Villasboas, José C.

Abstract Introduction Odronextamab, a CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody, demonstrated compelling efficacy with a generally manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) in the Phase 2 ELM-2 study (NCT03888105; Kim TM, et al. Ann Oncol 2024). Pts in ELM-2 received odronextamab monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, with dosing frequency reduced to every 4 weeks (Q4W) in those with sustained complete response (CR) for at least 9 months. Here, we report longer term outcomes in the global FL population of ELM-2, including efficacy and safety in pts who switched to Q4W dosing. Methods Details of the ELM-2 study for the R/R FL cohort have been reported previously. Odronextamab monotherapy was administered intravenously, with step-up dosing in Cycle (C) 1 to help mitigate the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), followed by 80 mg in C2–4, then 160 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) maintenance. Pts with a CR for ≥9 months switched from 160 mg Q2W to Q4W. Pts with the opportunity for response assessment at 12 weeks were included in this analysis. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per Lugano criteria by independent central review (ICR). Key secondary endpoints included CR rate, duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) by ICR, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results As of May 5, 2025 data cutoff, 128 pts with R/R FL Grade (Gr) 1–3a were evaluable for efficacy and safety analysis (overall global population). Median duration of odronextamab exposure was 42.9 weeks (range 0.4–264.0) and median follow-up was 34.1 months (95% CI 33.8–37.9). Eligible pts (n=48) switched to Q4W dosing, with median duration of follow-up from time of switching to Q4W dosing of 19.7 months (95% CI 16.2–31.9). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the overall population and the subgroup of pts who switched to Q4W dosing. The ORR by ICR in the overall population was 80.5% and CR rate was 74.2%, with a median DOR of 26.0 months and median duration of CR of 32.2 months. In pts with sustained CR for ≥9 months who transitioned to Q4W maintenance, the median DOR from time of switching was 31.5 months. In the overall population, the median PFS was 24.1 months and median OS was not reached (estimated 24- and 36-month OS rates: 70.1% and 64.3%, respectively). In pts with CR, median PFS was 38.0 months and median OS was not reached (24- and 36-month OS rates: 80.1% and 75.2%). All 128 pts had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with Gr ≥3 TEAEs reported in 112 pts (87.5%). Discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred in 29 pts (22.7%), and 5 pts died due to treatment-related TEAEs. With the 0.7/4/20 mg step-up regimen, CRS was reported in 55.0% (33/60; Gr 3 in 1 pt) of pts, with no new CRS events observed after switching to Q4W. Infections occurred in 81.3% (Gr ≥3, 46.1%) of pts, with COVID-19 (any Gr, 39.8%) the most frequent. After switching to Q4W dosing, the rate of any grade infection was 81.3% (Gr ≥3, 39.6%). Opportunistic infections (narrow SMQ defined) were reported in 18% (Gr ≥3, 8.6%) of pts in the overall population, with 22.9% (Gr ≥3, 8.3%) of pts having an opportunistic infection after switching to Q4W. Conclusions In the ELM-2 study with ~3-year follow-up in heavily pretreated pts with R/R FL, odronextamab continued to demonstrate deep and durable responses, as well as encouraging PFS and OS, particularly in the majority of pts who achieved CR. Responses remain durable in those who switched to Q4W dosing, lasting for a median additional 31.5 months from the time of switching, demonstrating the long-term, continued therapeutic benefit of odronextamab in pts with R/R FL. The safety profile remained generally manageable, with no new safety signals observed, and no evidence of increased infection risk in pts who switched to Q4W maintenance. Updated data will be presented.

