Back to Authors

Escaned, Javier

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-0112

Mayo Clinic

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Citations 12

Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions
Räber, Lorenz , Mintz, Gary S. , Koskinas, Konstantinos C. , Johnson, Tom , Onuma, Yoshinubo, Radu, Maria , Joner, Michael , Jia, Haibo , Méneveau, Nicolas , Hernández, José M. de la Torre , Escaned, Javier , Hill, Jonathan , Prati, Francesco , Colombo, Antonio , Regar, Evelyn , Wijns, William , Byrne, Robert A. , Guagliumi, Giulio , Group, ESC Scientific Document, Alfonso, Fernándo , Bhindi, Ravinay, Ali, Ziad A. , Carter, Rickey E. , Joner, Michael , Onuma, Yoshinobu , Carter, Rickey E , Onuma, Yoshinobu , Holm, Niels Ramsing , Yu, Bo , Mario, Carlo Di , Capodanno, Davide , Group, ESC Scientific Document, Escaned, Javier , Wijns, William , Räber, Lorenz

European Heart Journal | May 16, 2018 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 35 | Pages: 3281-3300

10.1093/eurheartj/ehy285 Get It

Abstract This Consensus Document is the first of two reports summarizing the views of an expert panel organized by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) on the clinical use of intracoronary imaging including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The first document appraises the role of intracoronary imaging to guide percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in clinical practice. Current evidence regarding the impact of intracoronary imaging guidance on cardiovascular outcomes is summarized, and patients or lesions most likely to derive clinical benefit from an imaging-guided intervention are identified. The relevance of the use of IVUS or OCT prior to PCI for optimizing stent sizing (stent length and diameter) and planning the procedural strategy is discussed. Regarding post-implantation imaging, the consensus group recommends key parameters that characterize an optimal PCI result and provides cut-offs to guide corrective measures and optimize the stenting result. Moreover, routine performance of intracoronary imaging in patients with stent failure (restenosis or stent thrombosis) is recommended. Finally, strengths and limitations of IVUS and OCT for guiding PCI and assessing stent failures and areas that warrant further research are critically discussed.
Optimal Medical Therapy Improves Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Revascularization With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Iqbal, Javaid , Holmes, David R. , Morice, Marie‐Claude, Mack, Michael J. , Feldman, Ted , Ståhle, E, Escaned, Javier , Banning, Adrian , Gunn, Julian , Colombo, Antonio , Mohr, Friedrich W., Zhang, Yao‐Jun , Kappetein, Arie Pieter, Stahle, Elizabeth, Banning, Adrian P, Gunn, Julian P, Steyerberg, Ewout W. , Serruys, Patrick W. , Kappetein, A. Pieter , Escaned, Javier , Banning, Adrian

Circulation | February 26, 2015 | Volume: 131 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 1269-1277

10.1161/circulationaha.114.013042 Get It

Background— There is a paucity of data on the use of optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and its long-term prognostic significance. Methods and Results— The Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial is a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial of patients (n=1800) with complex coronary disease randomized to revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or CABG. Detailed drug history was collected for all patients at discharge and at the 1-month, 6-month, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-ups. OMT was defined as the combination of at least 1 antiplatelet drug, statin, β-blocker, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker. Five-year clinical outcomes were stratified by OMT and non-OMT. OMT was underused in patients treated with coronary revascularization, especially CABG. OMT was an independent predictor of survival. OMT was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–0.85; P =0.002) and composite end point of death/myocardial infarction/stroke (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.92; P =0.007) at the 5-year follow-up. The treatment effect with OMT (36% relative reduction in mortality over 5 years) was greater than the treatment effect of revascularization strategy (26% relative reduction in mortality with CABG versus percutaneous coronary intervention over 5 years). On stratified analysis, all the components of OMT were important for reducing adverse outcomes regardless of revascularization strategy. Conclusions— The use of OMT remains low in patients with complex coronary disease requiring coronary intervention with percutaneous coronary intervention and even lower in patients treated with CABG. Lack of OMT is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Targeted strategies to improve OMT use in postrevascularization patients are warranted. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00114972.