O’Carroll, Cumara B.

Background: Combined PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition for the has been shown to produce superior results in the treatment of malignant melanoma when compared to monotherapy. However, patients with intracranial disease were excluded from these studies given their poor prognosis. Objective: The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence supporting the co-administration of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a critically appraised topic that included a clinical scenario, structured question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, assessment of results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and a content expert in the field of neuro-oncology. Results: A recent, open-label, non-comparative randomized phase II trial was selected for critical appraisal. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in 79 adult patients with untreated, asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases. The rates of the primary outcome (intracranial response at ≥12 wk) in the primary endpoint cohort were 46% for cohort A (combination therapy) and 20% for cohort B (nivolumab monotherapy). No treatment related deaths were observed in the study. Grade 4 adverse events occurred in 9% of patients in cohort A and none in cohort B. Conclusions: Co-administration of ipilimumab and nivolumab as first-line therapy is effective in the treatment of asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases, with an acceptable safety profile.

ABSTRACT. The clinical epidemiology of adults admitted with reduced level of consciousness (LOC) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and the impact of HIV infection on the risk of mortality in this population is unknown. We secondarily analyzed data from a cohort study that enrolled 359 consecutive adults with reduced LOC presenting to Mbarara Regional Hospital in Uganda with the aim of comparing the prognostic utility of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score. For this analysis, we included 336 individuals with known HIV serostatus, obtaining clinical, laboratory, and follow-up data. We recorded investigations and treatments deemed critical by clinicians for patient care but were unavailable. We computed mortality rates and used logistic regression to determine predictors of 30-day mortality. The median GCS was 10. Persons living with HIV infection (PLWH) accounted for 97 of 336 (29%) of the cohort. The 30-day mortality rate in the total cohort was 148 of 329 (45%), and this was significantly higher in PLWH (57% versus 40%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.39: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31–4.35, P = 0.0046). Other predictors of mortality were presence of any unmet clinical need (aOR 1.72; 95% CIL 1.04–2.84, P = 0.0346), anemia (aOR 1.68; 95% CI: 1.01–2.81, P = 0.047), and admission FOUR score < 12 [aOR 4.26; 95% CI: 2.36–7.7, P < 0.0001). Presentation with reduced LOC in Uganda is associated with high mortality rates, with worse outcomes in PLWH. Improvement of existing acute care services is likely to improve outcomes.

Background Retinal migraine is defined by fully reversible monocular visual phenomena. We present two cases that were complicated by permanent monocular vision deficits. Cases A 57-year-old man with history of retinal migraine experienced persistent monocular vision loss after one stereotypical retinal migraine, progressing to finger-count vision over 4 days. He developed paracentral acute middle maculopathy that progressed to central retinal artery occlusion. A 27-year-old man with history of retinal migraine presented with persistent right eye superotemporal scotoma after a retinal migraine. Relative afferent pupillary defect and superotemporal visual field defect were noted, consistent with ischemic optic neuropathy. Conclusion Retinal migraine can complicate with permanent monocular visual loss, suggesting potential migrainous infarction of the retina or optic nerve. A thorough cerebrovascular evaluation must be completed, which was unrevealing in our cases. Acute and preventive migraine therapy may be considered in retinal migraine patients, to mitigate rare but potentially permanent visual loss.

Background: The implementation of telemedicine for stroke has played a vital role in creating universal access to emergency stroke care for patients in both rural and urban communities, regardless of location or hospital resources. Objective: We evaluated the hypothesis that there is no difference in speed of assessment between vascular neurologist (VN) robotic telepresence and standard VN supervised stroke alert patients in a primary stroke center. Methods: A retrospective stroke alert database review was used to identify all robotic telepresence and standardly supervised stroke alert patient assessments at Mayo Clinic Hospital Emergency Department from 2009 to 2012. The robotic telepresence cohort was compared to a random sample of standard stroke alert patients, with an equal number of patients selected from each year. The primary outcome measure was the duration of assessment from stroke alert activation to treatment or downgrade. Results: The sample size was 196 subjects. The mean duration of time from stroke alert activation to initiation of IV thrombolytic treatment or downgrade was 8.6 minutes longer in the robotic telepresence group than in the standard group ( P =0.03). There was a higher percentage of patients diagnosed with acute stroke in the robotic stroke alert group than in the standard stroke alert group (77% vs 60%, P =0.01). Controlling for acute stroke, age, and NIHSS did not significantly reduce the time difference between groups. Among the subgroup of acute ischemic stroke patients requiring IV thrombolysis, the mean duration of time from activation to treatment was 18 minutes longer in the robotic group than in the standard group ( P =0.01). Safety outcomes including thrombolysis protocol violations (0% vs 1%), post-thrombolysis symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic complications (3% vs 1%), and death during hospitalization (8% vs 6%) were low in the robotic group and not significantly different from that in the standard group. Conclusion: Standard VN supervised acute stroke team assessments are swifter than those supervised by robotic telepresence. Safety outcomes of robotic telepresence supervised stroke alerts are excellent, and this modality may be preferred in circumstances when a VN is not immediately available on-site.

