Back to Authors

Liu, Jun

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8148-9175

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Citations 1

An international randomised trial of celecoxib versus celecoxib plus difluoromethylornithine in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis
Lynch, Patrick M, Burke, Carol A. , Phillips, Robin, Morris, Jeffrey S. , Slack, Rebecca, Wang, Xuemei , Liu, Jun , Patterson, Sherri, Rodrı́guez-Bigas, Miguel A. , Half, Elizabeth , Bülow, Steffen, Latchford, Andrew , Clark, Sue, Ross, William A., Malone, Bonnie, Hasson, Hennie, Hawk, Ernest T. , Lynch, Patrick M, Sinicrope, Frank A. , Richmond, Ellen S. , Burke, Carol A

Gut | March 20, 2015 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 286-295

10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307235 Get It

Background and aim Although Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce colorectal adenoma burden in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), the utility of combining chemopreventive agents in FAP is not known. We conducted a randomised trial of celecoxib (CXB) versus CXB+diflouromethylornithine (DFMO) to determine the synergistic effect, if any. Methods The primary endpoint was % change in adenoma count in a defined field. Secondary endpoints were adenoma burden (weighted by adenoma diameter) and video review of entire colon/rectal segments. Adverse event (AEs) were monitored by National Cancer Institution toxicity criteria. Results 112 subjects were randomised: 60 men and 52 women at a mean age of 38 years. For the 89 patients who had landmark-matched polyp counts available at baseline and 6 months, the mean % change in adenoma count over the 6 months of trial was −13.0% for CXB+DFMO and −1.0% for CXB (p=0.69). Mean % change in adenoma burden was −40% (CXB+DFMO) vs −27% (CXB) (p=0.13). Video-based global polyp change was −0.80 for CXB+DFMO vs −0.33 for CXB (p=0.03). Fatigue was the only significant AE, worse on the CXB arm (p=0.02). Conclusions CXB combined with DFMO yielded moderate synergy according to a video-based global assessment. No significant difference in adenoma count, the primary endpoint, was seen between the two study arms. No evidence of DFMO-related ototoxicity was seen. There were no adverse cardiovascular outcomes in either trial arm and no significant increase in AEs in the CXB+DFMO arm of the trial. Differences in outcomes between primary and secondary endpoints may relate to sensitivity of the endpoint measures themselves. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov number N01-CN95040.