Back to Authors

Mutter, Robert W.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-7323

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 47

Optimizing Breast Cancer Adjuvant Radiation and Integration of Breast and Reconstructive Surgery
Kuerer, Henry M. , Cordeiro, Peter G., Mutter, Robert W.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book | October 29, 2018 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 37 | Pages: 93-105

10.1200/edbk_175342 Get It

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) reduces the risk of locoregional and distant recurrence and improves overall survival in women with lymph node–positive breast cancer. Because of stage migration and improvements in systemic therapy and other aspects of breast cancer care, the absolute benefit of PMRT and regional nodal irradiation may be small in some favorable subsets of patients with very low nodal burden, and newer consensus guidelines do not mandate PMRT in all node-positive cases. The use and need for PMRT may considerably complicate breast reconstruction after mastectomy and therefore mandates multidisciplinary input that takes into account patient choice given potential risk of acute and long-term toxicities, benefits, life expectancy, the biology of the tumor, plans for systemic therapy, and actual tumor burden. Management of axillary lymph node metastases is changing with selective use of axillary lymph node dissection for advanced disease, sentinel lymph node biopsy alone for clinically and pathologic node-negative cases receiving mastectomy, and targeted axillary dissection alone among patients with eradication of initial biopsy-proven nodal metastases with neoadjuvant systemic therapy use. In general, when the need for PMRT is anticipated, autologous reconstruction should be delayed. This comprehensive article reviews the current indications and implications regarding integration of breast cancer surgery and timing of reconstruction with optimum radiation delivery to achieve the best possible patient outcomes.
ATR Inhibition Is a Promising Radiosensitizing Strategy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Tu, Xinyi , Kahila, Mohamed M. , Zhou, Qin , Yu, Jia , Wang, Liewei , Harmsen, William S. , Mutter, Robert W. , Kalari, Krishna R. , Yuan, Jian , Boughey, Judy C. , Goetz, Matthew P. , Sarkaria, Jann N. , Lou, Zhenkun

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | August 30, 2018 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2462-2472

10.1158/1535-7163.mct-18-0470 Get It

Abstract Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by elevated locoregional recurrence risk despite aggressive local therapies. New tumor-specific radiosensitizers are needed. We hypothesized that the ATR inhibitor, VX-970 (now known as M6620), would preferentially radiosensitize TNBC. Noncancerous breast epithelial and TNBC cell lines were investigated in clonogenic survival, cell cycle, and DNA damage signaling and repair assays. In addition, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models generated prospectively as part of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy study from either baseline tumor biopsies or surgical specimens with chemoresistant residual disease were assessed for sensitivity to fractionated radiotherapy, VX-970, or the combination. To explore potential response biomarkers, exome sequencing was assessed for germline and/or somatic alterations in homologous recombination (HR) genes and other alterations associated with ATR inhibitor sensitivity. VX-970 preferentially inhibited ATR-Chk1-CDC25a signaling, abrogated the radiotherapy-induced G2–M checkpoint, delayed resolution of DNA double-strand breaks, and reduced colony formation after radiotherapy in TNBC cells relative to normal-like breast epithelial cells. In vivo, VX-970 did not exhibit significant single-agent activity at the dose administered even in the context of genomic alterations predictive of ATR inhibitor responsiveness, but significantly sensitized TNBC PDXs to radiotherapy. Exome sequencing and functional testing demonstrated that combination therapy was effective in both HR-proficient and -deficient models. PDXs established from patients with chemoresistant TNBC were also highly radiosensitized. In conclusion, VX-970 is a tumor-specific radiosensitizer for TNBC. Patients with residual TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a subset at particularly high risk of relapse, may be ideally suited for this treatment intensification strategy. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(11); 2462–72. ©2018 AACR.
Abstract 840: ATR inhibition is a promising radiosensitizing strategy for chemotherapy-resistant triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)
Mutter, Robert W. , Tu, Xinyi , Yu, Jia , Wang, Liewei , Kahila, Mohamed M. , Zhou, Qin , Kalari, Krishna R. , Boughey, Judy C. , Goetz, Matthew P. , Sarkaria, Jann N. , Lou, Zhenkun

Cancer Research | August 17, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 840-840

