Asiedu, Gladys B.

Abstract Background: Much has been published about barriers to research participation for under-represented minority (URM) yet we know little about the experiences, motivations, and decision-making of the URM patients who were successfully treated on clinical trial (CT). The purpose of this study is to draw on the experiences of URM patients as insiders of practical knowledge of CT through photo elicitation to comprehensively understand the current state of recruitment and treatment of URM patients on interventional cancer CTs across the Mayo Clinic enterprise with a short-term goal of informing mechanisms to enrich CT participation and a long-term goal of building a patient-centered cancer practice and clinical trial patient population that is reflective of the diverse communities served by Mayo Clinic. Method: An Appreciative inquiry approach was adapted for this study which acknowledges that existing strengths and everyday experiences of URM patients has the potential to allow a more nuanced view as it pertains to our cancer populations. A total of 138 URM were invited to participate. Using photo elicitation technique, patients were asked to take photographs to portray factors that motivated them and/or facilitated their enrollment, barriers to enrollment and recommendations to improve the process for CT recruitment for other URM. Participant-generated photographs (59) and accompanying 13 interview narratives were analyzed using layered analysis. Results: A total of 13 patients (female =9) participated in the photo interviews. URM detailed their overall experiences around CT participation, motivations for participating in clinical trials; facilitators to clinical trial participation; and opportunities and considerations for increasing minority patients CT participation. Photo analyses provided symbolic representation of patients’ general experiences around CT including celebrating their “new identity”, finding peace in moments of nostalgia, their journey through the trial, lost times and finances and yet finding a new purpose to live through CT participation. Importantly patients described decision making in CT participation as a relational approach. Patients suggested opportunities and considerations for increasing minority patients trial participation, which included minimizing logistical barriers, decentralizing cancer clinical trials, increasing awareness via patient narratives, diversifying research staff, minimizing cost, and being clear on purpose and benefit of the trial. Conclusion: Our study highlights the potential to utilize visual data and narratives from URM in CT recruitment and education programming. It provided valuable insights from the URM community for the URM community on key issues on motivations of CT participation and decision-making in CT participation. Citation Format: Gladys B. Asiedu, Rahma Warsame, Mary O’Shea, Yong-hun Kim, Sara A. Ellingson, Katharine A. Price. Trial participation in pictures: Using photo elicitation to explore minority patients’ experiences on therapeutic cancer clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A076.

Abstract Background: The increasing number of African immigrants in the United States has contributed to the diversity of the country's Black population. However, there is limited research on the impact of immigration, particularly regarding chronic diseases like cancer, within the sub-Saharan African immigrant (SSAI) community. To address this gap, this study aimed to explore cultural factors among SSAIs to better understand the drivers of health disparities in prostate cancer outcomes. Methods: A qualitative approach using grounded theory was employed for this study. Participants were purposefully recruited to reflect the cultural diversity among SSAIs. Recruitment occurred at health fairs, community events and by snowball approach. In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 participants, including prostate cancer survivors. Nine participants have lived in the US for at least 10 years. The average age of participants was 51 years. Country of birth for study participants include, Nigeria, Ghana, Cameroon, Kenya, and Ethiopia. Interviews were transcribed, verified, and de-identified then imported into NVivo 12 software. Four research team members, three of them African immigrants, performed open and axial coding, with consensus on the emerging findings. Results: This study identified several key cultural factors influencing SSAI men’s health behaviors. These factors include the perception of cancer in their country of birth, the low priority given to preventative care in their country of origin, and reluctance to embrace a Westernized diet, the perception of cancer in their country of origin as a death sentence, viewing cancer as a spiritual/religious attack, and associating cancer with affluence. In addition, these cultural factors made participants hesitant to discuss cancer, relying on religion for healing instead of medical care, and seeking healthcare only for cure. Conclusion: This study illuminates key cultural factors among SSAI men that influence their health-seeking behaviors. These findings highlight the need for culturally tailored behavioral interventions to address these factors and improve health outcomes within this understudied population. Citation Format: Ernest Kaninjing, Motolani Ogunsanya, Kaitlin Van Voorhis, Gladys Asiedu, Assata Kokayi, Rae Walker Brennan, Mary Ellen Young, Folake Odedina. The influence of cultural factors on health-seeking behaviors regarding prostate cancer among African immigrant men in the United States [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A070.

