Barry, William T.

Abstract Background: In vivo synergy with concurrent PI3-Kinase inhibition and PARP inhibition has been observed in BRCA-deficient and BRCA-proficient preclinical models of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and ovarian cancer (OC). A phase I trial of the oral pan-class I PI3-Kinase inhibitor BKM120 and the PARP inhibitor olaparib demonstrated anti-cancer activity in TNBC and OC, both in patients with and without germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations. However, CNS toxicity (depression) and liver function test abnormalities limited dose escalation of BKM120 prompting evaluation of the alpha specific PI3-Kinase inhibitor BYL719 (which has no CNS toxicity) in combination with olaparib. Methods: Olaparib was administered twice daily (tablet formulation) and BYL719 daily on a 28-day cycle, both orally. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was employed with primary objectives of defining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose of the combination of BYL719 and olaparib, and secondary objectives of defining toxicity, activity, and pharmacokinetic profiles of both agents. Eligibility included recurrent TNBC or high grade serous (HGS) OC, or any histology OC or breast cancer (BC) with presence of a known germline BRCA mutation, performance status of 0-1 and measurable/evaluable cancer. Patients with platinum sensitive or resistant or refractory OC were eligible and prior PARP inhibitor use was allowed. Dose-expansion cohorts at the MTD were enrolled for both BC and OC. Results: 46 patients (16 BC and 30 OC) have been enrolled in the study; 28 patients participated in the dose escalation portion of the study (4 BC and 24 OC). Two patients with OC did not receive study drugs because of ineligibility. MTD was defined as BYL719 200mg once daily and olaparib 200mg twice daily. Dose limiting toxicities included hyperglycemia, rash and fever with decreased neutrophil count. Four patients (3 OC and 1 BC) discontinued protocol therapy because of toxicity (2 for hyperglycemia, 1 for nausea and 1 for allergic reaction). Most common toxicities included nausea, hyperglycemia, fatigue, diarrhea and vomiting. At the MTD, 6 patients with OC and 12 patients with BC were enrolled into a dose expansion cohort. The OC expansion cohort has completed enrollment, while the BC cohort is still enrolling. Among patients with OC who received study drugs (28 patients, 26 (93%) with platinum resistant disease), objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 was 36% (10/28 patients, all partial responses (PRs)). Median duration of response was 167 days (range 16-398 days); 5 of 10 patients with PR remain on treatment. ORR was 33% for patients with germline BRCA mutations and 31% for patients without germline BRCA mutations. Among patients without germline BRCA mutations with platinum resistant OC, ORR was 29%. Conclusions: Combined BYL719 and olaparib is feasible, and similar clinical benefit was observed in patients with and without germline BRCA mutations. The activity of this combination in OC patients without germline BRCA mutations and with platinum resistant disease was higher than expected from olaparib monotherapy and warrants further investigation. This work was funded in part by the Stand Up To Cancer Ovarian Dream Team. Clinical trial: NCT01623349. Citation Format: Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos, William T. Barry, Michael Birrer, Shannon N. Westin, Sarah Farooq, Karen Cadoo, Christin Whalen, Weixiu Luo, Hui Liu, Carol Aghajanian, David B. Solit, Gordon B. Mills, Barry S. Taylor, Helen Won, Michael F. Berger, Sangeetha Palakurthi, Joyce F. Liu, Lew Cantley, Scott H. Kaufmann, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Alan D. D'Andrea, Eric Winer, Gerburg M. Wulf, Ursula A. Matulonis. Phase I study of the alpha specific PI3-Kinase inhibitor BYL719 and the poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib in recurrent ovarian and breast cancer: Analysis of the dose escalation and ovarian cancer expansion cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT008. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT008

