Wohlfahrt, Peter

Background— Afterload reduction is a cornerstone in the management of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction. However, arterial load and the effect of HF therapies on afterload might vary between individuals. Tailoring vasoactive medicines to patients with HF based upon better understanding of arterial afterload may enable better individualization of therapy. Methods and Results— Subjects with HF and reduced ejection fraction underwent aggressive titration of vasoactive HF therapies with assessment of central aortic waveforms analyzed using pulse wave, wave separation, and arterial reservoir models. Clinical response to treatment was assessed using the 6-minute walk test distance, which increased in 25 subjects and decreased or remained unchanged in 13. Subjects with improvement on therapy displayed higher aortic pressure wave pulsatility (central pulse pressure [PP], reflected pressure wave, and reservoir pressure) at study entry compared with subjects without improvement (all P <0.05). Parameters derived by the arterial analysis methods were strongly correlated with one another and displayed similar ability to predict improvement. Aortic pressure pulsatility significantly decreased in subjects with functional improvement, whereas no change was observed in patients without functional improvement ( P for interaction <0.05). These differences in arterial load at baseline and on therapy were not apparent from conventional brachial artery cuff pressure assessments. Conclusions— Increased aortic pressure wave pulsatility and greater decrease in pulsatility on treatment are associated with functional improvement in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction receiving aggressive vasodilator titration. These differences are not identifiable using brachial cuff pressures. Central aortic waveform analysis may enable better individualization of vasoactive therapies in chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00588692.

Abstract Aims Left ventricular systolic elastance (Ees) and diastolic elastance (Eed) correlate with arterial elastance (Ea), but it is unknown how chronic changes in arterial compliance and resistance, which determine Ea, might differentially affect cardiac properties with ageing. We sought to characterize chronic changes in pulsatile and resistive arterial load and correlate them with longitudinal changes in LV structure and function in a prospective, community-based study. Methods and results Comprehensive echocardiography was performed in 722 subjects participating in a randomly selected community-based study at two examinations separated by 4 years, allowing for assessment of LV Ees, Eed, and end-diastolic volume (EDV), Ea, total arterial compliance, and systemic vascular resistance at both examinations. Chronic changes in resistance and heart rate were the dominant contributors to change in Ea. Changes in arterial compliance had little impact on changes in Ea, but were strongly associated with changes in Ees. The combination of increased resistance and decreased compliance was associated with the largest increase in LV diastolic stiffness, an effect that was mediated by a decrease in LVEDV. In contrast, subjects with both improved arterial compliance and decreased resistance displayed an increase in LVEDV over time, with no increase in LV Eed. Conclusion Increases in pulsatile arterial load with ageing contribute more to LV systolic stiffening, while combined pulsatile and resistive loading changes are associated with positive and negative chamber remodelling and diastolic stiffness. Therapies designed to improve arterial resistance and particularly to enhance aortic compliance may hold promise to prevent or reverse cardiac ageing and its sequelae.