Abstract Background Single-agent R is a common 1st-line therapy for patients (pts) with FL, especially those with low-tumor burden advanced stage disease or comorbidities. EO is a therapeutic vaccine generated from non-self-protein sequences from gut bacteria, including 4 HLA-A2 CD8 T cell epitopes that mimic B cell-specific markers: CD20, CD22, CD37 and BAFF-receptor. EO also contains a CD4 helper epitope UCP2. EO expands pre-existing memory CD8 T cells recognizing non-self-protein sequences from gut bacteria which can cross-react with B cell antigens on tumor cells. The aim adding EO to R is to safely increase the depth and duration of responses. Methods Cohort 3 (C3) of trial EONHL1-20/SIDNEY includes pts with HLA-A2 and previously untreated low-tumor burden (GELF) FL grade 1-3A in need of treatment (per pt/treating physician). Pts receive EO (300μg/peptide) SC with adjuvant Montanide, q2 weeks (w) x 4, then q4w for a total of 12 doses, combined with R starting at w7 (375 mg/m2 IV q1w x4, then q8w x4). For immune responses blood mononuclear cells were assayed by flow cytometry and EO-mimic or B cell peptide specific tetramers without in vitro stimulation. The primary objective is to assess safety; secondary objectives include EO immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy. Results As of July 2025, the 6 planned pts had started EO. Median age was 66 years (range 46-73); 5 ECOG 0/1 ECOG 1; 1 Ann Arbor stage III/5 stage IV; FLIPI low risk 2/intermediate 2/high 2; FLIPI-2 low risk 2/intermediate 4. At median follow-up 10.6 months (mo) 4 pts completed and 2 are ongoing on EO. Median treatment duration was 43 w (range 2-43). Best response by Lugano in the 6 pts included 4 complete (CR) and 2 partial responses (PR). Median time to PR/CR was 17.1 w (range 6.0-18.0). Currently there is only 1 (not yet confirmed) progression at 20.5 mo. All 5 immune response evaluable pts had expansion of CD8 T cells specific for EO mimic and B cell target peptides during treatment; 4 of 5 had detectable expansions at w5 (1st testing time). Currently, the longest tested immune response is at w65 and positive for both EO mimic and B cell target peptides. Expanded specific CD8 T cells had a memory phenotype predominantly composed of effector memory (TEM) cells but also including central memory (TCM) and terminally differentiated effector memory CD8 T (TEMRA) cells. Across the 5 pts, the medians of max % (sum of specific CD8 T cells targeting either the 4 EO mimic peptides or the 4 B cell antigen epitopes at a specific timepoint) among all peripheral CD8 T cells were 0.71% (range 0.19-3.97) for EO mimic and 0.33% (0.20-1.30) for B cell target peptides. The most common EO-related adverse events (AEs) were local administration site reactions (erythema, pain, induration). These included Gr (Grade) 1 reactions in 3 pts, Gr 2 in 1 pt, and Gr 3 in 1 pt; latter being ulceration with EO-interruption at w10.1, and in context of a strong immune response against EO mimic [3.97% of all peripheral CD8 T cells at w5] and B cell target [1.30%] peptides, and CR from w16.7. Other EO related AEs were Gr 1 lymph node pain (1 pt), and related to both EO and R were Gr 2 urticaria (1 pt) and Gr 1 fatigue (1 pt). Only R related were Gr 2 infusion related reaction (3 pts), Gr 2 enterocolitis infection (1 pt), and in 1 pt each Gr 1 flushing, anemia, headache and diarrhea. There were no further Gr 3-4 AE and no death on treatment/follow-up. Complete B cell depletion was seen in 5 pts tested at w18 (R added w7); no recovery in the range of w30-65. Only 3 infections were reported, per above enterocolitis, and 2 cases of COVID-19 both resolved without sequalae. ConclusionsThe combination of EO with R has a predictable and manageable safety profile, with EO only adding local administration site reactions to the well-known R safety profile. In this feasibility cohort all evaluable pts developed a specific immune response against EO and B cell targets, and a Lugano objective response. The combination of EO and R is feasible and can be evaluated in further trials. Updated results will be presented at the meeting.

