Back to Authors

Davenport, William Jeptha

Mayo Clinic

University of Calgary

Citations 3

How to Apply the AHS Evidence Assessment of the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults to your Patient with Migraine
Pringsheim, Tamara , Davenport, William Jeptha, Marmura, Michael J. , Silberstein, Stephen D., Schwedt, Todd J. , Pringsheim, Tamara , Marmura, Michael J

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | June 20, 2016 | Volume: 56 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1194-1200

10.1111/head.12870 Get It

The “Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults: The American Headache Society Evidence Assessment of Migraine Pharmacotherapies” provides levels of evidence for medication efficacy for acute treatment of migraine. The goal of this companion paper is to provide guidance on how to choose between evidence‐based treatment options, and, based on the clinical characteristics of the patient and their migraine attacks, to provide guidance on designing an individualized strategy for managing migraine attacks. The acute pharmacological treatments described in the American Headache Society evidence assessment can be divided into those initially taken by the patient during the headache phase of the migraine attack, those taken by the patient later in the attack when initial treatments fail, and those administered intravenously or intramuscularly in urgent care settings. Medications taken initially by patients in the headache phase include nonspecific analgesics such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triptans, and dihydroergotamine (DHE). A stratified approach to treatment is advised, with the choice of medication based on the patient's treatment needs, taking into consideration the attack severity, presence of associated symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, and the degree of migraine‐related disability. Individuals with migraine may find reassurance in having a “back‐up plan” in the event of an initial acute treatment failure. For those individuals who had a partial response to the initial acute treatment, a second dose might be indicated. When the initial treatment does not provide meaningful and sustained benefits, a treatment from a different medication class is typically chosen. Depending upon the initial treatment used, this might include NSAIDs, triptans, or DHE. Opioids or acetaminophen in combination with codeine or tramadol can be considered as part of the “back‐up plan,” provided they are used infrequently. When all patient administered treatments have failed and moderate to severe migraine symptoms remain, some individuals seek treatment in urgent care settings. The intravenous administration of antiemetics with or without an intravenous or intramuscular NSAID or DHE, or an intramuscular opioid can be considered. Patients with migraine should be encouraged to treat migraine pain early, and avoid overuse of medications.
Canadian Headache Society systematic review and recommendations on the treatment of migraine pain in emergency settings
Orr, Serena L. , Aubé, Michel, Becker, Werner J. , Davenport, William Jeptha, Dilli, Esma, Giammarco, Rose, Gladstone, Jonathan P., Leroux, Élizabeth , Pim, Heather, Dickinson, Garth, Christie, Suzanne, Dodick, David, Dodick, David W.

Cephalalgia | May 30, 2014 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 271-284

10.1177/0333102414535997 Get It

Background There is a considerable amount of practice variation in managing migraines in emergency settings, and evidence-based therapies are often not used first line. Methods A peer-reviewed search of databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL) was carried out to identify randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of interventions for acute pain relief in adults presenting with migraine to emergency settings. Where possible, data were pooled into meta-analyses. Results Two independent reviewers screened 831 titles and abstracts for eligibility. Three independent reviewers subsequently evaluated 120 full text articles for inclusion, of which 44 were included. Individual studies were then assigned a US Preventive Services Task Force quality rating. The GRADE scheme was used to assign a level of evidence and recommendation strength for each intervention. Interpretation We strongly recommend the use of prochlorperazine based on a high level of evidence, lysine acetylsalicylic acid, metoclopramide and sumatriptan, based on a moderate level of evidence, and ketorolac, based on a low level of evidence. We weakly recommend the use of chlorpromazine based on a moderate level of evidence, and ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, lidocaine intranasal and meperidine, based on a low level of evidence. We found evidence to recommend strongly against the use of dexamethasone, based on a moderate level of evidence, and granisetron, haloperidol and trimethobenzamide based on a low level of evidence. Based on moderate-quality evidence, we recommend weakly against the use of acetaminophen and magnesium sulfate. Based on low-quality evidence, we recommend weakly against the use of diclofenac, droperidol, lidocaine intravenous, lysine clonixinate, morphine, propofol, sodium valproate and tramadol.
Acute treatment and prevention of menstrually related migraine headache
Pringsheim, Tamara , Davenport, William Jeptha, Dodick, David W.

Neurology | April 21, 2008 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 1555-1563

10.1212/01.wnl.0000310638.54698.36 Get It