients who died with persistent E. faecium bacteremia had higher IL-18 on CP3. Infections occurred in 43%, 58%, and 85% respectively (p=0.002), including E. faecium bacteremia (3%, 5%, 35%; p=0.0004), CMV viremia (30% of IEC-HS patients vs. 11% of non-IEC-HS; p=0.025), and invasive fungal infections (15% of IEC-HS patients; p=0.0001). Between the IEC-HS and non-IEC-HS groups, day 100 non-relapse mortality was 35% vs. 0 (p<0.0001), day 100 all-cause mortality was 45% vs. 3% (p<0.0001), and E. faecium bacteremia-related deaths were 50% vs. 1% (p<0.0001). Conclusions: CRS, MAS-L andIEC-HS are known complications of CAR-T. Cytokine-directed therapy can modify the cytokine milieu and control the inflammatory process. However, excess immunosuppression may result in life-threatening infections. Further studies are needed to identify optimal biomarker-guided immunosuppressive strategies to control the inflammatory cascade, while avoiding excess immunosuppression. References: 1. Leung, Nelson, et al. “Outcomes of patients who received CAR T cell therapy and developed IEC-HS treated with cytokine directed therapy.” (2024): 7516-7516.

Introduction In ELM-2 (NCT03888105), a Phase 2, open-label, multicohort study, odronextamab monotherapy demonstrated encouraging clinical efficacy, generally manageable safety, and maintenance of patient-reported outcomes in R/R FL (Chong et al. AACR 2024; Tessoulin et al. ASH 2023). In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials comparing CD20×CD3 bispecific antibodies in R/R FL, two unanchored MAICs were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of odronextamab versus mosunetuzumab and epcoritamab in patients with R/R FL in the third-line or later (3L+) setting. Methods Patient-level data from the ELM-2 R/R FL cohort receiving odronextamab (N=128; data cutoff: October 2023) were compared with published data from similar cohorts in the GO29781 trial of mosunetuzumab (N=90; Budde et al. Lancet Oncol 2022) and EPCORE NHL-1 trial of epcoritamab (N=128; Linton et al. Lancet Haematol 2024). To adjust for baseline differences in the trial populations, a priori-identified prognostic variables (progression of disease within 2 years, primary refractory, refractory to last line of therapy [LOT], number of prior LOTs, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index, age at start of LOT, and Ann Arbor disease stage) were included in the base-case MAICs. Two additional variables (double refractory and prior autologous stem cell transplant), reported in ELM-2 and the comparator studies, were included in a sensitivity analysis. The MAICs reported here were focused on response outcomes as assessed by independent central review, which were reported across trials. Relative treatment effects before and after matching were presented as odds ratios (ORs), along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The effective sample size for odronextamab was 102.0 after matching with mosunetuzumab and 90.6 after matching with epcoritamab in the base-case MAICs. All key prognostic variables were balanced between ELM-2 and both comparator trials in each analysis. Before and after matching, odronextamab demonstrated comparable objective response rates (ORRs) and significantly higher complete response (CR) rates versus mosunetuzumab (before matching: ORR 80.5% vs 80.0%, OR 1.03 [95% CI 0.52-2.03], p=0.93; CR rate 73.4% vs 60.0%, OR 1.84 [95% CI 1.04-3.28], p=0.04; after matching: ORR 83.5% vs 80.0%, OR 1.27 [95% CI 0.61-2.65], p=0.53; CR rate 75.7% vs 60.0%, OR 2.08 [95% CI 1.12-3.86], p=0.02). Odronextamab demonstrated numerically higher CR rates versus epcoritamab before and after matching (before matching: CR rate 73.4% vs 62.5%, OR 1.66 [95% CI 0.98-2.82], p=0.06; after matching: CR rate 69.4% vs 62.5%, OR 1.36 [95% CI 0.77-2.41], p=0.29). The ORRs of odronextamab and epcoritamab were comparable before matching (ORR 80.5% vs 82.0%, OR 0.90 [95% CI 0.48-1.69], p=0.75) and after matching (ORR 78.1% vs 82.0%, OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.40-1.53], p=0.47). Consistent results were observed in the sensitivity analyses. Conclusions In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials comparing bispecific antibodies in the setting of 3L+ FL, MAICs demonstrate that odronextamab was associated with higher CR rates compared with mosunetuzumab and epcoritamab. Since achieving a CR in the R/R FL setting is an important treatment goal, our results highlight the potential of odronextamab as an effective treatment option in R/R FL.