Abstract The importance of bone marrow (BM) microenvironment and its immune interactions within and their role in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) disease progression have not been well studied. Our previous work in CMML identified type 1 helper T cell (Th1) and CD4 terminal effector cell suppression in peripheral blood from untreated patients, in comparison to age-matched normal controls (Mangaonkar A et al. Blood Adv 2020). Furthermore, clonal dendritic cell (DC) aggregates in CMML are present in approximately 20-30% patients at diagnosis, display significant cell heterogeneity (plasmacytoid DCs + myeloid DCs and other myeloid/immune cells), express indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO), associate with T regulatory cell (Treg) expansion, and transformation to AML [blast transformation or BT, Lucas N et al. Leukemia 2019, Mangaonkar A et al. Blood Adv 2020, and Mangaonkar A et al. Blood 2023 (abstract)]. The purpose of this study was to define the myeloid-immune cell interactions within the BM microenvironment critical for CMML progression to AML. To phenotypically identify cell types and their interactions within the CMML BM, we used single-cell type spatial omics through two distinct modalities on archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) BM biopsy specimens. Ten serial CMML samples at chronic phase [CP, n=5, median BM blast% 5 (2-15)] and at BT [n=5, median BM blast% 60 (25-74)] were used for both techniques. Spatial transcriptomics was conducted through GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler (DSP) platform that uses UV-photocleavable, spatial-barcoded oligo probes to profile the whole transcriptome in defined regions of interest (ROI). CD123 (marker for DC-myeloid aggregates) immunofluorescence antibody was used to identify and segment ROI. 16-color flow cytometry was done to validate cell-specific expression. Spatial cellular phenotyping of immune cells on the same samples (serial cuts) was done through multiplex imaging by co-detection by indexing (CODEX) using 27 markers: CD31, Ki67, CD11b, CD20, CD44, Ecad, CD123, CD107a, CD8, CD11c, CD45RO, FoxP3, CD14, PDL1, CD56, CD68, CD163, PD-1, CD38, HLA-DR, CD4, IDO, CD45, PanCK, Na/K/ATPase, CD3e, and DAPI. CD8T+ cell anergy was demonstrated through CFSE cell proliferation assay. Benjamini-Hochberg correction was used to adjust for multiple hypotheses. After filtering poor quality ROIs [ROIs with total read count < 1000 were removed, ROIs with trim, stitch, alignment < 80% or saturation < 50% were removed], 3rd-quartile normalization [BiocGenerics (v. 0.48.1)] and batch correction [limma (v. 3.58.1)], we compared transcriptomics signatures between CD123+ and CD123- ROIs in all samples. Results showed that LIPA, SLC4A1, HBA2, TIMD4 and HMOX1 werethe top five genes upregulated in CD123+ areas. Among all gene transcripts, TIMD4 expression increased the most (Log2FC=0.6, P-value=8.79E-10, FC=1.52, FDR=1.68E-07) when CD123+ ROIs were compared between CMML-CP and CMML-BT serial samples, suggesting a biological relevance in disease progression. Previous work in metastatic peritoneal cancer has established that TIM-4 expressing macrophages suppress Th1/Th2 ratios and impair CD8+ T cell function (Chow A et al. Cancer Cell 2021). To confirm expression at the protein level, we used a multicolor flow cytometry panel and confirmed that TIM4 is expressed on macrophages (Lineage-negative, HLA-DR+, CD68+ cells) in independent CMML BM aspirate samples (n=3). Next, we conducted spatial phenotyping using CODEX on serial cuts from the same serial samples used for spatial transcriptomics. Anatomical co-localization of macrophages with leukemic cells, monocytes and T cells was visually inspected and confirmed. Cell-interaction analysis (after Benjamini-Hochberg correction) indicated that macrophages-monocyte, macrophage-leukemic cells, and macrophage-memory CD4+T cells were significantly (P<0.05) increased in CMML-BT versus CMML-CP. CD8T+ cell anergy was confirmed through a CFSE cell proliferation assay in untreated CMML PBMC samples. In conclusion, our data suggests that TIM4-expressing macrophages and their interactions with monocytes/monocyte precursors and immune cells within a DC aggregate create a protective leukemic stem cell niche and T cell tolerance, promoting blast transformation in CMML.

