O’Malley, David M.

Abstract Germline and somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) confer PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Promoter hypermethylation is an alternate mechanism of gene down-regulation, and BRCA1 promoter methylation is relatively common in sporadic ovarian cancer. The clinical significance of BRCA1 methylation is less clear than for mutations, as the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and others have failed to show improved survival in ovarian carcinomas with BRCA1 methylation. No one has previously tested whether BRCA1 methylation confers in vivo sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in patients with ovarian cancer. ARIEL2 is a phase 2 study of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with recurrent platinum sensitive high-grade ovarian, peritoneal or fallopian tube carcinoma. At enrollment, ARIEL2 required pre-treatment tumor biopsies with the goal of developing tissue predictors of PARP inhibitor sensitivity other than BRCA mutations. The number of women with known germline mutations was capped at 15 patients in order to predominantly enroll BRCA wildtype cases. As presented at ASCO 2016, in cases with no BRCA mutations, a high fraction of genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) significantly predicted a better progression-free survival (the primary endpoint), longer duration of response, and a higher fraction of responders compared to cases with low LOH. We assessed BRCA1 and RAD51C promoter hypermethylation using methylation-sensitive polymerase chain reaction in paired archival and pre-treatment biopsies from patients on ARIEL2. Of 165 cases for which methylation analyses were completed, 21 (12.7%) were methylated at the BRCA1 promoter and four (2.4%) at the RAD51C promoter. Methylation of BRCA1 and RAD51C was mutually exclusive with mutation in BRCA or other homologous recombination genes. All four cases with RAD51C methylation and 15/19 (78.9%) with BRCA1 methylation were associated with high LOH. In 90 paired samples archival and pre-treatment tissues, RAD51C methylation was 100% concordant and BRCA1 methylation was highly concordant (p<0·001). For 13 cases with BRCA1 methylation in the archival specimen, 4 (30·8%) were unmethylated in the paired pretreatment tumor, but for 77 unmethylated archival specimens, gain of methylation in the pretreatment biopsy was observed just once. Confirmed RECIST responses were seen in 52.4% (11/21) BRCA1 methylated and 75.0% (3/4) RAD51C methylated cases. In conclusion, BRCA1 and RAD51C methylation in ovarian carcinomas correlates with a high response rate to PARP inhibitors. If methylation was to be used as a predictor of PARP inhibitor sensitivity, it would need to be assessed in a pre-treatment (not archival) specimen. The loss of BRCA1 methylation in recurrent ovarian carcinoma, which was common even in these platinum sensitive cases, could explain why BRCA1 methylation is associated with similar survival to methylated cases, despite initial improved therapeutic sensitivity. Citation Format: Elizabeth Swisher, Maria Harrell, Kevin K. Lin, Clare Scott, Sandra Goble, Amit Oza, Robert L. Coleman, Gottfried Konecny, Anna V. Tinker, David M. O'Malley, Rebecca Kristeleit, Ling Ma, James Brenton, Katherine Bell-McGuinn, Ana Oaknin, Alexandra Leary, Elaina Mann, Heidi Giordano, Mitch Rapon, Iain McNeish, Scott H. Kaufmann. BRCA1 and RAD51C Promoter Hypermethylation Confer Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitors in Patients with Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 12-13, 2016; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr AP28.

Abstract High-grade epithelial ovarian carcinomas containing mutated BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) homologous recombination (HR) genes are sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors (PARPi), while restoration of HR function due to secondary mutations in BRCA1/2 has been recognized as an important resistance mechanism. We sequenced core HR pathway genes in 12 pairs of pretreatment and postprogression tumor biopsy samples collected from patients in ARIEL2 Part 1, a phase II study of the PARPi rucaparib as treatment for platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian carcinoma. In 6 of 12 pretreatment biopsies, a truncation mutation in BRCA1, RAD51C, or RAD51D was identified. In five of six paired postprogression biopsies, one or more secondary mutations restored the open reading frame. Four distinct secondary mutations and spatial heterogeneity were observed for RAD51C. In vitro complementation assays and a patient-derived xenograft, as well as predictive molecular modeling, confirmed that resistance to rucaparib was associated with secondary mutations. Significance: Analyses of primary and secondary mutations in RAD51C and RAD51D provide evidence for these primary mutations in conferring PARPi sensitivity and secondary mutations as a mechanism of acquired PARPi resistance. PARPi resistance due to secondary mutations underpins the need for early delivery of PARPi therapy and for combination strategies. Cancer Discov; 7(9); 984–98. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Domchek, p. 937. See related article by Quigley et al., p. 999. See related article by Goodall et al., p. 1006. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 920

Purpose Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel achieves objective response in 35% of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). This study aimed to determine whether the addition of bevacizumab to gemcitabine-docetaxel increases progression-free survival (PFS) in uLMS. Patients and Methods In this phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, unresectable uLMS were randomly assigned to gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab or gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo. PFS, overall survival (OS), and objective response rates (ORRs) were compared to determine superiority. Target accrual was 130 patients to detect an increase in median PFS from 4 months (gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo) to 6.7 months (gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab). Treatment effects on PFS and OS were described by hazard ratios (HRs), median times to event, and 95% CIs. Results In all, 107 patients were accrued: gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo (n = 54) and gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab (n = 53). Accrual was stopped early for futility. No statistically significant differences in grade 3 to 4 toxicities were observed. Median PFS was 6.2 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo versus 4.2 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab (HR, 1.12; P = .58). Median OS was 26.9 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo and 23.3 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab (HR, 1.07; P = .81). Objective responses were observed in 17 (31.5%) of 54 patients randomly assigned to gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo and 19 (35.8%) of 53 patients randomly assigned to gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab. Mean duration of response was 8.6 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus placebo versus 8.8 months for gemcitabine-docetaxel plus bevacizumab. Conclusion The addition of bevacizumab to gemcitabine-docetaxel for first-line treatment of metastatic uLMS failed to improve PFS, OS, or ORR. Gemcitabine-docetaxel remains a standard first-line treatment for uLMS.