Background: Despite effective front-line therapies, DLBCL & MM have high relapse rates. Novel therapies like CAR-T & bispecific antibodies (BsAb) offer deep & durable remission compared to salvage therapies, but have a unique toxicity profile (TP) that requires monitoring. With no head-to-head trials, the rationale for therapy selection may vary. This study explores provider choices, sequencing preferences, & access barriers. Methods: Two anonymous surveys (MM and DLBCL) of US-based Hematologists were conducted from 2/2024 to 6/2024, on practice settings, CAR-T & BsAb availability, treatment preferences & barriers. Responses were analyzed to assess preferences across clinical scenarios. Results: Surveys were completed by 37 MM & 45 DLBCL providers. Most were at centers offering both CAR-T & BsAb. Most gave CAR-T inpatient, & BsAb outpatient. CAR-T was given by 73% MM providers & 66% DLBCL (92% used Cilta-cel, 96% used Ide-cel; 100% used Axi-cel, 90% used Liso-cel & 73% Tisa-cel). In MM, 78% used Teclistamab, 60% Talquetamab & 24% Elranatamab. In DLBCL, 62% used Epcoritamab & 40% Glofitamab. Providers preferred CAR-T over BsAb in MM after 4+ prior lines of therapy (LOT) (89%), & in DLBCL after 2+ prior LOT (93%). CAR-T was favored more among academic providers & those at CAR-T centers. Practice volume did not impact selection. Among providers at centers with BsAb-only, CAR-T was preferred by 60% (MM) and 50% (DLBCL). Providers at centers without both favored CAR-T (MM: 75%, DLBCL: 86%). CAR-T was chosen for better outcomes, short treatment, center choice, & prior experience. Other factors that influenced decisions were lower incidence of cytopenia/infection & “BsAb effective post-CAR-T, less so vice versa” (MM), & “curative potential of CAR-T” (DLBCL). Logistical barriers & institutional constraints influenced BsAb selection: CAR-T unavailability, access to specialized centers, referral complexity, insurance delay, manufacturing delay & hospitalization needs. In MM, 78% providers preferred Cilta-cel over Ide-cel, especially academic providers & those with CAR-T experience. CAR-T volume did not impact selection. Cilta-cel was preferred due to perceived better response rate (RR), more experience, “progression-free survival (PFS) benefit”, center choice, & logistical issues with Ide-cel. Ide-cel was selected due to center choice, favorable TP & insurance preference. Teclistamab was preferred by 78% due to more experience, better RR, TP & center choice, Elranatamab by 11% (better TP, RR, & “PFS”), & Talquetamab by 11% due to having a non-BCMA target. Academic providers preferred Teclistamab (89% vs 50%), & nonacademic providers preferred Talquetamab (38% vs 4%) and Elranatamab (13% vs 8%). In DLBCL after 2+ LOT, 69% favored Axi-cel due to prior experience, RR, center choice, & logistical issues with other products. Liso-cel & Tisa-cel were chosen by 27% & 2%, respectively, due to favorable TP. Axi-cel was also preferred 2nd line by 73% for similar reasons, while 24% favored Liso-cel for its favorable TP. Epcoritamab was preferred by 56% (subcutaneous injection, more experience & center choice) & Glofitamab by 42% (shorter treatment duration, easy administration, more experience, & center choice). Practice setting & volume did not impact selection between products in DLBCL. InBCMA-naïve MM pts, majority (97%) chose an anti-BCMA agent over GPRC5D due to better RR, TP, prior experience, & center choice. InBCMA-exposed pts, most (92%) favored an anti-GPRC5D agent. In contrast in DLBCL, 80% chose CD19 CAR-T after prior CD19-directed therapy, & 18% chose CD20 BsAb. Therefore, antigen escape was less of a concern in DLBCL vs MM. For relapse after 2nd line CAR-T in DLBCL, 78% preferred BsAb over other salvage options due to better RR, TP, & more experience. Providers prioritized RR, survival, & TP in decision making. Treatment logistics, duration, frequency, & cost were less crucial. MM providers also prioritized quality of life, which was less so in DLBCL. There were no differences in priority based on practice setting & experience with CAR-T. Conclusion: The study highlights factors influencing therapy choices in MM & DLBCL. Despite CAR-T's potential for better outcomes, significant access barriers exist. Efforts to streamline referral pathways, logistics, & expanding availability are crucial to improve outcomes. Understanding these preferences & barriers can guide future management strategies.

