Back to Authors

Lee, Jen‐Chieh

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7739-5934

Mayo Clinic

National Taiwan University

Citations 2

Head and Neck Mesenchymal Neoplasms With GLI1 Gene Alterations
Xu, Bin , Chang, Koping , Folpe, Andrew L. , Kao, Yu‐Chien , Wey, Shiuan-Li, Huang, Hsuan-Ying, Gill, Anthony J. , Wey, Shiuan-Li, Rooper, Lisa M. , Bishop, Justin A. , Dickson, Brendan C. , Lee, Jen‐Chieh , Antonescu, Cristina R.

American Journal of Surgical Pathology | January 14, 2020 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 729-737

10.1097/pas.0000000000001439 Get It

Soft tissue tumors with GLI1 gene fusions or amplifications have been recently described as a unique pathologic entity with an established risk of malignancy. We herein expand these findings by investigating a cohort of 11 head and neck lesions with GLI1 alterations, including 8 from the tongue, for their clinicopathologic and molecular features. The tumors commonly affected males in their 30s (male:female ratio 2.7:1; range: 1 to 65). Tumors showed a multinodular growth pattern, nested architecture separated by a delicate, arborizing vascular network, monotonous round to ovoid nuclei, and clear cytoplasm. Tumor protrusion into vascular spaces was common. Genetic alterations were investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or targeted RNA sequencing. Seven tumors harbored GLI1 fusions with the following partners: ACTB (n=4), PTCH1 (n=2), or MALAT1 (n=1). The remaining 4 cases showed coamplifications of GLI1 with CDK4 and MDM2 genes. Tumors were commonly positive for S100 protein and CD56. CDK4, MDM2, and STAT6 were positive in GLI1 -amplified tumors. Two of 6 patients with available follow-up (1 each with GLI1 amplification and PTCH1-GLI1 fusion) developed distant metastases. Both tumors showed a high mitotic index and tumor necrosis. The head and neck region, particularly tongue, is a common location for GLI1 -related mesenchymal tumors. Although a morphologic overlap was noted with the previously reported “pericytoma with t(7,12) translocation,” often occurring in the tongue, our findings expand the original findings, to include a more variable immunophenotype, propensity for late distant metastases, and alternative mechanisms of GLI1 oncogenic activation, such as various GLI1 fusion partners or GLI1 coamplifications with MDM2 and CDK4 genes.
Identification of a novel FN1–FGFR1 genetic fusion as a frequent event in phosphaturic mesenchymal tumour
Lee, Jen‐Chieh , Jeng, Yung‐Ming , Su, Sheng-Yao, Wu, Chen‐Tu , Tsai, Keh‐Sung , Lee, Cheng‐Han , Lin, Chung‐Yen , Carter, Jodi M. , Huang, Jenq‐Wen , Chen, Shu-Hwa, Shih, Shyang‐Rong , Mariño‐Enríquez, Adrián , Chen, Chih-Chi, Folpe, Andrew L. , Chang, Yih‐Leong , Liang, Cher‐Wei , Chen, Shu‐Hwa , Marino-Enriquez, Adrian , Carter, Jodi

The Journal of Pathology | October 16, 2014 | Volume: 235 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 539-545

10.1002/path.4465 Get It

Abstract Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumours ( PMTs ) are uncommon soft tissue and bone tumours that typically cause hypophosphataemia and tumour‐induced osteomalacia ( TIO ) through secretion of phosphatonins including fibroblast growth factor 23 ( FGF23 ). PMT has recently been accepted by the World Health Organization as a formal tumour entity. The genetic basis and oncogenic pathways underlying its tumourigenesis remain obscure. In this study, we identified a novel FN1–FGFR1 fusion gene in three out of four PMTs by next‐generation RNA sequencing. The fusion transcripts and proteins were subsequently confirmed with RT‐PCR and western blotting. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis showed six cases with FN1–FGFR1 fusion out of an additional 11 PMTs . Overall, nine out of 15 PMTs (60%) harboured this fusion. The FN1 gene possibly provides its constitutively active promoter and the encoded protein's oligomerization domains to overexpress and facilitate the activation of the FGFR1 kinase domain. Interestingly, unlike the prototypical leukaemia‐inducing FGFR1 fusion genes, which are ligand‐independent, the FN1–FGFR1 chimeric protein was predicted to preserve its ligand‐binding domains, suggesting an advantage of the presence of its ligands (such as FGF23 secreted at high levels by the tumour) in the activation of the chimeric receptor tyrosine kinase, thus effecting an autocrine or a paracrine mechanism of tumourigenesis. Copyright © 2014 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.