10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-840 Get It

Abstract Purpose: TNBC represents an aggressive subtype characterized by earlier relapse and worse survival compared to non-TNBC. Patients with residual TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have a high risk of locoregional recurrence despite aggressive subsequent local therapies, including RT. Thus, new radiosensitizers that address chemoresistant TNBC (i.e residual disease after NAC) are needed. ATR plays a key role in the cellular response to replication stress and DNA damage. TNBC is characterized by G1 checkpoint loss, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and other features which increase dependence on ATR pathway signaling. We hypothesized that VX-970, a selective inhibitor of ATR, would effectively radiosensitize TNBC. Methods: Cell lines representing varying subtypes of TNBC (MDA-MB-231, HCC1806, and BT-549) and the normal breast epithelial cell line MCF10a were investigated in clonogenic survival, cell cycle, and DNA damage signaling and repair assays. In addition, Mayo Clinic (MC)TNBC1 and MCTNBC2, patient derived xenograft models (PDXs) generated prospectively from baseline and chemoresistant residual disease surgical specimens after NAC, respectively, of unique patients in the Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study were analyzed. Tumors were injected into hind-legs of athymic nude mice and animals were randomized to: 1) Vehicle 2) RT 3) VX-970 4) RT + VX-970. RT was delivered in 5 daily fractions of 2 Gy. VX-970 was administered daily 1 hour prior to RT at a dose of 60 mg/kg. Exome sequencing was assessed for germ-line and/or somatic alterations in HR genes and an ex-vivo RAD51 foci formation assay was applied to confirm the functional status of HR in each PDX model. Results: In vitro, VX-970 preferentially inhibited ATR-Chk1-CDC25a signaling, abrogated the RT-induced G2/M checkpoint, delayed resolution of γH2AX and 53BP1 foci and reduced colony formation after RT in MDA-MB-231, HCC1806, and BT-549 relative to MCF10a. In vivo, VX-970 did not exhibit single agent activity at the dose administered but markedly sensitized both MCTNBC1 and MCTNBC2 to RT, suggesting that VX-970 could overcome chemoresistant TNBC biology. For MCTNBC1 and MCTNBC2, the median time to tumor tripling was 26 vs 49 days (p=0.002) and 25 vs 43 days (p=0.006) for the RT and RT + VX-970 groups, respectively. Ex-vivo RAD51 foci formation was robust in MCTNBC1, a PDX without HR gene alterations. In contrast, there was no RT-induced RAD51 foci formation in MCTNBC2, suggesting a BRCA1 mutation in the corresponding human tumor resulted in loss of HR function in that model. Conclusion: VX-970 + RT effectively radiosensitized TNBC PDXs established from both pre-treatment biopsy specimens and chemoresistant residual tumor samples and in both HR deficient and HR proficient settings. ATR inhibition should be investigated in the clinic in combination with RT for patients with residual TNBC after NAC. Citation Format: Robert W. Mutter, Mohamed M. Kahila, Xinyi Tu, Qin Zhou, Jia Yu, Krishna R. Kalari, Liewei Wang, Judy C. Boughey, Matthew P. Goetz, Jann N. Sarkaria, Zhenkun Lou. ATR inhibition is a promising radiosensitizing strategy for chemotherapy-resistant triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 840.
Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy
Elswick, Sarah M. , Harless, Christin A., Bishop, Sarah N. , Schleck, Cathy D. , Mandrekar, Jay , Reusche, Ryan, Mutter, Robert W. , Jacobson, Steven R., Lemaine, Valérie, Reusche, Ryan D, Boughey, Judy C.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery | June 7, 2018 | Volume: 142 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1-12

10.1097/prs.0000000000004453 Get It

Background: Two-stage subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common method for breast reconstruction. Recent advances in surgical techniques and technology have made prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction feasible. There are limited data on outcomes after prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiation therapy. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing immediate two-stage prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy was performed. Outcomes of irradiated breasts were compared with nonirradiated breasts in bilateral cases. Results: Ninety-three cases of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in 54 women who underwent immediate two-stage reconstruction (39 bilateral and 15 unilateral) and unilateral postmastectomy radiation therapy were identified. Mean follow-up was 19 months from mastectomy and tissue expander reconstruction and 9 months from implant placement. Crude complication rates in irradiated versus nonirradiated sides were as follows: surgical-site infection, 18.5 percent versus 7.7 percent; seroma, 5.6 percent versus 5.1 percent; mastectomy skin flap necrosis, 1.9 percent versus 2.6 percent; wound dehiscence, 1.9 percent versus 7.7 percent; capsular contracture, 1.9 percent versus 0 percent; hematoma, 1.9 percent versus 2.6 percent; and extrusion, 1.9 percent versus 0 percent. On univariate analysis, there were no risk factors associated with any complication, including radiation therapy, surgical-site infection, unplanned readmissions, and unplanned return to the operating room. To date, reconstruction has been completed in 96 percent of patients, with successful implant-based breast reconstruction in 81 breasts (45 irradiated breasts and 36 nonirradiated breasts). Conclusions: Early data of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with postmastectomy radiation therapy show promising results. Postmastectomy radiation therapy should not be an absolute contraindication to prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer: Progress & Pitfalls
Corbin, Kimberly S. , Mutter, Robert W.

Breast Cancer Management | April 13, 2018 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.2217/bmt-2018-0001 Get It

Bi‐allelic alterations in DNA repair genes underpin homologous recombination DNA repair defects in breast cancer
Mutter, Robert W. , Riaz, Nadeem , Ng, Charlotte K.Y. , Delsite, R., Piscuoglio, Salvatore , Edelweiss, Marcia , Martelotto, Luciano G. , Sakr, Rita A. , King, Tari A. , Giri, Dilip D. , Brogi, Edi , Bernheim, Giana, Blecua, Pedro , Desrichard, Alexis , Higginson, Daniel S. , Towers, Russell, Jiang, Ruomu, Lee, William , Weigelt, Britta , Ng, Charlotte Ky , Drobnjak, Marija , Bindra, Ranjit S. , Lim, Raymond S. , Reis‐Filho, Jorge S. , Powell, Simon N. , Higginson, Daniel S , Riaz, Nadeem