CRA1002 Background: Weekly P is superior to q 3 week (wk) dosing, and adding B improves progression free survival (PFS) (E2100). Ix is a potent epothilone that can be effective after microtubule inhibitor resistance. NP is a novel albumin-bound formulation of P with promising activity in the first-line MBC setting. In this phase III trial, the efficacy of weekly Ix or NP is compared to P, in combination with B in patients (pts) with chemotherapy (CTX) naïve MBC. Toxicity including >Grade 2 sensory neuropathy (SN) is compared to P. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive P (90 mg/m2), Ix (16 mg/m2) or NP (150 mg/m2) on a 3 wk on, 1 wk off schedule, stratified by prior adjuvant taxane use and hormone receptor status. B was initially given to all pts, but became optional in 3/2011 and was added to stratification. The primary end point of PFS is defined as time from randomization to progression or all-cause death. With a target N=900 pts, the study was powered to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.36 (median PFS 10 vs 13.6 mos). Eligibility included no prior CTX for MBC, >12 mos from adjuvant P and measurable disease. Results: 799 pts were enrolled between 11/08-11/11 (283 to P, 271 to NP, 245 to Ix); 98% received B. 72% had ER+ disease, 44% received adjuvant P. At the 1st interim analysis (165 events) the comparison of Ix to P crossed the futility boundary (FB) and accrual to Ix was closed. At the 2nd interim analysis (236 events), NP to P crossed the FB and the study was closed on 11/30/11. Median PFS was 10.4, 9.6 and 7.6 mos for P, NP and Ix, with HRs (95% CIs) of 0.94 (0.73-1.22) and 0.66 (0.51-0.84) for P to NP and Ix respectively. Grade 2+ SN was 48% for NP, 44% for Ix and 37% for P; Grade 3+ hematologic toxicity was 49% for NP, 20% for Ix, and 12% for P. Conclusions: In pts with CTX naive MBC, both NP and Ix are highly unlikely to be superior to P for PFS (when all are combined with B), and in combination with B, weekly P is the better tolerated drug. Toxicity including SN was greater in each experimental arm compared to P. Updated data will be presented, and correlative studies will be reported at a future date.

175 Background: Inactivity is common in breast cancer survivors and has been linked to poor outcomes. Few trials have tested physical activity (PA) interventions in young women with breast cancer, who may face unique PA barriers due to demands of jobs and young families. Methods: Young and Strong was a cluster-randomized study evaluating the effect of education interventions for young breast cancer survivors.Sites were randomized 1:1 to a young women’s intervention (YWI), focused on fertility and other issues facing young women, or to a physical activity intervention (PAI). At PAI sites, providers were instructed to discuss PA with patients, and participants were given materials to encourage PA. PA was measured with the modified Godin Leisure Score Index at baseline, and 3, 6, and 12 months. Medical records were reviewed to assess provider attention to PA. Changes in weekly min of PA were compared between the PAI and YWI groups using general estimating equations to evaluate clustered binary and Gaussian data. Results: 467 patients enrolled between 7/12 -12/13 across 54 sites. Median age at dx was 40yrs (range 22-45). At baseline, participants were moderately active. PA increased in both groups over time (Table); there was no significant difference in PA between groups at any time (all p > 0.1). Provider attention to PA was documented in 74% of participants on PAI and 61% on YWI (p = 0.15), and correlated with PA at 12 months (median 100 min/wk of PA in participants with provider attention to PA vs. 60 min/wk in those without, p = 0.016). Participants who reported reading all or most the PAI materials reported higher levels of PA vs. those who read less (78% vs. 64%, p = 0.05) Conclusions: Young breast cancer survivors assigned to a PA intervention did not increase PA more than those assigned to an intervention focused on young women’s issues. However, the higher levels of PA among women who engaged with the PAI materials and those whose oncology providers addressed PA suggests the importance of enhancing patient and provider engagement with healthy lifestyle information and recommendations. Clinical trial information: NCT01647607. [Table: see text]

PurposeWe compared nab-paclitaxel or ixabepilone once per week to paclitaxel with bevacizumab as first-line therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) for nab-paclitaxel or ixabepilone versus paclitaxel.Patients and MethodsEligible patients were age ≥ 18 years with chemotherapy-naive advanced BC. Patients were randomly assigned to bevacizumab with paclitaxel 90 mg/m2(arm A), nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2(arm B), or ixabepilone 16 mg/m2(arm C), once per week for 3 of 4 weeks. Planned enrollment was 900 patients, which would give 88% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.73.ResultsIn all, 799 patients were enrolled, and 783 received treatment (97% received bevacizumab). Arm C was closed for futility at the first interim analysis (n = 241), and arm A (n = 267) and arm B (n = 275) were closed for futility at the second interim analysis. Median PFS for paclitaxel was 11 months, ixabepilone was inferior to paclitaxel (PFS, 7.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.93; P < .001), and nab-paclitaxel was not superior to paclitaxel (PFS, 9.3 months; hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.45; P = .054). Results were concordant with overall survival; time to treatment failure was significantly shorter in both experimental arms v paclitaxel. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity, including peripheral neuropathy, was increased with nab-paclitaxel, with more frequent and earlier dose reductions.ConclusionIn patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced BC, ixabepilone once per week was inferior to paclitaxel, and nab-paclitaxel was not superior with a trend toward inferiority. Toxicity was increased in the experimental arms, particularly for nab-paclitaxel. Paclitaxel once per week remains the preferred palliative chemotherapy in this setting.