Abstract Background: Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is an off-the-shelf, CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody that redirects T cells to eliminate B cells, including those that cause malignant disease. Mosun is FDA- and EMA-approved for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 prior lines of therapy as a fixed-duration intravenous treatment, and can be given in an outpatient setting without mandatory hospitalization. Initial Phase I/II data with Mosun monotherapy have shown notable efficacy and manageable safety in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; NCT03677154; Olszewski et al. ASH 2022). The Phase II MorningSun study is the first to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) Mosun monotherapy in elderly/unfit patients with previously untreated DLBCL; we report an interim analysis for this study. Methods: MorningSun (NCT05207670) is an open-label, multicenter, Phase II, basket study evaluating the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of Mosun SC monotherapy in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In the DLBCL cohort, eligible patients aged ≥80 years or aged 65–79 and considered ineligible for chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) were enrolled, primarily in US community sites. Hospitalization was not mandatory. Step-up doses of Mosun SC were administered on Day (D) 1 (5mg), D8 (45mg) and D15 (45mg) of Cycle 1, followed by 45mg on D1 of 21-day cycles, for up to 17 cycles or until unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint in this cohort was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 months after first study treatment. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), duration of complete response (DOCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. An exploratory circulating tumor DNA analysis was performed using an AOA-NHL assay. Results: Overall,49 patients were enrolled, the majority at community sites (community, n=34; academic, n=15). Thirty-six patients had DLBCL, 6 had high-grade [Gr] B-cell lymphoma, 2 had T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma, and 1 had Gr 3B FL (histology missing/other lymphoma, n=4). Median age was 82.5 years (range: 71–101); 63.3% and 20.4% of patients had an ECOG performance status of 1 and 2, respectively; 40.8% had Ann Arbor stage IV disease; 51.0% had extranodal involvement; 18.4% had bulky disease; and 53.1% had an IPI score of 3–5. At the clinical cut-off date of February 10, 2025, 23 (46.9%) patients had discontinued treatment, mainly due to progressive disease (n=12, 24.5%) or an adverse event (AE; n=5, 10.2%); the median duration of follow-up was 12.5 months (range: 1.4–30.8) and the median number of cycles received was 14 (range: 1–17). The PFS rate at 12 months was 68.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.1–80.6) and OS rate at 12 months was 77.2% (95% CI: 61.1–87.3). The ORR and CR rates were 73.5% and 59.2%, respectively. Median TTR was 2.7 (range: 2.5–6.1) months. DOR and DOCR rates at 12 months were 84.6% (95% CI: 66.8–93.3) and 95.0% (95% CI: 69.5–99.3), respectively. The most common AE (any grade) was injection site reaction (n=25, 51.0%), which was mostly Gr 1 (n=24, 49.0%). Gr 3/4 AEs occurred in 65.3% (n=32) of patients, most commonly infections (16.3% [n=8]) and decreased neutrophil count (10.2% [n=5]); serious AEs occurred in 42.9% (n=21) of patients. Four patients experienced Gr 5 AEs (congestive cardiac failure, volvulus, unexplained death and intracranial hemorrhage, n=1 each); none were related to Mosun per investigator assessment. Infections occurred in 46.9% (n=23) of patients (Gr 1/2, 30.6% [n=15]; Gr 3, 16.3% [n=8]); no Gr 4/5 infections were observed. No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome events occurred. Cytokine release syndrome was reported in 12.2% (n=6) of patients, with 10.2% (n=5) Gr 1 and 2.0% (n=1) Gr 2 events, all of which resolved. In evaluable patients with a CR (n=16), 68.8% (n=11) of patients were minimal residual disease negative (p-value cut-off 0.005).Conclusions: There remains an unmet need for effective chemotherapy-free options in previously untreated elderly and CIT-ineligible patients with DLBCL. Interim data from MorningSun demonstrate that fixed-duration Mosun SC monotherapy is active in these patients, with promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile, with predominantly mild-to-moderate AEs, allowing for outpatient administration in the community practice setting.