Abstract Background: Sub-Saharan African immigrant (SSAI) men constitute one of the fastest-growing immigrant populations in the United States and a large heterogeneous group in cancer survivorship. Yet research has ignored decision making about health and behavioral risk factors among SSAI communities. Intersecting acculturation and culture-specific perceptions about cancer screening within decision-making frameworks may be an essential step towards developing meaningful interventions for immigrant men’s healthcare. Objectives: This study aimed to gain insight into cancer-related beliefs and health decision-making practices among sub-Saharan African immigrant men. Methods: A qualitative design intersecting grounded theory analysis was employed using 16 semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews with SSAI men residing in Georgia and Florida. Participants were recruited from health fairs, community events, and by snowball effect. The average age of participants was 51 years with country of birth including Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, and Nigeria. An interview guide was prepared with emphasis on SSAI’s perspectives on lifestyle factors for cancer and decision making about cancer screening. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using open, inductive, and axial coding via NVivo 12 qualitative data analysis software. Results: Findings identified key cultural factors impacting barriers to and facilitators of SSAI men’s decision-making processes and health-seeking behaviors. Most participants making positive decisions reflected on intercultural health practices made in collaboration with clinicians, significant others and community partnerships. Most participants with negative decisions tended to consider socio-cultural barriers and shortcomings in US health-care system. Participants’ preventative care decisions about cancer screening differed. Conclusions: This qualitative study illuminated key cultural factors among SSAI men that influenced their decision making about cancer screening and health-seeking behaviors. Future research should investigate longitudinal and quantitative studies to test decision-making outcomes. Funding Source: This study is funded by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (1R15MD017012-01A1). Keywords: Cancer health disparities, Decision-making, Immigrant men, Intersectionality, Qualitative study Citation Format: Assata Kokayi, Gladys Asiedu, Kaitlin Van Voorhis, Rae Walker, M.E. Young, Folakemi Odedina, Motolani Ogunsanya, Ernie Kaninjing. Intersecting acculturation and decision making about cancer screening among sub-Saharan African immigrant men: A qualitative study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A062.

Abstract Background: Sub-Saharan African immigrants (SSAI) in the United States (US) constitute one of the fastest-growing segments of the immigrant population. Between 2010 and 2018, the SSAI population in the US increased by 53%, significantly outpacing the 12% growth rate for the overall foreign-born population in the US during that time frame. For the purposes of this study, we define SSAI as the 2 million individuals living in the US originally from the region of the African continent located south of the Saharan desert. Despite their growing numbers, little is published about the extent to which SSAI adapt to health behaviors more common in the US or remain immersed in the values, beliefs and practices reflective of their country of origin. Importantly, no study has comprehensively examined the social determinants of health factors among this population and its influence on health-seeking behaviors and decision-making regarding prostate cancer care and treatment options. This study employs the social determinant of migrant health framework to examine the impact of immigration on the health-seeking behaviors of SSAI including informed-decision making, psychosocial effects and coping mechanisms. This study will fill the void of research studies that link social determinant of health and immigration among SSAI. Methods: Grounded theory will guide the study design that include in-depth interviews to document the experiences of SSAI relative to health seeking behaviors, care, and treatment. We explore differences and similarities among participants based on country or region of origin in Africa. We employ the social determinants of migrant health framework to better understand the needs of SSAI prostate cancer survivors in the United States and how to effectively support these survivors. Results: We will present findings based on preliminary interviews conducted with SSAI prostate cancer survivors recruited from Florida or Minnesota. Additionally, we will report on the development of a SSAI social determinant of migration model that explains individual and structural factors that impact the health-seeking behaviors and coping mechanisms among this population. We will provide new understanding about specific social determinant of health factors that can be addressed in intervention studies among SSAI in the United States. Conclusion: This study examines the full range of racial, social, environmental, behavioral and structural factors that SSAI prostate cancer survivors experience. It will illuminate the decision-making process and overall quality of care among this understudied population. Citation Format: Ernie Kaninjing, Gladys Asiedu, Mary Ellen Young, Ebenezer Erefah, Folakemi Odedina, Roxana Dronca, Kimlin Ashing, Solomon Rotimi, Che Ngufor, Arnold Merriweather, Jennifer Crook, Manisha Salinas, Parisa Fathi, Sha’Reff Rashad, John McCall, Ayinde Yahaya. The iCCARE consortium for prostate cancer in Black men: Grounded theory study of the social determinant of health factors among African immigrant men diagnosed with prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B050.