Background: Chemoimmunotherapy using rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride (hydroxydaunomycin), vincristine sulfate (Oncovin), and prednisone (R-CHOP) has been the standard of care treatment of DLBCL for over 20 years. Despite its widespread usage, there is no accepted standard for the dose of prednisone in this setting which varies from fixed-dose (100 mg daily for 5 days) to different levels of BSA-adjusted dosage (ranging from 40-100 mg/m2 daily for 5 days). BSA-adjusted dosage results in high doses of prednisone administered to patients with increased body surface area which may lead to significant adverse events. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if fixed-dose prednisone during R-CHOP therapy results in equivalent outcomes compared to BSA-adjusted dosing. Methods: A comprehensive search of several databases from each database's inception to April 29th, 2024, English language, was conducted. The databases included Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. The search strategy was designed and conducted by an experienced librarian with input from the study's principal investigator. Controlled vocabulary supplemented with keywords was used to search for prospective clinical studies of R-CHOP for adult patients with untreated DLBCL. Search results were reviewed independently by 2 members of the study team for final inclusion. Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third member and reviewed by the senior author. Prednisone dosage and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the available public data. Meta-analysis was performed using the metafor package in R version 4.2.2 by applying a mixed-effects model to combine results from the multiple studies. The analysis was first conducted overall to determine the general effect, and then stratified by prednisone dose (fixed- vs. BSA-adjusted) to explore dose-dependent variations in outcomes. Results: Our search resulted in 2287 entries which were individually reviewed by the study team. A total of 30 studies with a combined sample size of 3573 treated patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis set. Nineteen (63%) studies with a combined sample size of 1930 patients (median 155, range 12-399) used fixed-dose prednisone. Eleven (37%) studies with a combined sample size of 1643 patients (median 70, range 9-439) used BSA-adjusted dosing. Overall survival (OS) at 2 years data were available for 11 (37%) of the studies. Progression free survival (PFS) at 2 years data were available for 8 studies (27%). Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) data were available for 16 (54%) and 14 (47%) of the included studies, respectively. OS at 2 years for all studies was 84% (SD 78%-91%) and did not differ between fixed-dose (88%, SD 79%-97%) and BSA-adjusted dose (82%, 73%-91%). PFS at 2 years for all studies was 77% (SD 68%-85%) and did not differ between fixed-dose (80%, SD 68%-93%) and BSA-adjusted dose (74%, SD 62%-86%). ORR for all studies was 86% (SD 79%-92%) and did not differ between fixed-dose (86%, SD 76%-96%) and BSA-adjusted dosage (84%, SD 80%-88%). CRR for all studies was 70% (SD 61%-80%) and did not differ between fixed-dose (67%, SD 54%-81%) and BSA-adjusted dose (77%, SD 64%-89%). Heterogeneity tests performed according to available clinical outcomes yielded results between 0% and 76%. Conclusion: The result of our systematic review and meta-analysis combining 30 prospective studies and a total of 3573 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with frontline R-CHOP found no difference in clinical outcomes between patients treated with fixed-dose and BSA-adjusted dose prednisone. Our findings provide scientific evidence for the widespread practice of capping prednisone at the maximum dose of 100 mg daily for 5 days, potentially avoiding unnecessary adverse effects from BSA-adjusted dosing.

Abstract Background Sarcomatoid carcinomas (SC) are rare tumors with both epithelial and mesenchymal characteristics, linked to aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of unknown primary (SCUP) is an exceedingly rare subset with limited literature and no standardized management guidelines. This study aims to characterize the clinical presentations, treatment patterns, and genomic landscape of SCUP. Patients and Methods Data were retrospectively collected from the Mayo Clinic Rochester Cancer of Unknown Primary Registry. Patients included had biopsy-proven SC with no identifiable primary tumor despite comprehensive diagnostic evaluations. Baseline characteristics, immunohistochemistry (IHC) results, next-generation sequencing (NGS) data, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results Fifty-two SCUP patients were identified, with a median age of 60 years. Most patients presented with widely metastatic disease, particularly lytic bone lesions. Elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was noted in nearly half of the patients. IHC showed high positivity for AE1/AE3 and OSCAR antibodies. Tumor NGS revealed 247 alterations, with TP53 being the most common mutation. Patients receiving definitive therapy had a median overall survival (OS) of 72 months, significantly longer than those receiving systemic therapy (14 months). Immunotherapy was a significant prognostic factor, reducing the risk of death by 90%. Conclusions This study provides essential insights into the clinical and genomic characteristics of SCUP, advocating for the integration of definitive therapy and immunotherapy in treatment protocols. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and improve patient outcomes.