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) and bispecific antibody (BsAb) therapies are both effective for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL), but differ in treatment schedules and associated “time toxicity,” or contact days spent physically interacting with the healthcare system. While contact days can be estimated from clinical trials, real-world data provides a more nuanced depiction of treatment-related time burden, which may guide treatment decision-making. The comparative time toxicity of CAR-T vs BsAb in R/R FL is not defined. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of adults with R/R grade 1-3A FL who received standard-of-care CAR-T (axi-cel, tisa-cel, liso-cel) or BsAb (mosunetuzumab, epcoritamab) in the third-line or later setting before Jan 1, 2025. Time toxicity was defined as outpatient or inpatient days with physical health care system contact, counting multiple visits on the same day as only one day. All days after treatment initiation were counted, regardless of disease progression, therapy completion, or relation to FL therapy. Median contact days over 1-year time horizon were compared, stratified by CAR-T vs BsAb, prior lines of therapy (LOT, 2 vs 3+), and time intervals (0-1, 1-3, 3-6, 6-9, and 9-12 months). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from day of CAR-T infusion or day 1, cycle 1 for BsAb. Cox regression and propensity matching (by age, ECOG, refractory to prior LOT, POD24) were used to assess predictors and survival associations with contact days. Results Among 209 patients from 15 U.S. academic centers, median age was 64, 37% were female, 61% received CAR-T (80% axi-cel, 7% liso-cel, 13% tisa-cel) and 39% BsAb (93% mosun, 7% epcor). Most had Grade 1-2 FL (72%), advanced stage (84%), and extranodal disease (51%). Median prior LOT was 3 (range 2-15), 41% were refractory to prior LOT, and 52% had POD24. Median number of BsAb doses was 10 (range 1-36). Patients receiving BsAb were significantly older (p<.01) and had higher CIRS comorbidity scores (p<.02) in both 2 and 3+ prior LOT cohorts, and had higher ECOG scores (p=.01) and were less likely to be refractory to prior LOT (p=.029) in 3+ LOT cohort. There were no differences in POD24 rates between CAR-T and BsAb. Median PFS for the entire cohort was 3.6 yrs; median OS was not reached. In the 2 prior LOT cohort (N=75), 60% received CAR-T and 40% BsAb. With median follow-up of 1.5 years, median PFS was not reached for CAR-T and 1.6 yrs for BsAb (p<.0001). In the 3+ prior LOT cohort (N=134), 62% received CAR-T and 38% BsAb. With median follow-up of 2 yrs, median PFS was 3.6 yrs for CAR-T and 1.6 yrs for BsAb (p=.0044). In propensity matched analysis, PFS was shorter for BsAb in both 2 LOT (HR 9.0, 95% CI 1.14-71.04, p=.037) and 3+ LOT (HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.06-9.97, p=.039) cohorts as compared to CAR-T. There were no significant differences in OS between CAR-T and BsAb. Median contact days were significantly higher for CAR-T vs BsAb in the 0-1 month interval: 19 vs 8 days in 2 LOT (p<.0001) and 18 vs 7 days in 3+ LOT (p<.0001) cohorts. There were no differences in contact days between CAR-T vs BsAb in subsequent time intervals. Over 1 year, CAR-T had significantly more time toxicity than BsAb: median 51 vs 36 contact days in 2 LOT (p<.0001) and 64 vs 38 days in 3L+ LOT (p<.0001) cohorts; these remained significant in the matched analysis. B symptoms (p=.04) and Grade ≥3 cytopenias (p=.007) were associated with higher contact days in 3+ LOT cohort in univariable analysis. Higher contact days were associated with inferior PFS (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, p=.032) and OS (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, p=.038) in 3+ LOT cohort regardless of treatment type. Discussion In this large real-world cohort of patients with R/R FL, CAR-T therapy resulted in better PFS but more time toxicity over the first year as compared to BsAb therapy. Excess time toxicity from CAR-T was driven by more contact days in the first month of treatment. This study provides benchmark data for counseling patients about expected time burden of CAR-T (51-64 days) and BsAb (36-38 days) over the first year of these therapies. Further, with superior PFS of CAR-T in this study and minimal impact of time toxicity on survival outcomes, these data can be used to better support shared decision-making in R/R FL by addressing patient preferences regarding both contact days as well as duration of disease control.