Background: High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT) is a promising alternative to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence supporting the use of HD-ASCT as first-line consolidative therapy in PCNSL. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a critically appraised topic that included a clinical scenario, structured question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, assessment of results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and a content expert in the field of neuro-oncology. Results: A recent, open-label, noncomparative randomized phase II trial was selected for critical appraisal. This trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of consolidative therapy with HD-ASCT and WBRT in PCNSL in 2 separate treatment arms. A total of 140 patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL between the ages of 18 and 60 years were included. The primary endpoint of 2-year progression-free survival was met in 63% of patients in the WBRT arm and 87% in the HD-ASCT arm. Notably, an overall improvement in neurocognitive scores was observed following HD-ASCT, while WBRT was associated with worsened cognitive outcomes. Conclusions: In young patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL, consolidative therapy with HD-ASCT appears to be associated with less neurocognitive toxicity and may be more effective than WBRT at preventing relapses, however, at the cost of a higher treatment-related mortality.

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are often prescribed following stroke due to high rates of depression. Interest in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use for poststroke motor and functional recovery was generated after the publication of the Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischemic stroke (FLAME) trial in 2011, which showed improved motor recovery in ischemic stroke patients with moderate to severe motor deficits. The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence regarding the use of fluoxetine compared with placebo for poststroke functional recovery. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario and question, literature search, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and clinical bottom line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and content experts in the field of cerebrovascular neurology and physical medicine and rehabilitation. Results: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was selected for critical appraisal. This trial compared the functional outcomes of subjects poststroke receiving fluoxetine versus placebo. There was no significant difference in functional outcome measured by the Modified Rankin Scale between the 2 groups. Prespecified secondary analysis showed significantly decreased rates of depression in the fluoxetine group, but significantly increased rates of bone fracture. Conclusion: Among patients with stroke, early initiation of fluoxetine did not result in improved functional recovery. Lower rates of depression were observed in the fluoxetine-treated group; however these patients experienced higher rates of bone fracture.

Background:Concussion affects almost 4 million individuals annually. There are many sideline screening tools available to assist in the detection of sports-related concussion. The King-Devick (K-D) test in association with Mayo Clinic utilizes rapid number naming to test saccadic eye movements in order to screen for concussion. An ideal screening tool for concussion would correctly identify all athletes with active concussion. The accuracy of K-D testing compared with other sideline screening tools is undetermined.Objective:To critically assess current evidence regarding the utility of K-D testing as a sideline screening tool for acute concussion and compare K-D testing to other sideline concussion assessments.Methods:The objective was addressed through the development of a critically appraised topic that included a clinical scenario, structured question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, assessment of results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and content experts in the field of concussion neurology and neuro-ophthalmology.Results:A recent meta-analysis was selected for critical appraisal. Cohorts analyzing athletes with sports-related concussion were selected, and utilized K-D testing as the main baseline and sideline assessment of concussion. K-D testing was found to have a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting concussion when there was worsening from baseline.Conclusion:K-D testing has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting sideline concussion. Compared with other sideline screening tools that do not include vision testing, it has greater accuracy. Screening for concussion is optimized when multiple testing modalities are used in conjunction.

Background: Noninvasive neuromodulation devices have been used for a variety of headache disorders, including cluster and migraine, since recently being cleared by the Federal Drug Administration. Although these devices have been touted as low-risk options for improved headache control, the data behind actual efficacy endpoints remain unclear. Objective: To critically assess current evidence regarding the efficacy of the noninvasive vagus nerve stimulator (nVNS) device for acute migraine management. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario with a clinical question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and a content expert in the field of headache. Results: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was selected for critical appraisal. In this trial, the primary endpoint (pain freedom at 120 min after use of nVNS for first acute migraine attack) was not met when compared with sham device (30.4% for nVNS vs. 19.7% for sham; P=0.067). However, there were statistically significant differences found for various secondary endpoints favoring nVNS, such as pain freedom rates at 30 and 60 minutes, pain relief at 120 minutes, and mean percentage pain score reduction rates at 60 and 120 minutes. Conclusions: When comparing nVNS with sham, no statistically significant differences were found with regards to the primary endpoint of pain freedom at 120 minutes, although differences were found with various secondary endpoints and post hoc analysis. nVNS is likely a safe alternative to medications.