Back to Authors

Marmura, Michael J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6421-6594

Mayo Clinic

Thomas Jefferson University

Citations 12

How to Apply the AHS Evidence Assessment of the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults to your Patient with Migraine
Pringsheim, Tamara , Davenport, William Jeptha, Marmura, Michael J. , Silberstein, Stephen D., Schwedt, Todd J. , Pringsheim, Tamara , Marmura, Michael J

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | June 20, 2016 | Volume: 56 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1194-1200

10.1111/head.12870 Get It

The “Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults: The American Headache Society Evidence Assessment of Migraine Pharmacotherapies” provides levels of evidence for medication efficacy for acute treatment of migraine. The goal of this companion paper is to provide guidance on how to choose between evidence‐based treatment options, and, based on the clinical characteristics of the patient and their migraine attacks, to provide guidance on designing an individualized strategy for managing migraine attacks. The acute pharmacological treatments described in the American Headache Society evidence assessment can be divided into those initially taken by the patient during the headache phase of the migraine attack, those taken by the patient later in the attack when initial treatments fail, and those administered intravenously or intramuscularly in urgent care settings. Medications taken initially by patients in the headache phase include nonspecific analgesics such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triptans, and dihydroergotamine (DHE). A stratified approach to treatment is advised, with the choice of medication based on the patient's treatment needs, taking into consideration the attack severity, presence of associated symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, and the degree of migraine‐related disability. Individuals with migraine may find reassurance in having a “back‐up plan” in the event of an initial acute treatment failure. For those individuals who had a partial response to the initial acute treatment, a second dose might be indicated. When the initial treatment does not provide meaningful and sustained benefits, a treatment from a different medication class is typically chosen. Depending upon the initial treatment used, this might include NSAIDs, triptans, or DHE. Opioids or acetaminophen in combination with codeine or tramadol can be considered as part of the “back‐up plan,” provided they are used infrequently. When all patient administered treatments have failed and moderate to severe migraine symptoms remain, some individuals seek treatment in urgent care settings. The intravenous administration of antiemetics with or without an intravenous or intramuscular NSAID or DHE, or an intramuscular opioid can be considered. Patients with migraine should be encouraged to treat migraine pain early, and avoid overuse of medications.
The Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults: The A merican H eadache S ociety Evidence Assessment of Migr
Marmura, Michael J. , Silberstein, Stephen D., Schwedt, Todd J. , Marmura, Michael J

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | January 20, 2015 | Volume: 55 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 3-20

10.1111/head.12499 Get It

The study aims to provide an updated assessment of the evidence for individual pharmacological therapies for acute migraine treatment. Pharmacological therapy is frequently required for acutely treating migraine attacks. The A merican A cademy of N eurology G uidelines published in 2000 summarized the available evidence relating to the efficacy of acute migraine medications. This review, conducted by the members of the G uidelines S ection of the A merican H eadache S ociety, is an updated assessment of evidence for the migraine acute medications. A standardized literature search was performed to identify articles related to acute migraine treatment that were published between 1998 and 2013. The A merican A cademy of N eurology G uidelines D evelopment procedures were followed. Two authors reviewed each abstract resulting from the search and determined whether the full manuscript qualified for review. Two reviewers studied each qualifying full manuscript for its level of evidence. Level A evidence requires at least 2 C lass I studies, and L evel B evidence requires 1 C lass I or 2 C lass II studies. The specific medications – triptans (almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan [oral, nasal spray, injectable, transcutaneous patch], zolmitriptan [oral and nasal spray]) and dihydroergotamine (nasal spray, inhaler) are effective ( L evel A ). Ergotamine and other forms of dihydroergotamine are probably effective ( L evel B ). Effective nonspecific medications include acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (aspirin, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen), opioids (butorphanol nasal spray), sumatriptan/naproxen, and the combination of acetaminophen/aspirin/caffeine ( L evel A ). Ketoprofen, intravenous and intramuscular ketorolac, flurbiprofen, intravenous magnesium (in migraine with aura), and the combination of isometheptene compounds, codeine/acetaminophen and tramadol/acetaminophen are probably effective ( L evel B ). The antiemetics prochlorperazine, droperidol, chlorpromazine, and metoclopramide are probably effective ( L evel B ). There is inadequate evidence for butalbital and butalbital combinations, phenazone, intravenous tramadol, methadone, butorphanol or meperidine injections, intranasal lidocaine, and corticosteroids, including dexamethasone ( L evel C ). Octreotide is probably not effective ( L evel B ). There is inadequate evidence to refute the efficacy of ketorolac nasal spray, intravenous acetaminophen, chlorpromazine injection, and intravenous granisetron ( L evel C ). There are many acute migraine treatments for which evidence supports efficacy. Clinicians must consider medication efficacy, potential side effects, and potential medication‐related adverse events when prescribing acute medications for migraine. Although opioids, such as butorphanol, codeine/acetaminophen, and tramadol/acetaminophen, are probably effective, they are not recommended for regular use.