Abstract Background: There remains an opportunity for new therapies to improve long-term outcomes for patients with low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma (FL). Mosunetuzumab is an off-the-shelf CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody, approved as an intravenous therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory FL after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy. Mosunetuzumab can be administered in the outpatient setting as a fixed-duration regimen. In an open-label, multicenter, Phase II study conducted mainly across US community sites (MorningSun; NCT05207670), mosunetuzumab administered subcutaneously (SC) induced high response rates with a manageable safety profile in patients with previously untreated low-tumor burden FL (Burke et al. ASH 2024). Here we present updated efficacy and safety data for mosunetuzumab SC in patients with previously untreated, low-tumor burden FL. Methods: Patients had untreated Grade 1 or 2 low-tumor burden FL per Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria, Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0–2. Mosunetuzumab SC was administered with step-up dosing in Cycle 1 (Day [D]1, 5mg; D8, 45mg; D15, 45mg), then 45mg on D1 of each 21-day cycle. Hospitalization was not mandatory. Patients with a complete metabolic response after 8 cycles could complete therapy and patients with a partial metabolic response or stable disease continued treatment for up to 17 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months. Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), duration of complete response (DOCR), and safety. Exploratory analyses assessed pharmacodynamic changes in B-cell subsets. Here, we report interim data. Results: As of February 10, 2025 (clinical cut-off date), 101 patients were enrolled from US community (n=56) and academic (n=45) centers; 52 patients had completed treatment, 21 had discontinued (mainly due to adverse events [AEs; n=6] and progressive disease [n=5]), and 28 were ongoing on treatment. Median age was 65 years (range: 34–82). Most patients had an ECOG PS of 0 (81.2%) or 1 (18.8%) and 43 patients (42.6%) had extranodal involvement. Median duration of follow-up was 13.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5–16.9) and median number of cycles received was 10 (range: 3–17). The ORR was 98.0% (95% CI: 93.0–99.8) and the complete response rate was 89.1% (95% CI: 81.3–94.4). Median TTR was 2.8 months (range: 1.4–8.3). Landmark DOR and DOCR rates at 12 months were 91.8% (95% CI: 81.5–96.5) and 95.7% (95% CI: 82.6–99.0), respectively. The 12-month PFS and OS rates were 92.0% (95% CI: 83.8‒96.1) and 99.0% (95% CI: 93.2‒99.9), respectively. The most common AE was injection-site reaction (ISR, 81.2%; Grade 1, 74.3%; Grade 2, 5.9%; Grade 3, 1.0%). Grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 51.5% of patients; the most common (≥10%) events were cytopenias (36.6%) and infections (11.9%). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was reported in 48.5% of patients (Grade 1, 40.6%; Grade 2, 7.9%). Overall,infections occurred in 63.4% of patients (Grade 1, 7.9%; Grade 2, 42.6%; Grade 3, 11.9%; Grade 5, 1.0%) with the most common (≥10%) being upper respiratory tract infection (21.8%), COVID-19 (17.8%), sinusitis (13.9%), and pneumonia (11.9%). At the time of data cut-off, ISR, CRS, and infection AEs were resolved at rates of 98.2%, 100%, and 89.0%, respectively. Two patients had a Grade 5 AE (sepsis, n=1; unknown cause, n=1).No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome events were reported. B-cell depletion was observed following the first dose of mosunetuzumab, with subsequent B-cell recovery observed within six months of treatment completion. Conclusions: Fixed-duration mosunetuzumab SC demonstrates high efficacy rates with deep and sustained responses in patients with previously untreated, low-tumor burden FL. The manageable safety profile supports ease of outpatient administration without mandatory hospitalization, including in community oncology practices. Additionally, exploratory analyses demonstrating B-cell recovery after treatment completion also substantiate the use of mosunetuzumab SC as a fixed-duration regimen. These data support further evaluation of mosunetuzumab SC in patients with previously untreated, low-tumor burden FL.