The Journal of Pathology | March 16, 2017 | Volume: 242 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 165-177

10.1002/path.4890 Get It

AbstractHomologous recombination (HR) DNA repair‐deficient (HRD) breast cancers have been shown to be sensitive to DNA repair targeted therapies. Burgeoning evidence suggests that sporadic breast cancers, lacking germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, may also be HRD. We developed a functional ex vivo RAD51‐based test to identify HRD primary breast cancers. An integrated approach examining methylation, gene expression, and whole‐exome sequencing was employed to ascertain the aetiology of HRD. Functional HRD breast cancers displayed genomic features of lack of competent HR, including large‐scale state transitions and specific mutational signatures. Somatic and/or germline genetic alterations resulting in bi‐allelic loss‐of‐function of HR genes underpinned functional HRD in 89% of cases, and were observed in only one of the 15 HR‐proficient samples tested. These findings indicate the importance of a comprehensive genetic assessment of bi‐allelic alterations in the HR pathway to deliver a precision medicine‐based approach to select patients for therapies targeting tumour‐specific DNA repair defects. Copyright © 2017 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract P5-12-05: Breast cancer (BC) following prophylactic mastectomy (PM), a clinical entity: Presentation, management, and outcomes
Mutter, Robert W. , Frost, Marlene H., Johnson, Joanne L., Hartmann, Lynn C. , Hoskin, Tanya L. , Boughey, Judy C.

Cancer Research | May 4, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 9_Supplement | Pages: P5-12-05-P5-12-05

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-p5-12-05 Get It

Abstract Objective: Contralateral PM (CPM) and Bilateral PM (BPM) markedly decrease, but do not completely eliminate the possibility of development of a new BC on the side of the PM. Given the relative infrequency of its occurrence, little is known about the clinical characteristics, presentation, and management of patients who develop BC after PM. Our aim was to review our institutional experience of BC occurring after PM. Methods: Between 1960 and 1993, 1,065 women underwent BPM and 1,643 women with unilateral BC treated with therapeutic mastectomy underwent a CPM. Medical records were reviewed and study-specific questionnaires were sent to all women at 10 years and 20 years after PM. BC after PM included locoregional invasive BC or DCIS on the side of the PM. Results: Thirteen patients who underwent BPM developed BC after PM. Twelve patients who underwent CPM developed a subsequent BC on the side of the CPM. The median follow-up time from PM was 22 years (range 3-34). Detailed clinical characteristics of BC after PM are shown in Table 1. Presentations included: disease limited to the axilla without evidence of a local primary 4 (16%); synchronous local and axillary disease 1 (4%); synchronous local disease and distant metastases 4 (16%); clinically isolated local disease 17 (68%). Characteristics of BC Following PM All Patients (n=25)BPM Cohort (n=13)CPM Cohort (n=12)Median age at diagnosis of BC after PM56 (range 38-81)58 (range 38-71)54 (range 39-81)Median time to development of BC after PM (years)7 (range 1-25)6 (range 2-25)8 (range 1-21)Presentation Self-detected abnormality23 (92%)12 (92%)11 (92%)Screening mammogram1 (4%)02 (16%)Not known1 (4%)1 (8%)0Local disease only17 (68%)10 (77%)7 (58%)-Sub-areolar7 (41%)6 (40%)1 (8%)-UOQ/axillary tail2 (12%)02 (16%)-Lower/inframmamary crease2 (12%)1 (10%)1(8%)Chest wall or unspecified6 (35%)3 (30%)3 (25%)Local & regional (axillary) disease1 (4%01 (8%)Axillary BC without evidence of local primary4 (16%)1 (8%)3 (25%)Synchronous local and distant disease3 (12%)2 (15%)1 (8%) Of the 17 patients with isolated local disease, 11 (65%) underwent a completion/redo mastectomy, local excision of the tumor was performed in 5 (29%), and surgical management was unknown in 1 (6%). Ten of 17 (59%) underwent axillary lymph node dissection, 1 (6%) underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 1 did not undergo axillary staging, and axillary management was unknown in 5 (29%). Median tumor size was 0.9 cm (range 0.3-3.5) and only 1 of 17 (6%) patients was confirmed to have pathologic nodal involvement. Twelve of 17 (71%) received some type of adjuvant therapy: chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy 3 (18%); radiotherapy 2 (12%); both 5 (29%); none 5 (29%). With a median follow-up of 7 years since diagnosis of local BC after PM, there has been one isolated local recurrence and 2 distant recurrences as first event. Conclusion: BC can occur after PM. With rising rates of PM, understanding management of BC after PM is important. Most common presentation is local disease and can be managed with resection with consideration of adjuvant therapy. Multidisciplinary management of these cases is needed. Citation Format: Robert W Mutter, Tanya L Hoskin, Marlene H Frost, Joanne L Johnson, Lynn C Hartmann, Judy C Boughey. Breast cancer (BC) following prophylactic mastectomy (PM), a clinical entity: Presentation, management, and outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-05.