Back to Authors

Peng, Ying

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2907-7741

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

A CRISPR reimagining: New twists and turns of CRISPR beyond the genome‐engineering revolution
Plummer, Robert J., Guo, Yi , Peng, Ying , Plummer, Robert J.

Journal of Cellular Biochemistry | September 19, 2017 | Volume: 119 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 1299-1308

10.1002/jcb.26406 Get It

AbstractDespite its explosive applications in genome engineering, CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspersed Short Palindromic Repeats) has been developed into a versatile tool beyond its well‐known nuclease function. In this prospect article, we summarize a few exciting “off‐label” applications of CRISPR including manipulating DNA sequences, visualizing chromosomal loci in living cells, and modulating transcription and chromatin structures. These novel applications will likely elevate CRISPR tools into yet another level of sophistication and diversity, leading to many more exciting cell biological discoveries.
The Ets protein pointed prevents both premature differentiation and dedifferentiation of Drosophila intermediate neural progenitors
Xie, Yong-Gang , Li, Xiaosu , Deng, Xiaobing, Hou, Yanjun , O’Hara, Krysten , Urso, Andreacarola , Peng, Ying , Zhu, Sijun , Zhu, Sijun , Chen, Li

Development | August 11, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1242/dev.137281 Get It

Intermediate neural progenitor cells (INPs) need to avoid both dedifferentiation and differentiation during neurogenesis, but the mechanisms are not well understood. In Drosophila, the Ets protein Pointed P1 (PntP1) is required to generate INPs from type II neuroblasts. Here, we investigated how PntP1 promotes INP generation. By generating pntP1-specific mutants and using RNAi knockdown, we show that the loss of PntP1 leads to both an increase in the type II neuroblast number and the elimination of INPs. We show that the elimination of INPs results from premature differentiation of INPs due to the ectopic Prospero expression in newly generated immature INPs (imINP), whereas the increase in the type II neuroblast number results from the dedifferentiation of imINPs due to a loss of Earmuff at later stages of imINP development. Furthermore, reducing Buttonhead enhances the loss of INPs in pntP1 mutants, suggesting that PntP1 and Buttonhead act cooperatively to prevent premature INP differentiation. Our results demonstrate that PntP1 prevents both the premature differentiation and dedifferentiation of INPs by regulating the expression of distinct target genes at different stages of imINP development.
Making designer mutants in model organisms
Peng, Ying , Clark, Karl J. , Campbell, Jarryd M. , Panetta, Magdalena R., Guo, Yi , Ekker, Stephen C. , Ekker, Stephen C , Clark, Karl J

Development | October 22, 2014 | Volume: 141 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 4042-4054

10.1242/dev.102186 Get It

Recent advances in the targeted modification of complex eukaryotic genomes have unlocked a new era of genome engineering. From the pioneering work using zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), to the advent of the versatile and specific TALEN systems, and most recently the highly accessible CRISPR/Cas9 systems, we now possess an unprecedented ability to analyze developmental processes using sophisticated designer genetic tools. In this Review, we summarize the common approaches and applications of these still-evolving tools as they are being used in the most popular model developmental systems. Excitingly, these robust and simple genomic engineering tools also promise to revolutionize developmental studies using less well established experimental organisms.