Abstract Description Cellular immune responses are critical for protection from environmental and genetic insults, including pathogens and cancer. However, immunity can also drive pathogenic responses that damage organs and drive pathogenesis. Immune response quality is influenced by several factors including genetics, age, sex and the environment. Environmental influences including everyday activities and lifestyle have been shown to modulate the immune system but are often difficult to monitor. We have developed a system of serial monitoring of peripheral blood mononuclear cells that coincided with wearable device activity monitoring to further understand how biometric data correlates with the composition of blood derived immune cells. Using a 31-marker CyTOF phenotyping panel we monitored blood derived immune cell composition over a 14-week period in an individual volunteer while biometric data was collected via wearable technology. To determine whether interventions can be introduced that change peripheral blood immune cell phenotypes our volunteer introduced lifestyle changes at specific intervals in this period of monitoring. These included intermittent fasting and the introduction of regular exercise. In addition, the individual was immunized against COVID-19 during this time to provide an immune challenge that would perturb immune homeostasis. In this study, we find that lifestyle changes can promote alterations in immune cell phenotypes identified using high parameter mass cytometry. Topic Categories Translational and Interventional Immunology (TI)

Abstract Description Signal regulatory protein-α (SIRPα) is a key member of the “do-not-eat-me” signaling pathway and is expressed on intratumoral monocytes/macrophages in lymphoma. In this study, we found that SIRPα is also expressed by a subset of malignant B cells in lymphoma. SIRPα+ B cells have a memory phenotype with germinal center (GC) dark-zone features, and RNA velocity analysis showed that SIRPα+ B cells exhibit higher spliced transcripts confirming a more mature phenotype. SIRPα expression is substantially upregulated by treating lymphoma B cells with LPS or CpG and SIRPα+ B cells showed increased proliferation when compared to SIRPα- B cells, which was associated with reduced cellular autophagy. SIRPα+ B cells exhibited increased expression of BAFF signaling pathway molecules as the likely mechanism of increased proliferation and survival. Furthermore, in co-culture, SIRPα+ lymphoma B cells suppressed T-cell function and blocking SIRPa/CD47 signaling reversed T cell inhibition. Clinically, we found that a greater number of SIRPα+ B cells present in the diagnostic tumor biopsies of FL patients was associated with a significantly poorer overall survival. We conclude that SIRPα+ lymphoma B cells are a proliferative component of indolent lymphomas, are associated with T-cell suppression, and increased prevalence of these cells is associated with a poor prognosis. Targeting SIRPα+ B cells in lymphoma may therefore be a promising therapeutic strategy. Topic Categories Tumor Immunology: Cellular Responses and Tumor Microevironment (TIME)

207 Background: CAR-T & bispecific antibodies (BsAb) for large B-cell lymphoma offer deep responses, but have unique toxicities requiring close monitoring. Different practice settings have varied strategies for managing these toxicities, leading to increased costs, healthcare resource use, & reduced quality of life. With no direct comparison, rationale for therapy selection may vary. This study explores provider choices, sequencing strategies & access barriers. Methods: A survey of US-based Hematologists was conducted on practice demographics, therapy availability, preferences, & barriers in LBCL. Responses were analyzed across clinical scenarios. Results: Responses were received from 45 physicians. Availability of CAR-T & BsAb varied with 75% prescribing both, & only BsAb being available at 9% of providers’ centers. There was a strong preference for CAR-T over BsAb—higher among academic vs. nonacademic providers (96% vs. 78%; p = 0.03) & at CAR-T vs. non-CAR-T centers (100% vs. 72%; p = 0.001). Even at BsAb-only centers, preference leaned toward CAR-T, though notably lower compared to CAR-T centers. Among centers without either, 86% preferred CAR-T. Practice volume had no impact. Reasons for favoring CAR-T included perceived better outcomes (55%), shorter treatment (26%), center choice (19%), more experience (48%), & curative potential (21%). BsAb selection was driven by CAR-T unavailability & logistical barriers (distance to specialized center, insurance delays, referral complexity, manufacturing time, & hospitalization needs). Axi-cel was preferred by 69% ( p = 0.0001) vs. other CAR-T for third-line or later due to experience with use, response rates, center choice, & logistical ease. Liso-cel (26%) & Tisa-cel (2%) were chosen for perceived favorable toxicity over Axi-cel. Axi-cel was also preferred second-line vs. Liso-cel (73% vs. 24%; p < 0.0001) for similar reasons. Among BsAb, Epcoritamab was favored by 56% for administration ease (subcutaneous), experience, & center preference; Glofitamab by 42% for shorter duration, experience, & center preference. There was no difference by academic vs nonacademic practice & volume for both CAR-T & BsAb. In patients with prior non-CAR-T anti-CD19 therapy, providers chose CD19 CAR-T over CD20 BsAb (80% vs. 18%; p < 0.0001). For relapse after second-line CAR-T, 78% providers preferred BsAb as the next line over other options ( p < 0.0001) due to more favorable response rates, toxicity profile, & experience with use. Providers prioritized response rates, survival, & toxicity profile in their treatment decisions. Logistics, duration, frequency, & cost were less important. There were no differences based on practice setting & CAR-T experience. Conclusions: Despite higher preference for CAR-T due to perceived superior outcomes, access barriers exist. Efforts to streamline referral pathways, logistics, & expand availability are crucial to improve outcomes.