Back to Authors

Bibby, David C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-6007

Mayo Clinic

Bionomics (Australia)

Citations 2

Association of baseline IL-8 and ferritin with clinical outcome with everolimus and BNC105P in the DisrupTOR-1 trial.
Pal, Sumanta K. , Bhatia, Sumeet, Drabkin, Harry A., Costello, Brian A. , Sarantopoulos, John , Lauer, Richard C., Hahn, Noah M. , Sonpavde, Guru , Richey, Stephen , Breen, T., Kremmidiotis, Gabriel, Leske, Annabell F., Doolin, Elizabeth , Bibby, David C. , Iglesias, J. L. Mesías, Azad, Arun , Kanesvaran, Ravindran , Sweeney, Christopher J. , Simpson, Jeremy Andrew , Hutson, Thomas E.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: 475-475

10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.475 Get It

475 Background: The vascular disrupting agent (VDA) BNC105P shows synergy with everolimus in preclinical models. The DisrupTOR-1 trial included a phase I component exploring this combination and a randomized phase II component comparing everolimus with BNC105P (Arm A) to everolimus monotherapy (Arm B) (Pal et al. ESMO 2014). Methods: Pts with clear cell mRCC and 1-2 prior therapies (including ≥1 VEGF-TKI) were randomized in the phase II study component. In Arm A, patients received a 7 day lead-in dose of everolimus followed by dosing with BNC105P. Patients in Arm A had optional blood collections prior to administration of BNC105P and 3 hours after receiving BNC105P. A fluorescence-based assay was used to characterize a broad panel of analytes at each time point. Biomarkers were assessed in both a static and dynamic fashion. For the former, biomarkers were stratified by median value, and progression-free survival (PFS) was compared in resulting subgroups using the Kaplan-Meier method. For the latter, change in biomarker level before and after BNC105P infusion was stratified by median difference, and PFS was compared in resulting subgroups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 139 pts were randomized with 69 and 67 evaluable pts in Arms A and B, respectively. Dynamic biomarkers were assessed in a total of 44 patients who received everolimus with BNC105P. Increases in matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and stem cell factor (SCF) were associated with improved PFS (p=0.0421 and p=0.0291, respectively). Decreases in sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and serum amyloid protein (SAP) were associated with improved PFS (p=0.0184 and p=0.0063). With respect to static biomarkers, elevated baseline ferritin and lower baseline IL-8 were associated with improved PFS (p=0.0291 and p=0.0149, respectively). Conclusions: Several static and dynamic biomarkers in the DisrupTOR-1 trial were associated with PFS. A prospective biomarker-driven study examining everolimus with BNC105P selected by baseline IL-8 and ferritin is in development. Clinical trial information: NCT01034631.
A Phase I/II Trial of BNC105P with Everolimus in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Pal, Sumanta K. , Azad, Arun , Drabkin, Harry A., Costello, Brian A. , Sarantopoulos, John , Kanesvaran, Ravindran , Lauer, Richard C., Starodub, Alexander, Hauke, Ralph J. , Sweeney, Christopher J. , Hahn, Noah M. , Sonpavde, Guru , Richey, Stephen , Breen, T., Kremmidiotis, Gabriel, Leske, Annabell F., Doolin, Elizabeth , Bibby, David C. , Hutson, Thomas E. , Costello, Brian, Bhatia, Shailender , Simpson, Jeremy Andrew , Iglesias, José , Azad, Arun A , Sweeney, Christopher , Hutson, Thomas , Kanesvaran, Ravindran

Clinical Cancer Research | March 18, 2015 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 3420-3427

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-3370 Get It

Abstract Purpose: BNC105P inhibits tubulin polymerization, and preclinical studies suggest possible synergy with everolimus. In this phase I/II study, efficacy and safety of the combination were explored in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Experimental Design: A phase I study in patients with clear cell mRCC and any prior number of therapies was conducted using a classical 3 + 3 design to evaluate standard doses of everolimus with increasing doses of BNC105P. At the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), patients with clear cell mRCC and one to two prior therapies (including ≥ 1 VEGF-TKI) were randomized to BNC105P with everolimus (arm A) or everolimus alone (arm B). The primary endpoint of the study was 6-month progression-free survival (6MPFS). Secondary endpoints included response rate, PFS, overall survival, and exploratory biomarker analyses. Results: In the phase I study (N = 15), a dose of BNC105P at 16 mg/m2 with everolimus at 10 mg daily was identified as the RP2D. In the phase II study, 139 patients were randomized, with 69 and 67 evaluable patients in arms A and B, respectively. 6MPFS was similar in the treatment arms (arm A: 33.82% vs. arm B: 30.30%, P = 0.66) and no difference in median PFS was observed (arm A: 4.7 mos vs. arm B: 4.1 mos; P = 0.49). Changes in matrix metalloproteinase-9, stem cell factor, sex hormone-binding globulin, and serum amyloid A protein were associated with clinical outcome with BNC105P. Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not met in an unselected population, correlative studies suggest several biomarkers that warrant further prospective evaluation. Clin Cancer Res; 21(15); 3420–7. ©2015 AACR.