Abstract Background: Although the spectrum of genomic alterations in primary, treatment-naïve breast tumors has been described, the genomic landscape of HER2+ MBC remains underexplored. Furthermore, tumor genomic alterations that arise after progression on anti-HER2 therapy are largely unknown. Methods: We prospectively collected metastatic tumor biopsies from patients (pts) enrolled on TBCRC003 (NCT00470704), a phase II study evaluating the combination of lapatinib (L) and T in pts with HER2+ MBC who had varying degrees of prior T exposure. We performed WES on baseline metastatic biopsies and normal DNA from 57 pts. In 36 pts, we also performed WES on pre-treatment primary tumors. Tumors were analyzed for point mutations, insertions/deletions, and copy number alterations. Results: Total accrual was 116 pts. 87 pts were registered in one of two efficacy cohorts: Cohort 1 included pts w no prior T for MBC. Pts with prior adjuvant T were included if the interval from last T to 1st recurrence &gt; 12 months. Cohort 2 included pts with 1-2 prior lines of T for MBC or recurrence within 12 months of adjuvant T. An additional 29 pts were enrolled in a biomarker cohort (Cohort 3). Per-protocol efficacy analyses for 85 pts deemed evaluable are shown below: Objective Response RateClinical Benefit RateMedian Time to ProgressionCohort 150% (90% CI 33.8-66.2%)57.5% (95% CI 40.9-73.0)7.4 monthsCohort 222.2% (90% CI 11.2-37.1%)42.2% (95% CI 27.7-57.8)5.3 months As we previously reported (Wagle et al, ASCO 2014), across 57 metastatic tumors, significant recurrently mutated genes were TP53 (n=30; 53%) and PIK3CA (n=19; 33%). The frequency of mutant TP53 and PIK3CA was not significantly different from 119 primary, treatment-naïve HER2+ tumors sequenced in the TCGA study (50%, p=0.8 and 27%, p=0.5, respectively). Recurrent copy number alterations were also similar to TCGA data. Comparing the 38 pts who received any prior T with the 19 pts who did not, there was no significant difference in the incidence of mutant TP53 (53% vs 53%, p=1.0) and PIK3CA (37% vs 26%, p=0.6). We identified mutations in the HER2 kinase domain in 4/38 pts who received prior T (11%), as compared to 0/19 T-naïve pts. HER2 kinase domain mutations have been identified in ∼2% of HER2-negative cancers but &lt;1% of primary HER2+ cancers. 3 of the mutations were L755S, which has been shown to be resistant to L and sensitive to irreversible HER2 inhibitors. The 4th mutation was D742N, a novel kinase domain mutation. None of the 4 pts with HER2 kinase domain mutations had an objective response, though 1 pt had stable disease for 29 weeks. An analysis comparing paired archival primary tumors and baseline metastatic biopsies from 36 pts to identify genomic alterations acquired or enriched in the metastatic tumors will be presented. Conclusions: We present an analysis of the genomic landscape of HER2+ MBC, including comparisons between matched primary tumors and metastatic biopsies. Somatic HER2 kinase mutations in pts with HER2+ MBC treated with prior T suggests that these mutations may be involved in resistance to T, and may predict poor response to additional anti-HER2 therapy with combined L and T. Novel therapeutic approaches may be required for these pts. Citation Format: Nikhil Wagle, Nancy U Lin, Andrea L Richardson, Ignaty Leshchiner, Ingrid A Mayer, Andres Forero-Torres, Timothy J Hobday, Elizabeth C Dees, Rita Nanda, Mothaffar F Rimawi, Hao Guo, William T Barry, Ron Bose, Wei Shen, Antonio C Wolff, Stacey B Gabriel, Levi A Garraway, Eric P Winer, Ian E Krop. Whole exome sequencing (WES) of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from patients with or without prior trastuzumab (T): A correlative analysis of TBCRC003 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-5.