Sharathkumar, Anjali

Introduction Assessing bleeding symptoms is essential for diagnosing bleeding disorders. Bleeding assessment tools (BATs) were developed to standardize the collection of bleeding symptoms and their severity, thereby enhancing the diagnostic accuracy. However, their diagnostic precision across various inherited bleeding disorders remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of BATs in pediatric and adult populations. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of BATs in pediatric and adult populations. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of BATs in identifying laboratory-confirmed inherited bleeding disorders. Methods Literature Search Strategy: A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted across Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the World Health Organization databases from inception until January 27, 2024 Study Selection: Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts using Covidence (Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation). Data extraction was performed independently by two authors reviewing and collecting data in duplicate from all selected articles. Eligibility Criteria: Included studies reported on the diagnostic accuracy of any BAT in diagnosing inherited bleeding disorders. Exclusion criteria included abstracts, review articles, case reports/series, studies focusing solely on distinguishing specific bleeding disorders, and those lacking sufficient data to assess test accuracy. Quality Assessment: Risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Two authors assessed each article independently and each study was categorized as having a low, moderate, or high risk of bias. Results Of 7,009 studies identified, 31 met the inclusion criteria, comprising 6,962 patients (2,152 with bleeding disorders, 4,810 controls). Most studies (74%) were prospective. Studies assessed various bleeding disorders: 39% all types, 32% von Willebrand Disease (VWD), 10% Inherited Platelet Function Disorder (IPFD), 10% both VWD and IPFD, and 10% other rare disorders. The ISTH-BAT was the most frequently used tool (47%), followed by MCMDM-1 VWD (21%) and PBQ (18%). The pooled prevalence of confirmed bleeding disorder in all prospective studies was 32% (range, 3%-71%). The pooled sensitivity for BAT in all included studies (31 studies) was 82% (95% CI, 76.5%-86.7%) and the specificity was 66% (95% CI, 54%-76%). Subgroup analysis revealed that the ISTH-BAT (studies: BD 6, VWD 5, IPFD 3, GT/BSS 2), had a sensitivity of 77% (95% CI, 69%-84%) and a specificity of 70% (95% CI, 58%-80%), the MCMDM-1 VWD (studies: VWD 4, BD 2, GT/BSS 1) had sensitivity of 78% (95% CI, 61%-89%) and a specificity of 79% (95% CI, 54%-92%) , and the Pediatric Bleeding Questionnaire (studies: BD 3, VWD 2, VWD/IPFD 1) had a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 85%-97%) and a specificity of 73% (95% CI, 41%-92%) . The sensitivity and specificity of BATs for studies investigating all types of bleeding disorders (12 studies) soley VWD (10 studies), and soley IPFD (3 studies) were 80% (95% CI, 67%-88%) and 50% (95% CI, 34%-67%) , 79% (95% CI, 71%-86%) and 83% (95% CI, 59%-95%), and 85% (95% CI, 79%-89%) and 74% (95% CI, 56%-86%), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies in terms of populations, BATs used, and diagnostic methods. This heterogeneity limits the generalizability of the results and suggests that BAT performance may vary depending on the specific clinical context and patient population. Additionally, 26% of studies were classified as having a high risk of bias, potentially affecting the reliability of some findings. Conclusion Despite heterogeneity, this meta-analysis supports the use of BATs as valuable screening tools for inherited bleeding disorders, demonstrating generally high sensitivity across various patient populations. However, the variability in specificity across different disorders and tools underscores the need for careful selection and interpretation of BATs in clinical practice. Further standardization of BATs and diagnostic criteria could improve their utility in diverse clinical settings.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) induce trilineage hematopoiesis under conditions with acquired hematopoietic failure. We evaluated safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of a TPO-RA, romiplostim (Nplate), with or without standard-of-care immunosuppressive therapy (±IST) for children (ages <21 y) with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory severe aplastic anemia (SAA) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Data were collected from an observational study and a single arm interventional pilot study. The safety outcome was treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Efficacy was evaluated by complete hematopoietic response (CHR) at week 24. Romiplostim was commenced at 5 µg/kg/week, with dose escalation of 2.5 µg/kg/week (maximum, 20 µg/kg/dose) based on platelet response. Romiplostim was continued until CHR was observed. Ten subjects (SAA, 9 [IST, 4; without IST, 5]; MDS, 1) completed the study (median age: 9.2 y). Median romiplostim dose was 10 µg/kg/week (range: 5 to 17.5 µg/kg/week). The cumulative incidence of CHR was 70.4% (95% CI, 20.2%-92.6%). Among 21 AEs (Grade 1 to 3), 3 were attributed to romiplostim. At a median posttherapy follow-up of 10.9 months (range: 0.7 to 77.5), no clonal evolution, bone marrow fibrosis or mortality was reported. This proof-of-concept study provides data about short-term safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of romiplostim (±IST) for treatment of pediatric SAA/MDS.

SummaryNeonatal circumcision in patients with severe haemophilia has not been well studied. We performed a survey of paediatric haematologists from Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTC) across the United States to better understand the attitudes toward and management of neonatal circumcision in haemophilia patients. Response rate to our survey was 40% (n = 64/159). Thirty‐eight percent of respondents (n = 24) said that they would allow this procedure in the newborn period but in many cases this was against medical advice. The most reported concern regarding neonatal circumcision in haemophilia patients was the risk of development of an inhibitor (n = 25; 39%) followed by the concern for bleeding (n = 22; 34%) and issues related to vascular access in the neonate (n = 11; 17%). All respondents recommended at least one preprocedure dose of factor replacement. Twenty‐two percent (n = 14) of respondents did not use more than one dose of factor replacement but 32% (n = 21) used 1–2 postoperative doses. The remainder of paediatric haematologists surveyed recommended between 3–5 (16%; n = 10) and 6–10 (3%, n = 2) additional days postoperatively. There was wide variation in both techniques of circumcision as well as adjuvant haemostatic agents used. Only 22% of respondents said that they had an established protocol for management of circumcision in the newborn haemophilia patient. These survey results highlight the need for evidence‐based guidelines regarding the optimal management of circumcision in neonates with severe haemophilia.