Lester, Rachael

ABSTRACTObjectives:We aimed to determine vaccination practices of pediatric gastroenterologists, as well as barriers to following immunization guidelines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Methods:Institutions listed in the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition clinical research registry and/or ImproveCareNow were contacted. A total of 657 physicians from 129 institutions were asked to complete a 16‐question electronic survey.Results:A total of 178 physicians (27.1%) responded, of whom 55% were male and 83.1% practiced in an academic setting. A total of 11 physicians (6.2%) do not routinely assess vaccination status, whereas 63.5% assess at the time of diagnosis, 29.8% at “well” visits, and 44.4% before initiating immunosuppression. At diagnosis, 51.1% verbally inquire about immunization status, 30.9% obtain records, and 9.0% obtain serology.The influenza (78%), hepatitis B (84%), and varicella (82%) vaccines were most frequently assessed. Fewer than 55.5% of physicians reviewed other vaccines. Physicians using a reminder mechanism were more likely to review immunizations at established visits (41.1% vs 20.8%), and before transfer to an adult gastroenterologist (14.4% vs 2.6%). Lack of coordination of care with primary care practitioners (41%), poor access to immunization records (36%), and inability to offer vaccinations in their immediate area (55%) are barriers to vaccination. Only 28% believed that primary care practitioners were solely responsible for immunizations.Conclusions:There is practice variation among pediatric gastroenterologists in assessment of immunizations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, including the specific vaccines assessed, and timing and method of assessment. Inability to coordinate care, access immunization records, and offer vaccines through their medical practice are barriers to adhering to immunization guidelines.

Background. Radiotherapy has been utilized for metastatic and recurrent osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma (ES), in order to provide palliation and possibly prolong overall or progression-free survival. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is convenient for patients and offers the possibility of increased efficacy. We report our early institutional experience using SBRT for recurrent and metastatic osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma.Methods. We reviewed all cases of osteosarcoma or ES treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2012.Results. We identified 14 patients with a total of 27 lesions from osteosarcoma(n=19)or ES(n=8). The median total curative/definitive SBRT dose delivered was 40 Gy in 5 fractions (range, 30–60 Gy in 3–10 fractions). The median total palliative SBRT dose delivered was 40 Gy in 5 fractions (range, 16–50 Gy in 1–10 fractions). Two grade 2 and 1 grade 3 late toxicities occurred, consisting of myonecrosis, avascular necrosis with pathologic fracture, and sacral plexopathy. Toxicity was seen in the settings of concurrent chemotherapy and reirradiation.Conclusions. This descriptive report suggests that SBRT may be a feasible local treatment option for patients with osteosarcoma and ES. However, significant toxicity can result, and thus systematic study is warranted to clarify efficacy and characterize long-term toxicity.

A 23-year-old woman presented with an 8-month history of asymptomatic thickening of the central areola bilaterally and oily nipple discharge. On examination, there were yellowish-pink papules coalescing into plaques bilaterally. Biopsy showed ectopic sebaceous glands (Montgomery tubercles), known as bilateral areolar sebaceous hyperplasia.