e18544 Background: Underrepresented minority (URM) patients continue to make up a small percentage of patients treated on cancer clinical trials (CCTs), thus perpetuating health care disparities. Research indicates that engagement of healthcare staff is critical for successful recruitment. Our study sought to better define barriers to minority recruitment to CCT from the research staff perspective. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted of key stakeholders for CCT enrollment, including clinical research coordinators (CRCs), principal investigators (PIs), and treating clinicians. Questions for the healthcare team explored their experiences caring for URM patients with specific inquiry into the barriers of enrollment/retention and the processes or resources required to better meet patient needs. Results: All hematology and oncology staff at Mayo Clinic Cancer Center were invited to participate via email. Of the 28 who consented, 13 were male (46%), 15 female (54%), and 21% non-white (3 Asian, 2 Hispanic, 1 Black). Of the 19 PIs, 9 were Professors (47%), 5 Associate professors (26%), and 5 Assistant professors (26%). The additional 9 interviewees were CRCs. Select themes with representative quotes and proposed actions can be seen in Table. Conclusions: Recommendations for CCT accrual include accelerating efforts to address workforce diversity gaps, engaging in community outreach, optimization of CCT participation through collaborative care, incentivizing trial participation, and creating flexibility in eligibility criteria.[Table: see text]

e18543 Background: Representation of minority patients (pts) in cancer clinical trials (CCTs) is low and contributes to health disparities. Our study sought to understand the beliefs and motivations of minority patients and to identify barriers and facilitators of CCT enrollment. Methods: 270 minority pts treated on CCT were identified from the medical record from 2018-2021. Of the 138 of pts alive, 13 (9.4%) consented. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted exploring motivations, barriers, and facilitators to CCT participation. Surveys collected demographics and explored beliefs towards cancer and factors that influenced participation. Results: Of the 13 participants, 9 were female (69%), 4 Hispanic (30%), 3 Black (23%), 3 multiple races (23%), 2 Asian (15%), 2 Native American (15%), and 1 Native Hawaiian (8%). Two pts had a high school education (15%), 7 ≥ 4-year college (54%), 4 ≥ 2-year college (30%). Eight pts were married, 3 divorced, 1 widowed, and 1 single. Employment status was: employed (4 pts, 30%), unemployed (1 pt, 8%), disabled (5 pts, 38%), retired (3 pts, 23%). All pts were insured. Median household was 3 people (range 1 to > 5); 3 pts had dependents. 9 pts had their own vehicle; 4 used public or subsidized transport. 2 pts had trouble finding transportation. Income was: 3 pts < 25K, 4 pts 25-35K, 1 pts 35-50 K, 1 pts 50-75K, and 4 pts > 75K. 4 pts received emotional support from religion. All pts had heard of CCTs and 6 (46%) had known other CT participants. Direct communication from healthcare provider was the most common way of hearing about CCT. 9 pts (69%) had trust or strong trust in experimental therapy/CCT; 4 pts (30%) were neutral. 8 pts (61%) believed standard therapy was needed to cure cancer. 5 pts (38%) believed God would decide if they die from cancer. 7 pts (54%) believed that worry makes cancer worse. Key themes about patients’ motivation to participate: chance for cure, staying positive, giving back to others, having representation in research, and advancing science. Key themes about facilitators to participation: supportive family, cost coverage for treatment, and limited treatment options. Key themes on participation: minimizing logistical barriers, decentralizing CCTs, increasing awareness via patient narratives, diversifying research staff, minimizing cost, and being clear on purpose and benefit of CCT. Factors from survey that influenced participation are summarized in Table. Conclusions: Understanding minority pts experience through in-depth interviews is valuable and may help with recruitment.[Table: see text]

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors cause cutaneous toxicity in over 90% of patients. Conceivably, healthcare providers could overlook such toxicity in African American/Black patients because of a darker complexion. This qualitative study sought to learn about such cutaneous signs and symptoms and, if present, to report them in patients’ own words. Methods: Any patient who self-identified as African American/Black and who had been prescribed an EGFR inhibitor was eligible. The current report focuses on patients’ responses to the following question, “What have you noticed since starting your cancer treatment (the EGFR inhibitor), any particular symptoms or reactions, positive or negative?” All interview data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and then independently coded and analyzed by two investigators. Results: Fifteen patients are the focus of this report, and all described cutaneous toxicity. Patients appeared troubled by the cosmetic aspect of these drug-induced skin changes, including their acneiform appearance, describing “little pimples with little, little pus in it.” Notable were comments on hyperpigmentation, “I’m a black person but…. became darker.” Furthermore, patients experienced physical symptoms: “it itches;” “it’s like you stuck a pin in it;” “stinging;” and “burning;”. Conclusion: Although cutaneous toxicity from EGFR inhibitors might be more difficult to visualize among darkly complected patients, the graphic descriptions offered in this qualitative study underscore the need for clinicians to heighten their awareness of such toxicity in African American/Black patients.

Purpose To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a social network weight loss intervention delivered by lay health promoters (HPs) to immigrant populations. Design Single-arm, non-randomized, pilot study of a social network weight loss intervention developed by a community-based participatory research partnership and delivered by HPs. Setting Community-based setting in Southeastern Minnesota, United States. Sample Somali and Hispanic immigrants to the United States: 4 social networks of adults (2 Hispanic and 2 Somali) with 39 network participants. Intervention Twelve-week behavioral weight loss intervention delivered by HPs (4 weeks in-person and then 8 weeks virtual). Measures Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention rates. Acceptability was assessed by surveys and focus groups with HPs and participants. Behavioral measures included servings of fruits and vegetables, drinking soda, and physical activity. Physiologic measures included weight, blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides. Analysis Paired t-tests of pre- to post-intervention changes at the end of 12 weeks of treatment. Results Recruitment was feasible and post-intervention was 100%. Participants highly rated the intervention on satisfaction, motivation, and confidence to eat a healthy diet, be physically active, and lose weight. Participants were motivated by group social support and cohesion of their social networks. On average, participants lost weight (91.6 ± 15.9 to 89.7 ± 16.6 kg, P < .0001), lowered their systolic blood pressure (133.9±16.9 to 127.2 ± 15.8 mm Hg; P < .001), lowered their diastolic blood pressure (81 ± 9.5 to 75.8 ± 9.6 mm Hg; P < .0001), had more servings of vegetables per day (1.9 ± 1.2 to 2.6 ± 1.4; P < .001), and increased their physical activity (2690 ± 3231 to 6595 ± 7322 MET-minutes per week; P = .02). Conclusion This pilot study of 2 immigrant communities who participated in a peer-led weight loss social network intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability. Participants lost weight, improved their health status, and improved their health behaviors.